The DOI matches its Crossref record; 89 of the 89 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
DeepTox: Toxicity Prediction using Deep Learning
Open accessAbstract
The Tox21 Data Challenge has been the largest effort of the scientific community to compare computational methods for toxicity prediction. This challenge comprised 12,000 environmental chemicals and drugs which were measured for 12 different toxic effects by specifically designed assays. We participated in this challenge to assess the performance of Deep Learning in computational toxicity prediction. Deep Learning has already revolutionized image processing, speech recognition, and language understanding but has not yet been applied to computational toxicity. Deep Learning is founded on novel algorithms and architectures for artificial neural networks together with the recent availability of very fast computers and massive datasets. It discovers multiple levels of distributed representations of the input, with higher levels representing more abstract concepts. We hypothesized that the construction of a hierarchy of chemical features gives Deep Learning the edge over other toxicity prediction methods. Furthermore, Deep Learning naturally enables multi-task learning, that is, learning of all toxic effects in one neural network and thereby learning of highly informative chemical features. In order to utilize Deep Learning for toxicity prediction, we have developed the DeepTox pipeline. First, DeepTox normalizes the chemical representations of the compounds. Then it computes a large number of chemical descriptors that are used as input to machine learning methods. In its next step, DeepTox trains models, evaluates them, and combines the best of them to ensembles. Finally, DeepTox predicts the toxicity of new compounds. In the Tox21 Data Challenge, DeepTox had the highest performance of all computational methods winning the grand challenge, the nuclear receptor panel, the stress response panel, and six single assays (teams “Bioinf@JKU”). We found that Deep Learning excelled in toxicity prediction and outperformed many other computational approaches like naive Bayes, support vector machines, and random forests.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Machine learning has also been implemented to assess the toxicity of molecules, for instance, using DeepTox, a DL-based model for evaluating the toxic effects of compounds based on a dataset containing many drug molecules [19].”
From The rise of artificial intelligence in healthcare applications (2020) · cites this paper as [19]
In the citing paper
“When working on new test sets, CNN usually predicts with high accuracy [88].”
From Machine Learning Based Toxicity Prediction: From Chemical Structural Description to Transcriptome Analysis (2018) · cites this paper as [88]
In the citing paper
“Using CNN to automatically construct abstract chemical fragments, the deep learning model showed very high performance in toxicity prediction based on high-throughput data, with an average area under the curve (AUC) of 0.846 [88].”
From Machine Learning Based Toxicity Prediction: From Chemical Structural Description to Transcriptome Analysis (2018) · cites this paper as [88]
In the citing paper
“After extensive data training, CNN can identify those substructure or molecular fragments that might make a molecule toxic.”
From Machine Learning Based Toxicity Prediction: From Chemical Structural Description to Transcriptome Analysis (2018) · cites this paper as [88]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Breiman, L. (2001) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1010933404324 · Cited by 133,538
ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2017) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3065386 · Cited by 112,155
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14539 · Cited by 84,126
(2014) · Cited by 33,419
Learning representations by back-propagating errors
Rumelhart, D. E., Hinton, G. E., & Williams, R. J. (1986) · Nature · doi:10.1038/323533a0 · Cited by 31,892
Regularization Paths for Generalized Linear Models via Coordinate Descent
Friedman, J., Hastie, T., & Tibshirani, R. (2010) · Journal of Statistical Software · doi:10.18637/jss.v033.i01 · Cited by 19,927
Deep learning in neural networks: an overview
Schmidhuber, J. (2015) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2014.09.003 · Cited by 18,570
Sequence to Sequence Learning with Neural Networks
Sutskever, I., Vinyals, O., & Le, Q. V. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1409.3215 · Cited by 17,766
(2010) · International Conference on Machine Learning · Cited by 13,995
Speech recognition with deep recurrent neural networks
Graves, A., Mohamed, A.-R., & Hinton, G. (2013) · 2013 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/icassp.2013.6638947 · Cited by 8,893
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Svetnik, 2003, Random forest: a classification and regression tool for compound classification and QSAR modeling, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 43, 1947, 10.1021/ci034160g · DOI
- Unterthiner, 2014, Deep learning as an opportunity in virtual screening
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 901–1,000 of 1,000
Метод машинного навчання для створення нових лікарських речовин із заданими властивостями
Гурбич, О. (2022) · Науковий вісник Ужгородського університету Серія Математика і інформатика · doi:10.24144/2616-7700.2022.40(1).126-145 · Cited by 1
Hadiby, S., & Ali, Y. M. B. (2022) · International Journal of Computational Intelligence and Applications · doi:10.1142/s1469026822500195 · Cited by 1
Graph Kernel Learning for Predictive Toxicity Models
Xu, Y., Chou, C.-H., Han, N., Pei, J., & Lai, L. (2023) · Computational methods in engineering & the sciences · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-20730-3_6 · Cited by 1
Machine Learning-Based QSAR Models and Structural Alerts for Prediction of Mitochondrial Dysfunction
Tang, W., Peijnenburg, W. J. G. M., & Chen, J. (2023) · Computational methods in engineering & the sciences · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-20730-3_17 · Cited by 1
Machado, H. G., & Mundim, K. C. (2023) · Revista Processos Químicos · doi:10.19142/rpq.v18i32.663 · Cited by 1
Reinforcement learning: A novel approach towards drug discovery
Ansari, N., Shaik, A., Patluri, H., Varasree, B., Purnachand, K., & Tara, S. (2023) · AIP conference proceedings · doi:10.1063/5.0125206 · Cited by 1
Artificial neural network–based inference of drug–target interactions
Melamane, S., Mandava, T. T., Manda, A., Luphade, L. N., Khamanga, S. M., Makoni, P. A., Demana, P. H., Matafwali, S. K., & Witika, B. A. (2023) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-323-91763-6.00015-1 · Cited by 2
Sharma, A., & Pandey, M. (2023) · IP International Journal of Forensic Medicine and Toxicological Sciences · doi:10.18231/j.ijfmts.2023.020 · Cited by 1
Artificial Intelligence in Pharmaceutical Industry
Bodade, S. M., Mam, N. B., Deshmukh, D. S., Khedkar, S., & Hire, M. (2023) · International Journal of Advanced Research in Science Communication and Technology · doi:10.48175/ijarsct-14346 · Cited by 1
Hadiby, S., & Ali, Y. M. B. (2024) · Journal of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology · doi:10.1142/s0219720024500033 · Cited by 1
Pan, X., Lian, X., Zhu, J., Lv, T., Hong, X., Ding, L., Ni, J., Jiang, C., & Ni, J. (2024) · IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics · doi:10.1109/jbhi.2024.3416348 · Cited by 1
Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Oncology in the UAE
Shaikh, K., & Bekal, S. V. (2024) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-99-6794-0_18 · Cited by 1
Transformative AI in Biomedicine Analysis
Tiwari, N. K. (2024) · Advances in information security, privacy, and ethics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-9311-6.ch006 · Cited by 1
Artificial intelligence in experimental studies and in drug design
Galagudza, M. M., Toropova, Y. G., & Конради, А. О. (2025) · Russian Journal for Personalized Medicine · doi:10.18705/2782-3806-2025-5-1-58-65 · Cited by 1
Catch Causal Signals from Edges for Label Imbalance in Graph Classification
Zhang, F., Yin, Y., Li, H., Chen, Y., & Qu, T. (2025) · IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/icassp49660.2025.10889221 · Cited by 1
A Binary Classification Model for Toxicity Prediction in Drug Design
Varela-Salinas, G., Cruz, H. E. C., Juárez-Saldívar, A., Martinez-Rodriguez, J. L., Rodriguez-Rodriguez, J., & García-Pérez, C. A. (2021) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-86271-8_13 · Cited by 1
Petinrin, O. O., Saeed, F., Li, X., Ghabban, F. M., & Wong, K. (2021) · Computers, materials & continua/Computers, materials & continua (Print) · doi:10.32604/cmc.2022.020523 · Cited by 1
TPE-Lasso-GBDT Method for BV-2 Cell Toxicity Classifier
Liu, Q., He, D., Wang, J., & Hou, Y. (2021) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-981-16-7213-2_73 · Cited by 1
Molecular Bioactivity Prediction of HDAC1: Based on Deep Neural Nets
Chen, M., Li, S., Ding, Y., Jin, H., & Xia, J. (2022) · Springer proceedings in business and economics · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-75166-1_15 · Cited by 1
Santana, M. V., & Silva, F. P. (2022) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-323-91172-6.00016-9 · Cited by 1
Student Performance Assessment Using AI
Soujanya, K. L. S., MadhaviLatha, C., Swathi, M., Rao, C. M., & Sakhamuri, S. (2022) · Algorithms for intelligent systems · doi:10.1007/978-981-19-1484-3_21 · Cited by 1
Concept drift detection in toxicology datasets using discriminative subgraph-based drift detector
Bharti, V., Nair, S. S., Jain, A., Shukla, K. K., & Biswas, B. (2022) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbac506 · Cited by 1
Sharma, M., & Deswal, S. (2022) · Journal of Electronic Imaging · doi:10.1117/1.jei.32.5.052304 · Cited by 1
RetractedComputational Modeling for the Prediction of Hepatotoxicity Caused by Drugs and Chemicals
Chen, M., Liu, J., Liao, T.-J., Ashby, K., Wu, Y., Wu, L., Tong, W., & Hong, H. (2023) · Computational methods in engineering & the sciences · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-20730-3_23 · Cited by 1
Enhancing Predictions in Ungauged Basins Using Machine Learning to Its Full Potential
Fadziso, T. (2019) · Asian Journal of Applied Science and Engineering · doi:10.18034/ajase.v8i1.10 · Cited by 1
Activity Detection of Estrogen Receptor α Ligand Binding Domain using Proposed Ensemble Learning
Gupta, V. K., Vishwakarma, S., Anand, D., Sangaiah, A. K., Tiwari, H., & Kumar, A. (2023) · International Conference on Innovative Sustainable Computational Technologies (CISCT) · doi:10.1109/cisct57197.2023.10351258 · Cited by 1
Relational dynamic memory networksPreprint
Pham, T., Tran, T., & Venkatesh, S. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1808.04247 · Cited by 1
Group-Connected Multilayer Perceptron NetworksPreprint
Kachuee, M., Darabi, S., Fazeli, S., & Sarrafzadeh, M. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1912.09600 · Cited by 1
Seed Stocking Via Multi-Task LearningPreprint
Feng, Y., & Zhou, W. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2101.04333 · Cited by 1
Predicting Environmental Chemical Toxicity using a New Hybrid Deep Machine Learning MethodPreprint
Limbu, S., Zakka, C., & Dakshanamurthy, S. (2021) · ChemRxiv · doi:10.26434/chemrxiv.13726258.v1 · Cited by 1
Zhong, W., Zhao, L., & Chen, C. Y. (2021) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-278141/v1 · Cited by 1
In SilicoPlatforms for Predictive Ecotoxicology
Lee, Y. O., & Sung, B. (2021) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119681397.ch23 · Cited by 1
Image Analysis and Deep Learning Web Services for Nano informatics
Papadiamantis, A. G., Afantitis, A., Tsoumanis, A., Karatzas, P., Doganis, P., Varsou, D., Sarimveis, H., Ellis, L. A., Valsami‐Jones, E., Lynch, I., et al. (2021) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119681397.ch28 · Cited by 1
In Silico Design and Selection of CD44 Antagonists
Ruiz-Moreno, A. J. (2021) · University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) · doi:10.33612/diss.193912062 · Cited by 1
Naga, D., Muster, W., Musvasva, E., & Ecker, G. F. (2021) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-957525/v1 · Cited by 1
Winter, R., Montanari, F., Noé, F., & Clevert, D.-A. (2018) · ChemRxiv · doi:10.26434/chemrxiv.6871628 · Cited by 1
Gong, J., Deng, Z., Xie, H., Zhao, Z., & Tang, B. Z. (2022) · ChemRxiv · doi:10.26434/chemrxiv-2022-r4bfq-v4 · Cited by 1
Deep Learning on Site‐Specific Drug Delivery System
Mishra, P. S., Mishra, R., & Mazumder, R. (2022) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119857983.ch3 · Cited by 1
Deep Learning Framework for Cancer
Pratishtha (2022) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119857983.ch11 · Cited by 1
Recent Advances in Drug Design With Machine Learning
Faisal, M. (2022) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781394167258.ch6 · Cited by 1
Romero, R. C. (2023) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2023.09.05.556125 · Cited by 1
PanScreen: A Comprehensive Approach to Off-Target Liability AssessmentPreprint
Sellner, M. S., Joos, F. L., Odermatt, A., Lill, M. A., & Smieško, M. (2023) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2023.11.16.567496 · Cited by 1
Shaik, F., Yelchuri, R., Gudur, N. A., & Dash, J. K. (2024) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781394214167.ch14 · Cited by 1
A community effort to discover small molecule SARS-CoV-2 inhibitorsPreprint
Schimunek, J., Seidl, P., Elez, K., Hempel, T., Le, T., Noé, F., Olsson, S., Raich, L., Winter, R., Gökcan, H., et al. (2023) · ChemRxiv · doi:10.26434/chemrxiv-2023-1d5w8 · Cited by 1
Self-citationMachine learning approaches for drug virtual screening
Playe, B. (2019) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/8bd92cdfzf773z462dzba58za5132a1d4e92 · Cited by 1
Molecular Modeling in Drug Design
Wade, R. C., & Salo‐Ahen, O. M. H. (2019) · MDPI eBooks · doi:10.3390/books978-3-03897-615-8
Improving the Use of Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for the Prediction of Molecular Properties
Ståhl, N., Falkman, G., Karlsson, A., Mathiason, G., & Boström, J. (2018) · Advances in intelligent systems and computing · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-98702-6_9
Baldo, F. (2018) · Apollo (University of Cambridge) · doi:10.17863/cam.36962
Evaluation of general toxicity in food constituents using in silico tools
Mascarenhas, R. M. G., de Lima, C. A., Rodrigues, R. P., Kitagawa, R. R., Faraoni, A. S., & Oliveira, T. B. (2019) · Revista Virtual de Química · doi:10.21577/1984-6835.20190041
Fast Structure Learning for Deep Feedforward Networks via Tree Skeleton Expansion
Chen, Z., Li, X., Tian, Z., & Zhang, N. L. (2019) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-29765-7_23
Modeling Protein-Ligand Interactions: Are We Ready for Deep Learning?
Rognan, D. (2019) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-801238-3.11521-1
Einsatz von computerbasierten Methoden und künstlicher Intelligenz in der chemischen Innovation
Erdmann, G. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-61358-0_8
Proposed Improvements for Automated Chemical Safety Evaluations Using In-Silico TechniquesPreprint
Jordan, B. (2020) · Preprints.org · doi:10.20944/preprints202005.0408.v1
The Position of ADME Predictions in Multi-Objective QSAR
Tsantili‐Kakoulidou, A. (2021) · International Journal of Quantitative Structure-Property Relationships · doi:10.4018/ijqspr.2021010101
Research on Drug Response Prediction Model Based on Big Data
Li, G., & Xie, M. (2021) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-78615-1_46
Studies on Prediction Systems for Revealing Biological Functions of Drug Candidates
福田, 保., & Fukuda, Y. (2019) · Terrestrial Environment Research Center (University of Tsukuba)
Learning on Random Balls is Sufficient for Estimating (Some) Graph ParametersPreprint
Maehara, T., & Nt, H. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2111.03317
Undiagnosed periodontal disease. A mock trial.
