The DOI matches its Crossref record; 130 of the 130 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 84 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
Human-AI collaboration is not very collaborative yet: a taxonomy of interaction patterns in AI-assisted decision making from a systematic review
Open accessAbstract
Leveraging Artificial Intelligence (AI) in decision support systems has disproportionately focused on technological advancements, often overlooking the alignment between algorithmic outputs and human expectations. A human-centered perspective attempts to alleviate this concern by designing AI solutions for seamless integration with existing processes. Determining what information AI should provide to aid humans is vital, a concept underscored by explainable AI's efforts to justify AI predictions. However, how the information is presented, e.g., the sequence of recommendations and solicitation of interpretations, is equally crucial as complex interactions may emerge between humans and AI. While empirical studies have evaluated human-AI dynamics across domains, a common vocabulary for human-AI interaction protocols is lacking. To promote more deliberate consideration of interaction designs, we introduce a taxonomy of interaction patterns that delineate various modes of human-AI interactivity. We summarize the results of a systematic review of AI-assisted decision making literature and identify trends and opportunities in existing interactions across application domains from 105 articles. We find that current interactions are dominated by simplistic collaboration paradigms, leading to little support for truly interactive functionality. Our taxonomy offers a tool to understand interactivity with AI in decision-making and foster interaction designs for achieving clear communication, trustworthiness, and collaboration.
Overview
CoChat Summary
TL;DR
This systematic review of 105 empirical studies proposes a taxonomy of interaction patterns for AI-assisted decision making. It finds that current human-AI interactions are dominated by simple AI-first and AI-follow assistance, with limited support for more interactive collaboration.
Key findings
- Across 105 articles and 131 interaction sequences, AI-first assistance was most common (n = 67), followed by AI-follow assistance (n = 28); AI solutions were accompanied by additional information in 81% and 68% of those patterns, respectively.
- More interactive patterns were less frequent: Request-driven AI assistance (n = 25; 14 for direct solution, 13 for support information), Secondary assistance (n = 16), User-guided interactive adjustments (n = 9), Delegation (n = 9), and AI-guided dialogic user engagement (n = 6, of which 5 were conversational).
- Domains included healthcare (26/108), generic tasks (20/108), finance/business (15/108), and law (6/108); most evaluations used non-expert users (60/108), and less than 15% used artificial tasks. AI systems were simulated/Wizard of Oz (39/105), deep learning-based (34/105), or shallow models (35/105).
- The taxonomy comprises seven interaction patterns—AI-first assistance, AI-follow assistance, Secondary assistance, Request-driven AI assistance, AI-guided dialogic user engagement, User-guided interactive adjustments, and Delegation—plus an “Others” category.
Methods
- Systematic review of empirical human-AI decision-making studies from 2013 to June 2023 across ACM Digital Library, IEEE Xplore, Compendex, Scopus, and PubMed; the initial search returned 3,770 papers, 358 duplicates were removed, 3,412 were screened, and 105 articles were included.
- Inclusion required complete decision-making tasks, an implemented interface for human-AI interaction, screen-based/virtual/non-embodied setups, and empirical user studies; robotics, gaming, short papers (<8 pages), non-peer-reviewed works, and reviews/surveys were excluded.
- Data extraction coded context, AI system, and interaction building blocks (action-output pairs); interaction sequences were grouped iteratively into the taxonomy, and pattern frequency was quantified via automated search plus manual inspection.
Limitations
- Stated: search terminology may have excluded relevant work if interaction design was not explicitly mentioned; publication bias is possible; including only one healthcare-focused database alongside general databases may limit observed domain frequencies; analysis was restricted to screen-based interfaces; strict complete-decision-task criteria were used; some papers lacked sufficient interface detail for full recreation; and further use-case evaluations are needed to assess the taxonomy’s utility.
- Evident from the text: because interaction patterns are not mutually exclusive and the taxonomy was iteratively refined by the authors, category assignments may involve subjective interpretation.
- Evident from the text: the corpus ends in June 2023, so newer interaction patterns or studies published after that date are not represented.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Figures
Verification
Claims the paper makes
0 Valid · 0 Not valid · 45 Not checked · 126 Own results and interpretations
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Human-AI interactions in AI-advised decision makings in the healthcare domain mostly adhered to the AI-first assistance pattern (n = 14), followed by Secondary assistance (n = 7).”
