CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 212

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Homoeologous Exchanges, Segmental Allopolyploidy, and Polyploid Genome Evolution

Mason, Annaliese S., Wendel, Jonathan F.·2020·Frontiers in Genetics
DOI 10.3389/fgene.2020.01014PMC PMC7485112
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fgene.2020.01014

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Whole-genome duplication can arise through autopolyploidization or allopolyploidization, with different consequences on subsequent genome evolution.

    “WGD can arise through two mechanisms: autopolyploidization (within or between populations of a single species) or allopolyploidization (after hybridization of related species), with different consequences on subsequent genome evolution (Stebbins 1947; Mason and Wendel 2020).”

    From An atlas of fish genome evolution reveals delayed rediploidization following the teleost whole-genome duplication (2022) · cites this paper as Mason and Wendel 2020

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 105

  1. Abel, 2007, The effect of autopolyploidy on biomass production in homozygous lines of Brassica rapa and Brassica oleracea., Plant Breed., 126, 642, 10.1111/j.1439-0523.2007.01405.x · DOI
  2. Ainouche, 2004, Spartina anglica C. E. Hubbard: a natural model system for analysing early evolutionary changes that affect allopolyploid genomes., Biol. J. Linn. Soc., 82, 475, 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2004.00334.x · DOI
  3. Ashton, 1992, Multiple origins and genetic diversity in the newly arisen allopolyploid species, Senecio cambrensis Rosser (Compositae)., Heredity, 68, 25, 10.1038/hdy.1992.3 · DOI
  4. Barker, 2016, On the relative abundance of autopolyploids and allopolyploids., New Phytol., 210, 391, 10.1111/nph.13698 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Baumel, 2002, Retrotransposons and genomic stability in populations of the young allopolyploid species Spartina anglica C.E. Hubbard (Poaceae)., Mol. Biol. Evol., 19, 1218, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a004182 · DOI
  6. Bertioli, 2019, The genome sequence of segmental allotetraploid peanut Arachis hypogaea., Nat. Genet., 51, 877, 10.1038/s41588-019-0405-z · DOI
  7. Bhullar, 2014, Silencing of a metaphase I-specific gene results in a phenotype similar to that of the Pairing homeologous 1 (Ph1) gene mutations., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 111, 14187, 10.1073/pnas.1416241111 · DOI
  8. Bingham, 1980, Maximising heterozygosity in autopolyploids, Polyploidy: Biological Relevance, 471, 10.1007/978-1-4613-3069-1_24 · DOI
  9. Birchler, 2010, The gene balance hypothesis: implications for gene regulation, quantitative traits and evolution., New Phytol., 186, 54, 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.03087.x · DOI
  10. Birchler, 2012, Gene balance hypothesis: connecting issues of dosage sensitivity across biological disciplines., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 109, 14746, 10.1073/pnas.1207726109 · DOI
  11. Birchler, 2014, The gene balance hypothesis: dosage effects in plants, Plant Epigenetics and Epigenomics, 25, 10.1007/978-1-62703-773-0_2 · DOI
  12. Bomblies, 2015, Meiosis evolves: adaptation to external and internal environments., New Phytol., 208, 306, 10.1111/nph.13499 · DOI
  13. Bomblies, 2016, The challenge of evolving stable polyploidy: Could an increase in “crossover interference distance” play a central role?, Chromosoma, 125, 287, 10.1007/s00412-015-0571-4 · DOI
  14. Bothmer, 1995, Brassica sect. Brassica (Brassicaceae) II. Inter- and intraspecific crosses with cultivars of B. oleracea., Genet. Resour. Crop Evol., 42, 165, 10.1007/bf02539520 · DOI
  15. Buggs, 2012, Next-generation sequencing and genome evolution in allopolyploids., Am. J. Bot., 99, 372, 10.3732/Ajb.1100395 · DOI
