Cited by 5Spectroscopy and Chemometric AnalysesAgricultural and Food SciencesForest Biomass Utilization and Management

Study of Variability of Waste Wood Samples Collected in a Panel Board Industry

Open access
Mancini, Manuela, Rinnan, Åsmund·2021·Frontiers in Chemistry

Abstract

Waste wood is becoming an appealing alternative material to virgin wood, and the main drivers are the increased demand for waste wood by the panel industry, the introduction of renewable energy policies, and the waste framework directive. In fact, the use of waste wood as a secondary resource is favored over both landfills and combustion. The best reuse and cascading use of the material are linked to its characteristics. That is why it is important to know the chemical composition and the variation in the properties of such a heterogeneous material. In this article, a sampling study was carried out in a panel board company located in the northern part of Italy. In order to investigate the heterogeneity of waste wood, all samples have been analyzed by near-infrared spectroscopy. Nested analysis of variance and principal component analysis have been used to evaluate the heterogeneity and the variation in sample properties. The approach gives information about how to ensure representative measurements and efficiently describe the variability of the material. The results suggest that it is important to have replicates or at least two subsamples for each lot and then measure each of these with at least 100 scans, in order to get representative measurements and describe the variability of the material. The determination of waste wood composition and variability is the focal point for improving the sorting process and increasing the reuse of waste wood, avoiding expensive landfills and risks for human health and the environment.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fchem.2021.722090

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Only a few grams of material are used for lab analysis compared to tons of waste wood handled, leading to reliability problems due to huge variability in material composition.

    “Only a few grams of material are used for the lab analysis compared to the tons of waste wood handled, leading to well-known problems of reliability of the results due to the huge variability in material composition [19,20].”

    From Classification of waste wood categories according to the best reuse using FT-NIR spectroscopy and chemometrics (2023) · cites this paper as [20]

    The Results and Discussion section (‘Deciding the Best Sampling Procedure’; page unavailable) says that one subsample is insufficient and that multiple subsamples and scans provide reliable estimates for a heterogeneous waste-wood lot. The Methods section (‘Collection of Waste Wood Samples’; page unavailable) describes 10 L samples, but the paper does not state that only a few grams are analyzed compared with tons handled. It supports the concern about variability and reliability, not the claimed quantities. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Waste wood presents a high inherent variability.

