Cited by 24Language Development and DisordersVoice and Speech DisordersStuttering Research and Treatment

Language Sample Analysis With TalkBank: An Update and Review

Open access
MacWhinney, Brian, Fromm, Davida·2022·Frontiers in Communication

Abstract

This chapter examines state-of-the-art methods for coding, analyzing, and interpreting discourse-level language data from children and adults with language disorders using the data, tools, and methods provided by the TalkBank system (https://www.talkbank.org). These open and free methods have been used for language sample analysis (LSA) with several clinical populations (e.g., child language disorders, stuttering, aphasia, dementia, traumatic brain injury, right hemisphere brain damage), as well as with control participants without communication impairments. We review the six core principles guiding TalkBank, the current shape of the 15 TalkBank databanks, and the different analytic tools provided by TalkBank. We examine automatic TalkBank methods that use ASR (automatic speech recognition), NLP (natural language processing), database technology, statistics in R and Python, and ML (machine learning). The specific tools include corpus analysis methods, LSA profiling systems, online database searches through TalkBank, online browsing through transcripts linked to media, and a new system for online collaborative commentary. These systems provide multimedia access to transcripts from a wide variety of participants with and without language disorders.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fcomm.2022.865498

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Lee, L. (1974). Developmental Sentence Analysis. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
  2. Szabo, G., Fromm, D., Heimlich, T., and Holland, A. (2014). Script Training and Its Application to Everyday Life in an Aphasia Center Clinical Aphasiology Conference. St.
  3. Wiederholt, J., and Bryant, B. (2012). Gray Oral Reading Test-Fifth Edition (GORT- 5): Examiner's Manual. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
MacWhinney, B., & Fromm, D.
Affiliations
Carnegie Mellon University (US)
Corresponding author
MacWhinney, Brian
Venue
Frontiers in Communication
Published
2022-04-27
Volume
7
ISSN
2297-900X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4298056709
Cited by
23
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 1
FWCI
6.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Communication (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Voice and Speech Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Stuttering Research and Treatment
Keywords
TalkBank, language sample analysis, language disorders, language disorders in children, stuttering, aphasia, dementia, traumatic brain injury, right hemisphere damage, speech recognition, natural language processing, corpus analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review