§ Human-AI collaboration is not very collaborative yet: a taxonomy of interaction patterns in AI-assisted decision making from a systematic review > Domain Decision making task Total tasks
plainn = 7- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We identified one interaction that supported AI-guided dialogic user engagement, three interactions in the User-guided interactive adjustments, and one in which delegation was an option.”
§ Human-AI collaboration is not very collaborative yet: a taxonomy of interaction patterns in AI-assisted decision making from a systematic review > Domain Decision making task Total tasks
plainn = 3- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We present seven categories of interaction patterns that we have identified in our corpus, illustrated in Figure 1.”
§ Human-AI collaboration is not very collaborative yet: a taxonomy of interaction patterns in AI-assisted decision making from a systematic review > Results
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A check of a cited source is scheduled, or we don’t hold its full text yet; the claim is checked once it runs.
In the paper
“For instance, manipulations of the inputs result in new AI's outcome computations for exploratory purposes (Liu et al., 2021;Gu et al., 2023;Nguyen et al., 2018;Zytek et al., 2022;Suresh et al., 2022).”
§ Human-AI collaboration is not very collaborative yet: a taxonomy of interaction patterns in AI-assisted decision making from a systematic review > . Identification of interaction patterns in AI-assisted decision making studies
What the sources say
plainstates a cause- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Even though we identified multiple decision making tasks in applications that require a specialized population, where recruiting large numbers of participants is often challenging, the majority of human-AI interactions have been evaluated with non-expert uses (60/108).”
§ Human-AI collaboration is not very collaborative yet: a taxonomy of interaction patterns in AI-assisted decision making from a systematic review > Domain Decision making task Total tasks
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
81 more claims
Create a free account to see all 171 claims and to verify the 77 references still open.
- Probably not a substantial claim. 73
- It may state two separate claims as one. 26
- The quote only partly states this claim. 2
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
“The type of AI systems behind the interactions with users in the studies that covered these decision-making tasks were distributed among three categories: simulated models or Wizard of Oz experiments (39/105), deep learning-based models (34/105), and shallow models (35/105).”
§ Human-AI collaboration is not very collaborative yet: a taxonomy of interaction patterns in AI-assisted decision making from a systematic review > Domain Decision making task Total tasks
Reported 105 · recomputed 108
Citations
Cites
A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation
Parasuraman, R., Sheridan, T. B., & Wickens, C. D. (2000) · IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans · doi:10.1109/3468.844354 · Cited by 4,195 · cited 1×
“We searched for relevant articles from five databases that cover Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) studies and related disciplines and selected 105 to conduct a detailed coding and analysis of the sequences of interactions that exist between humans and AI.”
Buçinca, Z., Malaya, M. B., & Gajos, K. Z. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2102.09692 · Cited by 1,124 · cited 3×
“…the decision making problem, we observe cases ( n = 10) in which users are given the ability to control when they want to receive the AI assistance via a request (Khadpe et al., 2020; Mackeprang et al., 2019; Baudel et al., 2021; Molina and Sundar, 2022; Gomez et al., 2023; Buçinca et al., 2021).”
