The DOI matches its Crossref record; 89 of the 89 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
DeepTox: Toxicity Prediction using Deep Learning
Open accessAbstract
The Tox21 Data Challenge has been the largest effort of the scientific community to compare computational methods for toxicity prediction. This challenge comprised 12,000 environmental chemicals and drugs which were measured for 12 different toxic effects by specifically designed assays. We participated in this challenge to assess the performance of Deep Learning in computational toxicity prediction. Deep Learning has already revolutionized image processing, speech recognition, and language understanding but has not yet been applied to computational toxicity. Deep Learning is founded on novel algorithms and architectures for artificial neural networks together with the recent availability of very fast computers and massive datasets. It discovers multiple levels of distributed representations of the input, with higher levels representing more abstract concepts. We hypothesized that the construction of a hierarchy of chemical features gives Deep Learning the edge over other toxicity prediction methods. Furthermore, Deep Learning naturally enables multi-task learning, that is, learning of all toxic effects in one neural network and thereby learning of highly informative chemical features. In order to utilize Deep Learning for toxicity prediction, we have developed the DeepTox pipeline. First, DeepTox normalizes the chemical representations of the compounds. Then it computes a large number of chemical descriptors that are used as input to machine learning methods. In its next step, DeepTox trains models, evaluates them, and combines the best of them to ensembles. Finally, DeepTox predicts the toxicity of new compounds. In the Tox21 Data Challenge, DeepTox had the highest performance of all computational methods winning the grand challenge, the nuclear receptor panel, the stress response panel, and six single assays (teams “Bioinf@JKU”). We found that Deep Learning excelled in toxicity prediction and outperformed many other computational approaches like naive Bayes, support vector machines, and random forests.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Machine learning has also been implemented to assess the toxicity of molecules, for instance, using DeepTox, a DL-based model for evaluating the toxic effects of compounds based on a dataset containing many drug molecules [19].”
From The rise of artificial intelligence in healthcare applications (2020) · cites this paper as [19]
In the citing paper
“When working on new test sets, CNN usually predicts with high accuracy [88].”
From Machine Learning Based Toxicity Prediction: From Chemical Structural Description to Transcriptome Analysis (2018) · cites this paper as [88]
In the citing paper
“Using CNN to automatically construct abstract chemical fragments, the deep learning model showed very high performance in toxicity prediction based on high-throughput data, with an average area under the curve (AUC) of 0.846 [88].”
From Machine Learning Based Toxicity Prediction: From Chemical Structural Description to Transcriptome Analysis (2018) · cites this paper as [88]
In the citing paper
“After extensive data training, CNN can identify those substructure or molecular fragments that might make a molecule toxic.”
From Machine Learning Based Toxicity Prediction: From Chemical Structural Description to Transcriptome Analysis (2018) · cites this paper as [88]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Breiman, L. (2001) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1010933404324 · Cited by 133,538
ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2017) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3065386 · Cited by 112,155
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14539 · Cited by 84,126
(2014) · Cited by 33,419
Learning representations by back-propagating errors
Rumelhart, D. E., Hinton, G. E., & Williams, R. J. (1986) · Nature · doi:10.1038/323533a0 · Cited by 31,892
Regularization Paths for Generalized Linear Models via Coordinate Descent
Friedman, J., Hastie, T., & Tibshirani, R. (2010) · Journal of Statistical Software · doi:10.18637/jss.v033.i01 · Cited by 19,927
Deep learning in neural networks: an overview
Schmidhuber, J. (2015) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2014.09.003 · Cited by 18,570