  16. Buggs, 2011, Transcriptomic shock generates evolutionary novelty in a newly formed, natural allopolyploid plant., Curr. Biol., 21, 551, 10.1016/j.cub.2011.02.016 · DOI
  17. Carputo, 2006, Terminology for polyploids based on cytogenetic behavior: consequences in genetics and breeding., Plant Breed. Rev., 26, 105, 10.1002/9780470650325.ch4 · DOI
  18. Chalhoub, 2014, Early allopolyploid evolution in the post-Neolithic Brassica napus oilseed genome., Science, 345, 950, 10.1126/science.1253435 · DOI
  19. Chen, 2018, Unstable allotetraploid tobacco genome due to frequent homeologous recombination, segmental deletion, and chromosome loss., Mol. Plant., 11, 914, 10.1016/j.molp.2018.04.009 · DOI
  20. Cheng, 2018, Gene retention, fractionation and subgenome differences in polyploid plants., Nat. Plants, 4, 258, 10.1038/s41477-018-0136-7 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Chester, 2012, Extensive chromosomal variation in a recently formed natural allopolyploid species, Tragopogon miscellus (Asteraceae)., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 109, 1176, 10.1073/pnas.1112041109 · DOI
  22. Cifuentes, 2010, Genetic regulation of meiosis in polyploid species: new insights into an old question., New Phytol., 186, 29, 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.03084.x · DOI
  23. De Storme, 2013, Sexual polyploidization in plants–cytological mechanisms and molecular regulation., New Phytol., 198, 670, 10.1111/nph.12184 · DOI
  24. De Storme, 2014, Plant speciation through chromosome instability and ploidy change: cellular mechanisms, molecular factors and evolutionary relevance., Curr. Plant Biol., 1, 10, 10.1016/j.cpb.2014.09.002 · DOI
  25. Edger, 2018, Subgenome assignment in allopolyploids: challenges and future directions., Curr. Opin. Plant Biol., 42, 76, 10.1016/j.pbi.2018.03.006 · DOI
  26. Endrizzi, 1985, Genetics, cytology, and evolution of Gossypium., Adv. Genet., 23, 271, 10.1016/s0065-2660(08)60515-5 · DOI
  27. Feldman, 1993, Cytogenetic activity and mode of action of the pairing homoeologous (Ph1) gene of wheat., Crop Sci., 33, 894, 10.2135/cropsci1993.0011183x003300050003x · DOI
  28. Gaebelein, 2018, Allohexaploids in the genus Brassica., Crit. Rev. Plant Sci., 37, 422, 10.1080/07352689.2018.1517143 · DOI
  29. Gaebelein, 2019, Inherited allelic variants and novel karyotype changes influence fertility and genome stability in Brassica allohexaploids., New Phytol., 223, 965, 10.1111/nph.15804 · DOI
  30. Gaeta, 2007, Genomic changes in resynthesized Brassica napus and their effect on gene expression and phenotype., Plant Cell, 19, 3403, 10.1105/tpc.107.054346 · DOI
  31. Gao, 2014, Regularities in simple sequence repeat variations induced by a cross of resynthesized Brassica napus and natural Brassica napus., Plant OMICS, 7, 35
  32. Gorbunova, 1999, How plants make ends meet: DNA double-strand break repair., Trends Plant Sci., 4, 263, 10.1016/S1360-1385(99)01430-2 · DOI
  33. Grandont, 2013, Meiosis and its deviations in polyploid plants., Cytogenet. Genome Res., 140, 171, 10.1159/000351730 · DOI
  34. Greer, 2012, The Ph1 locus suppresses Cdk2-type activity during premeiosis and meiosis in wheat., Plant Cell, 24, 152, 10.1105/tpc.111.094771 · DOI
  35. Griffiths, 2019, Breaking free: the genomics of allopolyploidy-facilitated niche expansion in white clover., Plant Cell, 31, 1466, 10.1105/tpc.18.00606 · DOI
  36. Griffiths, 2006, Molecular characterization of Ph1 as a major chromosome pairing locus in polyploid wheat., Nature, 439, 749, 10.1038/nature04434 · DOI
  37. Grover, 2012, Homoeolog expression bias and expression level dominance in allopolyploids., New Phytol., 196, 966, 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04365.x · DOI
  38. Gupta, 2016, Development and molecular-genetic characterization of a stable Brassica allohexaploid., Theor. Appl. Genet., 129, 2085, 10.1007/s00122-016-2759-2 · DOI
  39. Harlan, 1975, On Ö. Winge and a prayer: the origins of polyploidy., Bot. Rev., 41, 361, 10.1007/bf02860830 · DOI
