Cited by 17vaccines and immunoinformatics approachesT-cell and B-cell ImmunologyProtein Structure and Dynamics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Quantifying conformational changes in the TCR:pMHC-I binding interface

Open access

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Background: T cells form one of the key pillars of adaptive immunity. Using their surface bound T cell antigen receptors (TCRs), these cells screen millions of antigens presented by major histocompatibility complex (MHC) or MHC-like molecules. In other protein families, the dynamics of protein-protein interactions have important implications for protein function. Case studies of TCR:class I peptide-MHCs (pMHC-Is) structures have reported mixed results on whether the binding interfaces undergo conformational change during engagement and no robust statistical quantification has been done to generalise these results. Thus, it remains an open question of whether movement occurs in the binding interface that enables the recognition and activation of T cells. Methods: In this work, we quantify the conformational changes in the TCR:pMHC-I binding interface by creating a dataset of 391 structures, comprising 22 TCRs, 19 MHC alleles, and 79 peptide structures in both unbound (apo) and bound (holo) conformations. Results: In support of some case studies, we demonstrate that all complementarity determining region (CDR) loops move to a certain extent but only CDR3α and CDR3β loops modify their shape when binding pMHC-Is. We also map the contacts between TCRs and pMHC-Is, generating a novel fingerprint of TCRs on MHC molecules and show that the CDR3α tends to bind the N-terminus of the peptide and the CDR3β tends to bind the C-terminus of the peptide. Finally, we show that the presented peptides can undergo conformational changes when engaged by TCRs, as has been reported in past literature, but novelly show these changes depend on how the peptides are anchored in the MHC binding groove. Conclusions: Our work has implications in understanding the behaviour of TCR:pMHC-I interactions and providing insights that can be used for modelling Tcell antigen specificity, an ongoing grand challenge in immunology.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1491656

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 51

  1. Rudolph, 2006, How TCRs bind MHCs, peptides, and coreceptors, Annu Rev Immunol, 24, 10.1146/annurev.immunol.23.021704.115658 · DOI
  2. Turner, 2006, Structural determinants of T-cell receptor bias in immunity, Nat Rev Immunol, 6, 10.1038/nri1977 · DOI
  3. Ali, 2020, The functions of kinesin and kinesin-related proteins in eukaryotes, Cell Adhes Migr, 14, 10.1080/19336918.2020.1810939 · DOI
  4. Goh, 2004, Conformational changes associated with protein–protein interactions, Curr Opin Struct Biol, 14, 10.1016/j.sbi.2004.01.005 · DOI
  5. Liu, 2024, Do antibody CDR loops change conformation upon binding, mAbs, 16, 10.1080/19420862.2024.2322533 · DOI
  6. Garcia, 1998, Structural basis of plasticity in T cell receptor recognition of a self peptide-MHC antigen, Science, 279, 10.1126/science.279.5354.1166 · DOI
  7. Reiser, 2002, A T cell receptor CDR3beta loop undergoes conformational changes of unprecedented magnitude upon binding to a peptide/MHC class I complex, Immunity, 16, 10.1016/s1074-7613(02)00288-1 · DOI
  8. Kjer-Nielsen, 2002, The 1.5 A crystal structure of a highly selected antiviral T cell receptor provides evidence for a structural basis of immunodominance, Struct (London England: 1993), 10, 10.1016/s0969-2126(02)00878-x · DOI
  9. Kjer-Nielsen, 2003, A structural basis for the selection of dominant alphabeta T cell receptors in antiviral immunity, Immunity, 18, 53, 10.1016/s1074-7613(02)00513-7 · DOI
  10. Reiser, 2003, CDR3 loop flexibility contributes to the degeneracy of TCR recognition, Nat Immunol, 4, 10.1038/ni891 · DOI
  11. Chen, 2005, Structural and kinetic basis for heightened immunogenicity of T cell vaccines, J Exp Med, 201, 10.1084/jem.20042323 · DOI
