The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Microplastics Increase Soil pH and Decrease Microbial Activities as a Function of Microplastic Shape, Polymer Type, and Exposure Time
Open accessAbstract
Microplastic pollution is a topic of increasing concern, especially since this issue was first addressed in soils. Results have so far been variable in terms of effects, suggesting that there is substantial context-dependency in microplastic effects in soil. To better define conditions that may affect microplastic-related impacts, we here examined effects as a function of microplastic shape and polymer type, and we tested if effects on soil properties and soil microbial activities change with incubation time. In our laboratory study, we evaluated twelve different secondary microplastics representing four microplastic shapes: fibers, films, foams and fragments; and eight polymer types: polyamide (PA), polycarbonate (PC), polyethylene (PE), polyester (PES), polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polypropylene (PP), polystyrene (PS), and polyurethane (PU). We mixed the microplastics with a sandy soil (0.4% w/w) and incubated at 25°C for 31 days. Then, we collected soil samples on the 3rd, 11th, and 31st day, and measured soil pH, respiration and four enzyme activities (soil enzymatic activities). Our results showed that microplastics could affect soil pH, respiration and enzymatic activities depending on microplastic shape and polymer type, effects that were altered with incubation time. Soil pH increased with foams and fragments and overall decreased in the first days of incubation and then increased. Soil respiration increased with PE foams and was affected by the incubation time, declining over time. Overall, acid phosphatase activity was not affected by shape or polymer type. β-D-glucosidase activity decreased with foams, cellobiosidase activity decreased with fibers, films and foams while N-acetyl-β-glucosaminidase activities decreased with fibers and fragments. Enzymatic activities fluctuated during the incubation time, except N-acetyl-β-glucosaminidase, which showed a declining trend with incubation time. Enzymatic activities were negatively correlated with soil pH and this relationship was less strong when microplastics were added to the soil. Our study adds to the evidence that research should embrace the complexity and diversity of microplastics, highlighting the role of microplastic shape and polymer type in influencing effects; additionally, we show that incubation time is also a parameter to consider, as effects are dynamic even in the short term.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Production, use, and fate of all plastics ever made
Geyer, R., Jambeck, J. R., & Law, K. L. (2017) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.1700782 · Cited by 18,606
Soil structure and management: a review
Bronick, C. J., & Lal, R. (2005) · Geoderma · doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2004.03.005 · Cited by 4,463
Six, J., Bossuyt, H., Degryze, S., & Denef, K. (2004) · Soil and Tillage Research · doi:10.1016/j.still.2004.03.008 · Cited by 4,410
Transport and release of chemicals from plastics to the environment and to wildlife
Teuten, E. L., Saquing, J. M., Knappe, D. R. U., Barlaz, M. A., Jonsson, S., Björn, A., Rowland, S. J., Thompson, R. C., Galloway, T. S., Yamashita, R., et al. (2009) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2008.0284 · Cited by 2,938
Lithner, D., Larsson, Å., & Dave, G. (2011) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.04.038 · Cited by 2,684
Plastics in soil: Analytical methods and possible sources
Bläsing, M., & Amelung, W. (2018) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.08.086 · Cited by 1,655
Microplastic in Terrestrial Ecosystems and the Soil?
Rillig, M. C. (2012) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es302011r · Cited by 1,619
Self-citationInteraction of chemical contaminants with microplastics: principles and perspectives
Fred-Ahmadu, O. H., Bhagwat, G., Oluyoye, I., Benson, N. U., Ayejuyo, O. O., & Palanisami, T. (2020) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135978 · Cited by 505 · cited 2×
“For example, PE had greater sorption capacity for hydrophobic organic compounds such as pesticide and solvents (Teuten et al., 2009; Fred-Ahmadu et al., 2020), while PS had larger sorption capacity for Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons than PET, PVC, PE or PP (Rochman et al.”
Background
Cited by
Wu, P., Lin, S., Cao, G., Wu, J., Jin, H., Wang, C., Wong, M. H., Yang, Z., & Cai, Z. (2022) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.129361 · Cited by 428
Xu, Y., Ou, Q., van der Hoek, J. P., Liu, G., & Lompe, K. M. (2024) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.3c07035 · Cited by 325
Ali, N., Khan, M. H., Ali, M., Sidra, Ahmad, S., Khan, A., Nabi, G., Ali, F., Bououdina, M., & Kyzas, G. Z. (2024) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.169489 · Cited by 262
Dissanayake, P. D., Palansooriya, K. N., Sang, M. K., Oh, D. X., Park, J., Hwang, S. Y., Igalavithana, A. D., Gu, C., & Ok, Y. S. (2022) · Soil Use and Management · doi:10.1111/sum.12804 · Cited by 57
Železnikar, Š., Dolar, A., Danevčič, T., Pintar, M., & Drobne, D. (2026) · Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2026.119741 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhao, T., Lozano, Y. M., & Rillig, M. C.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Environmental Science
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2021-06-23
- Volume
- 9
- ISSN
- 2296-665X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3175533638
- Cited by
- 450
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 13.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Microplastics Increase Soil pH and Decrease Microbial Activities as a Function of Microplastic Shape, Polymer Type, and Exposure Time. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3389/fenvs.2021.675803
- The paper
- Zhao, T., Lozano, Y. M., & Rillig, M. C. (2021). Microplastics Increase Soil pH and Decrease Microbial Activities as a Function of Microplastic Shape, Polymer Type, and Exposure Time. Frontiers in Environmental Science. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2021.675803
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.