Sequence to Sequence Learning with Neural Networks
Sutskever, I., Vinyals, O., & Le, Q. V. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1409.3215 · Cited by 17,766
(2010) · International Conference on Machine Learning · Cited by 13,995
Speech recognition with deep recurrent neural networks
Graves, A., Mohamed, A.-R., & Hinton, G. (2013) · 2013 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/icassp.2013.6638947 · Cited by 8,893
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Svetnik, 2003, Random forest: a classification and regression tool for compound classification and QSAR modeling, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 43, 1947, 10.1021/ci034160g · DOI
- Unterthiner, 2014, Deep learning as an opportunity in virtual screening
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 601–700 of 1,000
A small-scale data driven and graph neural network based toxicity prediction method of compounds
Zhao, X., Zhang, S., Zhang, T., Cao, Y., & Liu, J. (2025) · Computational Biology and Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2025.108393 · Cited by 10
Zhang, J., Zhao, L., Wang, W., Xing, D., Wang, Z., Ma, J., Wang, A., Ren, N.-Q., Lee, D., & Chen, C. (2025) · Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/10643389.2025.2469868 · Cited by 11
Cheung, A., Liu, Y., Chenoweth, A. M., Montaseri, H., Esapa, B., Chudasama, V., Baker, J. R., Thurston, D. E., & Karagiannis, S. N. (2026) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00039.2025 · Cited by 12
Application of machine learning and deep learning for the prediction of HIV/AIDS
Tefera, M. A. (2022) · HIV & AIDS Review · doi:10.5114/hivar.2022.112852 · Cited by 10
Deep learning in drug discovery: applications and limitations
Tang, Y. (2023) · Frontiers in Computing and Intelligent Systems · doi:10.54097/fcis.v3i2.7575 · Cited by 10
Biodegradation and Bioremediation: An Introduction
de Lorenzo, V. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-44535-9_1-1 · Cited by 10
Graph convolutional network approach to investigate potential selective Limk1 inhibitors
Zhong, W., Zhao, L., Yang, Z., & Chen, C. Y. (2021) · Journal of Molecular Graphics and Modelling · doi:10.1016/j.jmgm.2021.107965 · Cited by 10
Ismail, H., Malim, N. H. A. H., Zobir, S. Z. M., & Wahab, H. A. (2021) · International Conference of Women in Data Science at Taif University (WiDSTaif) · doi:10.1109/widstaif52235.2021.9430198 · Cited by 10
Bioactivity characterization of herbal molecules
Félix-Cuencas, L., Hechavarría, E. A. D., Jarro, A., Parola-Contreras, I., Escamilla-García, A., Torres‐Pacheco, I., García‐Trejo, J. F., Soto-Zarazúa, G. M., & Guevara-González, R. G. (2021) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-323-85852-6.00007-x · Cited by 10
Drug Discovery With XAI Using Deep Learning
Iswarya, B., & Kumarappan, M. (2022) · Advances in medical technologies and clinical practice book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-6684-3791-9.ch006 · Cited by 10
Molecular activity prediction using deep learning software library
Kato, Y., Hamada, S., & Goto, M. (2016) · International Conference on Advanced Informatics: Concepts, Theory and Applications (ICAICTA) · doi:10.1109/icaicta.2016.7803113 · Cited by 10
Deeply learning molecular structure-property relationships using graph attention neural network.Preprint
Ryu, S., Lim, J., & Kim, W. Y. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · Cited by 10
Ghosh, A., Choudhary, G. P., & Medhi, B. (2024) · Indian Journal of Pharmacology · doi:10.4103/ijp.ijp_81_24 · Cited by 9
Breitmeyer, S. E., Williams, A., Conlon, M. D., Wertz, T. A., Heflin, B. C., Shull, D., & Duris, J. W. (2024) · Toxics · doi:10.3390/toxics12120921 · Cited by 9
He, Y., Lv, X., Long, W., Zhai, S., Li, M., & Wen, Z. (2025) · Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.jpha.2025.101387 · Cited by 9
Amen, R. A., Essmat, R. A., Farid, A., Abdel-Rahman, M. A., El-Sherif, A. A., & Zhang, Y. (2025) · Toxicon · doi:10.1016/j.toxicon.2025.108603 · Cited by 9
UniTox: Leveraging LLMs to Curate a Unified Dataset of Drug-Induced Toxicity from FDA Labels
Silberg, J., Swanson, K., Simon, E. P., Zhang, A., Ghazizadeh, Z., Ogden, S., Hamadeh, H. K., & Zou, J. (2024) · neural information processing systems · doi:10.52202/079017-0385 · Cited by 9
Artificial Intelligence in Drug Discovery and Development: Transforming Pharmaceutical Innovation
