CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 7

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cancer immunogenic cell death via pyroptosis with CXCR4-targeted nanotoxins in hepatocellular carcinoma

Huang, Yingbin, Li, Yihu, He, Rui, Dong, Shuyi, Zhao, Zheng, Jiao, Xingyuan·2024·Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
DOI 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1433126PMC PMC11570815
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Introduction: Cytotoxic agents have shown limited benefits in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), mediated in part by the lack of targeting. As cell-penetrating peptides (CPPs) are capable of delivering various biologically active molecules into cells, including protein, peptides, small chemo-drugs, and nucleic acid with or without targeting, we developed T22-PE24, a CXCR4-targeted self-assembling cytotoxic nanotoxin, to effectively induce HCC pyroptosis. Methods: T22 incorporating enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) or PE24 was purified from DE3 bacterial cells and characterized using transmission electron microscopy, the Zetasizer Nano®, and SEC-HPLC. The internalization effect of T22-EGFP was detected by flow cytometry system (FCS) in CXCR4+/LM3(CXCR4−) HCC cells. The CCK8, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) release, Western blot, and nude mice HCC models were used to estimate the cell viability of T22-PE24. The complete-immunity HCC tumor-bearing mice model was used to assess the immune response of T22-PE24. Results: The round shape under transmission electron microscopy, 49.4 nm hydrodynamic diameter, and −33.33 mV zeta potential indicated that T22-PE24 self-assembled into nanoparticles. T22 incorporating EGFP selectively internalized in CXCR4+ HCC cells and showed no accumulation in CXCR4-knockout HCC cells. The T22-PE24 nanotoxin induced HCC pyroptosis via the caspase-3/GSDME signaling pathway and suppressed tumor growth in the absence of histological alterations in normal organs. Using the complete-immunity HCC tumor-bearing mice model, we found that T22-PE24 nanotoxin effectively induces the global reprogramming of cell components of the immune tumor microenvironment, leading to enhanced antitumor effects compared to those observed in immunodeficient mice. Conclusion: Our findings demonstrate the activation of the innate immune response in HCC by inducing pyroptosis with T22-PE24 nanotoxin treatment and support an implementation of this strategy for HCC treatment.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1433126

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

FIGURE 1 High expression of CXCR4 in HCC cells and T22 targeting HCC. (A) CXCR4 expression in HCC cells and the normal tissue analyzed from TCGA. (B) CXCR4 expression in HCC cell lines determined by RT-PCR. (C) Cellular uptake in LM3 and LM3CXCR4− cells after treatment with various concentrations of T22-PE24 for 4 h by flow cytometry. The results are representative of three independent experiments. (D) Quantification analysis of T22-PE24 internalization in (C). (E) Cellular uptake in LM3 and LM3CXCR4− cells after treatment with T22-PE24 alone or in combination with CXCR4 inhibitor AMD3100. (F) Quantification analysis of T22-PE24 internalization in (E). Mean ± SEM of n = 3 repeats. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 in a one-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey’s multiple-comparison test.
FIGURE 1 High expression of CXCR4 in HCC cells and T22 targeting HCC. (A) CXCR4 expression in HCC cells and the normal tissue analyzed from TCGA. (B) CXCR4 expression in HCC cell lines determined by RT-PCR. (C) Cellular uptake in LM3 and LM3CXCR4− cells after treatment with various concentrations of T22-PE24 for 4 h by flow cytometry. The results are representative of three independent experiments. (D) Quantification analysis of T22-PE24 internalization in (C). (E) Cellular uptake in LM3 and LM3CXCR4− cells after treatment with T22-PE24 alone or in combination with CXCR4 inhibitor AMD3100. (F) Quantification analysis of T22-PE24 internalization in (E). Mean ± SEM of n = 3 repeats. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 in a one-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey’s multiple-comparison test.CC BY · PubMed Central
FIGURE 2 T22-PE24 inhibited the proliferation of HCC cells by activating pyroptosis. (A) IC50 of LO2, LM3, LM3CXCR4−, Hep3B, and Hep3BCXCR4− cells after incubation with T22-PE24. (B) Images of cell morphology in LM3 and LM3CXCR4− after incubation with 1 μM T22-PE24 determined by IncuCyte. Scale bar = 50 μm. (C) Quantification analysis of the LDH release in LM3, LM3CXCR4−, Hep3B, and Hep3BCXCR4− cells after incubation with 1 μM T22-PE24. (Mean ± SD shown. ***p < 0.001 in a two-way ANOVA, followed by Sidak’s multiple-comparison test.) (D) Flow cytometric analysis of pyroptosis induced by 1 μM T22-PE24. The upper right quadrant shows the pyroptotic cells.
