The DOI matches its Crossref record; 119 of the 119 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Interfaces Between Cathode and Electrolyte in Solid State Lithium Batteries: Challenges and Perspectives
Open accessAbstract
Solid state lithium batteries are widely accepted as promising candidates for next generation of various energy storage devices with the probability to realize improved energy density and superior safety performances. However, the interface between electrode and solid electrolyte remain a key issue that hinders practical development of solid state lithium batteries. In this review, we specifically focus on the interface between solid electrolytes and prevailing cathodes. The basic principles of interface layer formation are summarized and three kinds of interface layers can be categorized. For typical solid state lithium batteries, a most common and daunting challenge is to achieve and sustain intimate solid-solid contact. Meanwhile, different specific issues occur on various types of solid electrolytes, depending on the intrinsic properties of adjacent solid components. Our discussion mostly involves following electrolytes, including solid polymer electrolyte, inorganic solid oxide and sulfide electrolytes as well as composite electrolytes. The effective strategies to overcome the interface instabilities are also summarized. In order to clarify interfacial behaviors fundamentally, advanced characterization techniques with time, and atomic-scale resolution are required to gain more insights from different perspectives. And recent progresses achieved from advanced characterization are also reviewed here. We highlight that the cooperative characterization of diverse advanced characterization techniques is necessary to gain the final clarification of interface behavior, and stress that the combination of diverse interfacial modification strategies is required to build up decent cathode-electrolyte interface for superior solid state lithium batteries.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“A significant advancement in this area has been the development of solid-state electrolytes, allowing the thickness of these microbatteries to be reduced to mere micrometers.”
From Comparative analysis of energy transfer mechanisms for neural implants (2024) · cites this paper as Nie et al., 2018
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Issues and challenges facing rechargeable lithium batteries
Tarascon, J. ‐., & Armand, M. B. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35104644 · Cited by 21,450
Nonaqueous Liquid Electrolytes for Lithium-Based Rechargeable Batteries
Xu, K. (2004) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr030203g · Cited by 7,653
High-power all-solid-state batteries using sulfide superionic conductors
Kato, Y., Hori, S., Saito, T., Suzuki, K., Hirayama, M., Mitsui, A., Yonemura, M., Iba, H., & Kanno, R. (2016) · Nature Energy · doi:10.1038/nenergy.2016.30 · Cited by 3,560
Fast Lithium Ion Conduction in Garnet‐Type Li 7 La 3 Zr 2 O 12
Murugan, R., Thangadurai, V., & Weppner, W. (2007) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.200701144 · Cited by 3,304
Nanocomposite polymer electrolytes for lithium batteries
Croce, F., Appetecchi, G. B., Persi, L., & Scrosati, B. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/28818 · Cited by 3,206
Complexes of alkali metal ions with poly(ethylene oxide)
Fenton, D. E., Parker, J. M., & Wright, P. V. (1973) · Polymer · doi:10.1016/0032-3861(73)90146-8 · Cited by 2,698
Negating interfacial impedance in garnet-based solid-state Li metal batteries
Han, X., Gong, Y., Fu, K. K., He, X., Hitz, G. T., Dai, J., Pearse, A. J., Liu, B., Wang, H., Rubloff, G. W., et al. (2016) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat4821 · Cited by 2,031
High ionic conductivity in lithium lanthanum titanate
Inaguma, Y., Chen, L., Itoh, M., Nakamura, T., Uchida, T., Ikuta, H., & Wakihara, M. (1993) · Solid State Communications · doi:10.1016/0038-1098(93)90841-a · Cited by 1,627
Self-citationChen, L., Li, Y., Li, S.-P., Fan, L., Nan, C., & Goodenough, J. B. (2017) · Nano Energy · doi:10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.12.037 · Cited by 1,423
Self-citationReview on gel polymer electrolytes for lithium batteries
Stephan, A. (2006) · European Polymer Journal · doi:10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2005.09.017 · Cited by 1,367
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Lee, Y.-G., Fujiki, S., Jung, C., Suzuki, N., Yashiro, N., Omoda, R., Ko, D., Shiratsuchi, T., Sugimoto, T., Ryu, S., et al. (2020) · Nature Energy · doi:10.1038/s41560-020-0575-z · Cited by 1,752
Chen, R., Li, Q., Yu, X., Chen, L., & Li, H. (2019) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00268 · Cited by 1,700
Self-citationIntermolecular Chemistry in Solid Polymer Electrolytes for High‐Energy‐Density Lithium Batteries
Zhou, Q., Ma, J., Dong, S., Li, X., & Cui, G. (2019) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201902029 · Cited by 986
Lithium/Sulfide All‐Solid‐State Batteries using Sulfide Electrolytes
Wu, J., Liu, S., Han, F., Yao, X., & Wang, C. (2020) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.202000751 · Cited by 823
Interface Issues and Challenges in All‐Solid‐State Batteries: Lithium, Sodium, and Beyond
Lou, S., Zhang, F., Fu, C., Chen, M., Ma, Y., Yin, G., & Wang, J. (2020) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.202000721 · Cited by 560
Metadata
- Authors
- Nie, K., Hong, Y., Qiu, J., Li, Q., Yu, X., Li, H., & Chen, L.
- Affiliations
- Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Li, Qinghao
- Yu, Xiqian
- Venue
- Frontiers in Chemistry
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2018-12-12
- Volume
- 6
- Pages
- 616-616
- ISSN
- 2296-2646 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC6299818
- OpenAlex
- W2903697882
- Cited by
- 278
- References
- 119
- Citations by year
- 2026: 32 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 14
- FWCI
- 1.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Frontiers in Chemistry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (51822211)
- eijing Municipal Science & Technology (Z171100000917021)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advancements in Battery Materials
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Battery Modeling and Management
- Keywords
- solid-state lithium batteries, cathode-electrolyte interface, solid-solid contact, solid polymer electrolytes, solid oxide electrolytes, composite electrolytes, interfacial instability
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