Welker, D. J. (1985) · PubMed
Walters, P. (2020) · Faculty Opinions – Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature · doi:10.3410/f.738246220.793577015
Exploring Deep Neural Networks for Plant Image Classification
Bafandkar, M. (2022) · doi:10.36939/ir.202205031043
Gong, J., & Tang, B. Z. (2022) · ChemRxiv · doi:10.26434/chemrxiv-2022-r4bfq-v2
Gong, J., & Tang, B. Z. (2022) · ChemRxiv · doi:10.26434/chemrxiv-2022-r4bfq
Mohapatra, A. (2020) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-813724-6.00070-0
Machine Learning for Acute Oral System Toxicity Regression and ClassificationPreprint
Parks, C. D., Gaieb, Z., & Amaro, R. E. (2019) · ChemRxiv · doi:10.26434/chemrxiv.9733973
MolData, A Molecular Benchmark for Disease and Target Based Machine LearningPreprint
Arshadi, A. K., Salem, M., Firouzbakht, A., & Yuan, J. S. (2021) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-968557/v2
Gong, J., & Tang, B. Z. (2022) · ChemRxiv · doi:10.26434/chemrxiv-2022-r4bfq-v3
Janet, J. P. (2022) · ACS symposium series · doi:10.1021/bk-2022-1416.ch007
Abdelalim, M. (2022) · ChemRxiv · doi:10.26434/chemrxiv-2022-090pf
KANBERİZ, H., Korkmaz, S., & Süt, N. (2022) · Turkiye Klinikleri Journal of Biostatistics · doi:10.5336/biostatic.2022-88704
Elaleem, M. A. (2022) · ChemRxiv · doi:10.26434/chemrxiv-2022-090pf-v2
Sandjakoska, L., Bogdanova, A. M., & Pejov, L. (2022) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-22792-9_13
Hull, R., Manabile, M. A., & Dlamini, Z. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-21506-3_11
Radaeva, M., Pandey, M. K., Mslati, H., & Cherkasov, A. R. (2023) · Computational methods in engineering & the sciences · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-20730-3_25
Machine Learning and Deep Learning Applications to Evaluate Mutagenicity
Zhao, L., & Hasselgren, C. (2023) · Computational methods in engineering & the sciences · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-20730-3_18
Durham, S. K., Rudmann, D. G., Rudmann, K. C., & Swenberg, J. A. (2023) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-821047-5.00021-x
Geometric and topological AI for molecular sciences
Wee, J. (2023) · DR-NTU (Nanyang Technological University) · doi:10.32657/10356/165903
Role of Computational Modelling in Drug Discovery for HIV
Gomatam, A., Khan, A. A., Raikuvar, K., D'Costa, M., & Coutinho, E. C. (2023) · Challenges and advances in computational chemistry and physics · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-33871-7_6
Computational precision therapeutics and drug repositioning
Powell, R. T. (2023) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-824010-6.00063-0
Banerjee, P. (2023) · Toxicology Letters · doi:10.1016/s0378-4274(23)00269-2
Aprendizado de máquina e big data na descoberta de novos medicamentos: um mapeamento sistemático
Barbosa, L. C. B., Silva, G. M., & Fortini, R. M. (2023) · Brazilian Journal of Development · doi:10.34117/bjdv9n8-091
Blockchain and artificial intelligence: an overview
Malviya, R., Singh, A. K., Sundram, S., Balusamy, B., & Kadry, S. (2023) · Institute of Physics eBooks · doi:10.1088/978-0-7503-5839-2ch1
Artificial intelligence: Evolving role in drug design
Dahiya, A., Sharm, R., Arora, S., Bora, K. S., & Sharma, R. B. (2023) · AIP conference proceedings · doi:10.1063/5.0123091
Enhancing An Image Blood Staining Malaria Diagnosis Using Convolution Neural Network On Raspberry Pi