Ali, M. S., Alqahtani, T., Shmrany, H. A., Gupta, G., Goh, K. W., Sahebkar, A., & Kesharwani, P. (2026) · Drug Development Research · doi:10.1002/ddr.70281 · Cited by 11
Li, Z., Chen, X., Wen, H., ZHANG, R. Q., Li, M., Zhang, X., Yin, H., Yang, Q., Lam, K.-Y., Lio, P., et al. (2026) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.5c02081 · Cited by 9
Improving Compound Activity Classification via Deep Transfer and Representation Learning
Dey, V., Machiraju, R., & Ning, X. (2022) · ACS Omega · doi:10.1021/acsomega.1c06805 · Cited by 10
Use of Artificial Intelligence in Drug Discovery and its Application in Drug Development
Shaikh, H. S. (2023) · Asian Journal of Research in Chemistry · doi:10.52711/0974-4150.2023.00014 · Cited by 9
Machine learning methods for endocrine disrupting potential identification based on single-cell data
Aghayev, Z., Szafran, A. T., Tran, A. T., Ganesh, H. S., Stossi, F., Zhou, L. F., Mancini, M. A., Pistikopoulos, E. N., & Beykal, B. (2023) · Chemical Engineering Science · doi:10.1016/j.ces.2023.119086 · Cited by 9
Knowledge graph aids comprehensive explanation of drug and chemical toxicity
Hao, Y., Romano, J. D., & Moore, J. H. (2023) · CPT Pharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology · doi:10.1002/psp4.12975 · Cited by 9
Rovenchak, A. A., & Druchok, M. (2024) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.27292 · Cited by 9
Improving machine learning in early drug discovery
Bendtsen, C., Degasperi, A., Ahlberg, E., & Carlsson, L. (2017) · Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s10472-017-9541-2 · Cited by 10
Prediction of novel mouse TLR9 agonists using a random forest approach
Khanna, V., Li, L., Fung, J., Ranganathan, S., & Petrovsky, N. (2019) · BMC Molecular and Cell Biology · doi:10.1186/s12860-019-0241-0 · Cited by 9
Lee, Y. O., & Kim, Y. J. (2020) · Molecular Informatics · doi:10.1002/minf.201900131 · Cited by 10
Decision support: using machine learning through MATLAB to analyze environmental data
Nadler, D. W. (2019) · Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences · doi:10.1007/s13412-019-00558-9 · Cited by 9
Darwish, S. M., Shendi, T. A., & Younes, A. (2019) · Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems · doi:10.1016/j.chemolab.2019.103826 · Cited by 9
Modeling Long Short-Term Memory in Quantum Optical Experiments
Amin, R., & Manavalan, M. (2017) · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · doi:10.5281/zenodo.5633992 · Cited by 9
Sinha, K., Parwez, S., Shahana, M. V., Yadav, A., Siddiqi, M. I., & Banerjee, D. (2023) · Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics · doi:10.1080/07391102.2023.2240416 · Cited by 9
A deep learning architecture for metabolic pathway prediction
Baranwal, M., Magner, A., Elvati, P., Saldinger, J. C., Violi, A., & Hero, A. O. (2024) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btae359 · Cited by 8
Predicting Heat Capacity of Molecular Fluids Using Interpretable Machine Learning Model
Li, S., He, H., & Wang, Y. (2024) · Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · doi:10.1021/acs.iecr.4c02495 · Cited by 8
Nano-strategies used for combatting the scourge of tuberculosis infections
Fang, R., Jin, Y., Kong, W., Wang, H., Wang, S., Li, X., Xing, J., Zhang, Y., Yang, X., & Song, N. (2024) · Discover Immunity. · doi:10.1007/s44368-024-00007-y · Cited by 8
Artificial Intelligence in Drug Discovery and Development
Bhusare, S., Ghorpade, M. D., & Sanap, G. (2025) · International Journal of Research Publication and Reviews · doi:10.55248/gengpi.6.0125.0307 · Cited by 8
Yi, J., Jiang, D., Wu, C., Zhang, X., He, W., Zhao, W., & Cao, D. (2025) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbaf408 · Cited by 8
Banerjee, A., Kar, S., Roy, K., Patlewicz, G. Y., Shah, I., Karamertzanis, P. G., Gini, G. C., & Benfenati, E. (2025) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Computational Molecular Science · doi:10.1002/wcms.70057 · Cited by 10
AI/ML-based computational models for toxicity prediction
Barua, S., Balaji, B., & Balaji, S. (2026) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-025-37354-8 · Cited by 9
Toward Integrative Predictive Toxicology: Advanced Methods for Drug Toxicity and Safety Prediction
Gianquinto, E., Bersani, M., Armando, L. G., Davani, L., Cena, C., Simone, A. D., & Spyrakis, F. (2026) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Computational Molecular Science · doi:10.1002/wcms.70065 · Cited by 11
