The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Antifungal Activity of Bacillus Species Against Fusarium and Analysis of the Potential Mechanisms Used in Biocontrol
Open accessAbstract
Fusarium is a complex genus of ascomycete fungi that consists of plant pathogens of agricultural relevance. Controlling Fusarium infection in crops that leads to substantial yield losses is challenging. These economic losses along with environmental and human health concerns over usage of chemicals in attaining disease control are shifting focus towards the use of biocontrol agents for effective control of phytopathogenic Fusarium spp. In the present study, an analysis of the plant growth promoting (PGP) and biocontrol attributes of four bacilli (Bacillus simplex 30N-5, B. simplex 11, B. simplex 237 and B. subtilis 30VD-1) has been conducted. The production of cellulase, xylanase, pectinase and chitinase in functional assays was studied, followed by in silico gene analysis of the PGP-related and biocontrol associated genes. Of all the bacilli included in this study, B. subtilis 30VD-1 (30VD-1) demonstrated the most effective antagonism against Fusarium spp. under in vitro conditions. Additionally, 100 µg/ml of the crude 1-butanol extract of 30 VD-1’s cell free culture filtrate caused about 40% inhibition in radial growth of Fusarium spp. Pea seed bacterization with 30VD-1 led to considerable reduction in wilt severity in plants with about 35% increase in dry plant biomass over the plants growing in Fusarium infested soil. Phase contrast microscopy demonstrated distortions and abnormal swellings in F. oxysporum hyphae on co-culturing with 30VD-1. The results suggest a multivariate mode of antagonism of 30VD-1 against phytopathogenic Fusarium spp., by producing chitinase, volatiles, and other fungal toxic molecules, the characterization of which is underway.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Plant-Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria
Lugtenberg, B., & Kamilova, F. (2009) · Annual Review of Microbiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.micro.62.081307.162918 · