The DOI matches its Crossref record; 89 of the 89 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
DeepTox: Toxicity Prediction using Deep Learning
Open accessAbstract
The Tox21 Data Challenge has been the largest effort of the scientific community to compare computational methods for toxicity prediction. This challenge comprised 12,000 environmental chemicals and drugs which were measured for 12 different toxic effects by specifically designed assays. We participated in this challenge to assess the performance of Deep Learning in computational toxicity prediction. Deep Learning has already revolutionized image processing, speech recognition, and language understanding but has not yet been applied to computational toxicity. Deep Learning is founded on novel algorithms and architectures for artificial neural networks together with the recent availability of very fast computers and massive datasets. It discovers multiple levels of distributed representations of the input, with higher levels representing more abstract concepts. We hypothesized that the construction of a hierarchy of chemical features gives Deep Learning the edge over other toxicity prediction methods. Furthermore, Deep Learning naturally enables multi-task learning, that is, learning of all toxic effects in one neural network and thereby learning of highly informative chemical features. In order to utilize Deep Learning for toxicity prediction, we have developed the DeepTox pipeline. First, DeepTox normalizes the chemical representations of the compounds. Then it computes a large number of chemical descriptors that are used as input to machine learning methods. In its next step, DeepTox trains models, evaluates them, and combines the best of them to ensembles. Finally, DeepTox predicts the toxicity of new compounds. In the Tox21 Data Challenge, DeepTox had the highest performance of all computational methods winning the grand challenge, the nuclear receptor panel, the stress response panel, and six single assays (teams “Bioinf@JKU”). We found that Deep Learning excelled in toxicity prediction and outperformed many other computational approaches like naive Bayes, support vector machines, and random forests.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Machine learning has also been implemented to assess the toxicity of molecules, for instance, using DeepTox, a DL-based model for evaluating the toxic effects of compounds based on a dataset containing many drug molecules [19].”
From The rise of artificial intelligence in healthcare applications (2020) · cites this paper as [19]
In the citing paper
“When working on new test sets, CNN usually predicts with high accuracy [88].”
From Machine Learning Based Toxicity Prediction: From Chemical Structural Description to Transcriptome Analysis (2018) · cites this paper as [88]
In the citing paper
“Using CNN to automatically construct abstract chemical fragments, the deep learning model showed very high performance in toxicity prediction based on high-throughput data, with an average area under the curve (AUC) of 0.846 [88].”
From Machine Learning Based Toxicity Prediction: From Chemical Structural Description to Transcriptome Analysis (2018) · cites this paper as [88]
In the citing paper
“After extensive data training, CNN can identify those substructure or molecular fragments that might make a molecule toxic.”
From Machine Learning Based Toxicity Prediction: From Chemical Structural Description to Transcriptome Analysis (2018) · cites this paper as [88]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Breiman, L. (2001) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1010933404324 · Cited by 133,538
ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2017) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3065386 · Cited by 112,155