  40. Hegarty, 2006, Transcriptome shock after interspecific hybridization in Senecio is ameliorated by genome duplication., Curr. Biol., 16, 1652, 10.1016/j.cub.2006.06.071 · DOI
  41. Howard, 1939, The cytology of autotetraploid kale, Brassica oleracea., Cytologia, 10, 77, 10.1508/cytologia.10.77 · DOI
  42. Hurgobin, 2018, Homoeologous exchange is a major cause of gene presence/absence variation in the amphidiploid Brassica napus., Plant Biotechnol. J., 16, 1265, 10.1111/pbi.12867 · DOI
  43. Jarvis, 2017, The genome of Chenopodium quinoa, Nature, 542, 307, 10.1038/nature21370 · DOI
  44. Jenczewski, 2002, A strict diploid-like pairing regime is associated with tetrasomic segregation in induced autotetraploids of kale., Plant Breed., 121, 177, 10.1046/j.1439-0523.2002.00672.x · DOI
  45. Kianian, 1992, Trait inheritance, fertility, and genomic relationships of some n = 9 Brassica species., Genet. Resour. Crop Evol., 39, 165, 10.1007/BF00051930 · DOI
  46. Kihara, 1926, Chromosomenzahlen und systematische Gruppierung der Rumex-Arten., Z. Zellforsch. Microsk. Anat., 4, 475, 10.1007/bf00391215 · DOI
  47. Leal-Bertioli, 2018, Segmental allopolyploidy in action: Increasing diversity through polyploid hybridization and homoeologous recombination., Am. J. Bot., 105, 1053, 10.1002/ajb2.1112 · DOI
  48. Leitch, 2008, Genomic plasticity and the diversity of polyploid plants., Science, 320, 481, 10.1126/science.1153585 · DOI
  49. Li, 2019, DNA methylation repatterning accompanying hybridization, whole genome doubling and homoeolog exchange in nascent segmental rice allotetraploids., New Phytol., 223, 979, 10.1111/nph.15820 · DOI
  50. Lloyd, 2016, Meiosis in autopolyploid and allopolyploid Arabidopsis., Curr. Opin. Plant Biol., 30, 116, 10.1016/j.pbi.2016.02.004 · DOI
  51. Marburger, 2019, Interspecific introgression mediates adaptation to whole genome duplication., Nat. Commun., 10, 10.1038/s41467-019-13159-5 · DOI
  52. Mason, 2018, Agricultural selection and presence-absence variation in spring-type canola germplasm., Crop Pasture Sci., 69, 55, 10.1071/CP17161 · DOI
  53. Mason, 2015, Unreduced gametes: meiotic mishap or evolutionary mechanism?, Trends Genet., 31, 5, 10.1016/j.tig.2014.09.011 · DOI
  54. McClintock, 1984, The significance of responses of the genome to challenge., Science, 226, 792, 10.1126/science.15739260 · DOI
  55. Morgan, 2020, Derived alleles of two axis proteins affect meiotic traits in autotetraploid Arabidopsis arenosa., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 117, 8980, 10.1073/pnas.1919459117 · DOI
  56. Nicolas, 2009, Genetic regulation of meiotic cross-overs between related genomes in Brassica napus haploids and hybrids., Plant Cell, 21, 373, 10.1105/tpc.108.062273 · DOI
  57. Nicolas, 2012, Non-random distribution of extensive chromosome rearrangements in Brassica napus depends on genome organization., Plant J., 70, 691, 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2012.04914.x · DOI
  58. Nieto-Feliner, 2020, Genomics of evolutionary novelty in hybrids and polyploids., Front. Genet., 11, 10.3389/fgene.2020.00792 · DOI
  59. Otto, 2000, Polyploid incidence and evolution., Annu. Rev. Genet., 34, 401, 10.1146/annurev.genet.34.1.401 · DOI · Paper page
  60. Ozkan, 2001, Allopolyploidy-induced rapid genome evolution in the wheat (Aegilops-Triticum) group., Plant Cell, 13, 1735, 10.1105/tpc.13.8.1735 · DOI
  61. Parkin, 2003, Patterns of genome duplication within the Brassica napus genome., Genome, 46, 291, 10.1139/G03-006 · DOI
  62. Pelé, 2018, Speciation success of polyploid plants closely relates to the regulation of meiotic recombination., Front. Plant Sci., 9, 10.3389/fpls.2018.00907 · DOI
  63. Prakash, 1999, Cytogenetics, Biology of Brassica coenospecies, 59, 10.1016/S0168-7972(99)80004-8 · DOI
  64. Putnam, 2009, Specific pathways prevent duplication-mediated genome rearrangements., Nature, 460, 984, 10.1038/nature08217 · DOI
