The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bacterial chitin degradation—mechanisms and ecophysiological strategies
Open accessAbstract
Chitin is one the most abundant polymers in nature and interacts with both carbon and nitrogen cycles. Processes controlling chitin degradation are summarized in reviews published some 20 years ago, but the recent use of culture-independent molecular methods has led to a revised understanding of the ecology and biochemistry of this process and the organisms involved. This review summarizes different mechanisms and the principal steps involved in chitin degradation at a molecular level while also discussing the coupling of community composition to measured chitin hydrolysis activities and substrate uptake. Ecological consequences are then highlighted and discussed with a focus on the cross feeding associated with the different habitats that arise because of the need for extracellular hydrolysis of the chitin polymer prior to metabolic use. Principal environmental drivers of chitin degradation are identified which are likely to influence both community composition of chitin degrading bacteria and measured chitin hydrolysis activities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Prokaryotes: The unseen majority
Whitman, W. B., Coleman, D. C., & Wiebe, W. J. (1998) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.95.12.6578 · Cited by 4,871 · cited 2×
“REVIEW ARTICLE published: 14 June 2013 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2013.00149”
BackgroundInfluentialChernin, L. S., Winson, M. K., Thompson, J. M., Haran, S., Bycroft, B. W., Chet, I., Williams, P., & Stewart, G. S. A. B. (1998) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.180.17.4435-4441.1998 · Cited by 238
Conservation of the Chitin Utilization Pathway in the Vibrionaceae
Hunt, D. E., Gevers, D., Vahora, N. M., & Polz, M. F. (2008) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.01412-07 · Cited by 236
Cited by
Microbial interactions lead to rapid micro-scale successions on model marine particles
Datta, M. S., Sliwerska, E., Gore, J., Polz, M. F., & Cordero, O. X. (2016) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms11965 · Cited by 432
Understanding microbial community dynamics to improve optimal microbiome selection
Wright, R. J., Gibson, M. I., & Christie-Oleza, J. A. (2019) · Microbiome · doi:10.1186/s40168-019-0702-x · Cited by 341
Khan, N., Martínez-Hidalgo, P., Ice, T. A., Maymon, M., Humm, E. A., Nejat, N., Sanders, E. R., Kaplan, D., & Hirsch, A. M. (2018) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2018.02363 · Cited by 282
O’Loughlin, E. J., Gorski, C. A., Flynn, T. M., & Scherer, M. M. (2019) · Minerals · doi:10.3390/min9070434 · Cited by 28
Metadata
- Authors
- Beier, S., & Bertilsson, S.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Microbiology
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2013
- Volume
- 4
- Pages
- 149-149
- ISSN
- 1664-302X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2036182420
- Cited by
- 518
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 7.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bacterial chitin degradation—mechanisms and ecophysiological strategies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3389/fmicb.2013.00149
- The paper
- Beier, S., & Bertilsson, S. (2013). Bacterial chitin degradation—mechanisms and ecophysiological strategies. Frontiers in Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2013.00149
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.