Power to the People: The Role of Humans in Interactive Machine Learning
Amershi, S., Cakmak, M., Knox, W. B., & Kulesza, T. (2014) · AI Magazine · doi:10.1609/aimag.v35i4.2513 · Cited by 1,084
Toward a Deeper Understanding of the Role of Interaction in Information Visualization
Yi, J. S., Kang, Y. A., Stasko, J., & Jacko, J. A. (2007) · IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics · doi:10.1109/tvcg.2007.70515 · Cited by 1,031
Human-computer collaboration for skin cancer recognition
Tschandl, P., Rinner, C., Apalla, Z., Argenziano, G., Codella, N., Halpern, A., Janda, M., Lallas, A., Longo, C., Malvehy, J., et al. (2020) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-020-0942-0 · Cited by 1,024
Zhang, Y., Liao, Q. V., & Bellamy, R. K. E. (2020) · Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3351095.3372852 · Cited by 895
Does the Whole Exceed its Parts? The Effect of AI Explanations on Complementary Team Performance
Bansal, G., Wu, T., Zhou, J., Fok, R., Nushi, B., Kamar, E., Ribeiro, M. T., & Weld, D. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3411764.3445717 · Cited by 757 · cited 2×
“…al., 2022; Riveiro and Thill, 2021, 2022; Lai et al., 2020; Bansal et al., 2021); question answering (Feng and Boyd-Graber, 2022; Silva et al., 2023; Bansal et al., 2021); speech classification (Tutul et al., 2021; Zhang and Lim, 2022) 20 Labeling Text labeling (Bernard et al., 2018; Schrills and…”
Does the Whole Exceed its Parts? The Effect of AI Explanations on Complementary Team Performance
Bansal, G., Wu, T., Zhou, J., Fok, R., Nushi, B., Kamar, E., Ribeiro, M. T., & Weld, D. S. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2006.14779 · Cited by 754
Fügener, A., Grahl, J., Gupta, A., & Ketter, W. (2022) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2021.1079 · Cited by 478
Beyond Accuracy: The Role of Mental Models in Human-AI Team Performance
Bansal, G., Nushi, B., Kamar, E., Lasecki, W. S., Weld, D. S., & Horvitz, E. (2019) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Human Computation and Crowdsourcing · doi:10.1609/hcomp.v7i1.5285 · Cited by 466
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- David, 2022, “Interaction templates: a data-driven approach for authoring robot programs,”, PLATEAU: 12th Annual Workshop at the Intersection of PL and HCI
Cited by
Göndöcs, D., Horváth, S., & Dörfler, V. (2025) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2025.103622 · Cited by 42
Enhancing Intuitive Decision-Making and Reliance Through Human–AI Collaboration: A Review
Xu, G., Murthy, S. V., & Jia, B. (2025) · Informatics · doi:10.3390/informatics12040135 · Cited by 30
Human-Centered Human-AI Collaboration (HC-HAC)
Gao, Q., Xu, W., Pan, H., Shen, M., & Gao, Z. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-95-5585-7_7 · Cited by 26
Faas, C., Uth, R., Sterz, S., Langer, M., & Feit, A. M. (2026) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3805689.3812265 · Cited by 25
Engaging with AI: How Interface Design Shapes Human-AI Collaboration in High-Stakes Decision-MakingPreprint
Chen, Z., Luo, Y., & Sra, M. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2501.16627 · Cited by 24
Human-AI Use Patterns for Decision-Making in Disaster Scenarios: A Systematic Review
Domfeh, E. A., & Dancy, C. L. (2025) · IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society (ISTAS) · doi:10.1109/istas65609.2025.11269624 · Cited by 22
Liang, Z., Yang, K., Sha, L., Gašević, D., Yan, L., & Chen, G. (2026) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.70055 · Cited by 22
Exploring the impact of explainable AI and cognitive capabilities on users’ decisions
Cau, F. M., & Spano, L. D. (2025) · User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction · doi:10.1007/s11257-025-09438-0 · Cited by 16
Reid, M., French, M. B., Andreopoulos, S., Wong, C., & Kee, N. (2025) · Current Research in Physiology · doi:10.1016/j.crphys.2025.100160 · Cited by 15
Fanfani, M., Palesi, L. A. I., & Nesi, P. (2026) · Big Data and Cognitive Computing · doi:10.3390/bdcc10060186 · Cited by 15
How AI is rewiring the human brain: the generational transformation of cognition and knowing
Westerbeek, H. M. (2026) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-026-02912-2 · Cited by 14
