CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 103

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Techno-Economical Evaluation of Bio-Oil Production via Biomass Fast Pyrolysis Process: A Review

Inayat, Abrar, Ahmed, Ashfaq, Tariq, Rumaisa, Waris, Ammara, Jamil, Farrukh, Ahmed, Shams Forruque, Ghenai, Chaouki, Park, Young-Kwon·2022·Frontiers in Energy Research
DOI 10.3389/fenrg.2021.770355
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Biomass pyrolysis is one of the beneficial sources of the production of sustainable bio-oil. Currently, marketable bio-oil plants are scarce because of the complex operations and lower profits. Therefore, it is necessary to comprehend the relationship between technological parameters and economic practicality. This review outlines the technical and economical routine to produce bio-oils from various biomass by fast pyrolysis. Explicit pointers were compared, such as production cost, capacity, and biomass type for bio-oil production. The bio-oil production cost is crucial for evaluating the market compatibility with other biofuels available. Different pretreatments, upgrades and recycling processes influenced production costs. Using an energy integration strategy, it is possible to produce bio-oil from biomass pyrolysis. The findings of this study might lead to bio-oil industry-related research aimed at commercializing the product.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fenrg.2021.770355

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 78

  1. Abu Bakar, 2020, Pyrolysis of Solid Waste Residues from Lemon Myrtle Essential Oils Extraction for Bio-Oil Production, Bioresour. Tech., 318, 123913, 10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123913 · DOI
  2. Adams, 2018, Biomass Conversion Technologies, 107, 10.1016/B978-0-08-101036-5.00008-2 · DOI
  3. Al Arni, 2018, Comparison of Slow and Fast Pyrolysis for Converting Biomass into Fuel, Renew. Energ., 124, 197, 10.1016/j.renene.2017.04.060 · DOI
  4. Alvarez, 2016, Characterization of the Bio-Oil Obtained by Fast Pyrolysis of Sewage Sludge in a Conical Spouted Bed Reactor, Fuel Process. Tech., 149, 169, 10.1016/j.fuproc.2016.04.015 · DOI
  5. Ateş, 2019, Comparison of Non-catalytic and Catalytic Fast Pyrolysis of Pomegranate and Grape Marcs under Vacuum and Inert Atmospheres, Fuel, 255, 115788, 10.1016/j.fuel.2019.115788 · DOI
  6. Boran, 2018, A New Approach for Evaluation of Renewable Energy Resources: A Case of Turkey, Energ. Sourc. B: Econ. Plann. Pol., 13, 196, 10.1080/15567249.2017.1423414 · DOI
  7. Borges, 2014, Fast Microwave Assisted Pyrolysis of Biomass Using Microwave Absorbent, Bioresour. Tech., 156, 267, 10.1016/j.biortech.2014.01.038 · DOI
  8. Brammer, 2006, Opportunities for Biomass-Derived "Bio-Oil" in European Heat and Power Markets, Energy Policy, 34, 2871, 10.1016/j.enpol.2005.05.005 · DOI
  9. Bridgwater, 2017, Biomass Conversion Technologies: Fast Pyrolysis Liquids from Biomass: Quality and Upgrading, 55, 10.1007/978-3-319-48288-0_3 · DOI
  10. Brigagão, 2019, A Techno-Economic Analysis of Thermochemical Pathways for Corncob-To-Energy: Fast Pyrolysis to Bio-Oil, Gasification to Methanol and Combustion to Electricity, Fuel Process. Tech., 193, 102, 10.1016/j.fuproc.2019.05.011 · DOI
  11. Carrasco, 2017, Pyrolysis of forest Residues: An Approach to Techno-Economics for Bio-Fuel Production, Fuel, 193, 477, 10.1016/j.fuel.2016.12.063 · DOI
  12. Chandran, 2020, Characteristics of Bio-Oil from Continuous Fast Pyrolysis of Prosopis Juliflora, Energy, 190, 116387, 10.1016/j.energy.2019.116387 · DOI
  13. Chen, 2017, Fast Pyrolysis of Cotton Stalk Biomass Using Calcium Oxide, Bioresour. Tech., 233, 15, 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.02.070 · DOI
  14. Chen, 2019, Catalytic Fast Pyrolysis of Biomass: Selective Deoxygenation to Balance the Quality and Yield of Bio-Oil, Bioresour. Tech., 273, 153, 10.1016/j.biortech.2018.11.008 · DOI
  15. Czernik, 2004, Overview of Applications of Biomass Fast Pyrolysis Oil, Energy Fuels, 18, 590, 10.1021/ef034067u · DOI
  16. Diehlmann, 2019, Techno-Economic Assessment of Utilization Pathways for rice Straw: A Simulation-Optimization Approach, J. Clean. Prod., 230, 1329, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.369 · DOI
  17. Do, 2016, Techno-Economic Comparison of Three Energy Conversion Pathways from Empty Fruit Bunches, Renew. Energ., 90, 307, 10.1016/j.renene.2016.01.030 · DOI
  18. Farooq, 2021, Evolved Gas Analysis and Kinetics of Catalytic and Non-Catalytic Pyrolysis of Microalgae Chlorella Sp. Biomass with Ni/θ-Al2O3 Catalyst via Thermogravimetric Analysis, Front. Energ. Res., 9, 775037, 10.3389/fenrg.2021.775037 · DOI
  19. Garcia-Nunez, 2017, Historical Developments of Pyrolysis Reactors: A Review, Energy Fuels, 31, 5751, 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.7b00641 · DOI
  20. Ghenai, 2019, Combustion and Emissions Analysis of Spent Pot Lining (SPL) as Alternative Fuel in Cement Industry, Sci. Total Environ., 684, 519, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.157 · DOI
  21. Gómez, 2018, Effect of Temperature on Product Performance of a High Ash Biomass during Fast Pyrolysis and its Bio-Oil Storage Evaluation, Fuel Process. Tech., 172, 97, 10.1016/j.fuproc.2017.11.021 · DOI
  22. Han, 2013, Life Cycle Analysis of Fuel Production from Fast Pyrolysis of Biomass, Bioresour. Tech., 133, 421, 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.01.141 · DOI
  23. Hou, 2016, Co-Firing of Fast Pyrolysis Bio-Oil and Heavy Fuel Oil in a 300-kWth Furnace, Appl. Sci., 6, 326, 10.3390/app6110326 · DOI
  24. Hu, 2016, Comparative Techno-Economic Analysis of Advanced Biofuels, Biochemicals, and Hydrocarbon Chemicals via the Fast Pyrolysis Platform, Biofuels, 7, 57, 10.1080/17597269.2015.1118780 · DOI
  25. Inayat, 2017, Economic Analysis and Optimization for Bio-Hydrogen Production from Oil palm Waste via Steam Gasification, Energ. Sourc. Part B: Econ. Plann. Pol., 12, 158, 10.1080/15567249.2014.937881 · DOI
  26. Inayat, 2020, Parametric Analysis and Optimization for the Catalytic Air Gasification of palm Kernel Shell Using Coal Bottom Ash as Catalyst, Renew. Energ., 145, 671, 10.1016/j.renene.2019.06.104 · DOI
  27. Iribarren, 2012, Life Cycle Assessment of Transportation Fuels from Biomass Pyrolysis, Fuel, 97, 812, 10.1016/j.fuel.2012.02.053 · DOI
  28. Jaroenkhasemmeesuk, 2015, Technical and Economic Analysis of A Biomass Pyrolysis Plant, Energ. Proced., 79, 950, 10.1016/j.egypro.2015.11.592 · DOI
  29. Jeong, 2020, Characteristics of the Pyrolytic Products from the Fast Pyrolysis of palm Kernel Cake in a Bench-Scale Fluidized Bed Reactor, J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis, 145, 104708, 10.1016/j.jaap.2019.104708 · DOI