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14539 · Cited by 84,126
(2014) · Cited by 33,419
Learning representations by back-propagating errors
Rumelhart, D. E., Hinton, G. E., & Williams, R. J. (1986) · Nature · doi:10.1038/323533a0 · Cited by 31,892
Regularization Paths for Generalized Linear Models via Coordinate Descent
Friedman, J., Hastie, T., & Tibshirani, R. (2010) · Journal of Statistical Software · doi:10.18637/jss.v033.i01 · Cited by 19,927
Deep learning in neural networks: an overview
Schmidhuber, J. (2015) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2014.09.003 · Cited by 18,570
Sequence to Sequence Learning with Neural Networks
Sutskever, I., Vinyals, O., & Le, Q. V. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1409.3215 · Cited by 17,766
(2010) · International Conference on Machine Learning · Cited by 13,995
Speech recognition with deep recurrent neural networks
Graves, A., Mohamed, A.-R., & Hinton, G. (2013) · 2013 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/icassp.2013.6638947 · Cited by 8,893
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Svetnik, 2003, Random forest: a classification and regression tool for compound classification and QSAR modeling, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 43, 1947, 10.1021/ci034160g · DOI
- Unterthiner, 2014, Deep learning as an opportunity in virtual screening
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–400 of 1,000
Human iPSC-Based Modeling of Central Nerve System Disorders for Drug Discovery
Lu, Q., & Julia, T. C. W. (2021) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms22031203 · Cited by 49
Impacts of AIOT Implementation Course on the Learning Outcomes of Senior High School Students
Tsai, C.-C., Cheng, Y.-M., Tsai, Y.-S., & Lou, S. (2021) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci11020082 · Cited by 54
Green, A. J., Mohlenkamp, M. J., Das, J., Chaudhari, M., Truong, L., Tanguay, R. L., & Reif, D. M. (2021) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009135 · Cited by 49
Artificial intelligence for COVID-19: battling the pandemic with computational intelligence
Xu, Z., Su, C., Xiao, Y., & Wang, F. (2021) · Intelligent Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.imed.2021.09.001 · Cited by 48
The Role of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Techniques: Race for COVID-19 Vaccine
Kannan, S., Subbaram, K., Ali, S., & Kannan, H. (2020) · Archives of Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.5812/archcid.103232 · Cited by 47
Su, L., Ji, H., Kong, J., Yan, W., Zhang, Q., Li, J., & Zuo, M. (2024) · Trends in Food Science & Technology · doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2024.104607 · Cited by 47
Griffen, E., Dossetter, A. G., Leach, A. G., & Montague, S. (2018) · Drug Discovery Today · doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2018.03.011 · Cited by 47
Prototype-Based Compound Discovery Using Deep Generative Models
Harel, S., & Radinsky, K. (2018) · Molecular Pharmaceutics · doi:10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.8b00474 · Cited by 48
Matsuzaka, Y., & Uesawa, Y. (2019) · Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology · doi:10.3389/fbioe.2019.00065 · Cited by 48
Deep Learning for Ligand-Based Virtual Screening in Drug Discovery
Bahi, M., & Batouche, M. (2018) · International Conference on Pattern Analysis and Intelligent Systems (PAIS) · doi:10.1109/pais.2018.8598488 · Cited by 49
Marchwiany, M. E., Birowska, M., Popielski, M., Majewski, J. A., & Jastrzębska, A. (2020) · Materials · doi:10.3390/ma13143083 · Cited by 47
Jamshidi, M. B., Lalbakhsh, A., Talla, J., Peroutka, Z., Roshani, S., Matousek, V., Roshani, S., Mirmozafari, M., Malek, Z., Spada, L. L., et al. (2021) · Studies in systems, decision and control · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-67716-9_2 · Cited by 46
