The DOI matches its Crossref record; 114 of the 115 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 1 are not checked yet.
The integration of AI in nursing: addressing current applications, challenges, and future directions
Open accessAbstract
Artificial intelligence is increasingly influencing healthcare, providing transformative opportunities and challenges for nursing practice. This review critically evaluates the integration of AI in nursing, focusing on its current applications, limitations, and areas that require further investigation. A comprehensive analysis of recent studies highlights the use of AI in clinical decision support systems, patient monitoring, and nursing education. However, several barriers to successful implementation are identified, including technical constraints, ethical dilemmas, and the need for workforce adaptation. Significant gaps in the literature are also evident, such as the limited development of nursing-specific AI tools, insufficient long-term impact assessments, and the absence of comprehensive ethical frameworks tailored to nursing contexts. The potential of AI to reshape personalized care, advance robotics in nursing, and address global health challenges is explored in depth. This review integrates existing knowledge and identifies critical areas for future research, emphasizing the necessity of aligning AI advancements with the specific needs of nursing. Addressing these gaps is essential to fully harness AI's potential while reducing associated risks, ultimately enhancing nursing practice and improving patient outcomes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Mobile health and virtual care tools can enhance nursing workflows, improve clinical decision making, and help ensure that patients in under-resourced areas experience fewer gaps in care and more coordinated health services.4,5”
From Empathic and agentic artificial intelligence in nursing: perspectives on a human-centered framework for cancer care navigation in the United States of America (2026) · cites this paper as [5]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“This absence limits evaluation and improvement of AI tools and hinders insight into long-term impacts of nursing-specific AI frameworks on nurse clinical workflow and patient outcomes.4,5,7”
From Empathic and agentic artificial intelligence in nursing: perspectives on a human-centered framework for cancer care navigation in the United States of America (2026) · cites this paper as [5]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“while agentic AI may generate inaccurate, inequitable, or unsafe recommendations for marginalized populations.5,21,22”
From Empathic and agentic artificial intelligence in nursing: perspectives on a human-centered framework for cancer care navigation in the United States of America (2026) · cites this paper as [5]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Without diverse representative and contextually relevant training data, empathic AI systems may misinterpret emotional cues across different cultural, linguistic or socioeconomic groups”
From Empathic and agentic artificial intelligence in nursing: perspectives on a human-centered framework for cancer care navigation in the United States of America (2026) · cites this paper as [5]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Mobile health and virtual care tools can enhance nursing workflows, improve clinical decision making, and help ensure that patients in under-resourced areas experience fewer gaps in care and more coordinated health services.4,5”
From Empathic and agentic artificial intelligence in nursing: perspectives on a human-centered framework for cancer care navigation in the United States of America (2026) · cites this paper as [5]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Mobile health and virtual care tools can enhance nursing workflows, improve clinical decision making, and help ensure that patients in under-resourced areas experience fewer gaps in care and more coordinated health services.4,5”
From Empathic and agentic artificial intelligence in nursing: perspectives on a human-centered framework for cancer care navigation in the United States of America (2026) · cites this paper as [5]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“This absence limits evaluation and improvement of AI tools and hinders insight into long-term impacts of nursing-specific AI frameworks on nurse clinical workflow and patient outcomes.4,5,7”
From Empathic and agentic artificial intelligence in nursing: perspectives on a human-centered framework for cancer care navigation in the United States of America (2026) · cites this paper as [5]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“In real-world practice, our human-centered AI framework could help alleviate documentation burden, reduce cognitive overload, and enhance workflow efficiency across diverse cancer care settings and host communities.5”
From Empathic and agentic artificial intelligence in nursing: perspectives on a human-centered framework for cancer care navigation in the United States of America (2026) · cites this paper as [5]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Overreliance on automated interactions or AI-mediated communication could degrade patient–clinician relationships.5”
From Empathic and agentic artificial intelligence in nursing: perspectives on a human-centered framework for cancer care navigation in the United States of America (2026) · cites this paper as [5]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“In real-world practice, our human-centered AI framework could help alleviate documentation burden, reduce cognitive overload, and enhance workflow efficiency across diverse cancer care settings and host communities.5”
From Empathic and agentic artificial intelligence in nursing: perspectives on a human-centered framework for cancer care navigation in the United States of America (2026) · cites this paper as [5]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“In real-world practice, our human-centered AI framework could help alleviate documentation burden, reduce cognitive overload, and enhance workflow efficiency across diverse cancer care settings and host communities.5”
From Empathic and agentic artificial intelligence in nursing: perspectives on a human-centered framework for cancer care navigation in the United States of America (2026) · cites this paper as [5]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Equally concerning is the issue of algorithmic bias and inequitable system behavior.”
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Currently, there is a lack of nursing-specific AI frameworks designed to align emerging technologies with ethical nursing principles such as empathy, advocacy, and patient-centered care.4,5”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Artificial intelligence: a modern approach
Kumar, D. A., Balasubramanian, S., Byeon, D. H., & Manerkar, P. G. V. (1995) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.33-1577 · Cited by 22,191
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
Topol, E. J. (2019) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-018-0300-7 · Cited by 10,450
Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019) · International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education · doi:10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0 · Cited by 7,242
Artificial intelligence in healthcare: past, present and future
Jiang, F., Jiang, Y., Zhi, H., Dong, Y., Li, H., Ma, S., Wang, Y., Dong, Q., Shen, H., & Wang, Y. (2017) · Stroke and Vascular Neurology · doi:10.1136/svn-2017-000101 · Cited by 4,837
The practical implementation of artificial intelligence technologies in medicine
He, J., Baxter, S. L., Xu, J., Xu, J., Zhou, X., & Zhang, K. (2019) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-018-0307-0 · Cited by 2,246
Implementing Machine Learning in Health Care — Addressing Ethical Challenges
Char, D. S., Shah, N. H., & Magnus, D. (2018) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmp1714229 · Cited by 1,857 · cited 1×
“However, healthcare data often suffers from inconsistencies, incompleteness, and lack of standardization across different systems and institutions (39).”
Precision medicine, AI, and the future of personalized health care
Johnson, K. B., Wei, W., Weeraratne, D., Frisse, M. E., Misulis, K., Rhee, K., Zhao, J., & Snowdon, J. L. (2021) · Clinical and Translational Science · doi:10.1111/cts.12884 · Cited by 1,854
Secure, privacy-preserving and federated machine learning in medical imaging
Kaissis, G. A., Makowski, M. R., Rückert, D., & Braren, R. F. (2020) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-020-0186-1 · Cited by 1,676
Privacy in the age of medical big data
Price, W. N., & Cohen, I. G. (2019) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-018-0272-7 · Cited by 1,522
Potential Biases in Machine Learning Algorithms Using Electronic Health Record Data
Gianfrancesco, M. A., Tamang, S., Yazdany, J., & Schmajuk, G. (2018) · JAMA Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.3763 · Cited by 1,395
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–144 of 144
Surveying Artificial Intelligence (AI) Attitudes, Use, and Competencies Among Nursing Faculty
Turchioe, M. R., Moore, S., Shamnath, A., Hickey, M., & Ferrara, S. A. (2026) · CIN Computers Informatics Nursing · doi:10.1097/cin.0000000000001586
Needs assessment and development of an EMR-integrated AI system to enhance nursing handover: NurSync
Park, S., Kang, J. Y., Kim, N., & Lee, Y. (2026) · Health Informatics Journal · doi:10.1177/14604582261463639
Yurkiv, H., Booth, R. G., Garnett, A., & McIntyre, A. (2026) · doi:10.2196/preprints.105389
Benni, J. M. (2026) · Journal of research in nursing · doi:10.1177/17449871261448828
Exploring perceptions of data risks in AI-enabled nursing research: A qualitative study
