Cited by 33Service-Learning and Community EngagementReflective Practices in EducationAdult and Continuing Education Topics

A Theoretical Framework on Reflection in Service Learning: Deepening Reflection Through Identity Development

Open access
Kawai, Toru·2021·Frontiers in Education

Abstract

In higher education, well-designed service learning combines service activities and academic knowledge in reflection, generating essential learning outcomes: academic enhancement, personal growth, and civic engagement. As research on reflection in service learning has shown, the process of reflection deepens through description of service experiences, examination of those experiences and articulation of learning. This article provides a theoretical explanation of deepening the reflection process by incorporating reflection theory and identity theory of college student development, professional development, and general identity development. Expanding the theoretical explanation of the reflective process clarifies the conditions of the deepening student reflection process in service learning in the following ways. First, it focuses on concrete experience then-and-there at that moment rather than abstract impressions by paying attention to personal dissonance in the experience. In addition, it finds discrepancies from differences of views, perspectives, and backgrounds between those of students and others. It connects outward exploration of those differences and inward exploration to construct internal voices toward self-authorship. The deep reflection process requires confronting contradictions through dialogical interplays among the I-positions of their own and others. It bridges discontinuities between past, present, and future selves by expanding the time perspective retrospectively and prospectively, and solving contradictions embedding in their prejudice. Furthermore, it activates plurality in social norms and values. The above conditions should be design principles for deepening critical and dialogical reflection in high-impact service learning. Through deepening reflection in service learning, it can be expected to activate mutuality and support generativity toward solidarity against hostility.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/feduc.2020.604997

