The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Antimicrobial and Probiotic Properties of Yeasts: From Fundamental to Novel Applications
Open accessAbstract
The yeasts constitute a large and heterogeneous group of microorganisms that are currently attracting increased attention from scientists and industry. Numerous and diverse biological activities make them promising candidates for a wide range of applications not limited to the food sector. In addition to their major contribution to flavor development in fermented foods, their antagonistic activities toward undesirable bacteria, and fungi are now widely known. These activities are associated with their competitiveness for nutrients, acidification of their growth medium, their tolerance of high concentrations of ethanol, and release of antimicrobial compounds such as antifungal killer toxins or "mycocins" and antibacterial compounds. While the design of foods containing probiotics (microorganisms that confer health benefits) has focused primarily on Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium, the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae var. boulardii has long been known effective for treating gastroenteritis. In this review, the antimicrobial activities of yeasts are examined. Mechanisms underlying this antagonistic activity as well as recent applications of these biologically active yeasts in both the medical and veterinary sectors are described.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Review article: yeast as probiotics – Saccharomyces boulardii
CZERUCKA, D., PICHE, T., & RAMPAL, P. (2007) · Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2036.2007.03442.x · Cited by 587
Dawson, K. A., Newman, K. E., & Boling, J. A. (1990) · Journal of Animal Science · doi:10.2527/1990.68103392x · Cited by 243
Marquina, D., Santos, A., & Peinado, J. (2002) · International Microbiology · doi:10.1007/s10123-002-0066-z · Cited by 182
Anti-Candida activity of a novel killer toxin from the yeast Williopsis mrakii
Hodgson, V. J., Button, D., & Walker, G. M. (1995) · Microbiology · doi:10.1099/13500872-141-8-2003 · Cited by 73
Cited by
Lloyd-Price, J., Abu-Ali, G., & Huttenhower, C. (2016) · Genome Medicine · doi:10.1186/s13073-016-0307-y · Cited by 1,891
Antifungal Microbial Agents for Food Biopreservation—A Review
Leyva Salas, M., Mounier, J., Valence, F., Coton, M., Thierry, A., & Coton, E. (2017) · Microorganisms · doi:10.3390/microorganisms5030037 · Cited by 349
Abbas, Z., Yakoob, J., Jafri, W., Ahmad, Z., Azam, Z., Usman, M. W., Shamim, S., & Islam, M. (2014) · European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology · doi:10.1097/meg.0000000000000094 · Cited by 102
Yeasts isolated from figs (Ficus carica L.) as biocontrol agents of postharvest fruit diseases
Ruiz-Moyano, S., Martín, A., Villalobos, M. C., Calle, A., Serradilla, M. J., Córdoba, M. G., & Hernández, A. (2016) · Food Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.fm.2016.01.003 · Cited by 99
Ayub, A., Rahayu, F., Khamidah, A., Antarlina, S. S., Iswari, K., Supriyadi, K., Mufidah, E., Singh, A., Chopra, C., & Wani, A. K. (2025) · Discover Applied Sciences · doi:10.1007/s42452-025-06916-3 · Cited by 29
Metadata
- Authors
- Hatoum, R., Labrie, S., & Fliss, I.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Microbiology
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2012
- Volume
- 3
- Pages
- 421-421
- ISSN
- 1664-302X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2152606589
- Cited by
- 338
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 13.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.