Hilliger, I., Pérez‐Sanagustín, M., Gonzalez, C. S., Villalobos, E., & Celis, S. (2026) · Journal of Learning Analytics · doi:10.18608/jla.2026.9143 · Cited by 14
Chen, Z., & He, Y. (2026) · Digital Scholarship in the Humanities · doi:10.1093/llc/fqag035 · Cited by 13
Faas, C., Kerstan, S., Uth, R., Langer, M., & Feit, A. M. (2026) · ACM International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI) · doi:10.1145/3742413.3789100 · Cited by 12
Baeyaert, J. (2025) · Sustainable Futures · doi:10.1016/j.sftr.2025.101126 · Cited by 9
Divergent impacts of explainable AI for dermatological diagnosis on clinicians versus lay people
Xu, X., Hu, H., Zhang, H., Wang, W. K., Wang, R., Soenksen, L. R., Badri, O., Jafry, S., Burger, E., Nwandu, L., et al. (2026) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-026-04553-w · Cited by 9
Towards a Criteria‐Based Approach to Selecting Human‐AI Interaction Mode
Irons, J. L., Cooper, P., McGrath, M. J., Tariq, S., & Duenser, A. (2025) · Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries · doi:10.1002/hfm.70022 · Cited by 9
AI for Requirements Engineering: Industry Adoption and Practitioner Perspectives
Rani, L. M., Svensson, R. B., & FELDT, R. H. (2025) · IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering Workshops (ASEW) · doi:10.1109/asew67777.2025.00053 · Cited by 8
Leszczyński, G., Gaczek, P., & Munzel, A. (2026) · Technovation · doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2026.103519 · Cited by 7
Seo, J., Deldari, E., & Mentis, H. M. (2026) · ACM International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI) · doi:10.1145/3742413.3789121 · Cited by 7
“Control Is a Trajectory, Not a Point”: Conceptualizing Control in Human-AI Co-Creativity
Issak, A., Rezwana, J., & Harteveld, C. (2026) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3772318.3790861 · Cited by 7
A scoping review of human-AI collaboration patterns and task divisions in healthcare applications
You, Y., & Li, X. (2026) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-026-02912-y · Cited by 7
Coordination transparency: governing distributed agency in AI systems
Bohr, J. (2026) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-026-02853-w · Cited by 6
Sivaraman, V., Mason, E. P., Li, M. E., Tong, J., King, A. J., Kahn, J. M., & Perer, A. (2026) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3772318.3790953 · Cited by 6
Design patterns of human-AI interfaces in healthcare
Sheng, R., Shi, C., Lotfi, S., Liu, S., Perer, A., Qu, H., & Cheng, F. (2026) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2026.103737 · Cited by 6
How AI-Assisted Decision-Making Paradigms and Explainability Shape Human-AI Collaboration
Wang, Y., Ni, Q., Wei, T., Xu, H., Liu, L., & He, L. (2026) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su18073516 · Cited by 5
Co-Designing Collaborative Generative AI Tools for Freelancers
Imteyaz, K., Muller, M. J., Flores-Saviaga, C., & Savage, S. (2026) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3772318.3790280 · Cited by 5
Uçan, S., & Uçan, A. D. (2026) · Journal of Academic Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10805-026-09739-y · Cited by 5
Dong, A., Li, P., Chen, Y., Gibson, S., Zhao, L., & He, M. (2026) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su18115313 · Cited by 5
The Epistemic Suite: A Post-Foundational Diagnostic Methodology for Assessing AI Knowledge ClaimsPreprint
Kelly, M. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.24721 · Cited by 5
AI4Research: a survey of artificial intelligence for scientific research
Chen, Q., Yang, M., Qin, L., Liu, J., Yan, Z., Guan, J., Peng, D., Ji, Y., Li, H., Hu, M., et al. (2026) · Science China Information Sciences · doi:10.1007/s11432-025-5000-y · Cited by 4
Hybrid Human-AI Performance Evaluation System for Collaborative Business Ecosystems
Graça, P., & Camarinha-Matos, L. M. (2025) · IFIP advances in information and communication technology · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-05673-3_1 · Cited by 4
CLARA: AI-Mediated Facilitation for Enhancing Group Cognition and Cohesion in Remote Collaboration
Gunasekaran, T. S., Doosti, M. S., Gupta, K., Bai, H., Pai, Y. S., & Billinghurst, M. (2026) · ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction · doi:10.1145/3786325 · Cited by 4
