The DOI matches its Crossref record; 58 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A chatbot for mental health support: exploring the impact of Emohaa on reducing mental distress in China
Open accessAbstract
Introduction The growing demand for mental health support has highlighted the importance of conversational agents as human supporters worldwide and in China. These agents could increase availability and reduce the relative costs of mental health support. The provided support can be divided into two main types: cognitive and emotional. Existing work on this topic mainly focuses on constructing agents that adopt Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) principles. Such agents operate based on pre-defined templates and exercises to provide cognitive support. However, research on emotional support using such agents is limited. In addition, most of the constructed agents operate in English, highlighting the importance of conducting such studies in China. To this end, we introduce Emohaa, a conversational agent that provides cognitive support through CBT-Bot exercises and guided conversations. It also emotionally supports users through ES-Bot, enabling them to vent their emotional problems. In this study, we analyze the effectiveness of Emohaa in reducing symptoms of mental distress. Methods and Results Following the RCT design, the current study randomly assigned participants into three groups: Emohaa (CBT-Bot), Emohaa (Full), and control. With both Intention-To-Treat ( N = 247 ) and PerProtocol ( N = 134 ) analyses, the results demonstrated that compared to the control group, participants who used two types of Emohaa experienced considerably more significant improvements in symptoms of mental distress, including depression ( F [ 2 , 244 ] = 6.26 , p = 0.002 ), negative affect ( F [ 2 , 244 ] = 6.09 , p = 0.003 ), and insomnia ( F [ 2 , 244 ] = 3.69 , p = 0.026 ). Discussion Based on the obtained results and participants’ satisfaction with the platform, we concluded that Emohaa is a practical and effective tool for reducing mental distress.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“For example, Jeong [99] reported 0.30 SD for depression, McFadyen et al [61] reported 0.26 SD for anxiety, Sabour [64] reported 0.33 SD for depression.”
From Generative AI Mental Health Chatbots as Therapeutic Tools: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Their Role in Reducing Mental Health Issues (2025) · cites this paper as [64]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
Muller, K. E., & Cohen, J. (1989) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1270020 · Cited by 99,603
Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales.
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063 · Cited by 32,433
A Brief Measure for Assessing Generalized Anxiety Disorder: The GAD-7
Spitzer, R. L., Kroenke, K., Williams, J. B. W., & Löwe, B. (2006) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092 · Cited by 31,765
RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach
Liu, Y., Ott, M., Goyal, N., Du, J., Joshi, M., Chen, D., Levy, O., Lewis, M., Zettlemoyer, L., & Stoyanov, V. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1907.11692 · Cited by 16,515
Back-translation for cross-cultural research.
Brislin, R. W. (1970) · Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology · doi:10.1177/135910457000100301 · Cited by 14,091
Statistical Analysis with Missing Data
Little, R. J. A., & Rubin, D. B. (2002) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/9781119013563 · Cited by 8,473
The PHQ-9: A New Depression Diagnostic and Severity Measure
Kroenke, K., & Spitzer, R. L. (2002) · Psychiatric Annals · doi:10.3928/0048-5713-20020901-06 · Cited by 5,898 · cited 10×
“Compared to the control group, there was a significant decrease in depression and anxiety of the participants who used Emohaa, as measured by the PHQ-9 and the GAD-7 questionnaires, respectively.”
MethodInfluentialFitzpatrick, K. K., Darcy, A., & Vierhile, M. (2017) · JMIR Mental Health · doi:10.2196/mental.7785 · Cited by 2,730 · cited 4×
“PHQ-9 Participants’ depressionwasmeasuredwith the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) (Kroenke and Spitzer, 2002), the most widely used measure in psychological depression trials (Fitzpatrick et al., 2017; von Glischinski et al., 2021).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialPrevalence of mental disorders in China: a cross-sectional epidemiological study
Huang, Y., Wang, Y., Wang, H., Liu, Z., Yu, X., Yan, J., Yu, Y., Kou, C., Xu, X., Lu, J., et al. (2019) · The Lancet Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s2215-0366(18)30511-x · Cited by 2,335
(1993) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,324
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–103 of 103
Affective directions in activation space: An interpretable inference-time control mechanism
Dong, Y., Jin, L., Yang, Y., Lu, B., Yang, J., & Liu, Z. (2026) · Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.engappai.2026.116407
Joseph, E., Justin, J. K., & Thomas, M. (2026) · International Conference on Next-Gen Intelligent Computing and Applications (ICONICA) · doi:10.1109/iconica70605.2026.11736367
Ko, J. E., Hwang, J. W., Kim, S. M., & Kwon, J. Y. (2026) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/94543
Metadata
- Authors
- Sabour, S., Zhang, W., Xiao, X., Zhang, Y., Zheng, Y., Wen, J., Zhao, J., & Huang, M.
- Affiliations
- State Key Laboratory of Intelligent Technology and Systems (CN)
- Beijing Normal University (CN)
- Tsinghua University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Sabour, Sahand
- Huang, Minlie
- Venue
- Frontiers in Digital Health
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2023-05-04
- Volume
- 5
- Pages
- 1133987-1133987
- ISSN
- 2673-253X (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC10193040
- OpenAlex
- W4377565325
- Cited by
- 102
- References
- 44
- Citations by year
- 2026: 31 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 10
- FWCI
- 26.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Frontiers in Digital Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Emotion and Mood Recognition
- Keywords
- chatbots, mental health support, cognitive behavioral therapy, depression, negative affect, insomnia, emotional support, psychological distress, China
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
