Cited by 15Lipid metabolism and disordersLipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthCholesterol and Lipid Metabolism

The potential of ANGPTL8 antagonism to simultaneously reduce triglyceride and increase HDL-cholesterol plasma levels

Open access
Zhang, Ren·2021·Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine

Abstract

Elevated triglyceride (TG) and reduced high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C) plasma levels are risk factors for atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease. Therefore, a drug that simultaneously reduces TG and increases HDL-C plasma levels has the potential to prevent and treat these diseases. Angiopoietin-like 3 (ANGPTL3) regulates plasma TG and HDL-C levels by inhibiting lipoprotein lipase (LPL) and endothelial lipase (EL), respectively. ANGPTL3 inhibition of LPL requires complex formation with ANGPTL8, which is not required for its inhibition of EL. Therefore, the entire pool of plasma ANGPTL3 can be classified as ANGPTL8-associated ANGPTL3 and ANGPTL8-free ANGPTL3, where the former inhibits LPL and the latter inhibits EL. ANGPTL8 antibodies or inhibitors that block its interactions with ANGPTL3 can disrupt or preclude the ANGPTL3-8 complex formation, resulting in fewer ANGPTL3-8 complexes (reduced LPL inhibition), but more free ANGPTL3 (enhanced EL inhibition). Therefore, ANGPTL8 antagonism increases LPL activity while decreasing EL activity, thus leading to reduced plasma TG while simultaneously increasing HDL-C levels. In humans, carriers of ANGPTL8 truncating variants consistently have lower TG but higher HDL-C levels, supporting this hypothesis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fcvm.2021.795370

Cites

15 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • ANGPTL3 inhibition accelerates triglyceride-rich lipoprotein processing and reduces LDL precursors while enhancing HDL catabolism.

    “In contrast, ANGPTL3 inhibition accelerates triglyceride-rich lipoprotein processing and reduces LDL precursors while enhancing HDL catabolism, accounting for concurrent LDL-C reduction and modest HDL-C decrease (Zhang, 2021; Chen et al., 2024; Adam et al., 2020; Wang et al., 2015; Yasuda et al., 2010; Hooper and Burnett, 2013).”

    From Efficacy and safety of small interfering RNA (siRNA) therapies for hypertriglyceridemia and mixed dyslipidemia: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis (2026) · cites this paper as Zhang, 2021

    The Rationale (page not provided) explains that reducing ANGPTL3 inhibition permits LPL to hydrolyze circulating triglycerides and EL to hydrolyze HDL phospholipids. The Weaknesses section (page not provided) reports that ANGPTL3 antagonism lowers TG, LDL-C, and HDL-C in humans. Neither section says it reduces LDL precursors, and the paper does not characterize the HDL-C decrease as modest. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • APOC3 inhibition primarily enhances peripheral clearance of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins without substantially affecting hepatic VLDL production or LDL metabolism.

    “APOC3 inhibition primarily enhances peripheral clearance of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins without substantially affecting hepatic VLDL production or LDL metabolism, explaining neutral LDL-C effects and a tendency toward higher HDL-C levels (Malick et al., 2023b; Zhang, 2021; Visser et al., 2022; Khetarpal et al., 2017; Chen et al., 2024).”

    From Efficacy and safety of small interfering RNA (siRNA) therapies for hypertriglyceridemia and mixed dyslipidemia: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis (2026) · cites this paper as Zhang, 2021

    The Rationale and Weaknesses sections discuss ANGPTL3 and ANGPTL8, not APOC3. Searches for APOC3, apolipoprotein C-III, VLDL production, and LDL metabolism found no passage addressing the attributed mechanism or its claimed LDL-C and HDL-C effects. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, R.
Affiliations
Wayne State University (US)
Corresponding author
Zhang, Ren
Venue
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
Published
2021-11-16
Volume
8
Pages
795370-795370
ISSN
2297-055X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3214719256
Cited by
15
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1
FWCI
2.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (5R01HL134787)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Lipid metabolism and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cholesterol and Lipid Metabolism
Keywords
ANGPTL8, ANGPTL3, lipoprotein lipase, endothelial lipase, HDL cholesterol, atherosclerosis, cardiovascular disease

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review