Yin, X., Song, H., Moreira, P., Song, C., & Sun, Y. (2026) · Digital Health · doi:10.1177/20552076261456561
Trustworthy AI and Nursing Education
Küçük, E. E., & Küçük, D. (2026) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-2600-2811-7.ch006
Alshammari, F. T., & Dioso, R. I. (2026) · doi:10.2196/preprints.106108
AI-integrated nanotherapeutics for schizophrenia: advancing precision oral drug delivery
Dudhwala, Y. D., Kapoor, D. U., Mehta, R. K., Shah, K., & Nayak, V. M. (2026) · Exploration of Drug Science · doi:10.37349/eds.2026.1008165
Beyond Performance Metrics: Nurses’ Concerns and Comfort with Clinical AI Use in Canada
Kutenski, A., Khalil, T., & Jaana, M. (2026) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-30710-1_7
Qiu, J., & Li, H. (2026) · BMC Nursing · doi:10.1186/s12912-026-05002-2
Beyond the algorithm: nursing as a core foundation for ethical and equitable AI in healthcare
Sun, Y., Li, Y. D., Liu, Y., & Yu, S. (2026) · Cognition Technology & Work · doi:10.1007/s10111-026-00886-1
Sohrabi, S., Bonakchi, H., & Kazemi, R. (2026) · BMC Nursing · doi:10.1186/s12912-026-05025-9
Wang, F., Zhu, R., Sui, X., Jiang, J., Zhang, T., Xu, Z., & Iqbal, G. (2026) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2026.1842444
GLOBAL RESEARCH TRENDS IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN NURSING EDUCATION
Jelemie, C. S., Baddiri, B., Ahmad, N., Sator, P., Kassim, S. A., Majin, R., & Johari, L. B. (2026) · International Journal of Modern Education · doi:10.35631/ijmoe.830032
Yang, X., Xiao, Y., Liu, D., Sun, Y., Zhou, X., Yao, J., Zhang, B., Yang, L., Guo, W., Tang, W., et al. (2026) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-10258686/v1
Sun, X., Gao, Y., Zhou, D., Wang, Z., & Ji, H. (2026) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-10281161/v1 · Cited by 1
Wei, Y., Liu, X. L., Pei, J., Li, X. J., Xin, Z., Wang, J., 夏欣, Wu, W. P., Ren, Y., He, M., et al. (2026) · Journal of Nursing Management · doi:10.1155/jonm/8337477
Self-citationLiu, P., Xu, H., Huang, C., Lin, Q., & Lin, N. (2026) · doi:10.2196/preprints.108993
Informatics Techniques in Nursing Course and Readiness for Medical Artificial Intelligence
Özden, G., Aktura, S. Ç., Ceviz, A., & Ceviz, R. (2026) · CIN Computers Informatics Nursing · doi:10.1097/cin.0000000000001611
The AI Adaptation Paradox: Navigating Professional Relevance and Sustainable Integration in Nursing
Silva, A. (2026) · Nursing Inquiry · doi:10.1111/nin.70158
Choudhary, S., Kansal, A. R., Rana, P. S., & Mahala, P. (2026) · International Journal of Clinical Nursing Research Society · doi:10.5005/ijcnrs-11024-0019
Nurses’ Ethical Reasoning About Digital Ethical Risks: A Vignette‐Elicited Qualitative Study
Betül, B. A. L., KABA, N. K., & APAYDIN, E. (2026) · International Nursing Review · doi:10.1111/inr.70224
Yang, X., Xiao, Y., Liu, D., Tang, W., Wang, D., & Xu, C. (2026) · doi:10.2196/preprints.110771
AI Use, Perceptions, and Perceived Impact Among Nursing Students: Cross-Sectional Study
Taka, I., Hasalla, E., Sula, A., Bahiti, B., Oboni, R. H., & Bani, B. (2026) · JMIR Nursing · doi:10.2196/97832 · Cited by 1
Hijazi, H., Alsadi, M., Nashwan, A., & Alzaatreh, M. (2026) · Advances in Nursing Science · doi:10.1097/ans.0000000000000693
Nascimento, H. D. O. (2026) · Nexus Science Review · doi:10.66104/4xwn8e04 · Cited by 1
Yapay Zekânın Bireyselleştirilmiş Hemşirelik Bakımı Üzerine Etkileri: Tehdit Mi Güç Mü?
