Polygenic Risk Scores in Alzheimer's Disease: Current Applications and Future Directions
Open accessAbstract
Genome-wide association studies have identified nearly 40 genome-wide significant single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) which are associated with Alzheimer's Disease (AD). Due to the polygenicity of AD, polygenic risk scores (PRS) have shown high potential for AD risk prediction. PRSs have been shown to successfully discriminate between AD cases and controls achieving a prediction accuracy of up to 84% based on area under the receiver operating curve. The prediction accuracy in AD is higher compared with other complex genetic disorders. PRS can be restricted to SNPs which reside in biologically relevant gene-sets; the predictive value of these gene-sets in the general population is not as high as genome-wide PRS, but they may play an important role to identify mechanisms of disease development and inform biological experiments. Multiple methods are available to derive PRSs, such as selecting SNPs based on statistical evidence of association with the disease or using prior evidence for SNP selection. All methods have advantages, but PRS produced using different methodologies are often not comparable, and results should be interpreted with care. Similarly, this is true when PRS is based on different background populations. With the exponential growth in development of digital electronic devices it is easy to calculate an individual's disease risk using public databases. A major limitation for the utility of PRSs is that the risk score is sample and method dependent. Therefore, replicability and interpretability of PRS is an important issue. PRS can be used to determine the probability of developing disease which incorporates information about disease risk in the general population or in a specific AD risk group. It is essential to consult with genetic counselors to ensure genetic risk is communicated appropriately.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Polygenic risk score has been used to predict the development of AD.
“Polygenic risk score, which is constructed as a weighted sum of allele counts, has been used to predict the development of AD [49].”
From Genetics of Alzheimer’s disease: An East Asian perspective (2023) · cites this paper as [49]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Meta-Analysis of 74,046 Individuals Identifies 11 New Susceptibility Loci for Alzheimer’s Disease
(EADI), E. A. D. I., Lambert, J.-C., (GERAD), G. A. E. R. I. A. D., Alzheimer's Disease Genetic Consortium (ADGC), (CHARGE), C. F. H. A. A. R. I. G. E., Ibrahim-Verbaas, C. A., Harold, D., Naj, A. C., Sims, R., Bellenguez, C., et al. (2013) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.2802 · Cited by 4,336 · see citing works
Harold, D., Abraham, R., Hollingworth, P., Sims, R., Gerrish, A., Hamshere, M. L., Pahwa, J. S., Moskvina, V., Dowzell, K., Williams, A., et al. (2009) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.440 · Cited by 3,326 · see citing works
Clinical use of current polygenic risk scores may exacerbate health disparities
Martin, A. R., Kanai, M., Kamatani, Y., Okada, Y., Neale, B. M., & Daly, M. J. (2019) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-019-0379-x · Cited by 2,831 · see citing works
Alzheimer disease in the United States (2010–2050) estimated using the 2010 census
Hebert, L. E., Weuve, J., Scherr, P. A., & Evans, D. A. (2013) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0b013e31828726f5 · Cited by 2,642 · cited 1× · see citing works
“For example, AD prevalence in the general population is around 2% (26), in individuals who are aged 65 + prevalence is around 10% (27) and in those aged 85 + prevalence increases to 30% (28).”
