Cited by 39Bone Tissue Engineering MaterialsAdvanced Cellulose Research Studiesbiodegradable polymer synthesis and properties

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Bioactive Cellulose Nanocrystal-Poly(ε-Caprolactone) Nanocomposites for Bone Tissue Engineering Applications

Open access
Hong, Jung Ki, Cooke, Shelley L., Whittington, Abby R., Roman, Maren·2021·Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology

Abstract

3D-printed bone scaffolds hold great promise for the individualized treatment of critical-size bone defects. Among the resorbable polymers available for use as 3D-printable scaffold materials, poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL) has many benefits. However, its relatively low stiffness and lack of bioactivity limit its use in load-bearing bone scaffolds. This study tests the hypothesis that surface-oxidized cellulose nanocrystals (SO-CNCs), decorated with carboxyl groups, can act as multi-functional scaffold additives that (1) improve the mechanical properties of PCL and (2) induce biomineral formation upon PCL resorption. To this end, an in vitro biomineralization study was performed to assess the ability of SO-CNCs to induce the formation of calcium phosphate minerals. In addition, PCL nanocomposites containing different amounts of SO-CNCs (1, 2, 3, 5, and 10 wt%) were prepared using melt compounding extrusion and characterized in terms of Young's modulus, ultimate tensile strength, crystallinity, thermal transitions, and water contact angle. Neither sulfuric acid-hydrolyzed CNCs (SH-CNCs) nor SO-CNCs were toxic to MC3T3 preosteoblasts during a 24 h exposure at concentrations ranging from 0.25 to 3.0 mg/mL. SO-CNCs were more effective at inducing mineral formation than SH-CNCs in simulated body fluid (1x). An SO-CNC content of 10 wt% in the PCL matrix caused a more than 2-fold increase in Young's modulus (stiffness) and a more than 60% increase in ultimate tensile strength. The matrix glass transition and melting temperatures were not affected by the SO-CNCs but the crystallization temperature increased by about 5.5°C upon addition of 10 wt% SO-CNCs, the matrix crystallinity decreased from about 43 to about 40%, and the water contact angle decreased from 87 to 82.6°. The abilities of SO-CNCs to induce calcium phosphate mineral formation and increase the Young's modulus of PCL render them attractive for applications as multi-functional nanoscale additives in PCL-based bone scaffolds.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fbioe.2021.605924

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Conductometric titration curves for (A) SH-CNC-I and (B) SO-CNC-I.
Figure 1 Conductometric titration curves for (A) SH-CNC-I and (B) SO-CNC-I.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2 3D AFM height images of SH-CNCs (A,B) and SO-CNCs (C,D) before (A,C) and after (B,D) 400 h incubation in SBF at 37°C.
Figure 2 3D AFM height images of SH-CNCs (A,B) and SO-CNCs (C,D) before (A,C) and after (B,D) 400 h incubation in SBF at 37°C.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 3 Height changes of CNCs during the incubation in SBF at 37°C.
Figure 3 Height changes of CNCs during the incubation in SBF at 37°C.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 4 AFM phase images of SH-CNCs (A,B) and SO-CNCs (C,D) before (A,C) and after (B,D) 400 h incubation in SBF at 37°C. Scan size: 2 μm x 2 μm.
Figure 4 AFM phase images of SH-CNCs (A,B) and SO-CNCs (C,D) before (A,C) and after (B,D) 400 h incubation in SBF at 37°C. Scan size: 2 μm x 2 μm.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 5 Cytotoxicity of MC3T3 cells after 24 h exposure to SH-CNCs and SO-CNCs. Each data set mean value was normalized to the DI water control, data showed no significant difference in means (p < 0.05) compared to the control. Error bars represent one standard deviation.
Figure 5 Cytotoxicity of MC3T3 cells after 24 h exposure to SH-CNCs and SO-CNCs. Each data set mean value was normalized to the DI water control, data showed no significant difference in means (p < 0.05) compared to the control. Error bars represent one standard deviation.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 6 Mechanical properties of SO-CNC/PCL nanocomposite filaments. Insert: Stress-strain curves of the nanocomposite filaments.
Figure 6 Mechanical properties of SO-CNC/PCL nanocomposite filaments. Insert: Stress-strain curves of the nanocomposite filaments.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 7 DSC curves (2nd heating and 2nd cooling) of pure PCL and SO-CNC/PCL nanocomposite filament containing 10 wt% SO-CNC.
Figure 7 DSC curves (2nd heating and 2nd cooling) of pure PCL and SO-CNC/PCL nanocomposite filament containing 10 wt% SO-CNC.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 50 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 39

Metadata

Authors
Hong, J. K., Cooke, S. L., Whittington, A. R., & Roman, M.
Affiliations
Virginia Tech (US)
Corresponding author
Roman, Maren
Venue
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
Published
2021-02-25
Volume
9
Pages
605924-605924
ISSN
2296-4185 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3133428517
Cited by
39
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 4
FWCI
2.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • VTechWorks (Virginia Tech) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • U.S. Department of Agriculture
  • Virginia Agricultural Experiment Station, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
  • Institute for Critical Technology and Applied Science
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Advanced Cellulose Research Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
Keywords
cellulose nanocrystals, polycaprolactone, bone tissue engineering, 3D-printed bone scaffolds, biomineralization, mechanical properties, Young's modulus, tensile strength, crystallinity, water contact angle, biocompatibility, critical-size bone defect, resorbable polymers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bioactive Cellulose Nanocrystal-Poly(ε-Caprolactone) Nanocomposites for Bone Tissue Engineering Applications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3389/fbioe.2021.605924
The paper
Hong, J. K., Cooke, S. L., Whittington, A. R., & Roman, M. (2021). Bioactive Cellulose Nanocrystal-Poly(ε-Caprolactone) Nanocomposites for Bone Tissue Engineering Applications. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2021.605924