Wang, L., Zhao, L., Liu, X., Fu, J., & Zhang, A. (2021) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c01228 · Cited by 47
DeLA-Drug: A Deep Learning Algorithm for Automated Design of Druglike Analogues
Creanza, T. M., Lamanna, G., Delre, P., Contino, M., Corriero, N., Saviano, M., Mangiatordi, G. F., & Ancona, N. (2022) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.2c00205 · Cited by 50
Descriptive prediction of drug side‐effects using a hybrid deep learning model
Lee, C. Y., & Chen, Y. P. (2021) · International Journal of Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1002/int.22389 · Cited by 45
Molecular descriptor analysis of approved drugs using unsupervised learning for drug repurposing
Madugula, S. S., John, L., Nagamani, S., Gaur, A. S., Poroikov, V., & Sastry, G. N. (2021) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104856 · Cited by 45
Application of Deep Neural Network Models in Drug Discovery Programs
Grebner, C., Matter, H., Kofink, D., Wenzel, J., Schmidt, F., & Heßler, G. (2021) · ChemMedChem · doi:10.1002/cmdc.202100418 · Cited by 45
Application of Artificial Intelligence in Drug Discovery
Chopra, H., Baig, A. A., Gautam, R. K., & Kamal, M. A. (2022) · Current Pharmaceutical Design · doi:10.2174/1381612828666220608141049 · Cited by 45
Vargas, S., Gee, W., & Alexandrova, A. N. (2024) · Digital Discovery · doi:10.1039/d4dd00057a · Cited by 49
Machine learning small molecule properties in drug discovery
Schapin, N., Majewski, M., Varela‐Rial, A., Arróniz, C., & Fabritiis, G. D. (2023) · Artificial Intelligence Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.aichem.2023.100020 · Cited by 44
Computational Approaches to Design and Test Plant Synthetic Metabolic Pathways
Küken, A., & Nikoloski, Z. (2019) · PLANT PHYSIOLOGY · doi:10.1104/pp.18.01273 · Cited by 44
Schmidt, F., Wenzel, J., Halland, N., Güssregen, S., Delafoy, L., & Czich, A. (2019) · Chemical Research in Toxicology · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrestox.9b00338 · Cited by 44
Efficient lipophilicity prediction of molecules employing deep-learning models
Datta, R., Das, D. K., & Das, S. (2021) · Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems · doi:10.1016/j.chemolab.2021.104309 · Cited by 45
Wang, Z., Wen, H., Su, Y., Shen, W., Ren, J., Ma, Y., & Li, J. (2021) · Chemical Engineering Science · doi:10.1016/j.ces.2021.117219 · Cited by 44
Overview of Computational Toxicology Methods Applied in Drug and Green Chemical Discovery
Bueso-Bordils, J. I., Antón-Fos, G. M., Martín-Algarra, R. V., & Aleman, P. (2024) · Journal of Xenobiotics · doi:10.3390/jox14040101 · Cited by 43
Dual graph convolutional neural network for predicting chemical networks
Harada, S., Akita, H., Tsubaki, M., Baba, Y., Takigawa, I., Yamanishi, Y., & Kashima, H. (2020) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/s12859-020-3378-0 · Cited by 43
Network-principled deep generative models for designing drug combinations as graph sets
Karimi, M., Hasanzadeh, A., & Shen, Y. (2020) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa317 · Cited by 43
Li, S., Zhang, L., Feng, H., Meng, J., Xie, D., Yi, L., Arkin, I. T., & Liu, H. (2021) · Interdisciplinary Sciences Computational Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s12539-020-00407-2 · Cited by 46
All SMILES Variational AutoencoderPreprint
Alperstein, Z., Cherkasov, A. R., & Rolfe, J. T. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1905.13343 · Cited by 54
Artificial Intelligence and Quantum Computing as the Next Pharma Disruptors
Cova, T. F. G. G., Vitorino, C., Ferreira, M., Nunes, S. C. C., Rondón-Villarreal, P., & Pais, A. A. C. C. (2021) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-0716-1787-8_14 · Cited by 46
Cheminformatics and artificial intelligence for accelerating agrochemical discovery
Djoumbou-Feunang, Y., Wilmot, J. T., Kinney, J., Chanda, P., Yu, P., Sader, C. A., Sharifi, M., Smith, S., Ou, J., Hu, J. K., et al. (2023) · Frontiers in Chemistry · doi:10.3389/fchem.2023.1292027 · Cited by 47
TOP: A deep mixture representation learning method for boosting molecular toxicity prediction
Peng, Y., Zhang, Z., Jiang, Q., Guan, J., & Zhou, S. (2020) · Methods · doi:10.1016/j.ymeth.2020.05.013 · Cited by 43
Knowledge-guided deep learning models of drug toxicity improve interpretation
Hao, Y., Romano, J. D., & Moore, J. H. (2022) · Patterns · doi:10.1016/j.patter.2022.100565 · Cited by 42
Clinical trials in-a-dish for cardiovascular medicine
Wu, X., Swanson, K., Yıldırım, Z., Liu, W., Liao, R., & Wu, J. C. (2024) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehae519 · Cited by 42
An overview of neural networks for drug discovery and the inputs used
Xu, Y., Yao, H., & Lin, K. (2018) · Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery · doi:10.1080/17460441.2018.1547278 · Cited by 42
MolOpt: A Web Server for Drug Design using Bioisosteric Transformation
Shan, J., & Ji, C. (2019) · Current Computer - Aided Drug Design · doi:10.2174/1573409915666190704093400 · Cited by 41
COVER: conformational oversampling as data augmentation for molecules
Hemmerich, J., Asilar, E., & Ecker, G. F. (2020) · Journal of Cheminformatics · doi:10.1186/s13321-020-00420-z · Cited by 41
Latent Molecular Optimization for Targeted Therapeutic DesignPreprint
Aumentado‐Armstrong, T. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1809.02032 · Cited by 43
Explainable Supervised Machine Learning Model To Predict Solvation Gibbs Energy
Ferraz-Caetano, J., Teixeira, F., & Cordeiro, M. N. D. S. (2023) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.3c00544 · Cited by 40
Yıldırım, Z., Swanson, K., Wu, X., Zou, J., & Wu, J. C. (2024) · The Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology · doi:10.1146/annurev-pharmtox-022724-095035 · Cited by 40
Wang, X., Wang, Y., Xu, Z., Xiong, Y., & Wei, D. (2019) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2019.00971 · Cited by 39
Artificial intelligence in small molecule drug discovery from 2018 to 2023: Does it really work?
Lv, Q., Zhou, F., Liu, X., & Zhi, L. (2023) · Bioorganic Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.bioorg.2023.106894 · Cited by 41
Molecular similarity-based predictions of the Tox21 screening outcome
Drwal, M. N., Siramshetty, V. B., Banerjee, P., Goede, A., Preißner, R., & Dunkel, M. (2015) · Frontiers in Environmental Science · doi:10.3389/fenvs.2015.00054 · Cited by 39
Effect of missing data on multitask prediction methods
de León, A. D. L. V., Chen, B., & Gillet, V. J. (2018) · Journal of Cheminformatics · doi:10.1186/s13321-018-0281-z · Cited by 39
Virtual Screening Meets Deep Learning
Pérez-Sianes, J., Pérez‐Sánchez, H., & Díaz, F. (2018) · Current Computer - Aided Drug Design · doi:10.2174/1573409914666181018141602 · Cited by 39
Graph-based deep learning frameworks for molecules and solid-state materials
Gong, W., & Yan, Q. (2021) · Computational Materials Science · doi:10.1016/j.commatsci.2021.110332 · Cited by 40
Serafim, M. S. M., dos Santos, V. S., Gertrudes, J. C., Maltarollo, V. G., & Honório, K. M. (2021) · Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery · doi:10.1080/17460441.2021.1918098 · Cited by 38
He, Y., Liu, G., Hu, S., Wang, X., Jia, J., Zhou, H., & Yan, X. (2023) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2023.131942 · Cited by 37
Lovrić, M., Đuričić, T., Tran, H., Hussain, H., Lacić, E., Rasmussen, M. A., & Kern, R. (2021) · Pharmaceuticals · doi:10.3390/ph14080758 · Cited by 37
Machine Learning in Drug Discovery
Hochreiter, S., Klambauer, G., & Rarey, M. (2018) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.8b00478 · Cited by 36