  30. Ji, 2017, Economic Analysis of Converting of Waste Agricultural Biomass into Liquid Fuel: A Case Study on a Biofuel Plant in China, Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev., 70, 224, 10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.189 · DOI
  31. Kim, 2008, A Technical and Economic Evaluation of the Pyrolysis of Sewage Sludge for the Production of Bio-Oil, Bioresour. Tech., 99, 1409, 10.1016/j.biortech.2007.01.056 · DOI
  32. Kumar, 2021, Thermochemical Production of Bio-Oil: A Review of Downstream Processing Technologies for Bio-Oil Upgrading, Production of Hydrogen and High Value-Added Products, Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev., 135, 110152, 10.1016/j.rser.2020.110152 · DOI
  33. Lehto, 2014, Review of Fuel Oil Quality and Combustion of Fast Pyrolysis Bio-Oils from Lignocellulosic Biomass, Appl. Energ., 116, 178, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.11.040 · DOI
  34. Li, 2004, Fast Pyrolysis of Biomass in Free-Fall Reactor for Hydrogen-Rich Gas, Fuel Process. Tech., 85, 1201, 10.1016/j.fuproc.2003.11.043 · DOI
  35. Li, 2015, Techno-Economic and Uncertainty Analysis of In Situ and Ex Situ Fast Pyrolysis for Biofuel Production, Bioresour. Tech., 196, 49, 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.07.073 · DOI
  36. Li, 2017, The Impacts of Biomass Properties on Pyrolysis Yields, Economic and Environmental Performance of the Pyrolysis-Bioenergy-Biochar Platform to Carbon Negative Energy, Bioresour. Tech., 241, 959, 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.06.049 · DOI
  37. Ly, 2016, Fast Pyrolysis of Saccharina Japonica Alga in a Fixed-Bed Reactor for Bio-Oil Production, Energ. Convers. Manag., 122, 526, 10.1016/j.enconman.2016.06.019 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Marathe, 2020, Effect of Pressure and Hot Vapor Residence Time on the Fast Pyrolysis of Biomass: Experiments and Modeling, Energy Fuels, 34, 1773, 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.9b03193 · DOI
  39. Meyer, 2020, The Effect of Feedstock Composition on Fast Pyrolysis and Upgrading to Transportation Fuels: Techno-Economic Analysis and Greenhouse Gas Life Cycle Analysis, Fuel, 259, 116218, 10.1016/j.fuel.2019.116218 · DOI
  40. Miandad, 2019, Catalytic Pyrolysis of Plastic Waste: Moving toward Pyrolysis Based Biorefineries, Front. Energ. Res., 7, 10.3389/fenrg.2019.00027 · DOI
  41. Michailos, 2017, A Techno-Economic Comparison of Fischer-Tropsch and Fast Pyrolysis as Ways of Utilizing Sugar Cane Bagasse in Transportation Fuels Production, Chem. Eng. Res. Des., 118, 206, 10.1016/j.cherd.2017.01.001 · DOI
  42. Mohammed, 2019, Integrated Biomass Thermochemical Conversion for Clean Energy Production: Process Design and Economic Analysis, J. Environ. Chem. Eng., 7, 103093, 10.1016/j.jece.2019.103093 · DOI
  43. Mortensen, 2011, A Review of Catalytic Upgrading of Bio-Oil to Engine Fuels, Appl. Catal. A: Gen., 407, 1, 10.1016/j.apcata.2011.08.046 · DOI
  44. Nachenius, 2013, Biomass Pyrolysis, 75
  45. Naik, 2010, Production of First and Second Generation Biofuels: A Comprehensive Review, Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev., 14, 578, 10.1016/j.rser.2009.10.003 · DOI · Paper page
  46. Nzihou, 2019, The Catalytic Effect of Inherent and Adsorbed Metals on the Fast/Flash Pyrolysis of Biomass: A Review, Energy, 170, 326, 10.1016/j.energy.2018.12.174 · DOI
  47. Opatokun, 2017, Life Cycle Analysis of Energy Production from Food Waste through Anaerobic Digestion, Pyrolysis and Integrated Energy System, Sustainability, 9, 1804, 10.3390/su9101804 · DOI