Genomics-based tools for drug discovery and development: From network maps to efficacy prediction
Fang, J., Qi, C., & Wu, G. (2023) · Journal of Holistic Integrative Pharmacy · doi:10.1016/j.jhip.2023.11.001 · Cited by 9
The Future of Medicine: AI and ML Driven Drug Discovery Advancements
Patel, D. D., Pathak, R. S., Patel, K. S., Bhatt, H., & Patel, P. K. (2025) · Current Topics in Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.2174/0115680266346722250401191232 · Cited by 8
Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Toxicology
Sinha, M., Praveen, G. B., Sachan, D. K., & Parthasarathi, R. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-58080-3_137-1 · Cited by 8
Methodology to classify hazardous compounds via deep learning based on convolutional neural networks
Seo, M., & Lee, S. W. (2022) · Current Applied Physics · doi:10.1016/j.cap.2022.06.003 · Cited by 8
Artificial Intelligence for Computer-Aided Drug Discovery
Kate, A., Seth, E., Singh, A., Chakole, C. M., Chauhan, M. K., Singh, R. K., Maddalwar, S. R., & Mishra, M. S. (2023) · Drug Research · doi:10.1055/a-2076-3359 · Cited by 8
Artificial Intelligence in Biological Activity Prediction
Correia, J. V. M., Resende, T., Baptista, D., & Rocha, M. (2019) · Advances in intelligent systems and computing · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-23873-5_20 · Cited by 9
Prediction of toxicity of secondary metabolites
Hernández-Alvarado, R. B., Madariaga‐Mazón, A., & Martínez‐Mayorga, K. (2019) · Physical Sciences Reviews · doi:10.1515/psr-2018-0107 · Cited by 8
Explaining Chemical Toxicity using Missing FeaturesPreprint
Lim, K. W., Sharma, B., Das, P., Chenthamarakshan, V., & Dordick, J. S. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2009.12199 · Cited by 9
Arisa, O. T., Beatson, E. L., Reno, A., Chau, C. H., Aurigemma, R. E., Steeg, P. S., & Figg, W. D. (2024) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(24)00348-6 · Cited by 7
Kianfar, A., Razzaghi, P., & Asgari, Z. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-92218-y · Cited by 8
Modelling In vitro Mutagenicity Using Multi-Task Deep Learning and REACH Data
Karamertzanis, P. G., Rasenberg, M., Shah, I., & Patlewicz, G. Y. (2025) · Chemical Research in Toxicology · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrestox.5c00152 · Cited by 8
Chu, J.-W., Park, J.-H., & Cho, Y. (2025) · Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine · doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2025.109088 · Cited by 7
Dong, X., Zhao, G., Chen, X., Li, M., Shen, C., & Yan, Z. (2025) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.180985 · Cited by 7
MoltiTox: a multimodal fusion model for molecular toxicity prediction
Park, J., & Lee, S. (2025) · Frontiers in Toxicology · doi:10.3389/ftox.2025.1720651 · Cited by 8
Das, K., Paltani, M., Tripathi, P. K., Kumar, R., Verma, S., Kumar, S., & Jain, C. K. (2023) · Exploration of Targeted Anti-tumor Therapy · doi:10.37349/etat.2023.00197 · Cited by 8
Precision Medicine With Data-driven Approaches: A Framework For Clinical Translation
-, S. K., -, R. K., -, N. J., Calderon, J. P., -, S. R., -, N. M., Bhutia, K. G., Dhingra, K., & -, S. V. (2024) · Advanced International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research · doi:10.62127/aijmr.2024.v02i05.1077 · Cited by 7
Noreldeen, H. A. A. (2025) · Journal of Chromatography A · doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2024.465650 · Cited by 7
MHNfs: Prompting In-Context Bioactivity Predictions for Low-Data Drug Discovery
Schimunek, J., Luukkonen, S., & Klambauer, G. (2025) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.4c02373 · Cited by 7
Self-citationLiyaqat, T., Ahmad, T., Kashif, M., & Saxena, C. (2025) · Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing · doi:10.1007/s11517-025-03392-0 · Cited by 7
Paulose, R., Kalirajan, J., & Balakrishnan, G. S. (2018) · Indian Journal of Pharmacology · doi:10.4103/ijp.ijp_304_17 · Cited by 7
Application of Docking for Lead Optimization
Patra, J., Singh, D., Jain, S., & Mahindroo, N. (2021) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-822312-3.00012-6 · Cited by 8
Imbalanced Toxicity Prediction Using Multi-Task Learning and Over-Sampling
Li, J. (2020) · International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/icmlc51923.2020.9469546 · Cited by 8