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 60

  1. Akkerman, S. F., and Meijer, P. C. (2011). A dialogical approach to conceptualizing teacher identity. Teach. Teach. Educ. 27, 308-319. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2010.08.013 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Ambrose, S. A., Bridges, M. W., DiPietro, M., Lovett, M. C., and Norman, M. K. (2010). How Learning Works: Seven Research-Based Principles for Smart Teaching. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.
  3. Anderson, L. W., and Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching and Assessing. New York, NY: Addison-Wesley Longman.
  4. Barber, J. P., and King, P. M. (2014). Pathways toward self-authorship: student responses to the demands of developmentally effective experiences. J. Coll. Stud. Dev. 55, 433-450. doi: 10.1353/csd.2014.0047 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Bateson, G. (2000). Steps to an Ecology of Mind: Collected Essays in Anthropology, Psychiatry, Evolution, and Epistemology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  6. Baxter Magolda, M. B. (2004). Evolution of a constructivist conceptualization of epistemological reflection. Educational Psychologist 39, 31-42. doi: 10.1207/s15326985ep3901_4 · DOI
  7. Baxter Magolda, M. B. (2007). Self-authorship: The foundation for twenty- first-century education. New Dir. Teach. Learn. 109, 69-83. doi: 10.1002/ tl.266 · DOI
  8. Baxter Magolda, M. B., and King, P. M. (eds.). (2012). Assessing meaning making and self-authorship: theory, research, and application. ASHE Higher Educ. Rep. 38, 1-138. doi: 10.1002/aehe.v38. · DOI
  9. Beauchamp, C., and Thomas, L. (2009). Understanding teacher identity: An overview of issues in the literature and implications for teacher education. Camb. J. Educ. 39, 175-189. doi: 10.1080/03057640902902252 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Beck, U., and Beck-Gernsheim, E. (2002). Individualization: Institutionalized Individualism and its Social and Political Consequences. London: Sage Publications.
  11. Benner, P., Tanner, C., and Chesla, C. (eds.). (2009). Expertise in Nursing Practice: Caring, Clinical Judgment, and Ethics, 2nd Edn. New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company.
  12. Bringle, R. G., Hahn, T. W., and Hatcher, J. A. (2019). Civic-minded graduate: additional evidence II. Int. J. Research on Serv. Learn. Commun. Engage. 7:3. doi: 10.37333/001c.11481 · DOI
  13. Bringle, R. G., and Clayton, P. H. (2012). "Civic education through service learning: what, how, and why?, " in Higher Education and Civic Engagement, eds. L. McIlrath, A. Lyons, and R. Munck (New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan), 101-124.
  14. Bringle, R. G., and Wall, E. (2020). Civic-minded graduate: additional evidence. Michigan J. Community Serv. Learn. 26, 1-18. doi: 10.3998/mjcsloa.3239521.0026.101 · DOI
  15. Bronk, K. C. (2013). Purpose in Life: A Critical Component of Optimal Youth Development. New York, NY: Springer.
  16. Côté, J. E. (2019). Youth Development in Identity Societies: Paradoxes of Purpose. New York, NY: Routledge.
  17. Côté, J. E., and Levine, C. G. (2014). Identity, Formation, Agency, and Culture: A Social Psychological Synthesis. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
  18. Côté, J. E., and Levine, C. (2015). Identity Formation, Youth, and Development: A Simplified Approach. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
  19. Celio, C. I., Durlak, J., and Dymnicki, A. (2011). A meta-analysis of the impact of service-learning on students. J. Exp. Edu. 34, 164-181. doi: 10.5193/JEE34.2.164 · DOI
  20. Clandinin, D. J., and Rosiek, J. (2007). "Mapping a landscape of narrative inquiry, " in Handbook of Narrative Inquiry: Mapping a Methodology, ed D. J. Clandinin (Sage Publications), 35-75.
  21. Conway, J. M., Amel, E. L., and Gerwien, D. P. (2009). Teaching and learning in the social context: a meta-analysis of service learning's effects on academic, personal, social, and citizenship outcomes. Teach. Psychol. 26, 233-245. doi: 10.1080/00986280903172969 · DOI
  22. Damon, W. (2008). The Path to Purpose: Helping our Children Find their Calling in Life. New York, NY: Free Press.
  23. Emirbayer, M., and Mische, A. (1998). What is agency? Am. J. Sociol. 103, 962-1023. doi: 10.1086/231294 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Stanford, CA: Stanford university press.
  25. Hamman, D., Gosselin, K., Romano, J., and Bunuan, R. (2010). Using possible-selves theory to understand the identity development of new teachers. Teach. Teach. Educ. 26, 1349-1361. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2010. 03.005 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Hanna, F., Oostdam, R., Severiens, S. E., and Zijlstra, B. J. (2019). Domains of teacher identity: a review of quantitative measurement instruments. Educ. Res. Rev. 27, 15-27. doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2019.01.003 · DOI
  27. Hanna, F., Oostdam, R., Severiens, S. E., and Zijlstra, B. J. (2020). Assessing the professional identity of primary student teachers: design and validation of the teacher identity measurement scale. Stud. Educ. Eval. 64:100822. doi: 10.1016/j.stueduc.2019.100822 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Hatcher, J. A., and Bringle, R. G. (1997). Reflection: bridging the gap between service and learning. Coll. Teach. 45, 153-158. doi: 10.1080/87567559709596221 · DOI
  29. Hermans, H., and Hermans-Konopka, A. (2010). Dialogical Self Theory: Positioning and Counter-Positioning in a Globalizing Society. Cambridge University Press.
  30. Hermans, H. J., Kempen, H. J., and Van Loon, R. J. (1992). The dialogical self: beyond individualism and rationalism. Am. Psychol. 47, 23-33. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.47.1.23 · DOI
  31. Hermans, H. J. M. (2011). "The dialogical self: a process of positioning in space and time, " in The Oxford Handbook of the Self, ed S. Gallagher (New York, NY: Oxford University Press), 654-680.
  32. Hermans, H. J. M., and Gieser, T. (eds.). (2011). Handbook of Dialogical Self Theory. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press
  33. Hoffman, M. L. (2010). "Empathy and prosocial behavior, " in Handbook of Emotions, 3rd Edn, eds. M. Lewis, J. M. Haviland-Jones, and L. F. Barrett (New York, NY: Guilford Press), 440-455.
  34. Jameson, J. K., Clayton, P. H., and Ash, S. L. (2013). "Conceptualizing, assessing, and investigating academic learning in service learning, " in Research on Service Learning: Conceptual Frameworks and Assessment, Vol. 2A, eds P. H. Clayton, R. G. Bringle, and J. A. Hatcher (Sterling, VA: Stylus), 85-110.
