Cited by 562Pain Management and Placebo EffectPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsPatient-Provider Communication in Healthcare

Implications of placebo and nocebo effects for clinical practice: Expert consensus

Open access
Evers, Andrea W.M., Colloca, Luana, Blease, Charlotte, Annoni, Marco, Atlas, Lauren Y., Benedetti, Fabrizio, Bingel, Ulrike, Büchel, Christian +22 more·2018·Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Placebo and nocebo effects occur in clinical or laboratory medical contexts after administration of an inert treatment or as part of active treatments and are due to psychobiological mechanisms such as expectancies of the patient. Placebo and nocebo studies have evolved from predominantly methodological research into a far-reaching interdisciplinary field that is unravelling the neurobiological, behavioural and clinical underpinnings of these phenomena in a broad variety of medical conditions. As a consequence, there is an increasing demand from health professionals to develop expert recommendations about evidence-based and ethical use of placebo and nocebo effects for clinical practice. METHODS: A survey and interdisciplinary expert meeting by invitation was organized as part of the 1st Society for Interdisciplinary Placebo Studies (SIPS) conference in 2017. Twenty-nine internationally recognized placebo researchers participated. RESULTS: There was consensus that maximizing placebo effects and minimizing nocebo effects should lead to better treatment outcomes with fewer side effects. Experts particularly agreed on the importance of informing patients about placebo and nocebo effects and training health professionals in patient-clinician communication to maximize placebo and minimize nocebo effects. CONCLUSIONS: The current paper forms a first step towards developing evidence-based and ethical recommendations about the implications of placebo and nocebo research for medical practice, based on the current state of evidence and the consensus of experts. Future research might focus on how to implement these recommendations, including how to optimize conditions for educating patients about placebo and nocebo effects and providing training for the implementation in clinical practice.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1159/000490354

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The current literature may have not adequately considered the role of individual components of mindfulness and of placebo effects.

    “When examining the effectiveness of mindfulness, the current literature may have not adequately considered the role of its individual components and of placebo effects, i.e., beneficial effects of (inert) interventions due to mechanisms such as patients' expectations (Evers et al., 2018).”

    From Mindfulness Effects on Anxiety: Disentangling the Role of Decentering and Treatment Expectations (2024) · cites this paper as Evers et al., 2018

    The Discussion describes placebo effects associated with inert substances and active treatments, including effects mediated by patients’ expectations. It does not assess mindfulness, its individual components, or whether the mindfulness literature has adequately considered placebo effects. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Benedetti F: Placebo Effects. Understanding the Mechanisms in Health and Disease, ed 2. New York, Oxford University Press, 2015.
  2. Klinger R, Colloca, L, Bingel U, Flor H: Pla- cebo analgesia: clinical applications. Pain 2015;155: 1055-1058.
  3. American Medical Association: AMA Code of Medical Ethics. Opinion 8.083 -placebo use in clinical practice. 2007. https://www. ama-assn.org/delivering-care/use-placebo- clinical-practice.
  4. Colloca L, Howick J: Placebos without decep- tion: outcomes, mechanisms, an ethics. Int Rev Neurobiol 2018; 138: 219-240.
  5. Koban L, Ruzic L, Wager TD: Brain predic- tors of individual differences in placebo re- sponding; in Colloca L, Flaten MA, Meissner K (eds): Placebo and Pain. Elsevier/Academic Press, 2013.
  6. Doering BK, Rief W: Utilizing placebo mech- anisms for dose reduction in pharmacothera- py. Trends Pharmacol Sci 2010; 33: 165-172.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Evers, A. W. M., Colloca, L., Blease, C., Annoni, M., Atlas, L. Y., Benedetti, F., Bingel, U., Büchel, C., Carvalho, C., Colagiuri, B., Crum, A. J., Enck, P., Gaab, J., Geers, A. L., Howick, J., Jensen, K. B., Kirsch, I., Meissner, K., Napadow, V., Peerdeman, K. J., Raz, A., Rief, W., Vase, L., Wager, T. D., Wampold, B. E., Weimer, K., Wiech, K., Kaptchuk, T. J., Klinger, R., & Kelley, J. M.
Affiliations
  • Leiden University (NL)
  • University of Maryland, Baltimore (US)
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
  • Institute of Biomedical Technologies (IT)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • University of Turin (IT)
  • Essen University Hospital (DE)
  • University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (DE)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • Stanford University (US)
  • Universitätsklinikum Tübingen (DE)
  • University of Basel (CH)
  • University of Toledo (US)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
  • Coburg University of Applied Sciences (DE)
  • Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging (US)
  • McGill University (CA)
  • Philipps University of Marburg (DE)
  • Aarhus University (DK)
  • University of Colorado Boulder (US)
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
  • University Hospital Ulm (DE)
Venue
Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Published
2018
Volume
87
Issue
4
Pages
204-210
ISSN
  • 0033-3190 (ISSN-L)
  • 1423-0348
OpenAlex
W2807782653
Cited by
562
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 52 · 2025: 88 · 2024: 73 · 2023: 81 · 2022: 73 · 2021: 70 · 2020: 60 · 2019: 53 · 2018: 12
FWCI
29.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • edoc (University of Basel) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
  • KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • edoc (University of Basel)
Funders
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (SPCR-045)
  • Irish Research Council (CLNE/2017/226)
  • Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (453-16-004)
  • National Institutes of Health (OT2OD023867, R61-AT009306)
  • National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (R01DE025946)
  • National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (R61AT009306)
  • FP7 Ideas: European Research Council (617700)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
Keywords
placebo effect, nocebo effect, patient expectations, patient-clinician communication, informed consent, health professions education, expert consensus recommendations
MeSH terms
Humans, Physician-Patient Relations, Placebo Effect, Consensus, Evidence-Based Practice, Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions, Nocebo Effect

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review