Self-citationApplications of Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Quazi, S., Saha, R. P., & Singh, M. K. (2022) · Journal of Experimental Biology and Agricultural Sciences · doi:10.18006/2022.10(1).211.226 · Cited by 36
ToxMPNN: A deep learning model for small molecule toxicity prediction
Zhou, Y., Ning, C., Tan, Y., Li, Y., Wang, J., Shu, Y., Liang, S., Liu, Z., & Wang, Y. (2024) · Journal of Applied Toxicology · doi:10.1002/jat.4591 · Cited by 37
Fraser, K., Bruckner, D. M., & Dordick, J. S. (2018) · Chemical Research in Toxicology · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrestox.8b00054 · Cited by 38
Application of Bioactivity Profile-Based Fingerprints for Building Machine Learning Models
Sturm, N., Sun, J., Vandriessche, Y., Mayr, A., Klambauer, G., Carlsson, L., Engkvist, O., & Chen, H. (2018) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.8b00550 · Cited by 38
Self-citationIn Silico Target Prediction for Small Molecules
Byrne, R., & Schneider, G. (2018) · Methods in molecular biology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-8891-4_16 · Cited by 39
Deep Learning Model for Identifying Critical Structural Motifs in Potential Endocrine Disruptors
Mukherjee, A., Su, A., & Rajan, K. (2021) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.0c01409 · Cited by 36
Unsupervised Learning in Drug Design from Self-Organization to Deep Chemistry
Polański, J. (2022) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms23052797 · Cited by 40
Impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI) on Drug Discovery and Product Development
Narayanan, R. R., Durga, N., & Nagalakshmi, S. (2022) · Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Education and Research · doi:10.5530/ijper.56.3s.146 · Cited by 36
Trends in Deep Learning for Property-driven Drug Design
Born, J., & Manica, M. (2021) · Current Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.2174/0929867328666210729115728 · Cited by 36
Role of Artificial Intelligence in Drug Discovery and Target Identification in Cancer
Sharma, V., Singh, A. K., Chauhan, S., Sharma, P. K., Chaudhary, S., Sharma, A., Porwal, O., & Fuloria, N. K. (2023) · Current Drug Delivery · doi:10.2174/1567201821666230905090621 · Cited by 36
Application of Machine Learning in Nanotoxicology: A Critical Review and Perspective
Zhou, Y., Wang, Y., Peijnenburg, W. J. G. M., Vijver, M. G., Balraadjsing, S., Dong, Z., Zhao, X., Leung, K., Mortensen, H. M., Wang, Z., et al. (2024) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.4c03328 · Cited by 38
Stefaniak, F. (2015) · Frontiers in Environmental Science · doi:10.3389/fenvs.2015.00077 · Cited by 35
Evaluation of Cross-Validation Strategies in Sequence-Based Binding Prediction Using Deep Learning
Rio, A. L.-D., Nonell‐Canals, A., Vidal, D., & Perera-Lluna, A. (2019) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.8b00663 · Cited by 39
In Silico Prediction of Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals Using Single-Label and Multilabel Models
Sun, L., Yang, H., Cai, Y., Li, W., Liu, G., & Tang, Y. (2019) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.8b00551 · Cited by 35
Comprehensive Study on Molecular Supervised Learning with Graph Neural Networks
Hwang, D., Yang, S., Kwon, Y., Lee, K. H., Lee, G., Jo, H., Yoon, S., & Ryu, S. (2020) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.0c00416 · Cited by 35
Yang, A., Su, Y., Wang, Z., Jin, S., Ren, J., Zhang, X., Shen, W., & Clark, J. H. (2021) · Green Chemistry · doi:10.1039/d1gc00331c · Cited by 35
In silico methods for the prediction of drug toxicity
Rajpoot, K., Desai, N., Koppisetti, H., Tekade, M., Sharma, M. C., Behera, S. K., & Tekade, R. K. (2022) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-323-98367-9.00012-3 · Cited by 37
Rani, P., Dutta, K., & Kumar, V. (2022) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.105334 · Cited by 36