  65. Ramsey, 1998, Pathways, mechanisms, and rates of polyploid formation in flowering plants., Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst., 29, 467, 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.29.1.467 · DOI
  66. Rey, 2017, Exploiting the ZIP4 homologue within the wheat Ph1 locus has identified two lines exhibiting homoeologous crossover in wheat-wild relative hybrids., Mol. Breed., 37, 10.1007/s11032-017-0700-2 · DOI
  67. Samans, 2017, Surviving a genome collision: genomic signatures of allopolyploidization in the recent crop species Brassica napus., Plant Genome, 10, 1, 10.3835/plantgenome2017.02.0013 · DOI
  68. Schiessl, 2017, Post-polyploidisation morphotype diversification associates with gene copy number variation., Sci. Rep., 7, 10.1038/srep41845 · DOI
  69. Schiessl, 2019, The role of genomic structural variation in the genetic improvement of polyploid crops., Crop J., 7, 127, 10.1016/j.cj.2018.07.006 · DOI
  70. Schranz, 2006, The ABC’s of comparative genomics in the Brassicaceae: building blocks of crucifer genomes., Trends Plant Sci., 11, 535, 10.1016/j.tplants.2006.09.002 · DOI · Paper page
  71. Schuermann, 2005, The dual nature of homologous recombination in plants., Trends Genet., 21, 172, 10.1016/j.tig.2005.01.002 · DOI
  72. Sears, 1976, Genetic control of chromosome pairing in wheat., Annu. Rev. Genet., 10, 31, 10.1146/annurev.ge.10.120176.000335 · DOI
  73. Shaked, 2001, Sequence elimination and cytosine methylation are rapid and reproducible responses of the genome to wide hybridization and allopolyploidy in wheat., Plant Cell, 13, 1749, 10.1105/tpc.010083 · DOI
  74. Soltis, 2014, The polyploidy revolution then…and now: stebbins revisited., Am. J. Bot., 101, 1057, 10.3732/ajb.1400178 · DOI
  75. Song, 1995, Rapid genome change in synthetic polyploids of Brassica and its implications for polyploid evolution., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 92, 7719, 10.1073/pnas.92.17.7719 · DOI
  76. Spoelhof, Karyotypic variation and pollen stainability in resynthesized allopolyploids Tragopogon miscellus and T. mirus., Am. J. Bot., 104, 1484, 10.3732/ajb.1700180 · DOI
  77. Spoelhof, Pure polyploidy: closing the gaps in autopolyploid research., J. Syst. Evol., 55, 340, 10.1111/jse.12253 · DOI
  78. Stebbins, 1947, Types of polyploids: their classification and significance., Adv. Genet., 1, 403, 10.1016/S0065-2660(08)60490-3 · DOI · Paper page
  79. Stebbins, 1950, Variation and Evolution in Plants., 10.7312/steb94536 · DOI · Paper page
  80. Stebbins, 1971, Chromosomal Evolution in Higher Plants.
  81. Stein, 2017, Mapping of homoeologous chromosome exchanges influencing quantitative trait variation in Brassica napus., Plant Biotechnol. J., 15, 1478, 10.1111/pbi.12732 · DOI
  82. Sun, 2017, Segmental allotetraploidy generates extensive homoeologous expression rewiring and phenotypic diversity at the population level in rice., Mol. Ecol., 26, 5451, 10.1111/mec.14297 · DOI
  83. Swaminathan, 1959, Multivalent frequency and seed fertility in raw and evolved tetraploids of Brassica campestris var. toria., Z. Vererbungsl., 90, 385, 10.1007/BF00888813 · DOI
  84. Sybenga, 1996, Chromosome pairing affinity and quadrivalent formation in polyploids: Do segmental allopolyploids exist?, Genome, 39, 1176, 10.1139/g96-148 · DOI
  85. Szadkowski, 2010, The first meiosis of resynthesized Brassica napus, a genome blender., New Phytol., 186, 102, 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03182.x · DOI
  86. Taylor, 1976, The effect of B chromosomes on homoeologous pairing in species hybrids., Chromosoma, 57, 25, 10.1007/bf00292948 · DOI
  87. Tian, 2010, Synthesis of a Brassica trigenomic allohexaploid (B. carinata × B. rapa) de novo and its stability in subsequent generations., Theor. Appl. Genet., 121, 1431, 10.1007/s00122-010-1399-1 · DOI
