The DOI matches its Crossref record; 62 of the 62 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Common features of microRNA target prediction tools
Open accessAbstract
The human genome encodes for over 1800 microRNAs (miRNAs), which are short non-coding RNA molecules that function to regulate gene expression post-transcriptionally. Due to the potential for one miRNA to target multiple gene transcripts, miRNAs are recognized as a major mechanism to regulate gene expression and mRNA translation. Computational prediction of miRNA targets is a critical initial step in identifying miRNA:mRNA target interactions for experimental validation. The available tools for miRNA target prediction encompass a range of different computational approaches, from the modeling of physical interactions to the incorporation of machine learning. This review provides an overview of the major computational approaches to miRNA target prediction. Our discussion highlights three tools for their ease of use, reliance on relatively updated versions of miRBase, and range of capabilities, and these are DIANA-microT-CDS, miRanda-mirSVR, and TargetScan. In comparison across all miRNA target prediction tools, four main aspects of the miRNA:mRNA target interaction emerge as common features on which most target prediction is based: seed match, conservation, free energy, and site accessibility. This review explains these features and identifies how they are incorporated into currently available target prediction tools. MiRNA target prediction is a dynamic field with increasing attention on development of new analysis tools. This review attempts to provide a comprehensive assessment of these tools in a manner that is accessible across disciplines. Understanding the basis of these prediction methodologies will aid in user selection of the appropriate tools and interpretation of the tool output.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The C. elegans heterochronic gene lin-4 encodes small RNAs with antisense complementarity to lin-14
Lee, R. C., Feinbaum, R. L., & Ambros, V. (1993) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(93)90529-y · Cited by 12,948
Lewis, B. P., Burge, C. B., & Bartel, D. P. (2005) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2004.12.035 · Cited by 11,855
Most mammalian mRNAs are conserved targets of microRNAs
Friedman, R. C., Farh, K. K.-H., Burge, C. B., & Bartel, D. P. (2009) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.082701.108 · Cited by 8,462
(2023) · doi:10.1126/science · Cited by 6,063
Prediction of Mammalian MicroRNA Targets
Lewis, B. P., Shih, I.-H., Jones-Rhoades, M. W., Bartel, D. P., & Burge, C. B. (2003) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(03)01018-3 · Cited by 5,199
Combinatorial microRNA target predictions
Krek, A., Grün, D., Poy, M. N., Wolf, R., Rosenberg, L., Epstein, E. J., MacMenamin, P., da Piedade, I., Gunsalus, K. C., Stoffel, M., et al. (2005) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng1536 · Cited by 4,603
miRBase: tools for microRNA genomics
Griffiths-Jones, S., Saini, H. K., van Dongen, S., & Enright, A. J. (2007) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkm952 · Cited by 4,382
Wightman, B., Ha, I., & Ruvkun, G. (1993) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(93)90530-4 · Cited by 4,292
Evolutionarily conserved elements in vertebrate, insect, worm, and yeast genomes
Siepel, A., Bejerano, G., Pedersen, J. S., Hinrichs, A. S., Hou, M., Rosenbloom, K., Clawson, H., Spieth, J., Hillier, L. W., Richards, S., et al. (2005) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.3715005 · Cited by 3,971
John, B., Enright, A. J., Aravin, A., Tuschl, T., Sander, C., & Marks, D. S. (2004) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0020363 · Cited by 3,796
Cited by
Tools for Sequence-Based miRNA Target Prediction: What to Choose?
Riffo-Campos, Á., Riquelme, I., & Brebi-Mieville, P. (2016) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms17121987 · Cited by 432
Vienberg, S., Geiger, J., Madsen, S., & Dalgaard, L. T. (2017) · Acta Physiologica · doi:10.1111/apha.12681 · Cited by 373
TarPmiR: a new approach for microRNA target site prediction
Ding, J., Li, X., & Hu, H. (2016) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btw318 · Cited by 171
Raoof, R., Bauer, S., El Naggar, H., Connolly, N. M. C., Brennan, G. P., Brindley, E., Hill, T., McArdle, H., Spain, E., Forster, R. J., et al. (2018) · eBioMedicine · doi:10.1016/j.ebiom.2018.10.068 · Cited by 106
Comparative assessment of differential network analysis methods
Lichtblau, Y., Zimmermann, K., Haldemann, B., Lenze, D., Hummel, M., & Leser, U. (2016) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbw061 · Cited by 76
Metadata
- Authors
- Peterson, S. M., Thompson, J. A., Ufkin, M. L., Sathyanarayana, P., Liaw, L., & Congdon, C. B.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Genetics
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2014
- Volume
- 5
- Pages
- 23-23
- ISSN
- 1664-8021 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2170446948
- Cited by
- 462
- References
- 62
- FWCI
- 11.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Common features of microRNA target prediction tools. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3389/fgene.2014.00023
- The paper
- Peterson, S. M., Thompson, J. A., Ufkin, M. L., Sathyanarayana, P., Liaw, L., & Congdon, C. B. (2014). Common features of microRNA target prediction tools. Frontiers in Genetics. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2014.00023
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.