ARIKAN, E. N., & Şendir, M. (2026) · Samsun Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi · doi:10.47115/jshs.1968428
Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Home-Care and Community Nursing: A Scoping Review
Wang, H., Wang, G., Wang, T., Delaney, L., Bayuo, J., Li, M., & Tan, J.-Y. B. (2026) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare14183034 · Cited by 1
El‐Ashry, A. M., Alanazi, E. F. A., Khedr, M. A., Othman, A. A., Baaqil, S. M., Alwadei, N. H., Rajhi, F. A., Alsharari, A. S., Alanazi, H. F. A., Almutairi, W. A., et al. (2026) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare14183065
Artificial Intelligence in Nursing Care: Strategies for Addressing Implementation Challenges
Alrazeeni, D. M., Alharrasi, M., Rony, M. K. K., Biswas, R. K., Dhola, F.-T.-J., Aktery, A., & Akter, F. (2026) · International Nursing Review · doi:10.1111/inr.70241
Suzan, Ö. K., Gül, U., Koyuncu, O., & Akdeniz, C. (2026) · Journal of Nursing Management · doi:10.1155/jonm/1528189
Zou, Y., Su, H., Long, Q., & Xie, M. (2026) · International Journal of Nursing Practice · doi:10.1111/ijn.70183
Hong, Y., Hu, W., Tang, J., & Xiong, F. (2026) · Frontiers in Neurology · doi:10.3389/fneur.2026.1837085
Limiri, D. M. (2026) · Premier journal of science. · doi:10.70389/pjs.100280
Code With Care: A Strategic Blueprint for Nurse‐Led AI in Healthcare
Peltonen, L., Topaz, M., Michalowski, M., Ronquillo, C., Mitchell, J. L., Babić, A., Alhuwail, D., Junger, A., McCarthy, M. K., Hardiker, N. R., et al. (2026) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/jan.70755
Barros, S. C. D. C., Carvalho, A., Macedo, G., Ferreira, J. C., & Mascarenhas, M. (2026) · Nursing Reports · doi:10.3390/nursrep16100357
Alqaisi, O., Darwish, S. S., Dibas, M., & Al‐Ghabeesh, S. H. (2026) · Journal of Nursing Management · doi:10.1155/jonm/6525145
Ethical Challenges in Integrating Advanced Technology and AI into Nursing Education
Zic, W. G. (2026) · Journal of Nursing Care & Reports · doi:10.47485/3065-7636.1056
Wei, H. (2026) · Advances in Nursing Science · doi:10.1097/ans.0000000000000709
Nantschev, R., & Ammenwerth, E. (2026) · JMIR Nursing · doi:10.2196/95546
Brain Rot as an Emerging Concept in Nursing: A Concept Analysis for Nursing Management
Hashish, E. A. A., & Yasin, R. (2026) · Journal of Nursing Management · doi:10.1155/jonm/7646151
Alshammari, F. T., & Dioso, R. I. (2026) · JMIR Research Protocols · doi:10.2196/106108
How Artificial Intelligence may influence therapeutic adherence
Uchmanowicz, B., & Pustelak, K. (2025) · Modern Nursing and Public Health · doi:10.82051/mnph-2025-1272
Metadata
- Authors
- Wei, Q., Pan, S., Liu, X., Hong, M., Nong, C., & Zhang, W.
- Affiliations
- First Affiliated Hospital of GuangXi Medical University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Pan, Songcheng
- Venue
- Frontiers in Medicine
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2025-02-11
- Volume
- 12
- Pages
- 1545420-1545420
- ISSN
- 2296-858X (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC11850350
- OpenAlex
- W4407382566
- Cited by
- 143
- References
- 114
- Citations by year
- 2026: 89 · 2025: 53
- FWCI
- 8.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Frontiers in Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
- Keywords
- artificial intelligence in nursing, clinical decision support systems, patient monitoring, nursing education, implementation barriers, AI ethics, workforce adaptation, individualized care, global health, patient outcomes
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