Artificial Intelligence: A New Era in Drug Discovery
Mishra, D. K., & Awasthi, H. (2021) · Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Research and Development · doi:10.22270/ajprd.v9i5.995 · Cited by 7
Li, S., & Barnard, A. S. (2023) · Cell Reports Physical Science · doi:10.1016/j.xcrp.2023.101675 · Cited by 7
Toxicity Prediction Using Pre-trained Autoencoder
Galushka, M., Browne, F., Mulvenna, M. D., Bond, R., & Lightbody, G. (2018) · IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM) · doi:10.1109/bibm.2018.8621421 · Cited by 7
Site2Vec: a reference frame invariant algorithm for vector embedding of protein–ligand binding sites
Bhadra, A., & Yeturu, K. (2020) · Machine Learning Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2632-2153/abad88 · Cited by 7
Introduction: An Overview of AI in Oncology Drug Discovery and Development
Linton‐Reid, K. (2020) · IntechOpen eBooks · doi:10.5772/intechopen.92799 · Cited by 8
Prediction of Drug Clearance from Enzyme and Transporter Kinetics
Kulkarni, P., Youssef, A. S., & Argikar, A. A. (2021) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-0716-1554-6_14 · Cited by 7
Small Drug Molecule Classification Using Deep Neural Networks
Korkmaz, S. (2019) · Turkiye Klinikleri Journal of Biostatistics · doi:10.5336/biostatic.2019-64948 · Cited by 7
Machine Learning Applied to the Modeling of Pharmacological and ADMET Endpoints
Göller, A. H., Kuhnke, L., ter Laak, A., Meier, K., & Hillisch, A. (2021) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-0716-1787-8_2 · Cited by 7
Editorial: Deep Learning for Toxicity and Disease Prediction
Gong, P., Zhang, C., & Chen, M. (2020) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2020.00175 · Cited by 7
Artificial Intelligence for Assessing Side Effects
Panchbhai, A. (2022) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781394167258.ch12 · Cited by 7
Future Prospects and Challenges in the Implementation of AI and ML in Pharma Sector
Pokhriyal, P., Chavda, V. P., & Pathak, M. (2023) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119865728.ch17 · Cited by 7
A Wide Application of Artificial Intelligence in Pharma Field
-, V. S. H., & Baitule, A. W. (2024) · Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Research · doi:10.52711/2231-5691.2024.00064 · Cited by 6
Al-Jubouri, B., Desiati, I., Wijanarko, W., & Espallargas, N. (2025) · ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces · doi:10.1021/acsami.4c10622 · Cited by 6
Precision, Prediction and Progress: A New Era in Pharmacology
Singh, J. P., Gaur, V., & Dubey, P. (2025) · doi:10.38124/ijisrt/25apr1322 · Cited by 6
Prediction of Melting Points of Chemicals with a Data Augmentation-Based Neural Network Approach
Austermeier, L. E., Voigt, K., Böhme, A., & Ulrich, N. (2025) · ACS Omega · doi:10.1021/acsomega.5c00205 · Cited by 6
Shao, F., Li, W., Liang, Z., Zhou, Y., Zhang, D., & Chang, Y. (2026) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2026.125499 · Cited by 6
Agarwal, B., Gaware, S., More, N., Shinde, R., Shivakumar, H. N., & Jagdale, S. K. (2026) · Annales Pharmaceutiques Françaises · doi:10.1016/j.pharma.2026.01.007 · Cited by 8
Artificial Intelligence in Drug Discovery and Development: Raising Quality per Decision
Furukawa, S., Uchida, H., & Kishimoto, T. (2026) · Pharmacopsychiatry · doi:10.1055/a-2810-8972 · Cited by 7
Mishra, S. K., Hamadou, M., Gurung, K., Subba, A., Mukhia, P., Chhetri, T., Roy, A., Rai, P., & Georrge, J. J. (2026) · Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering · doi:10.1007/s11831-026-10617-4 · Cited by 6
Seyhan, A. A., & Carini, C. (2026) · Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology · doi:10.1016/j.critrevonc.2026.105461 · Cited by 7
Predictive Modeling of Tox21 Data
Huang, R. (2019) · Challenges and advances in computational chemistry and physics · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-16443-0_14 · Cited by 6
İLAÇ KEŞFİ VE GELİŞTİRİLMESİNDE YAPAY ZEKÂ
Çelik, İ. N., ARSLAN, F. K., Tunç, R., & Yıldız, İ. (2021) · Ankara Universitesi Eczacilik Fakultesi Dergisi · doi:10.33483/jfpau.878041 · Cited by 6
Fang, S., Liu, Y., & Liu, S. (2023) · IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM) · doi:10.1109/bibm58861.2023.10385471 · Cited by 6
Deep Learning for Predictive Toxicology Assessment Early Detection of Adverse Drug Reactions.