Xu, Y., Zhu, Y., Wang, H., Wu, Y. G., Ouyang, Y., Li, H., Zhou, W., Liu, X., Jiang, C., & Li, Q. (2026) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3772318.3790835 · Cited by 4
Unpacking human–AI collaboration: conceptualisations and emerging research streams
Wang, Y., de Paula, D. F. O., & Heavin, C. (2026) · Journal of Decision System · doi:10.1080/12460125.2026.2653697 · Cited by 4
Iram, S., Rafiq-uz-Zaman, M., & Malik, N. (2025) · Contemporary Journal of Social Science Review · doi:10.63878/cjssr.v3i3.2289 · Cited by 4
Human Oversight-by-Design for Accessible Generative IUIsPreprint
Jerry, B., Moreno, L. D. L. R., & Martínez, P. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.13745 · Cited by 4
Collaborating with LLMs Through a Voice and Graphical User Interface
Sorokin, L., Huynh, K., Eiband, M., Stappen, L., & Dillmann, J. (2025) · International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services Adjunct (MobileHCI Adjunct) · doi:10.1145/3737821.3749555 · Cited by 3
Zahlan, A., Soh, P. H., & Clarysse, B. (2026) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-026-02595-5 · Cited by 3
A roadmap for medical large language models: a review of foundations, applications, and challenges
Sha, Y.-Y., Yu, L., Lin, Z.-H., Kaur, A., Lou, Y., Gornale, S. S., Zhang, T., Wong, L. S., Wang, Z., Yan, Y., et al. (2026) · Military Medical Research · doi:10.1016/j.mmr.2026.100050 · Cited by 3
Cognitive Readiness for Human-AI Collaboration
Tremblay, S., de Hemptinne, D., Teyssier‐Roberge, G., Gallant, A., Marois, A., & Lafond, D. (2026) · Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/00187208261474345 · Cited by 3
Human-AI Collaborative Taxonomy Construction: A Case Study in Profession-Specific Writing Assistants
Lee, M., Kim, Z. M., Khetan, V., & Kang, D. (2024) · Workshop on Intelligent and Interactive Writing Assistants (In2Writing) · doi:10.1145/3690712.3690726 · Cited by 3
Matarese, M., Rea, F., Rohlfing, K. J., & Sciutti, A. (2024) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2411.10176 · Cited by 3
Collaborative Causal Sensemaking: Closing the Complementarity Gap in Human-AI Decision SupportPreprint
Jain, R. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2512.07801 · Cited by 3
From testbeds to high-stakes work: a review of human-AI teaming domains and teaming factors
Kargarnovin, S., Hernandez, C. I., Reiners, D., Cruz-Neira, C., Bochenek, G., & Karwowski, W. (2026) · Frontiers in Robotics and AI · doi:10.3389/frobt.2026.1733942 · Cited by 2
Koganti, V. K. (2025) · World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews · doi:10.30574/wjarr.2025.26.2.1969 · Cited by 2
Collaborating with Algorithms: AI for Collaborative Supply Chain Management
Couto, F. A. P., Malta, M. C., & Soares, A. L. (2025) · IFIP advances in information and communication technology · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-05673-3_12 · Cited by 2
Human at the Center: A Framework for Human‐Driven AI Development
Hu, D., Acosta-Navas, D., Gaube, S., Mozannar, H., Taylor, M. E., Dvijotham, K., & Bondi, E. (2025) · AI Magazine · doi:10.1002/aaai.70043 · Cited by 2
Badam, L. R. (2026) · European Journal of Computer Science and Information Technology · doi:10.37745/ejcsit.2013/vol14n21334 · Cited by 2
Zheng, Z., You, W., Shao, Y., Zhou, M., Zhao, X., Ye, Y., Lu, Y., Zhou, Z., & Sun, L. (2026) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2026.2623219 · Cited by 2
Rudaz, D., Carreras, B. N., Merlino, S., Due, B. L., & Brown, B. A. T. (2026) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3772318.3791708 · Cited by 2
Rethinking UX in the age of AI: DARPA’s Heilmeier Catechism at the interface 1
Prietula, M. J., O’Leary, D. E., & Swartout, W. (2026) · Journal of Decision System · doi:10.1080/12460125.2026.2655311 · Cited by 2
Knowledge Co‐Creation by Human–Machine Social Interaction: Based on Decision Field Theory
Ren, Z., Shen, X., & Xia, S. (2026) · Systems Research and Behavioral Science · doi:10.1002/sres.70103 · Cited by 2
Gazerani, P. (2025) · Frontiers in Neurology · doi:10.3389/fneur.2025.1587296 · Cited by 1
Fries, M., Sauter, L. M., Nießner, J., Keyser, M., & Ludwig, T. G. (2025) · Mensch und Computer (MuC) · doi:10.1145/3743049.3743053 · Cited by 1
