Cited by 1,160Teacher Education and Leadership StudiesSocial Representations and IdentityAdult and Continuing Education Topics

A dialogical approach to conceptualizing teacher identity

Akkerman, Sanne F., Meijer, Paulien C.·2011·Teaching and Teacher Education

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tate.2010.08.013

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Zhang et al. (2018) used Akkerman and Meijer's (2011) concept of identity as dynamic, multiple and social as the key theoretical underpinning for their work.

    “For example, Zhang et al. (2018) highlighted Akkerman and Meijer's (2011) concept of identity as dynamic, multiple and social as providing the key theoretical underpinning for their work.”
  • Identity is characterised by such conceptions as multiple, discontinuous and social.

    “Accordingly, identity is characterised by such conceptions as multiple, discontinuous and social.”

    From Tensions and striving for coherence in an academic’s professional identity work (2018) · cites this paper as Akkerman and Meijer 2011

  • Identities are changing, dynamic, continuously negotiated and reshaped in interactions with others.

    “Identities are changing, dynamic, continuously negotiated and reshaped in interactions with others (others in the broad sense; e.g. other people, groups, institutions and cultural categories) (Akkerman and Meijer 2011; Lee and Schallert 2016).”

    From Tensions and striving for coherence in an academic’s professional identity work (2018) · cites this paper as Akkerman and Meijer 2011

  • Dialogical self is composed of multiple I-positions changing in response to social settings one encounters.

    “Dialogical self is composed of multiple I-positions changing in response to social settings one encounters (Akkerman and Meijer 2011).”

    From Tensions and striving for coherence in an academic’s professional identity work (2018) · cites this paper as Akkerman and Meijer 2011

  • We need to consider also the modern stance on identity which sees identity as unitary, continuous and individual.

    “They suggest that we need to consider also the modern stance on identity which sees identity as unitary, continuous and individual.”

    From Tensions and striving for coherence in an academic’s professional identity work (2018) · cites this paper as Akkerman and Meijer 2011

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Akkerman, S. F., & Meijer, P. C.
Affiliations
Utrecht University (NL)
Corresponding author
Akkerman, Sanne F.
Venue
Teaching and Teacher Education
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-02
Volume
27
Issue
2
Pages
308-319
ISSN
0742-051X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2067389101
Cited by
1,160
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 132 · 2025: 106 · 2024: 91 · 2023: 138 · 2022: 97 · 2021: 99 · 2020: 90 · 2019: 81 · 2018: 83 · 2017: 52 · 2016: 64 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 42 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 20
FWCI
81.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Teaching and Teacher Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Representations and Identity
  • Social Sciences › Education › Adult and Continuing Education Topics
Keywords
teacher identity, dialogical self, multiple identities, social construction of identity, dialogical approach

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review