Priyadarshini, B. I. (2024) · Power System Technology · doi:10.52783/pst.322 · Cited by 6
Quantifying uncertainty in graph neural network explanations
Jiang, J., Chen, L., Li, H., Bai, G., Zhao, X., & Zhao, L. (2024) · Frontiers in Big Data · doi:10.3389/fdata.2024.1392662 · Cited by 6
Kensert, A., Desmet, G., & Cabooter, D. (2024) · Analytica Chimica Acta · doi:10.1016/j.aca.2024.343046 · Cited by 6
Kumar, P., Mahor, A., & Tomar, R. (2025) · Current Drug Discovery Technologies · doi:10.2174/0115701638364199250123062248 · Cited by 6
Kim, J., Lee, S., Jung, D., Kim, H. Y., Lee, J.-I., Seo, M., Kim, S., Choi, J., Yu, W., & Cho, H. (2025) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2025.137650 · Cited by 6
Zhang, G., Borgert, T., Stoffelen, C., & Schmitz, C. (2025) · Progress in Organic Coatings · doi:10.1016/j.porgcoat.2025.109265 · Cited by 6
Machine Learning Applications in Drug Discovery
Ugurlu, S. Y., McDonald, D., & He, S. (2025) · French-Ukrainian Journal of Chemistry · doi:10.17721/fujcv13i1p1-66 · Cited by 6
History and Present Scenario of Computers in Pharmaceutical Research and Development
Saharan, V. A., Banerjee, S., Penuli, S., & Dobhal, S. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-16-5180-9_1 · Cited by 6
AI for predicting chemical-effect associations at the chemical universe level— deepFPlearn
Schor, J., Scheibe, P., Bernt, M., Busch, W., Lai, C., & Hackermüller, J. (2022) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbac257 · Cited by 7
Artificial neural network (ANN) in drug delivery
Piroozmand, F., Mohammadipanah, F., & Sajedi, H. (2023) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-323-89925-3.00005-8 · Cited by 6
Performance evaluation of drug synergy datasets using computational intelligence approaches
Rani, P., Dutta, K., & Kumar, V. (2023) · Multimedia Tools and Applications · doi:10.1007/s11042-023-15723-0 · Cited by 6
Machine Learning in Drug Design
Engkvist, O., Mervin, L., Chen, H., & Ran, T. (2023) · Royal Society of Chemistry eBooks · doi:10.1039/9781788018982-00231 · Cited by 6
Cao, C., Wang, H., Yang, J., Chen, Q., Guo, Y.-M., & Chen, J. (2024) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.108037 · Cited by 6
Generating Modeling Data From Repeat-Dose Toxicity Reports
López-Massaguer, O., Pinto-Gil, K., Sanz, F., Amberg, A., Anger, L. T., Stolte, M., Ravagli, C., Marc, P., & Pastor, M. (2017) · Toxicological Sciences · doi:10.1093/toxsci/kfx254 · Cited by 6
Polash, A. H., Nakano, T., Rakers, C., Takeda, S., & Brown, J. B. (2020) · Computational Toxicology · doi:10.1016/j.comtox.2020.100129 · Cited by 6
Site-Level Bioactivity of Small-Molecules from Deep-Learned Representations of Quantum Chemistry
Sarullo, K., Matlock, M. K., & Swamidass, S. J. (2020) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry A · doi:10.1021/acs.jpca.0c06231 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Mayr, A., Klambauer, G., Unterthiner, T., & Hochreiter, S.
- Affiliations
- Johannes Kepler University of Linz (AT)
- Corresponding author
- Hochreiter, Sepp
- Venue
- Frontiers in Environmental Science
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2016-02-02
- Volume
- 3
- ISSN
- 2296-665X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2189911347
- Cited by
- 1,081
- References
- 89
- Citations by year
- 2026: 148 · 2025: 124 · 2024: 126 · 2023: 124 · 2022: 95 · 2021: 143 · 2020: 98 · 2019: 108 · 2018: 79 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 9
- FWCI
- 67.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Frontiers in Environmental Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- ChemBioBridge
- European Commission
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Machine Learning in Materials Science
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal testing and alternatives
- Keywords
- toxicity prediction, deep learning, multi-task learning, molecular descriptors, ensemble learning, environmental chemicals, drug toxicity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