  48. Oudenhoven, 2016, Using Pyrolytic Acid Leaching as a Pretreatment Step in a Biomass Fast Pyrolysis Plant: Process Design and Economic Evaluation, Biomass and Bioenergy, 95, 388, 10.1016/j.biombioe.2016.07.003 · DOI
  49. Park, 2019, Production of Bio-Oil from Fast Pyrolysis of Biomass Using a Pilot-Scale Circulating Fluidized Bed Reactor and its Characterization, J. Environ. Manage., 234, 138, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.12.104 · DOI
  50. Patel, 2019, A Techno-Economic Assessment of Renewable Diesel and Gasoline Production from Aspen Hardwood, Waste Biomass Valor., 10, 2745, 10.1007/s12649-018-0359-x · DOI
  51. Peacocke, 1994, Effect of Reactor Configuration on the Yields and Structures of Pine-Wood Derived Pyrolysis Liquids: A Comparison between Ablative and Wire-Mesh Pyrolysis, Biomass and Bioenergy, 7, 155, 10.1016/0961-9534(94)00055-X · DOI
  52. Pighinelli, 2018, Utilization of eucalyptus for Electricity Production in Brazil via Fast Pyrolysis: A Techno-Economic Analysis, Renew. Energ., 119, 590, 10.1016/j.renene.2017.12.036 · DOI
  53. Ramirez, 2019, Comparative Techno-Economic Analysis of Biofuel Production through Gasification, Thermal Liquefaction and Pyrolysis of Sugarcane Bagasse, J. Clean. Prod., 229, 513, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.017 · DOI
  54. Ravikumar, 2017, Microwave Assisted Fast Pyrolysis of Corn Cob, Corn stover, Saw Dust and Rice Straw: Experimental Investigation on Bio-Oil Yield and High Heating Values, Sust. Mater. Tech., 11, 19, 10.1016/j.susmat.2016.12.003 · DOI
  55. Rogers, 2012, Estimation of the Production Cost of Fast Pyrolysis Bio-Oil, Biomass and Bioenergy, 36, 208, 10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.10.028 · DOI
  56. Shahbaz, 2016, Parametric Study and Optimization of Methane Production in Biomass Gasification in the Presence of Coal Bottom Ash, Proced. Eng., 148, 409, 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.06.432 · DOI
  57. Shahbeig, 2020, Pyrolysis of Municipal Sewage Sludge for Bioenergy Production: Thermo-Kinetic Studies, Evolved Gas Analysis, and Techno-Socio-Economic Assessment, Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev., 119, 109567, 10.1016/j.rser.2019.109567 · DOI
  58. Sharma, 2019, Lowering Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions: Techno‐economic Analysis of Biomass Conversion to Biofuels and Value‐Added Chemicals, Greenhouse Gas Sci. Technol., 9, 454, 10.1002/ghg.1867 · DOI
  59. Shemfe, 2015, Techno-Economic Performance Analysis of Biofuel Production and Miniature Electric Power Generation from Biomass Fast Pyrolysis and Bio-Oil Upgrading, Fuel, 143, 361, 10.1016/j.fuel.2014.11.078 · DOI
  60. Shemfe, 2017, Techno-Economic Analysis of Biofuel Production via Bio-Oil Zeolite Upgrading: An Evaluation of Two Catalyst Regeneration Systems, Biomass and Bioenergy, 98, 182, 10.1016/j.biombioe.2017.01.020 · DOI
  61. Sorunmu, 2017, Fuels and Chemicals from Equine-Waste-Derived Tail Gas Reactive Pyrolysis Oil: Technoeconomic Analysis, Environmental and Exergetic Life Cycle Assessment, ACS Sust. Chem. Eng., 5, 8804, 10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b01609 · DOI
  62. Sorunmu, 2020, A Review of Thermochemical Upgrading of Pyrolysis Bio‐oil: Techno‐Economic Analysis, Life Cycle Assessment, and Technology Readiness, GCB Bioenergy, 12, 4, 10.1111/gcbb.12658 · DOI