Socio-Technical AI Maturity in Supply Chains: Insights from the Pulp and Paper Sector
Freitas, F., Zimmermann, R., Freires, F. G. M., Couto, F. A. P., Fontes, C. H., Soares, A. L., Dalmarco, G., Rhodes, D. H., & Gomes, J. (2025) · IFIP advances in information and communication technology · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-05673-3_11 · Cited by 1
The Power of Visual Framing in the Age of AI
Dimitrova, D. V., Bock, M. A., Bucy, E. P., Coleman, R., & Dan, V. (2025) · Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly · doi:10.1177/10776990251392597 · Cited by 1
Determinants of Effective Human-AI Teaming in Work Contexts: A Meta-Synthesis
Pedrami, M., & Gholipour, A. (2025) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2025.2604191 · Cited by 1
CAAD: A Cognitive-Aware Framework for AI Agent Design in Complex Tasks
Luo, J.-Y., & Xinxiong, L. (2026) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-12392-3_14 · Cited by 1
Huang, J. W.-T. (2026) · Language learning & technology · doi:10.64152/10125/73668 · Cited by 1
How Do We Measure Over-Reliance? A Unified Probabilistic View
Mikhaylova, D., Turchi, T., & Malizia, A. (2026) · ACM International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI) · doi:10.1145/3742414.3794719 · Cited by 1
After the Interface: Relocating Human Agency in the Age of Conversational AI
Wu, M., & Yao, M. (2026) · ACM Conference on Conversational User Interfaces (CUI) · doi:10.1145/3816046.3816301 · Cited by 1
Sun, X., Wei, S., Pan, T., Wang, Y., Bosch, J. A., Echizen, I., Ali, A. E., & Sugawara, S. (2026) · ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization (UMAP) · doi:10.1145/3774935.3806190 · Cited by 1
Talking to Ourselves Through a Smart Mirror: Artificial Confidence in Human–AI Interaction
Hochman, G. (2026) · Systems · doi:10.3390/systems14060627 · Cited by 1
Prieto, L. P., Asensio-Pérez, J. I., Rodríguez‐Triana, M. J., Saban, M., & Dimitriadis, Y. A. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2606.05222 · Cited by 1
Human-AI Collaboration in Leadership and Decision Making
Kumar, P., & Kumar, S. (2026) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-6650-0.ch004 · Cited by 1
Meng, Y., Que, Y., Yan, Z., Liu, B., Wang, Z., Yang, M., & Lu, H. (2026) · JMIR Human Factors · doi:10.2196/83428 · Cited by 1
Ogundokun, R. O., Bello, R.-W., Owolawi, P. A., Du, C., & Wyk, E. V. (2026) · International Conference on Human Centric Artificial Intelligence (ICHCAI) · doi:10.1109/ichcai70183.2026.11607648 · Cited by 1
Student-AI interaction in computer-assisted consecutive interpreting: patterns and performance
Kuang, H., Li, J., & Weng, Y. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1890808 · Cited by 1
Lyu, X., Wu, J. L., Zhao, S., Liu, T., Yang, H. H., Ma, Z., & Qin, J. (2025) · Journal of Visualized Experiments · doi:10.3791/68824 · Cited by 1
Making Enterprise AI Explainable through Calibrated Confidence and Provenance
Krstev, S., Devedžić, V., & Krneta, D. (2026) · Applied Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1080/08839514.2026.2739513 · Cited by 1
Barrows, M., & Ellison, G. T. H. (2024) · Preprints.org · doi:10.20944/preprints202401.1338.v1 · Cited by 1
Brière, M. (2025) · Revue d économie financière · doi:10.3917/ecofi.159.0009 · Cited by 1
Wang, B., & Liu, J. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2512.11096 · Cited by 1
Liang, H., Zhang, D., An, X., & Xu, J. (2026) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-8774138/v1 · Cited by 1
Quan, K., & Chin, J. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.14467 · Cited by 1
A Review of Data Models and Frameworks in Urban Environments in the Context of AI
McKenna, H. P. (2025) · Urban Science · doi:10.3390/urbansci9070239
Broughton, S. (2025) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-6969645/v1
AI and people: A review of current research on human-machine interaction
Buenaventura, S. H.-A.-S. (2025) · World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews · doi:10.30574/wjarr.2025.26.3.2486
Yang, B., & Xu, L. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5388567
Yang, B., & Xu, L. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5402422
FURDUESCU, E. N. (2025) · BUSINESS EXCELLENCE AND MANAGEMENT · doi:10.24818/beman/2025.s.i.5-08