    “In fact it is well known that waste wood presents a high inherent variability [20]”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. Bergeron F. C. (2016). Energy and Climate Impact Assessment of Waste wood Recovery in Switzerland. Biomass and Bioenergy. 94, 245– 257. 10.1016/J.BIOMBIOE.2016.09.009 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Dessipri E. Minopoulou E. Chryssikos G. D. Gionis V. Paipetis A. Panayiotou C. (2003). Use of FT-NIR Spectroscopy for On-Line Monitoring of Formaldehyde-Based Resin Synthesis. Eur. Polym. J. 39, 1533– 1540. 10.1016/S0014-3057(03)00073-9 · DOI
  3. Edo M. Björn E. Persson P.-E. Jansson S. (2016). Assessment of Chemical and Material Contamination in Waste wood Fuels - A Case Study Ranging over Nine Years. Waste Management 49, 311– 319. 10.1016/J.WASMAN.2015.11.048 26709051 · DOI · Paper page
  4. FAO/ECE (2012). Forest Production Annual Market Review 2011-2012. Available at: http://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/timber/publications/FPAMR_2012.pdf
  5. Faraca G. Boldrin A. Astrup T. (2019). Resource Quality of wood Waste: The Importance of Physical and Chemical Impurities in wood Waste for Recycling. Waste Management 87, 135– 147. 10.1016/j.wasman.2019.02.005 31109513 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Gehrmann H.-J. Mätzing H. Nowak P. Baris D. Seifert H. Dupont C. (2020). Waste wood Characterization and Combustion Behaviour in Pilot Lab Scale. J. Energ. Inst. 93, 1634– 1641. 10.1016/j.joei.2020.02.001 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Hakala J. Deroubaix G. (2012). “ Used Wood Sorting, Utilization and Recycling in Different Value Chains”, in NWBC 2012: The 4th Nordic Wood Biorefinery Conference. Editor Niemelä K. (VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, VTT Technology), No. 53, pp. 45– 50.
  8. Hein P. R. G. Campos A. C. M. Mendes R. F. Mendes L. M. Chaix G. (2011). Estimation of Physical and Mechanical Properties of Agro-Based Particleboards by Near Infrared Spectroscopy. Eur. J. Wood Prod. 69, 431– 442. 10.1007/s00107-010-0471-5 · DOI
  9. Henriques A. Cruz P. Martins J. Ferra J. M. Magalhães F. D. Carvalho L. H. (2012). Determination of Formaldehyde/urea Molar Ratio in Amino Resins by Near-Infrared Spectroscopy. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 124, 2441– 2448. 10.1002/app.35128 · DOI
  10. Huron M. Oukala S. Lardière J. Giraud N. Dupont C. (2017). An Extensive Characterization of Various Treated Waste wood for Assessment of Suitability with Combustion Process. Fuel 202, 118– 128. 10.1016/J.FUEL.2017.04.025 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Lian X. Zhang M. Sun X. Song C. Yuan H. Guo L. (2021). Online Real Time Determination of Free Formaldehyde Content during Polymerization Process of Phenolic Resin by NIR Spectra and a Modeling-free Method. Polym. Test. 93, 106584. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.106584 · DOI
  12. Mancini M. Rinnan Å. (2021). Near Infrared Technique as a Tool for the Rapid Assessment of Waste wood Quality for Energy Applications. Renew. Energ. 177, 113, 123. 10.1016/j.renene.2021.05.137 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Martens H. Jensen S. A. Geladi P. (1983). “ Multivariate Linearity Transformations for Near Infrared Reflectance Spectroscopy,” in Nordic Symposium Applied Statistics. Editors Christie O. H. J. Forlag S. (Stavanger, Norway), 205– 234.
  14. Mazzanti M. Zoboli R. (2013). “ International Waste Trade: Impacts and drivers,” in Waste Management in Spatial Environments. Editors D'Amato A. Mazzanti M. Montini A. (Routledge Studies in Ecological Economics), 99– 136.
  15. Moreno A. I. Font R. (2015). Pyrolysis of Furniture wood Waste: Decomposition and Gases Evolved. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis. 113, 464– 473. 10.1016/j.jaap.2015.03.008 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Rinnan Å. Berg F. v. d. Engelsen S. B. (2009). Review of the Most Common Pre-processing Techniques for Near-Infrared Spectra. Trac Trends Anal. Chem. 28, 1201– 1222. 10.1016/j.trac.2009.07.007 · DOI
  17. Röder M. Thornley P. (2018). Waste wood as Bioenergy Feedstock. Climate Change Impacts and Related Emission Uncertainties from Waste wood Based Energy Systems in the UK. Waste Management 74, 241– 252. 10.1016/J.WASMAN.2017.11.042 29203077 · DOI
  18. Sahai H. Ageel M. I. (2000). The Analysis of Variance. Boston: Birkhäuser. 10.1007/978-1-4612-1344-4 · DOI
  19. Sandak A. Sandak J. Zborowska M. Prądzyński W. (2010). Near Infrared Spectroscopy as a Tool for Archaeological wood Characterization. J. Archaeological Sci. 37, 2093– 2101. 10.1016/j.jas.2010.02.005 · DOI
  20. Schwanninger M. Rodrigues J. C. Fackler K. (2011). A Review of Band Assignments in Near Infrared Spectra of Wood and Wood Components. J. Near Infrared Spectrosc. 19, 287– 308. 10.1255/jnirs.955 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Tatàno F. Barbadoro L. Mangani G. Pretelli S. Tombari L. Mangani F. (2009). Furniture wood Wastes: Experimental Property Characterisation and Burning Tests. Waste Management 29, 2656– 2665. 10.1016/j.wasman.2009.06.012 19589670 · DOI
  22. Tomlinson S. K. Ghita O. R. Hooper R. M. Evans K. E. (2006). The Use of Near-Infrared Spectroscopy for the Cure Monitoring of an Ethyl Cyanoacrylate Adhesive. Vibrational Spectrosc. 40, 133– 141. 10.1016/j.vibspec.2005.07.009 · DOI
  23. Toscano G. Rinnan Å. Pizzi A. Mancini M. (2017). The Use of Near-Infrared (NIR) Spectroscopy and Principal Component Analysis (PCA) to Discriminate Bark and Wood of the Most Common Species of the Pellet Sector. Energy Fuels 31, 2814– 2821. 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.6b02421 · DOI
  24. Vrancken C. Longhurst P. J. Wagland S. T. (2017). Critical Review of Real-Time Methods for Solid Waste Characterisation: Informing Material Recovery and Fuel Production. Waste Management 61, 40– 57. 10.1016/j.wasman.2017.01.019 28139367 · DOI
  25. Wold S. Esbensen K. Geladi P. (1987). Principal Component Analysis. Chemometrics Intell. Lab. Syst. 2, 37– 52. 10.1016/0169-7439(87)80084-9 · DOI
  26. Workman J. Weyer J. L. (2007). “ Appendix 4a: Spectra-Structure Correlations for Near Infrared,” in Practical Guide to Interpretative Near-Infrared Spectroscopy. Editors Workman J. Weyer J. L. (Boca Raton: CRC Press), 239– 264.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mancini, M., & Rinnan, Å.
Affiliations
University of Copenhagen (DK)
Corresponding author
Rinnan, Åsmund
Venue
Frontiers in Chemistry
Published
2021-07-26
Volume
9
Pages
722090-722090
ISSN
2296-2646 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3188021696
Cited by
5
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3
FWCI
0.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Chemistry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Università Politecnica delle Marche (Università Politecnica delle Marche) (submittedVersion)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Horizon 2020
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › Agricultural and Food Sciences
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanics of Materials › Forest Biomass Utilization and Management
Keywords
wood waste, material heterogeneity, sample variability, near-infrared spectroscopy, nested analysis of variance, principal component analysis, chemical composition, waste sorting, secondary raw materials, representative sampling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review