  88. Vallejo-Marín, 2015, Speciation by genome duplication: repeated origins and genomic composition of the recently formed allopolyploid species Mimulus peregrinus., Evolution, 69, 1487, 10.1111/evo.12678 · DOI
  89. Van De Peer, 2017, The evolutionary significance of polyploidy., Nat. Rev. Genet., 18, 411, 10.1038/nrg.2017.26 · DOI
  90. Vicient, 2017, Impact of transposable elements on polyploid plant genomes., Ann. Bot., 120, 195, 10.1093/aob/mcx078 · DOI
  91. Wendel, 2005, Polyploidy and evolution in plants, Plant Diversity and Evolution: Genotypic and Phenotypic Variation in Higher Plants, 97, 10.1079/9780851999043.0097 · DOI
  92. Wendel, 2018, The long and short of doubling down: polyploidy, epigenetics, and the temporal dynamics of genome fractionation., Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev., 49, 1, 10.1016/j.gde.2018.01.004 · DOI · Paper page
  93. Wu, 2010, Chromosomal evolution in the plant family Solanaceae., BMC Genomics, 11, 10.1186/1471-2164-11-182 · DOI
  94. Xiao, 2000, Intrachromosomal homologous recombination in Arabidopsis induced by a maize transposon., Mol. Gen. Genet., 263, 22, 10.1007/PL00008672 · DOI
  95. Xiong, 2011, Homoeologous shuffling and chromosome compensation maintain genome balance in resynthesized allopolyploid Brassica napus., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 108, 7908, 10.1073/pnas.1014138108 · DOI
  96. Xuan, 2012, Ac/Ds -induced chromosomal rearrangements in rice genomes., Mob. Genet. Elements, 2, 67, 10.4161/mge.20264 · DOI
  97. Yant, 2017, Genomic studies of adaptive evolution in outcrossing Arabidopsis species., Curr. Opin. Plant Biol., 36, 9, 10.1016/j.pbi.2016.11.018 · DOI
  98. Yant, 2013, Meiotic adaptation to genome duplication in Arabidopsis arenosa., Curr. Biol., 23, 2151, 10.1016/j.cub.2013.08.059 · DOI
  99. Yuan, 2017, Improvements in genomic technologies: application to crop genomics., Trends Biotechnol., 35, 547, 10.1016/j.tibtech.2017.02.009 · DOI
  100. Zdráhalová, 1968, Frequency of polyvalents in relation to fertility of autogamized autotetraploid kohlrabi (Brassica oleracea var. gongylodes L.), cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata L.) and their hybrids., Biol. Plant., 10, 435, 10.1007/bf02920986 · DOI
  101. Zhang, 2019, Extensive changes in gene expression and alternative splicing due to homoeologous exchange in rice segmental allopolyploids., Theor. Appl. Genet., 132, 2295, 10.1007/s00122-019-03355-8 · DOI
  102. Zhang, 2020, Homoeologous exchanges occur through intragenic recombination generating novel transcripts and proteins in wheat and other polyploids., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 117, 14561, 10.1073/pnas.2003505117 · DOI
  103. Zhao, 2018, Rapid and pervasive development- and tissue-specific homeolog expression partitioning in newly formed inter-subspecific rice segmental allotetraploids., BMC Genomics, 19, 10.1186/s12864-018-5150-7 · DOI
  104. Zhuang, 2019, The genome of cultivated peanut provides insight into legume karyotypes, polyploid evolution and crop domestication., Nat. Genet., 51, 865, 10.1038/s41588-019-0402-2 · DOI
  105. Zou, 2011, De novo genetic variation associated with retrotransposon activation, genomic rearrangements and trait variation in a recombinant inbred line population of Brassica napus derived from interspecific hybridization with Brassica rapa., Plant J., 68, 212, 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2011.04679.x · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Mason, A. S., & Wendel, J. F.
Venue
Frontiers in Genetics
Publisher
Frontiers Media SA
Published
2020-08-28
Volume
11
ISSN
1664-8021
DOI
10.3389/fgene.2020.01014
PMC
PMC7485112
Cited by
212
References
1
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (vor)
Funders
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (MA6473/1-1, MA6473/2-1, MA6473/3-1)
  • National Science Foundation
  • Cotton Incorporated

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review