Navigating the Speed-Quality Trade-off in AI-Driven Decision-Making
Majumdar, P. K. (2025) · American Journal of Information Science and Technology · doi:10.11648/j.ajist.20250903.16
Developer-GenAI Collaboration: Understanding Workflow Dynamics for Sustainable Human-AI Interaction
Lin, W., Chiu, Y.-T., Cranefield, J., & Ekandjo, T. A. T. (2025) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Designing for Organizational Intelligence with Machine Learning
Schaschek, M. (2025) · Online Publication Service of Würzburg University (Würzburg University) · doi:10.25972/opus-40162
Human-AI Proximity: Unveiling the Detrimental Effects on Idea Selection and ImplementationPreprint
Mascareño, J., Wortler, B., Przegalinska, A., & Ciechanowskie, L. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5885745
Human-AI Proximity: Unveiling the Detrimental Effects on Idea Selection and ImplementationPreprint
Mascareño, J., Wortler, B., Przegalinska, A., & Ciechanowskie, L. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5885744
Human-AI Proximity: Unveiling the Detrimental Effects on Idea Selection and ImplementationPreprint
Mascareño, J., Wortler, B., Przegalinska, A., & Ciechanowskie, L. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5893131
A trained eye : Hybrid intelligence in data-driven decision-making
Hannah, S., & Dajana, S. (2025) · Diva portal (Dalarna University Library)
Mertiri, S. (2025) · Diva portal (Dalarna University Library)
Bayesian reasoning for overcoming over-reliance in AI-assisted decision making
Mikhaylova, D., Turchi, T., Cevolani, G., & Malizia, A. (2025) · CINECA IRIS Institutial research information system (University of Pisa)
Voigt, H. I., & Timinger, H. (2025) · Journal of Advanced Research in Leadership · doi:10.33422/jarl.v4i2.1191
AI Literacy and Managerial Perceptions in Strategic Decision-Making
Liwarska-Fulczyk, K., & Nadolny, M. (2026) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-13869-9_16
Celik AI Dalam Eksplorasi Sastera Nusantara: Menghubungkan Keupayaan Analitik dan Kefahaman Budaya
Salleh, M. A. M., Ridzuan, A. H., & Halim, J. A. (2025) · Journal of Communication in Scientific Inquiry (JCSI) · doi:10.58915/jcsi.v7i2.2674
Integrating Technology With Human Insight: The Era of Digital Collaboration
Dwiyanto, D., & aghata, F. (2025) · Technologia Journal · doi:10.62872/sztfq724
Agbese, M., Rousi, R. A., & Abrahamsson, P. (2026) · Lecture notes in business information processing · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-14518-5_8
Artificial Intelligence and Disability Entrepreneurship: Moving the Field Forward
Zhang, M., & Li, W. (2026) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-026-06249-0
A Two-Stage Simulation Framework for Evaluating AI Policy Recommendations: A Case Study of Covid-19
Abdollahi, A., Mohammadi, R., Griffin, J. A., & Harteveld, C. (2025) · Winter Simulation Conference · doi:10.1109/wsc68292.2025.11339011
How AI shapes return extrapolation in financial markets? From presence to interaction
Zhao, L., Zheng, H., & Li, L. (2026) · Nankai Business Review International · doi:10.1108/nbri-08-2025-0106
Ojo, A., Osborne, A., Soladoye, A. A., Matope, E. M., Bamidele, D. B., & Olawade, D. B. (2026) · Intelligent Hospital · doi:10.1016/j.inhs.2026.100053
Metadata
- Authors
- Gomez, C., Cho, S. M., Ke, S., Huang, C.-M., & Unberath, M.
- Affiliations
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Unberath, Mathias
- Venue
- Frontiers in Computer Science
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2025-01-06
- Volume
- 6
- ISSN
- 2624-9898 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4406083100
- Cited by
- 209
- References
- 129
- Citations by year
- 2026: 160 · 2025: 46
- FWCI
- 20.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Frontiers in Computer Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- Johns Hopkins University
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
- Keywords
- human-AI collaboration, AI-assisted decision-making, interaction design, decision support system, explainable AI, trust in AI, human-centered AI, interaction protocols
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-14, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-14 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