  12. Tynan, 2007, A T cell receptor flattens a bulged antigenic peptide presented by a major histocompatibility complex class I molecule, Nat Immunol, 8, 10.1038/ni1432 · DOI
  13. Krogsgaard, 2003, Evidence that Structural Rearrangements and/or Flexibility during TCR Binding Can Contribute to T Cell Activation, Mol Cell, 12, 10.1016/S1097-2765(03)00474-X · DOI
  14. Armstrong, 2008, Conformational changes and flexibility in T-cell receptor recognition of peptide–MHC complexes, Biochem J, 415, 10.1042/BJ20080850 · DOI
  15. Leem, 2018, STCRDab: the structural t-cell receptor database, Mol Cell, 46, 10.1093/nar/gkx971 · DOI
  16. Raybould, 2024, The observed t cell receptor space database enables paired-chain repertoire mining, coherence analysis and language modelling, bioRxiv, 43, 114704, 10.1101/2024.05.20.594960 · DOI
  17. Xue, 2023, Disease associated human TCR characterization by deep-learning framework TCR-DeepInsight, 10.1101/2023.05.22.541406 · DOI
  18. Lefranc, 2003, IMGT unique numbering for immunoglobulin and T cell receptor variable domains and Ig superfamily V-like domains, Dev Comp Immunol, 27, 55, 10.1016/S0145-305X(02)00039-3 · DOI
  19. Quast, 2024, T-cell receptor structures and predictive models reveal comparable alpha and beta chain structural diversity despite differing genetic complexity, 10.1101/2024.05.20.594940 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Borg, 2005, The CDR3 regions of an immunodominant T cell receptor dictate the ‘energetic landscape’ of peptide-MHC recognition, Nat Immunol, 6, 10.1038/ni1155 · DOI
  21. Coles, 2020, TCRs with distinct specificity profiles use different binding modes to engage an identical peptide–HLA complex, J Immunol Author Choice, 204, 10.4049/jimmunol.1900915 · DOI
  22. Raybould, 2023, Computationally profiling peptide:MHC recognition by T-cell receptors and T-cell receptor-mimetic antibodies, Front Immunol, 13, 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1080596 · DOI
  23. Henderson, 2024, Limits on inferring T-cell specificity from partial information, 10.48550/arXiv.2404.12565 · DOI
  24. Szeto, 2021, TCR recognition of peptide–MHC-I: rule makers and breakers, Int J Mol Sci, 22, 10.3390/ijms22010068 · DOI
  25. McMaster, 2024, Can AlphaFold’s breakthrough in protein structure help decode the fundamental principles of adaptive cellular immunity, Nat Methods, 21, 10.1038/s41592-024-02240-7 · DOI
  26. Abanades, 2023, ImmuneBuilder: Deep-learning models for predicting the structures of immune proteins, Commun Biol, 6, 1, 10.1038/s42003-023-04927-7 · DOI
  27. Gupta, 2024, A structure-guided approach to predict MHC-I restriction of T cell receptors for public antigens, 10.1101/2024.06.04.597418 · DOI
  28. Hudson, 2023, Can we predict T cell specificity with digital biology and machine learning, Nat Rev Immunol, 23, 10.1038/s41577-023-00835-3 · DOI
  29. Ortega, 2024, Learning predictive signatures of HLA type from t-cell repertoires, 10.1101/2024.01.25.577228 · DOI
  30. Guloglu, 2023, Specific attributes of the VL domain influence both the structure and structural variability of CDR-H3 through steric effects, Front Immunol, 14, 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1223802 · DOI
  31. Fernández-Quintero, 2020, T-cell receptor CDR3 loop conformations in solution shift the relative Vα-Vβ Domain distributions, Front Immunol, 11, 10.3389/fimmu.2020.01440 · DOI
  32. Hawse, 2014, TCR scanning of peptide/MHC through complementary matching of receptor and ligand molecular flexibility, J Immunol (Baltimore Md.: 1950), 192, 10.4049/jimmunol.1302953 · DOI
  33. Hawse, 2013, Peptide modulation of class I major histocompatibility complex protein molecular flexibility and the implications for immune recognition *, Front Immunol, 288, 10.1074/jbc.M113.490664 · DOI
  34. van Hateren, 2017, Direct evidence for conformational dynamics in major histocompatibility complex class I molecules, J Biol Chem, 292, 10.1074/jbc.M117.809624 · DOI
  35. Fabian, 2008, HLA-B27 subtypes differentially associated with disease exhibit conformational differences in solution, J Mol Biol, 376, 798, 10.1016/j.jmb.2007.12.009 · DOI