FIGURE 2 T22-PE24 inhibited the proliferation of HCC cells by activating pyroptosis. (A) IC50 of LO2, LM3, LM3CXCR4−, Hep3B, and Hep3BCXCR4− cells after incubation with T22-PE24. (B) Images of cell morphology in LM3 and LM3CXCR4− after incubation with 1 μM T22-PE24 determined by IncuCyte. Scale bar = 50 μm. (C) Quantification analysis of the LDH release in LM3, LM3CXCR4−, Hep3B, and Hep3BCXCR4− cells after incubation with 1 μM T22-PE24. (Mean ± SD shown. ***p < 0.001 in a two-way ANOVA, followed by Sidak’s multiple-comparison test.) (D) Flow cytometric analysis of pyroptosis induced by 1 μM T22-PE24. The upper right quadrant shows the pyroptotic cells.CC BY · PubMed Central
FIGURE 3 T22-PE24, targeting CXCR4, activated pyroptosis via the caspase3/GSDME pathway. (A) Western blot analysis of the silence expression effect in LM3 transfected with siGSDMA, siGSDMB, siGSDMC, siGSDMD, or siGSDME for 48 h. (B) Images of cell morphology in LM3 transfected with siGSDMA, siGSDMB, siGSDMC, siGSDMD, or siGSDME after incubation with 1 μM T22-PE24. (C) Western blot analysis of LM3 treated with 0 μM, 0.25 μM, 0.5 μM, or 1 μM T22-PE24 for 24 h. (D) Western blot analysis of LM3 and LM3CXCR4− cells treated with or without 0.5 μM T22-PE24 for 24 h. (E) Western blot analysis of LM3 treated with 0.5 μM T22-PE24 and pretreated with or without 40 μM Z-VAD (OME)-FMK for 24 h. (F) Western blot analysis of Hep3B treated with 0 μM, 0.25 μM, 0.5 μM, or 1 μM T22-PE24 for 24 h. (G) Western blot analysis of Hep3B and Hep3BCXCR4− cells treated with or without 0.5 μM T22-PE24 for 24 h. (H) Western blot analysis of Hep3B treated with 0.5 μM T22-PE24 and pretreated with or without 40 μM Z-VAD (OME)-FMK for 24 h.
FIGURE 3 T22-PE24, targeting CXCR4, activated pyroptosis via the caspase3/GSDME pathway. (A) Western blot analysis of the silence expression effect in LM3 transfected with siGSDMA, siGSDMB, siGSDMC, siGSDMD, or siGSDME for 48 h. (B) Images of cell morphology in LM3 transfected with siGSDMA, siGSDMB, siGSDMC, siGSDMD, or siGSDME after incubation with 1 μM T22-PE24. (C) Western blot analysis of LM3 treated with 0 μM, 0.25 μM, 0.5 μM, or 1 μM T22-PE24 for 24 h. (D) Western blot analysis of LM3 and LM3CXCR4− cells treated with or without 0.5 μM T22-PE24 for 24 h. (E) Western blot analysis of LM3 treated with 0.5 μM T22-PE24 and pretreated with or without 40 μM Z-VAD (OME)-FMK for 24 h. (F) Western blot analysis of Hep3B treated with 0 μM, 0.25 μM, 0.5 μM, or 1 μM T22-PE24 for 24 h. (G) Western blot analysis of Hep3B and Hep3BCXCR4− cells treated with or without 0.5 μM T22-PE24 for 24 h. (H) Western blot analysis of Hep3B treated with 0.5 μM T22-PE24 and pretreated with or without 40 μM Z-VAD (OME)-FMK for 24 h.CC BY · PubMed Central
FIGURE 4 In vivo antitumor efficacy of T22-PE24 in tumor-bearing mice. (A) Tumor growth was measured over time. T22-PE24 was injected every 2 days for a total of six times. (B) Photographs of solid tumors in each treatment group after 17 days. (C) Tumor weight of different treatment groups at the end of the experiment. (D) IHC images of the tumor sections stained with cleaved caspase-3 or Ki67 after various treatments. (E) Quantification analysis of cleaved caspase-3-positive cells. Each dot represented a single tumor. (F) Quantification analysis of Ki67-positive cells. Each dot represented a single tumor. Mean ± SEM is shown. ns means no significance. *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001. Tumor growth curves used two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple-comparison test. Tumor weights, cleaved caspase-3, and Ki67 expression in tumor tissues used a one-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey’s multiple-comparison test.