Hannah, G. O. (2023) · Multimedia Research · doi:10.46253/j.mr.v6i4.a5
İLAÇ TASARIMINDA YAPAY ZEKÂ UYGULAMALARI
Tari, O., & ARPACI, N. (2023) · Ankara Universitesi Eczacilik Fakultesi Dergisi · doi:10.33483/jfpau.1327078
Offline RL for generative design of protein bindersPreprint
Tarasov, D., Sob, U. A. M., Arbesú, M., Siboni, N. H., Boyer, S., Skwark, M. J., Smit, A., Bent, O., & Pretorius, A. (2023) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2023.11.29.569328
A survey of Bayesian statistical methods in biomarker discovery and early clinical development
Paul, E., Afzal, A. M., Brown, R. Z., Cao, S., Liu, Y., Matejovicova, T., Porwal, A., Sun, Z., Baumgartner, R., & Mallick, H. (2023) · Communications in Statistics Case Studies Data Analysis and Applications · doi:10.1080/23737484.2023.2278112
Modanwal, S., Mishra, N., & Mishra, A. (2023) · BENTHAM SCIENCE PUBLISHERS eBooks · doi:10.2174/9789815196986123010007
A COMPREHENSIVE REVIEW: EXPLORING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN DRUG DISCOVERY AND DEVELOPMENT
(2024) · International Research Journal of Modernization in Engineering Technology and Science · doi:10.56726/irjmets48342
Data collaboration analysis with orthonormal basis selection and alignment
Nosaka, K., Suetake, Y., Takano, Y., & Yoshise, A. (2026) · Computers & Electrical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.compeleceng.2026.111192
Chong, A., Phua, S.-X., Xiao, Y., Ng, W. Y., Li, H., & Goh, W. W. B. (2024) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2024.03.28.587184
Artificial Intelligence for Drug Toxicity and Safety
Joshi-Barr, S., & Wampole, M. E. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-73317-9_134-1
Sahu, A. K., Sahoo, R., Jena, L., Saluja, S. S., & Sahu, P. (2024) · Studies in computational intelligence · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-53148-4_4
Hwang, D., & Lim, C. (2024) · Korean Journal of Applied Statistics · doi:10.5351/kjas.2024.37.3.355
History, Current Status and Future Directions of Deep Learning
Yi, W.-J. (2022) · 대한치과의사협회지 · doi:10.22974/jkda.2022.60.5.005
Gulia, A., & Kumar, P. (2024) · International Conference on Advance Computing and Innovative Technologies in Engineering (ICACITE) · doi:10.1109/icacite60783.2024.10617309
Metadata
- Authors
- Mayr, A., Klambauer, G., Unterthiner, T., & Hochreiter, S.
- Affiliations
- Johannes Kepler University of Linz (AT)
- Corresponding author
- Hochreiter, Sepp
- Venue
- Frontiers in Environmental Science
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2016-02-02
- Volume
- 3
- ISSN
- 2296-665X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2189911347
- Cited by
- 1,081
- References
- 89
- Citations by year
- 2026: 148 · 2025: 124 · 2024: 126 · 2023: 124 · 2022: 95 · 2021: 143 · 2020: 98 · 2019: 108 · 2018: 79 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 9
- FWCI
- 67.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Frontiers in Environmental Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- ChemBioBridge
- European Commission
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Machine Learning in Materials Science
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal testing and alternatives
- Keywords
- toxicity prediction, deep learning, multi-task learning, molecular descriptors, ensemble learning, environmental chemicals, drug toxicity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
