Cited by 76Bioinformatics and Genomic NetworksGene Regulatory Network AnalysisMicrobial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction

Comparative assessment of differential network analysis methods

Lichtblau, Yvonne, Zimmermann, Karin, Haldemann, Berit, Lenze, Dido, Hummel, Michael, Leser, Ulf·2016·Briefings in Bioinformatics

Abstract

Differential network analysis (DiNA) denotes a recent class of network-based Bioinformatics algorithms which focus on the differences in network topologies between two states of a cell, such as healthy and disease, to identify key players in the discriminating biological processes. In contrast to conventional differential analysis, DiNA identifies changes in the interplay between molecules, rather than changes in single molecules. This ability is especially important in cases where effectors are changed, e.g. mutated, but their expression is not. A number of different DiNA approaches have been proposed, yet a comparative assessment of their performance in different settings is still lacking. In this paper, we evaluate 10 different DiNA algorithms regarding their ability to recover genetic key players from transcriptome data. We construct high-quality regulatory networks and enrich them with co-expression data from four different types of cancer. Next, we assess the results of applying DiNA algorithms on these data sets using a gold standard list (GSL). We find that local DiNA algorithms are generally superior to global algorithms, and that all DiNA algorithms outperform conventional differential expression analysis. We also assess the ability of DiNA methods to exploit additional knowledge in the underlying cellular networks. To this end, we enrich the cancer-type specific networks with known regulatory miRNAs and compare the algorithms performance in networks with and without miRNA. We find that including miRNAs consistently and considerably improves the performance of almost all tested algorithms. Our results underline the advantages of comprehensive cell models for the analysis of -omics data.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bib/bbw061

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • It remains difficult to evaluate differential co-expression algorithms owing to the lack of gold standard gene sets to validate the outcome of these methods.

    “An attempt was recently made to compare 10 differential co-expression algorithms, but concluded that it remains difficult to evaluate these owing to the lack of gold standard gene sets to validate the outcome of these methods [143].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lichtblau, Y., Zimmermann, K., Haldemann, B., Lenze, D., Hummel, M., & Leser, U.
Affiliations
  • Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE)
  • Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE)
Corresponding author
Lichtblau, Yvonne
Venue
Briefings in Bioinformatics
Published
2016-07-29
Volume
18
Issue
5
Pages
bbw061
ISSN
  • 1467-5463 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-4054
OpenAlex
W2494631976
Cited by
76
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1
FWCI
2.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Briefings in Bioinformatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
Keywords
differential network analysis, network topology comparison, transcriptome, cancer, regulatory networks, co-expression network, microRNA, key player identification, differential expression analysis, algorithm comparison
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Computational Biology, Gene Expression Profiling, MicroRNAs, Gene Regulatory Networks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review