FIGURE 4 In vivo antitumor efficacy of T22-PE24 in tumor-bearing mice. (A) Tumor growth was measured over time. T22-PE24 was injected every 2 days for a total of six times. (B) Photographs of solid tumors in each treatment group after 17 days. (C) Tumor weight of different treatment groups at the end of the experiment. (D) IHC images of the tumor sections stained with cleaved caspase-3 or Ki67 after various treatments. (E) Quantification analysis of cleaved caspase-3-positive cells. Each dot represented a single tumor. (F) Quantification analysis of Ki67-positive cells. Each dot represented a single tumor. Mean ± SEM is shown. ns means no significance. *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001. Tumor growth curves used two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple-comparison test. Tumor weights, cleaved caspase-3, and Ki67 expression in tumor tissues used a one-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey’s multiple-comparison test.CC BY · PubMed Central
FIGURE 5 In vivo immune activation efficacy of T22-PE24 in tumor-bearing mice. (A) Tumor growth was measured over time. T22-PE24 was injected every 2 days for a total of six times. (B) Photographs of solid tumors in each treatment group after 17 days. (C) Tumor weight of different treatment groups at the end of the experiment. (D) H&E and IF images of the tumor sections stained with CD3 and CD8 after various treatments. (E) Representative flow cytometry analysis of the CD3+ CD8+ T cell subgroup in PBMCs. (F) Quantification of CD3+ CD8+ population in PBMCs. Mean ± SEM is shown. *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001, and ****p < 0.0001. Tumor growth curves used two-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey’s multiple-comparison test. Tumor weights used a one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple-comparison test. Quantification of CD3+ CD8+ population analysis was performed by Student’s t-test.
FIGURE 5 In vivo immune activation efficacy of T22-PE24 in tumor-bearing mice. (A) Tumor growth was measured over time. T22-PE24 was injected every 2 days for a total of six times. (B) Photographs of solid tumors in each treatment group after 17 days. (C) Tumor weight of different treatment groups at the end of the experiment. (D) H&E and IF images of the tumor sections stained with CD3 and CD8 after various treatments. (E) Representative flow cytometry analysis of the CD3+ CD8+ T cell subgroup in PBMCs. (F) Quantification of CD3+ CD8+ population in PBMCs. Mean ± SEM is shown. *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001, and ****p < 0.0001. Tumor growth curves used two-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey’s multiple-comparison test. Tumor weights used a one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple-comparison test. Quantification of CD3+ CD8+ population analysis was performed by Student’s t-test.CC BY · PubMed Central
FIGURE 6 The self-assembling nanotoxin T22-PE24, specifically targeting CXCR4, was designed to selectively deliver the cytotoxic agent PE24 to HCC cells, leading to immunogenic pyroptotic cell death.