Moukheiber, L., Mangione, W., Moukheiber, M., Maleki, S., Falls, Z., Gao, M., & Samudrala, R. (2022) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules27093021 · Cited by 35
Providing data science support for systems pharmacology and its implications to drug discovery
Hart, T. D., & Xie, L. (2015) · Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery · doi:10.1517/17460441.2016.1135126 · Cited by 35
A simple model to solve a complex drug toxicity problem
Dixit, V. A. (2018) · Toxicology Research · doi:10.1039/c8tx00261d · Cited by 34
Lim, S., & Lee, Y. O. (2021) · Proceedings - International Conference on Pattern Recognition/Proceedings/International Conference on Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/icpr48806.2021.9412555 · Cited by 36
Liu, Y., Vijlder, T. D., Bittremieux, W., Laukens, K., & Heyndrickx, W. (2021) · Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry · doi:10.1002/rcm.9120 · Cited by 35
GNES: Learning to Explain Graph Neural Networks
Gao, Y., Sun, T., Bhatt, R., Yu, D., Hong, S.-S., & Zhao, L. (2021) · Proceedings · doi:10.1109/icdm51629.2021.00023 · Cited by 34
Cross-Domain Few-Shot Learning by Representation FusionPreprint
Adler, T., Brandstetter, J., Widrich, M., Mayr, A., Kreil, D. P., Kopp, M., Klambauer, G., & Hochreiter, S. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2010.06498 · Cited by 54
Self-citationTrusted Artificial Intelligence: Towards Certification of Machine Learning ApplicationsPreprint
Winter, P. M., Eder, S. K., Weissenböck, J., Schwald, C., Doms, T., Vogt, T., Hochreiter, S., & Nessler, B. (2021) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2103.16910 · Cited by 45
Self-citationPiquing artificial intelligence towards drug discovery: Tools, techniques, and applications
Agu, P. C., & Obulose, C. N. (2024) · Drug Development Research · doi:10.1002/ddr.22159 · Cited by 33
A Comprehensive Review on Deep Synergistic Drug Prediction Techniques for Cancer
Kumar, V., & Dogra, N. (2021) · Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering · doi:10.1007/s11831-021-09617-3 · Cited by 33
Prediction of Multicomponent Reaction Yields Using Machine Learning
Zhu, X., Ran, C., Wen, M. F., Guo, G., Liu, Y., Liao, L., Li, Y., Li, M., & Yu, D. (2021) · Chinese Journal of Chemistry · doi:10.1002/cjoc.202100434 · Cited by 33
Ram, R., Gadaleta, D., & Allen, T. E. H. (2022) · Computational Toxicology · doi:10.1016/j.comtox.2022.100232 · Cited by 33
Clerbaux, L., Paini, A., Lumen, A., Osman‐Ponchet, H., Worth, A. P., & Fardel, O. (2019) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2019.03.003 · Cited by 33
Randazzo, G. M., Bileck, A., Danani, A., Vogt, B., & Groessl, M. (2019) · Journal of Chromatography A · doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2019.460661 · Cited by 33
Kour, S., Biswas, I., Sheoran, S., Arora, S., Sheela, P., Duppala, S. K., Murthy, D. K., Pawar, S. C., Singh, H., Kumar, D., et al. (2023) · Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.jddst.2023.104392 · Cited by 33
Pre-trained molecular representations enable antimicrobial discovery
Olayo-Alarcón, R., Amstalden, M. K., Zannoni, A., Bajramovic, M., Sharma, C. M., Brochado, A. R., Rezaei, M., & Müller, C. L. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-58804-4 · Cited by 32
Xue, R., Liao, J., Shao, X., Han, K., Long, J., Shao, L., Ai, N., & Fan, X. (2019) · Chemical Research in Toxicology · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrestox.9b00238 · Cited by 33
Morger, A., Mathea, M., Achenbach, J., Wolf, A., Buesen, R., Schleifer, K.-J., Landsiedel, R., & Volkamer, A. (2020) · Journal of Cheminformatics · doi:10.1186/s13321-020-00422-x · Cited by 32
Different molecular enumeration influences in deep learning: an example using aqueous solubility
Chen, J., & Tseng, Y. J. (2020) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbaa092 · Cited by 32
