Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1Forensic and Genetic ResearchGenetic diversity and population structureEurasian Exchange Networks

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 25 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

Y chromosome evidence confirms northeast Asian origin of Xinjiang Kazakhs and genetic influence from 18th century expansion of Kerey clan

Open access
Wang, Bangyan, Liang, Jiayu, Allen, Edward, Chang, Xin, Jiang, Zixi, Yu, Yao, Shi, Meisen, Wen, Shaoqing·2023·Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution

Abstract

The Kazakhs of Xinjiang province are characterized by their nomadic lifestyle and patrilineal clan system. However, compared to Central Asian Kazakhs, a lack of Y chromosomal high-resolution analysis has hindered our understanding of the paternal history of modern Xinjiang Kazakhs. Methods: In this study, we present the analysis of 110 Y-SNP data from 209 Altay Kazakhs and 201 Ili Kazakhs in Xinjiang, along with their previously reported 24 Y-STR loci data. Results and discussion: We found that the Y chromosome haplogroups exhibit greater diversity in Altay Kazakhs compared to Kazakhs in Kazakhstan, Russia, and other regions of China. Y-SNP-based PCA plots reveal that both the Altay and Ili Kazakhs are situated between the Turkic, Mongolia, and Tibeto-Burman clusters. The dominant haplogroup C2a1a3-F1918, which originated in northeast Asia during the Neolithic Age, accounts for nearly half of the Altay and Ili Kazakhs. The Y lineage network of C2a1a3-F1918 contained two subclusters. Approximately 60.6% of the Altay Kazakhs belong to the DYS448-23 subcluster, indicating their Kerey-Abakh ancestry. On the other hand, around three-quarters of the Ili Kazakhs belong to the DYS448-22 subcluster, suggesting their Kerey-Ashmaily heritage. Notably, the TMRCA ages of the DYS448-23 subcluster were calculated to be 289.4 ± 202.65 years, which aligns with the historical immigration of the Kerey clan back to the Altay Mountains after the defeat of the Dzungar by the Qing dynasty in the mid-18th century.

Overview

CoChat Summary

Written by AI from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This study uses 110 Y-SNP markers and previously reported Y-STR data from 410 Xinjiang Kazakh males to reconstruct paternal ancestry in Altay and Ili. It finds northeast Asian origin for the dominant C2a1a3-F1918 lineage and links a Kerey-Abakh subcluster in Altay to an 18th-century Kerey clan expansion.

Key findings

  • Altay Kazakhs had 34 Y-chromosome haplogroups and Ili Kazakhs 27; Altay Kazakhs showed the highest haplogroup diversity among Kazakh populations in Kazakhstan, Russia, and China, with HD = 0.94.
  • C2-M217 was prevalent in Xinjiang Kazakhs: 64.1% in Altay and 55.2% in Ili. Within it, C2a1a3-F1918 accounted for 49.8% of Altay and 50.7% of Ili Kazakhs, while C2a1a2-M48 accounted for 9.6% and 2.5%, respectively. O2-M122 was 5.7% in Altay and 29.4% in Ili; O2a2b1a2a-F444 was 4.8% and 25.9%.
  • PCA placed Altay and Ili Kazakhs between Turkic, Mongolia, and Tibeto-Burman clusters; Altay Kazakhs were closer to Northwest Mongolia Mongols, and Ili Kazakhs closer to Chamdo Tibetans.
  • The C2a1a3-F1918 network split into subclusters: about 60.6% of Altay Kazakhs belonged to DYS448-23, indicating Kerey-Abakh ancestry, while around three-quarters of Ili Kazakhs belonged to DYS448-22, suggesting Kerey-Ashmaily heritage. TMRCA for DYS448-23 was 289.4 ± 202.65 years, aligning with mid-18th-century Kerey migration back to the Altay Mountains after the Qing defeat of the Dzungar.

Methods

  • The study analyzed 410 Kazakh males from Xinjiang: 209 from Altay and 201 from Ili. DNA was extracted and genotyped for 110 Y-SNPs using SNaPshot; 24 Y-STR loci had been previously reported. Haplogroups were classified using ISOGG Y-DNA Haplogroup Tree 2019.
  • Analyses included haplogroup diversity in Arlequin, Y-SNP-based PCA in RStudio against 156 published Eurasian populations, and median-joining networks in NETWORK v.10.2 using 15 Y-STRs for C2a1a3-F1918 and C2a1a2-M48. TMRCA was estimated by the ASD method with a 25-year generation time.
  • Published ancient DNA data were analyzed with bcftools mpileup/call, haplogroup inference with Yleaf, and SNP verification in IGV.

Limitations

  • The paper does not state a limitations section.
  • Evident from the text: the key TMRCA estimate has a very wide confidence interval (289.4 ± 202.65 years), so the precise timing of the Kerey-Abakh expansion is uncertain.
  • Evident from the text: the study is restricted to male Kazakhs from Altay and Ili, relies partly on previously reported Y-STR data, and uses Y-chromosome markers alone, so broader demographic or maternal/autosomal inferences are not tested here.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fevo.2023.1264718

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Figures

Image 1
CC-BY · From the PDF
Image 2
CC-BY · From the PDF
Image 3
CC-BY · From the PDF
Image 4
CC-BY · From the PDF
Image 5
CC-BY · From the PDF

Verification

Claims the paper makes

27 Own result · 14 Own interpretation · 8 Not checked yet · 7 Check pending · 6 No full text of the sources

  • It may state two separate claims as one. 15
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 8

Create a free account to see these claims.

Create a free account to see these assumptions.

36 more claims

Create a free account to see all 62 claims and to verify the 16 references still open.

See all claims — free account

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

2 of 2

Cited works that were retracted

Works this paper cites that were later retracted, from the retraction notices publishers deposit. Major when the notice came out before this paper was published.

1 of 1

Citations

Cites

1 retracted

Show all 41 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Bi, 2015, Kazak, kirgiz, tajik and tatar

Cited by

See all 1

Metadata

Authors
Wang, B., Liang, J., Allen, E., Chang, X., Jiang, Z., Yu, Y., Shi, M., & Wen, S.
Affiliations
  • Fudan University (CN)
  • China University of Political Science and Law (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Shi, Meisen
  • Wen, Shaoqing
Venue
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
Published
2023-09-18
Volume
11
ISSN
2296-701X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4386864207
Cited by
1
References
41
Citations by year
2024: 1
FWCI
0.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Forensic and Genetic Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic diversity and population structure
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Eurasian Exchange Networks
Keywords
Y chromosome, paternal ancestry, Y-SNPs, Y-chromosome short tandem repeats, population structure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-12, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-12 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review