Cited by 1,857Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationEthics and Social Impacts of AIEthics and bioethics in healthcare

Implementing Machine Learning in Health Care — Addressing Ethical Challenges

Open access
Char, Danton S., Shah, Nigam H., Magnus, David·2018·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

We need to consider the ethical challenges inherent in implementing machine learning in health care if its benefits are to be realized. Some of these challenges are straightforward, whereas others have less obvious risks but raise broader ethical concerns.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmp1714229

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Char, D. S., Shah, N. H., & Magnus, D.
Affiliations
Stanford Medicine (US)
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2018-03-15
Volume
378
Issue
11
Pages
981-983
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2789970635
Cited by
1,857
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 445 · 2025: 309 · 2024: 263 · 2023: 214 · 2022: 162 · 2021: 174 · 2020: 152 · 2019: 95 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
29.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Human Genome Research Institute (K01HG008498)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
Keywords
machine learning, health care ethics, ethical considerations, algorithmic bias, patient privacy, clinical decision support
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Algorithms, Decision Making, Computer-Assisted, Delivery of Health Care, Ethics, Medical, Humans, Physician-Patient Relations, Codes of Ethics, Healthcare Disparities, Racism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review