A deep neural network–based approach for prediction of mutagenicity of compounds
Kumar, R., Khan, F. U., Sharma, A., Siddiqui, M. H., Aziz, I. A., Kamal, M. A., Ashraf, G. M., Alghamdi, B. S. A., & Uddin, M. S. (2021) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-021-14028-9 · Cited by 32
MolData, a molecular benchmark for disease and target based machine learning
Arshadi, A. K., Salem, M., Firouzbakht, A., & Yuan, J. S. (2022) · Journal of Cheminformatics · doi:10.1186/s13321-022-00590-y · Cited by 32
Guo, J., Sun, M., Zhao, X., Shi, C., Su, H., Guo, Y., & Pu, X. (2023) · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · doi:10.1021/acs.jcim.2c01538 · Cited by 32
DeepCOP: deep learning-based approach to predict gene regulating effects of small molecules
Woo, G., Fernandez, M., Hsing, M., Lack, N. A., Cavga, A. D., & Cherkasov, A. (2020) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btz645 · Cited by 32
Tang, W., Chen, J., & Hong, H. (2020) · Chemosphere · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126768 · Cited by 31
Few-shot learning with transformers via graph embeddings for molecular property prediction
Torres, L. H. M., Ribeiro, B., & Arrais, J. P. (2023) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2023.120005 · Cited by 32
PyQSAR: A Fast QSAR Modeling Platform Using Machine Learning and Jupyter Notebook
Kim, S., & Cho, K. (2018) · Bulletin of the Korean Chemical Society · doi:10.1002/bkcs.11638 · Cited by 31
Deep Learning Methods for Small Molecule Drug Discovery: A Survey
Hu, W., Liu, Y., Chen, X., Chai, W., Chen, H., Wang, H., & Wang, G. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tai.2023.3251977 · Cited by 31
Zheng, Y., Ma, Y., Xiong, Q., Zhu, K., Weng, N., & Zhu, Q. X. (2024) · Pharmacological Research · doi:10.1016/j.phrs.2024.107381 · Cited by 32
Methodology of aiQSAR: a group-specific approach to QSAR modelling
Vuković, K., Gadaleta, D., & Benfenati, E. (2019) · Journal of Cheminformatics · doi:10.1186/s13321-019-0350-y · Cited by 30
A Deep-Learning Approach toward Rational Molecular Docking Protocol Selection
Jiménez-Luna, J., Cuzzolin, A., Bolcato, G., Sturlese, M., & Moro, S. (2020) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules25112487 · Cited by 30
A Review of Feature Reduction Methods for QSAR-Based Toxicity Prediction
Idakwo, G., Luttrell, J., Chen, M., Hong, H., Gong, P., & Zhang, C. (2019) · Challenges and advances in computational chemistry and physics · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-16443-0_7 · Cited by 29
Zhao, H., Li, Y., & Wang, J. (2021) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btab204 · Cited by 29
Metadata
- Authors
- Mayr, A., Klambauer, G., Unterthiner, T., & Hochreiter, S.
- Affiliations
- Johannes Kepler University of Linz (AT)
- Corresponding author
- Hochreiter, Sepp
- Venue
- Frontiers in Environmental Science
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2016-02-02
- Volume
- 3
- ISSN
- 2296-665X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2189911347
- Cited by
- 1,081
- References
- 89
- Citations by year
- 2026: 148 · 2025: 124 · 2024: 126 · 2023: 124 · 2022: 95 · 2021: 143 · 2020: 98 · 2019: 108 · 2018: 79 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 9
- FWCI
- 67.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Frontiers in Environmental Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- ChemBioBridge
- European Commission
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Machine Learning in Materials Science
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal testing and alternatives
- Keywords
- toxicity prediction, deep learning, multi-task learning, molecular descriptors, ensemble learning, environmental chemicals, drug toxicity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review