FIGURE 6 The self-assembling nanotoxin T22-PE24, specifically targeting CXCR4, was designed to selectively deliver the cytotoxic agent PE24 to HCC cells, leading to immunogenic pyroptotic cell death.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 34

  1. Anwanwan, 2020, Challenges in liver cancer and possible treatment approaches, Biochim. Biophys. Acta Rev. Cancer, 1873, 188314, 10.1016/j.bbcan.2019.188314 · DOI
  2. Cerella, 2014, From nature to bedside: pro-survival and cell death mechanisms as therapeutic targets in cancer treatment, Biotechnol. Adv., 32, 1111, 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2014.03.006 · DOI
  3. Chon, 2021, Hepatocellular carcinoma statistics in South Korea, Clin. Mol. Hepatol., 27, 512, 10.3350/cmh.2021.0171 · DOI
  4. El-Serag, 2008, Diagnosis and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma, Gastroenterology, 134, 1752, 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.02.090 · DOI
  5. Falgas, Selective delivery of t22-pe24-h6 to cxcr4(+) diffuse large b-cell lymphoma cells leads to wide therapeutic index in a disseminated mouse model, Theranostics, 10, 5169, 10.7150/thno.43231 · DOI
  6. Falgas, A cxcr4-targeted nanocarrier achieves highly selective tumor uptake in diffuse large b-cell lymphoma mouse models, Haematologica, 105, 741, 10.3324/haematol.2018.211490 · DOI
  7. Gebhardt, 2014, Baculovirus resistance in codling moth is virus isolate-dependent and the consequence of a mutation in viral gene pe38, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 111, 15711, 10.1073/pnas.1411089111 · DOI
  8. Gusarova, 2007, A cell-penetrating arf peptide inhibitor of foxm1 in mouse hepatocellular carcinoma treatment, J. Clin. Invest, 117, 99, 10.1172/JCI27527 · DOI
  9. Jin, 2018, Paclitaxel-loaded nanoparticles decorated with bivalent fragment hab18 f(ab')(2) and cell penetrating peptide for improved therapeutic effect on hepatocellular carcinoma, Artif. Cells Nanomed Biotechnol., 46, 1076, 10.1080/21691401.2017.1360325 · DOI
  10. Lee, 2019, Construction of an immunotoxin via site-specific conjugation of anti-her2 igg and engineered pseudomonas exotoxin a, J. Biol. Eng., 13, 56, 10.1186/s13036-019-0188-x · DOI
  11. Liu, 2016, Emerging landscape of cell penetrating peptide in reprogramming and gene editing, J. Control Release, 226, 124, 10.1016/j.jconrel.2016.02.002 · DOI
  12. Masuda, 1992, A novel anti-hiv synthetic peptide, t-22 ([tyr5,12,lys7]-polyphemusin ii), Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 189, 845, 10.1016/0006-291x(92)92280-b · DOI
  13. Medina-Gutierrez, 2022, Potent anticancer activity of cxcr4-targeted nanostructured toxins in aggressive endometrial cancer models, Cancers (Basel), 15, 85, 10.3390/cancers15010085 · DOI
  14. Moradian, 2021, Pe38-based gene therapy of her2-positive breast cancer stem cells via vhh-redirected polyamidoamine dendrimers, Sci. Rep., 11, 15517, 10.1038/s41598-021-93972-5 · DOI
  15. Morgan, 2023, Gamma radiation coupled adp-ribosyl transferase activity of pseudomonas aeruginosa pe24 moiety, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 107, 1765, 10.1007/s00253-023-12401-x · DOI
  16. Murakami, 1999, Inhibitory mechanism of the cxcr4 antagonist t22 against human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection, J. Virol., 73, 7489, 10.1128/JVI.73.9.7489-7496.1999 · DOI
  17. Nunez, 2023, T22-pe24-h6 nanotoxin selectively kills cxcr4-high expressing aml patient cells in vitro and potently blocks dissemination in vivo, Pharmaceutics, 15, 727, 10.3390/pharmaceutics15030727 · DOI
  18. Rioja-Blanco, Cxcr4-targeted nanotoxins induce gsdme-dependent pyroptosis in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res., 41, 49, 10.1186/s13046-022-02267-8 · DOI