  36. Hawse, 2012, Cutting edge: evidence for a dynamically driven T cell signaling mechanism, J Immunol, 188, 10.4049/jimmunol.1200952 · DOI
  37. Tripathi, 2021, Exploring the different states of wild-type T-cell receptor and mutant conformational changes towards understanding the antigen recognition, J Biomol Struct Dyn, 39, 188, 10.1080/07391102.2019.1708795 · DOI
  38. Pöhlmann, 2004, Differential peptide dynamics is linked to major histocompatibility complex polymorphism *, J Biol Chem, 279, 10.1074/jbc.C400128200 · DOI
  39. Reboul, 2012, Epitope flexibility and dynamic footprint revealed by molecular dynamics of a pMHC-TCR complex, PloS Comput Biol, 8, e1002404, 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002404 · DOI
  40. Knapp, 2016, T-cell receptor binding affects the dynamics of the peptide/MHC-I complex, J Chem Inf Model, 56, 46, 10.1021/acs.jcim.5b00511 · DOI
  41. Tomasiak, 2022, Conformational flexibility of a free and TCR-bound pMHC-I protein investigated by long-term molecular dynamics simulations, BMC Immunol, 23, 36, 10.1186/s12865-022-00510-7 · DOI
  42. Alba, 2022, The full model of the pMHC-TCR-CD3 complex: A structural and dynamical characterization of bound and unbound states, Cells, 11, 10.3390/cells11040668 · DOI
  43. Karch, 2019, Intramolecular domain movements of free and bound pMHC and TCR proteins: A molecular dynamics simulation study, Cells, 8, 10.3390/cells8070720 · DOI
  44. Alba, 2020, Molecular dynamics simulations reveal canonical conformations in different pMHC/TCR interactions, Cells, 9, 10.3390/cells9040942 · DOI
  45. Sewell, 2012, Why must T cells be cross-reactive, Nat Rev Immunol, 12, 10.1038/nri3279 · DOI
  46. Greenshields-Watson, 2024, Investigating the ability of deep learning-based structure prediction to extrapolate and/or enrich the set of antibody CDR canonical forms, Front Immunol, 15, 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1352703 · DOI · Paper page
  47. Dunbar, 2016, ANARCI: Antigen receptor numbering and receptor classification, Bioinformatics, 32, 298, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv552 · DOI
  48. Gupta, 2023, HLA3DB: Comprehensive annotation of peptide/HLA complexes enables blind structure prediction of T cell epitopes, Nat Comm, 14, 6349, 10.1038/s41467-023-42163-z · DOI · Paper page
  49. Wong, 2019, Comparative analysis of the CDR loops of antigen receptors, Front Immunol, 10, 10.3389/fimmu.2019.02454 · DOI
  50. McInnes, 2017, hdbscan: Hierarchical density based clustering, J Open Source Softw, 2, 205, 10.21105/joss.00205 · DOI · Paper page
  51. Tadros, 2023, The MHC Motif Atlas: A database of MHC binding specificities and ligands, Nucleic Acids Res, 51, 10.1093/nar/gkac965 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
McMaster, B., Thorpe, C. J., Rossjohn, J., Deane, C. M., & Koohy, H.
Affiliations
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • European Bioinformatics Institute (GB)
  • Institute of Infection and Immunity (CA)
Corresponding author
  • Deane, Charlotte M.
  • Koohy, Hashem
Venue
Frontiers in Immunology
Published
2024-12-02
Volume
15
Pages
1491656-1491656
ISSN
1664-3224 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4404899980
Cited by
17
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 4
FWCI
2.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Immunology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Medical Research Council (MC_UU_12010/3)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › T-cell and B-cell Immunology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
Keywords
T cell receptor, conformational change, hypervariable region, peptide conformation, T cell antigen specificity, protein-protein interaction, T cell activation
MeSH terms
Binding Sites, Humans, Models, Molecular, Peptides, Protein Binding, Protein Conformation, Receptors, Antigen, T-Cell, T-Lymphocytes, Histocompatibility Antigens Class I, Complementarity Determining Regions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review