Cited by 157Education during COVID-19 pandemicOnline and Blended LearningE-Learning and COVID-19

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Insights Into Students’ Experiences and Perceptions of Remote Learning Methods: From the COVID-19 Pandemic to Best Practice for the Future

Open access

Abstract

This spring, students across the globe transitioned from in-person classes to remote learning as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. This unprecedented change to undergraduate education saw institutions adopting multiple online teaching modalities and instructional platforms. We sought to understand students’ experiences with and perspectives on those methods of remote instruction in order to inform pedagogical decisions during the current pandemic and in future development of online courses and virtual learning experiences. Our survey gathered quantitative and qualitative data regarding students’ experiences with synchronous and asynchronous methods of remote learning and specific pedagogical techniques associated with each. A total of 4,789 undergraduate participants representing institutions across 95 countries were recruited via Instagram. We find that most students prefer synchronous online classes, and students whose primary mode of remote instruction has been synchronous report being more engaged and motivated. Our qualitative data show that students miss the social aspects of learning on campus, and it is possible that synchronous learning helps to mitigate some feelings of isolation. Students whose synchronous classes include active-learning techniques (which are inherently more social) report significantly higher levels of engagement, motivation, enjoyment, and satisfaction with instruction. Respondents’ recommendations for changes emphasize increased engagement, interaction, and student participation. We conclude that active-learning methods, which are known to increase motivation, engagement, and learning in traditional classrooms, also have a positive impact in the remote-learning environment. Integrating these elements into online courses will improve the student experience.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/feduc.2021.647986

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 25

  1. Aspergren, 2020, Snow Days Canceled Because of COVID-19 Online School? Not in These School Districts.sec. Education.
  2. Bostock, 1998, Constructivism in mass higher education: a case study., Br. J. Educ. Technol., 29, 225, 10.1111/1467-8535.00066 · DOI
  3. Bradbury, 2016, Attention span during lectures: 8 seconds, 10 minutes, or more?, Adv. Physiol. Educ., 40, 509, 10.1152/advan.00109.2016 · DOI
  4. Chen, 2018, Exploring best practices for online STEM courses: active learning, interaction & assessment design., Online Learn., 22, 59, 10.24059/olj.v22i2.1369 · DOI
  5. Davis, 2018, Activating learning at scale: a review of innovations in online learning strategies., Comput. Educ., 125, 327, 10.1016/j.compedu.2018.05.019 · DOI
  6. Deslauriers, 2019, Measuring actual learning versus feeling of learning in response to being actively engaged in the classroom., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 116, 19251, 10.1073/pnas.1821936116 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Fink, 2013, Creating Significant Learning Experiences: An Integrated Approach to Designing College Courses.
  8. Freeman, 2014, Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 111, 8410, 10.1073/pnas.1319030111 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Gay, 2000, Culturally Responsive Teaching: Theory, Research, and Practice. Multicultural Education Series.
  10. Gillingham, 2012, Online courses: student preferences survey., Internet Learn., 1, 36, 10.18278/il.1.1.4 · DOI
  11. Gillis, 2020, COVID-19 remote learning transition in spring 2020: class structures, student perceptions, and inequality in college courses., Teach. Sociol., 48, 283, 10.1177/0092055X20954263 · DOI
  12. Goodyear, 2002, Psychological foundations for networked learning, Networked Learning: Perspectives and Issues. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 49, 10.1007/978-1-4471-0181-9_4 · DOI
  13. Goodyear, 2005, Educational design and networked learning: patterns, pattern languages and design practice., Australas. J. Educ. Technol., 21, 82, 10.14742/ajet.1344 · DOI
  14. Gunawardena, 1995, Social presence theory and implications for interaction and collaborative learning in computer conferences., Int. J. Educ. Telecommun., 1, 147
  15. Gunawardena, 1997, Social presence as a predictor of satisfaction within a computer mediated conferencing environment., Am. J. Distance Educ., 11, 8, 10.1080/08923649709526970 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Harris, 2012, Student motivations for choosing online classes., Int. J. Scholarsh. Teach. Learn., 6, 1, 10.20429/ijsotl.2012.060211 · DOI
  17. Levitz, 2016, 2015-16 National Online Learners Satisfaction and Priorities Report., 12
  18. Mansinghka, 2016, CrossCat: a fully Bayesian nonparametric method for analyzing heterogeneous, high dimensional data., J. Mach. Learn. Res., 17, 1, 10.1007/978-0-387-69765-9_7 · DOI
  19. 2000, How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School: Expanded Edition., 10.17226/9853 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Richardson, 2019, Examining social presence in online courses in relation to students’ perceived learning and satisfaction., Online Learn., 7, 68, 10.24059/olj.v7i1.1864 · DOI
  21. Shea, 2019, A Follow-up investigation of ‘teaching presence’ in the suny learning network., Online Learn., 7, 73, 10.24059/olj.v7i2.1856 · DOI
  22. Shekhar, 2020, Negative student response to active learning in STEM classrooms: a systematic review of underlying reasons., J. Coll. Sci. Teach., 49, 45, 10.1080/0047231X.2020.12290664 · DOI
  23. Short, 1976, The Social Psychology of Telecommunications.
  24. Tu, 2002, The measurement of social presence in an online learning environment., Int. J. E Learn., 1, 34, 10.17471/2499-4324/421 · DOI
  25. Zull, 2002, The Art of Changing the Brain: Enriching Teaching by Exploring the Biology of Learning

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Nguyen, T., Netto, C. L. M., Wilkins, J. F., Bröker, P., Vargas, E. E., Sealfon, C. D., Puthipiroj, P., Li, K. S., Bowler, J. E., Hinson, H. R., Pujar, M., & Stein, G. M.
Affiliations
  • Keck Graduate Institute (US)
  • Ronin Institute (US)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
Corresponding author
Stein, Geneva M.
Venue
Frontiers in Education
Published
2021-04-09
Volume
6
ISSN
2504-284X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3156588284
Cited by
157
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 11
FWCI
54.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Education (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education during COVID-19 pandemic
  • Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
  • Social Sciences › Education › E-Learning and COVID-19
Keywords
distance education, COVID-19 pandemic, synchronous learning, asynchronous learning, student engagement, student motivation, active learning, online courses, student experience, social isolation, undergraduate education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review