Polygenic prediction via Bayesian regression and continuous shrinkage priors
Ge, T., Chen, C.-Y., Ni, Y., Feng, Y.-C. A., & Smoller, J. W. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-09718-5 · Cited by 1,922 · see citing works
GWAS on family history of Alzheimer’s disease
Marioni, R. E., Harris, S. E., Zhang, Q., McRae, A. F., Hagenaars, S. P., Hill, W. D., Davies, G., Ritchie, C. W., Gale, C. R., Starr, J. M., et al. (2018) · Translational Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41398-018-0150-6 · Cited by 564 · see citing works
Common polygenic variation enhances risk prediction for Alzheimer’s disease
Escott-Price, V., Sims, R., Bannister, C., Harold, D., Vronskaya, M., Majounie, E., Badarinarayan, N., GERAD/PERADES, consortia, I., Morgan, K., et al. (2015) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awv268 · Cited by 414 · see citing works
Self-citationDesikan, R. S., Fan, C. C., Wang, Y., Schork, A. J., Cabral, H. J., Cupples, L. A., Thompson, W. K., Besser, L., Kukull, W. A., Holland, D., et al. (2017) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1002258 · Cited by 395 · see citing works
Vigilante, A., Laddach, A., Moens, N., Meleckyte, R., Leha, A., Ghahramani, A., Culley, O. J., Kathuria, A., Hurling, C., Vickers, A., et al. (2019) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2019.01.094 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 25
- [4]Jansen IE Savage JE Watanabe K Bryois J Williams DM Steinberg S. Genome-wide meta-analysis identifies new loci and functional pathways influencing Alzheimer's disease risk. Nat Genet. (2019) 51: 404– 13. (2018). 10.1038/s41588-018-0311-9 30617256 PMC6836675 · DOI · Paper page
- [5]Kunkle BW Grenier-Boley B Sims R Bis JC Damotte V Naj AC. Genetic meta-analysis of diagnosed Alzheimer's disease identifies new risk loci and implicates Aβ, tau, immunity and lipid processing. Nat Genet. (2019) 51: 414– 30. 10.1038/s41588-019-0358-2 30820047 PMC6463297 · DOI · Paper page
- [7]Chouraki V Reitz C Maury F Bis JC Bellenguez C Yu L. Evaluation of a genetic risk score to improve risk prediction for alzheimer's disease. J Alzheimers Dis. (2016) 53: 921– 32. 10.3233/JAD-150749 27340842 PMC5036102 · DOI · Paper page
- [9]Escott-Price V Myers AJ Huentelman M Hardy J. Polygenic risk score analysis of pathologically confirmed Alzheimer disease. Ann Neurol. (2017) 82: 311– 4. 10.1002/ana.24999 28727176 PMC5599118 · DOI
- [10]Chaudhury S Brookes KJ Patel T Fallows A Guetta-Baranes T Turton JC. Alzheimer's disease polygenic risk score as a predictor of conversion from mild-cognitive impairment. Transl Psychiatry. (2019) 9: 154. 10.1038/s41398-019-0503-9 31127079 PMC6534556 · DOI
- [11]Purcell SM Wray NR Stone JL Visscher PM O'Donovan MC Sullivan PF. Common polygenic variation contributes to risk of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. Nature. (2009) 460: 748– 52. 10.1038/nature08185 19571811 PMC3912837 · DOI · Paper page
- [12]Euesden J Lewis CM O'Reilly PF. PRSice: polygenic risk score software. Bioinformatics. (2015) 31: 1466– 8. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu848 25550326 PMC4410663 · DOI
- [13]Choi SW O'Reilly PF. PRSice-2: polygenic risk score software for biobank-scale data. Gigascience. (2019) 8: giz082. 10.1093/gigascience/giz082 31307061 PMC6629542 · DOI
- [14]Baker E Schmidt KM Sims R O'Donovan MC Williams J Holmans P. POLARIS: polygenic LD-adjusted risk score approach for set-based analysis of GWAS data. Genet Epidemiol. (2018) 42: 366– 77. 10.1002/gepi.22117 29532500 PMC6001515 · DOI
- [15]Speed D Hemani G Johnson MR Balding DJ. Improved heritability estimation from genome-wide SNPs. Am J Hum Genet. (2012) 91: 1011– 21. 10.1016/j.ajhg.2012.10.010 23217325 PMC3516604 · DOI
- [16]Vilhjalmsson BJ Yang J Finucane HK Gusev A Lindstrom S Ripke S. Modeling linkage disequilibrium increases accuracy of polygenic risk scores. Am J Hum Genet. (2015) 97: 576– 92. 10.1101/015859 26430803 PMC4596916 · DOI
- [18]Auton A Abecasis GR Altshuler DM Durbin RM Bentley DR Chakravarti A.. A global reference for human genetic variation. Nature. (2015) 526: 68– 74. 10.1038/nature15393 26432245 PMC4750478 · DOI · Paper page