  63. Tabakaev, 2019, Thermal Enrichment of Different Types of Biomass by Low-Temperature Pyrolysis, Fuel, 245, 29, 10.1016/j.fuel.2019.02.049 · DOI
  64. Thilakaratne, 2014, A Techno-Economic Analysis of Microalgae Remnant Catalytic Pyrolysis and Upgrading to Fuels, Fuel, 128, 104, 10.1016/j.fuel.2014.02.077 · DOI
  65. Trinh, 2020, Upgrading of Bio-Oil from Biomass Pyrolysis: Current Status and Future Development, 317, 10.1007/978-981-15-1804-1_14 · DOI
  66. Uslu, 2008, Pre-treatment Technologies, and Their Effect on International Bioenergy Supply Chain Logistics. Techno-Economic Evaluation of Torrefaction, Fast Pyrolysis and Pelletisation, Energy, 33, 1206, 10.1016/j.energy.2008.03.007 · DOI
  67. Van Schalkwyk, 2020, Techno-Economic and Environmental Analysis of Bio-Oil Production from forest Residues via Non-Catalytic and Catalytic Pyrolysis Processes, Energ. Convers. Manag., 213, 112815, 10.1016/j.enconman.2020.112815 · DOI
  68. Vasalos, 2016, Biomass Catalytic Pyrolysis: Process Design and Economic Analysis, Wires Energ. Environ, 5, 370, 10.1002/wene.192 · DOI
  69. Wagenaar, 1994, Pyrolysis of Biomass in the Rotating Cone Reactor: Modelling and Experimental Justification, Chem. Eng. Sci., 49, 5109, 10.1016/0009-2509(94)00392-0 · DOI
  70. Wang, 2018, From Laboratory to Pilot: Design Concept and Techno-Economic Analyses of the Fluidized Bed Fast Pyrolysis of Biomass, Energy, 155, 139, 10.1016/j.energy.2018.05.012 · DOI
  71. Wang, 2013, Bio-Oil Catalytic Reforming without Steam Addition: Application to Hydrogen Production and Studies on its Mechanism, Int. J. Hydrogen Energ., 38, 16038, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.10.032 · DOI
  72. Wang, 2019, Techno‐Economic Analysis of Levoglucosan Production via Fast Pyrolysis of Cotton Straw in China, Biofuels, Bioprod. Bioref., 13, 1085, 10.1002/bbb.2004 · DOI
  73. Winjobi, 2017, Production of Hydrocarbon Fuel Using Two-Step Torrefaction and Fast Pyrolysis of Pine. Part 1: Techno-Economic Analysis, ACS Sust. Chem. Eng., 5, 4529, 10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b00372 · DOI
  74. Xin, 2018, Waste-to-Biofuel Integrated System and its Comprehensive Techno-Economic Assessment in Wastewater Treatment Plants, Bioresour. Tech., 250, 523, 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.11.040 · DOI
  75. Yang, 2018, The Influence of CO2 on Biomass Fast Pyrolysis at Medium Temperatures, J. Renew. Sust. Energ., 10, 013108, 10.1063/1.5005013 · DOI
  76. Zhang, 2007, Review of Biomass Pyrolysis Oil Properties and Upgrading Research, Energ. Convers. Manag., 48, 87, 10.1016/j.enconman.2006.05.010 · DOI
  77. Zhang, 2011, Biomass Fast Pyrolysis in a Fluidized Bed Reactor under N2, CO2, CO, CH4 and H2 Atmospheres, Bioresour. Tech., 102, 4258, 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.12.075 · DOI
  78. Zhang, 2013, Techno-Economic Analysis of Monosaccharide Production via Fast Pyrolysis of Lignocellulose, Bioresour. Tech., 127, 358, 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.09.070 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Inayat, A., Ahmed, A., Tariq, R., Waris, A., Jamil, F., Ahmed, S. F., Ghenai, C., & Park, Y.-K.
Venue
Frontiers in Energy Research
Publisher
Frontiers Media SA
Published
2022-01-13
Volume
9
ISSN
2296-598X
DOI
10.3389/fenrg.2021.770355
Cited by
103
References
5
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (vor)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review