Cited by 38Corneal surgery and disordersCorneal Surgery and TreatmentsAdvanced Drug Delivery Systems

Rapamycin nano-micelle ophthalmic solution reduces corneal allograft rejection by potentiating myeloid-derived suppressor cells' function

Open access
Wei, Chao, Wang, Yuexin, Ma, Li, Wang, Xin, Chi, Hao, Zhang, Sai, Liu, Ting, Li, Zhiyuan +5 more·2018·Frontiers in Immunology

Abstract

Allograft rejection is the major cause for corneal graft failure. Rapamycin(RAPA)was reported as an effective and novel immunosuppressive agent for patients undergoing corneal transplantation. However, the high water insolubility and low bioavailability has strongly constrained its clinical application. Here we successfully developed RAPA nano-micelle ophthalmic solution, and found that corneal allograft survival in RAPA nano-micelle ophthalmic solution treated recipients was significantly prolonged for more than 2 months, with less inflammatory infiltration, decreased production of pro-inflammatory factors and elevated recruitment of MDSCs. MDSCs from RAPA nano-micelle ophthalmic solution treated mice could significantly inhibit the proliferation of CD4+T cells with increased expressions of inducible nitric oxidase (iNOS) and arginase-1 (Arg-1). Activity blockade of Arg-1 and iNOS pharmacologically reversed their immunosuppressive ability. Moreover, the effects of RAPA were counterbalanced by the administration of anti-Gr-1 antibody or inhibiting the activity of iNOS pharmacologically. In addition, RAPA nano-micelle also effectively alleviated the allograft rejection in high-risk rabbit PKP models with corneal vascularization. Collectively, our results demonstrated that RAPA nano-micelle ophthalmic solution could improve the immunosuppressive activity of MDSCs through elevated expression of Arg-1 and iNOS, which highlights the possible therapeutic applications of RAPA on corneal allograft rejection.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fimmu.2018.02283

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Corneal allograft survival in recipients treated with RAPA nano-micelle ophthalmic solution was evidently prolongated for over 2 months, accompanied by decreased inflammatory infiltration and production of pro-inflammatory factors.

    “Similarly, investigators demonstrated that corneal allograft survival in recipients treated with a RAPA nano-micelle ophthalmic solution was evidently prolongated for over 2 months, accompanied by decreased inflammatory infiltration and production of pro-inflammatory factors [153]”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wei, C., Wang, Y., Ma, L., Wang, X., Chi, H., Zhang, S., Liu, T., Li, Z., Xiang, D., Dong, Y., Wu, X., Shi, W., & Gao, H.
Affiliations
  • Shandong First Medical University (CN)
  • University of Jinan (CN)
  • Qingdao University (CN)
  • Qingdao University of Science and Technology (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Shi, Weiyun
  • Gao, Hua
Venue
Frontiers in Immunology
Published
2018-10-08
Volume
9
Pages
2283-2283
ISSN
1664-3224 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2897903405
Cited by
38
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4
FWCI
2.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Immunology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (20081148, 81500767, 81570821, 2013CB967004, 81530027, 81370989, 2016GSF201182)
  • Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences (2013CB967004, 81570821, 20081148, 81530027, 81370989)
  • National Key Research and Development Program of China (2013CB967004, 81570821, 20081148, 81370989)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Corneal surgery and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Corneal Surgery and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Advanced Drug Delivery Systems
Keywords
rapamycin, corneal graft rejection, myeloid-derived suppressor cells, immunosuppression, arginase-1, inducible nitric oxide synthase, CD4+ T cell proliferation, corneal transplantation, corneal neovascularization, drug delivery
MeSH terms
Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells, Animals, Arginase, Eye, Graft Rejection, Immunosuppressive Agents, Male, Mice, Inbred BALB C, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Micelles, Ophthalmic Solutions, Rabbits, Keratoplasty, Penetrating, Corneal Transplantation, Sirolimus, Nitric Oxide Synthase Type II, Nanoparticles, Allografts

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review