  35. Jones, S. R., and Abes, E. S. (2013). Identity Development of College Students: Advancing Frameworks for Multiple Dimensions of Identity. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.
  36. Kawai, T. (2012). The impact of participation in out-of-class communities of practice and bridge learning on student learning and development. Educ. Tech. Res. 35, 135-144. doi: 10.15077/etr.KJ00008327918 · DOI
  37. Kawai, T., and Kimura, M. (2014). A study on the role of reflection and bridge learning in service-learning: through the survey of the "community service learning" course at ritsumeikan university. Educ. Tech. Res. 37, 15-23. doi: 10.1002/cc.20089 · DOI
  38. Kawai, T., and Mizokami, S. (2013). Analysis of bridge learning: focus on the relationship between bridge learning, approaches to learning, and the connection of present and future life. Educ. Tech. Res. 36, 23-31. doi: 10.15077/etr.KJ00008877023 · DOI
  39. Kawai, T., and Moran, S. (2017). How do future life perspective and present action work in Japanese youth development? J. Moral. Educ. 46, 323-336. doi: 10.1080/03057240.2017.1350150 · DOI
  40. Kegan, R. (1982). The Evolving Self. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  41. Kegan, R. (1994). In Over Our Heads: The Mental Demands of Modern Life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  42. Kegan, R., and Lahey, L. (2009). Immunity to Change: How to Overcome it and Unlock Potential in Yourself and Your Organization. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.
  43. King, P. M., and Kitchener, K. S. (2004). Reflective judgment: theory and research on the development of epistemic assumptions through adulthood. Educ. Psychol. 39, 5-18. doi: 10.1207/s15326985ep3901_2 · DOI
  44. Korthagen, F., and Vasalos, A. (2005). Levels in reflection: Core reflection as a means to enhance professional growth. Teach. Teach. Theory Pract. 11, 47-71. doi: 10.1080/1354060042000337093 · DOI
  45. Korthagen, F. A. (2004). In search of the essence of a good teacher: towards a more holistic approach in teacher education. Teach. Teach. Educ. 20, 77-97. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2003.10.002 · DOI · Paper page
  46. Korthagen, F. A. (2014). "Promoting core reflection in teacher education: deepening professional growth, " in International Teacher Education: Promising Pedagogies, eds. L. Orland-Barak, and C. J. Craig (Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited), 73-89.
  47. Korthagen, F. A. (2017). "A foundation for effective teacher education: teacher education pedagogy based on situated learning, " in The SAGE Handbook of Research on Teacher Education, eds. D. J. Clandinin, and J. Husu (Los Angeles, CA: Sage), 528-544.
  48. Loughran, J., and Hamilton, M. L. (eds.). (2016). "Developing an understanding of teacher education, " in International Handbook of Teacher Education, eds J. Loughran, and M. L. Hamilton (New York, NY: Springer).
  49. Love, P. G., and Guthrie, V. L. (1999). Understanding and applying cognitive development theory: new directions for student services. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.
  50. McCormick, A. C., Kinzie, J., and Gonyea, R. M. (2013). "Student engagement: Bridging research and practice to improve the quality of undergraduate education, " in Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, ed M. B. Paulsen (Dordrecht: Springer), 47-92.
  51. Meijer, P. C., Korthagen, F. A., and Vasalos, A. (2009). Supporting presence in teacher education: The connection between the personal and professional aspects of teaching. Teach. Teach. Educ. 25, 297-308. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2008.09.013 · DOI
  52. Oyserman, D. (2008). Identity-based motivation and consumer behavior. J. Consum. Psychol. 19, 276-279. doi: 10.1016/j.jcps.2009.06.001 · DOI
  53. Patton, L. D., Renn, K. A., Guido, F. M., and Quaye, S. J. (2016). Student Development in College: Theory, Research, and Practice, 3rd Edn. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.
  54. Pizzolato, J. E. (2007). Assessing self-authorship. New Dir. Teach. Learn. 109, 31-42. doi: 10.1002/tl.263 · DOI
  55. Rodgers, C. R., and Scott, K. H. (2008)." The development of the personal self and professional identity in learning to teach, " in Handbook of Research on Teacher Education: Enduring Questions in Changing Contexts, eds. M. Cochran- Smith, S. Feiman-Nemser, D. J. McIntyre, and K. E. Demers (New York, NY: Routledge), 732-755.
  56. Schwartz, S. J., Luyckx, K., and Vignoles, V. L. (eds.). (2011). Handbook of Identity Theory and Research. New York, NY: Springer Science & Business Media.
  57. Vignoles, V. L. (2018). "Identity: personal and social, " in Oxford Handbook of Personality and Social Psychology, 2nd Edn, eds. K. Deaux and M. Snyder. (Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press), 289-315.
  58. Vignoles, V. L., Schwartz, S. J., and Luyckx, K. (2011). "Introduction: toward an integrative view of identity, " in Handbook of Identity Theory and Research, eds. S. J. Schwartz, K. Luyckx, and V. L. Vignoles (New York, NY: Springer), 1-27.
  59. Whitley, M. A. (2014). A draft conceptual framework of relevant theories to inform future rigorous research on student service-learning outcomes. Michigan J. Commun. Serv. Learn. 20, 19-40. Available online at: http://hdl.handle.net/ 2027/spo.3239521.0020.202
  60. Zhang, Y., Hawk, S. T., Zhang, X., and Zhao, H. (2016). Chinese preservice teachers' professional identity links with education program performance: the roles of task value belief and learning motivations. Front. Psychol. 7:573. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00573 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kawai, T.
Affiliations
Ritsumeikan University (JP)
Corresponding author
Kawai, Toru
Venue
Frontiers in Education
Published
2021-01-07
Volume
5
ISSN
2504-284X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3118812335
Cited by
33
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2
FWCI
6.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Education (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (18K13198)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Service-Learning and Community Engagement
  • Social Sciences › Education › Reflective Practices in Education
  • Social Sciences › Education › Adult and Continuing Education Topics
Keywords
service-learning, reflection, identity construction, dialogical reflection, critical reflection, college student development, self-authorship, citizen participation, high-impact learning, time perspective, generativity, social norms and values

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review