  19. Rioja-Blanco, Self-assembling protein nanocarrier for selective delivery of cytotoxic polypeptides to cxcr4(+) head and neck squamous cell carcinoma tumors, Acta Pharm. Sin. B, 12, 2578, 10.1016/j.apsb.2021.09.030 · DOI
  20. Sala, 2022, Gsdmd-dependent pyroptotic induction by a multivalent cxcr4-targeted nanotoxin blocks colorectal cancer metastases, Drug Deliv., 29, 1384, 10.1080/10717544.2022.2069302 · DOI
  21. Salem, 2022, Interventional treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma, J. Hepatol., 77, 1205, 10.1016/j.jhep.2022.03.037 · DOI
  22. Sanchez-Garcia, 2018, Self-assembling toxin-based nanoparticles as self-delivered antitumoral drugs, J. Control Release, 274, 81, 10.1016/j.jconrel.2018.01.031 · DOI
  23. Shao, 2021, Gasdermins: making pores for pyroptosis, Nat. Rev. Immunol., 21, 620, 10.1038/s41577-021-00602-2 · DOI
  24. Siegel, 2021, Cancer statistics, 2021, CA Cancer J. Clin., 71, 7, 10.3322/caac.21654 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Takeuchi, 2006, Direct and rapid cytosolic delivery using cell-penetrating peptides mediated by pyrenebutyrate, ACS Chem. Biol., 1, 299, 10.1021/cb600127m · DOI
  26. Wang, 2020, A bioorthogonal system reveals antitumour immune function of pyroptosis, Nature, 579, 421, 10.1038/s41586-020-2079-1 · DOI
  27. Wang, 2018, Lipid-modified cell-penetrating peptide-based self-assembly micelles for co-delivery of narciclasine and siulk1 in hepatocellular carcinoma therapy, Acta Biomater., 74, 414, 10.1016/j.actbio.2018.05.030 · DOI
  28. Yang, 2019, Tcf12 promotes the tumorigenesis and metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma via upregulation of cxcr4 expression, Theranostics, 9, 5810, 10.7150/thno.34973 · DOI
  29. Yang, 2020, Cxcr4 mediates matrix stiffness-induced downregulation of ubtd1 driving hepatocellular carcinoma progression via yap signaling pathway, Theranostics, 10, 5790, 10.7150/thno.44789 · DOI
  30. Yu, Pyroptosis: mechanisms and diseases, Signal Transduct. Target Ther., 6, 128, 10.1038/s41392-021-00507-5 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Yu, Efficient intracellular delivery of proteins by a multifunctional chimaeric peptide in vitro and in vivo, Nat. Commun., 12, 5131, 10.1038/s41467-021-25448-z · DOI
  32. Zhang, 2020, Gasdermin e suppresses tumour growth by activating anti-tumour immunity, Nature, 579, 415, 10.1038/s41586-020-2071-9 · DOI
  33. Zhao, 2018, Cell-penetrating peptide-modified targeted drug-loaded phase-transformation lipid nanoparticles combined with low-intensity focused ultrasound for precision theranostics against hepatocellular carcinoma, Theranostics, 8, 1892, 10.7150/thno.22386 · DOI
  34. Zhao, 2023, A self-assembling cxcr4-targeted pyroptosis nanotoxin for melanoma therapy, Biomater. Sci., 11, 2200, 10.1039/d2bm02026b · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 7

Metadata

Authors
Huang, Y., Li, Y., He, R., Dong, S., Zhao, Z., & Jiao, X.
Venue
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
Publisher
Frontiers Media SA
Published
2024-11-04
Volume
12
ISSN
2296-4185
DOI
10.3389/fbioe.2024.1433126
PMC
PMC11570815
Cited by
7
References
1
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (vor)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cancer immunogenic cell death via pyroptosis with CXCR4-targeted nanotoxins in hepatocellular carcinoma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3389/fbioe.2024.1433126
The paper
Huang, Y., Li, Y., He, R., Dong, S., Zhao, Z., & Jiao, X. (2024). Cancer immunogenic cell death via pyroptosis with CXCR4-targeted nanotoxins in hepatocellular carcinoma. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2024.1433126