- [20]Tanzi RE Bertram L. Twenty years of the Alzheimer's disease amyloid hypothesis: a genetic perspective. Cell. (2005) 120: 545– 55. 10.1016/j.cell.2005.02.008 15734686 · DOI · Paper page
- [21]Strittmatter WJ Saunders AM Schmechel D Pericak-Vance M Enghild J Salvesen GS. Apolipoprotein E: high-avidity binding to beta-amyloid and increased frequency of type 4 allele in late-onset familial Alzheimer disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (1993) 90: 1977– 81. 10.1073/pnas.90.5.1977 8446617 PMC46003 · DOI · Paper page
- [22]Wray N Visscher P. Estimating trait heritability. Nat Educ. (2018) 1: 29. Available online at: https://www.nature.com/scitable/topicpage/estimating-trait-heritability-46889/
- [23]Wray NR Kemper KE Hayes BJ Goddard ME Visscher PM. Complex trait prediction from genome data: contrasting EBV in livestock to PRS in humans: genomic prediction. Genetics. (2019) 211: 1131– 41. 10.1534/genetics.119.301859 30967442 PMC6456317 · DOI
- [24]Leonenko G Baker E Schmidt KM Escott-Price V. Positioning personal polygenic risk score against the population background. bioRxiv. (2019) 2019: 813170. 10.1101/813170 · DOI
- [26]Brookmeyer R Gray S Kawas C. Projections of Alzheimer's disease in the United States and the public health impact of delaying disease onset. Am J Public Health. (1998) 88: 1337– 42. 10.2105/AJPH.88.9.1337 9736873 PMC1509089 · DOI
- [27]William Thies LB. Alzheimer's disease facts and figures. Alzheimers Dement. (2012) 8: 131– 68. 10.1016/j.jalz.2012.02.001 22404854 · DOI
- [29]Lo MT Kauppi K Fan CC Sanyal N Reas ET Sundar VS. Identification of genetic heterogeneity of Alzheimer's disease across age. Neurobiol Aging. (2019) 84: 243 e1– e9. 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2019.02.022 30979435 PMC6783343 · DOI
- [30]Jones L Holmans PA Hamshere ML Harold D Moskvina V Ivanov D. Genetic evidence implicates the immune system and cholesterol metabolism in the aetiology of Alzheimer's disease. PLoS ONE. (2010) 5: e13950. 10.1371/journal.pone.0013950 21085570 PMC2981526 · DOI · Paper page
- [31]Leonenko G Shoai M Bellou E Sims R Williams J Hardy J. Genetic risk for alzheimer disease is distinct from genetic risk for amyloid deposition. Ann Neurol. (2019) 86: 427– 35. 10.1002/ana.25530 31199530 PMC6771864 · DOI · Paper page
- [32]Escott-Price V Jones L. Genomic profiling and diagnostic biomarkers in Alzheimer's disease. Lancet Neurol. (2017) 16: 582– 3. 10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30202-8 28721917 · DOI
- [33]Hampel H O'Bryant SE Castrillo JI Ritchie C Rojkova K Broich K. PRECISION MEDICINE - the golden gate for detection, treatment and prevention of alzheimer's disease. J Prev Alzheimers Dis. (2016) 3: 243– 59. 10.14283/jpad.2016.112 28344933 PMC5363725 · DOI
- [34]Hampel H O'Bryant SE Durrleman S Younesi E Rojkova K Escott-Price V. A precision medicine initiative for Alzheimer's disease: the road ahead to biomarker-guided integrative disease modeling. Climacteric. (2017) 20: 107– 18. 10.1080/13697137.2017.1287866 28286989 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Genetics of Alzheimer’s disease: An East Asian perspective
Miyashita, A., Kikuchi, M., Hara, N., & Ikeuchi, T. (2023) · Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1038/s10038-022-01050-z · Cited by 64 · see citing works
- Authors
- Baker, E. A., & Escott‐Price, V.
- Affiliations
- Cardiff University (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Valentina Escott‐Price
- Venue
- Frontiers in Digital Health
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2020-08-11
- Volume
- 2
- Pages
- 14-14
- ISSN
- 2673-253X (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC8521998
- OpenAlex
- W3048963803
- Cited by
- 71
- References
- 9
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 3
- FWCI
- 1.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Frontiers in Digital Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (acceptedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Medical Research Council
- Mauritius Research Council
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Keywords
- polygenic risk score, Alzheimer's disease, single nucleotide polymorphisms, disease risk prediction, polygenicity, replicability, interpretability, genetic counseling
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review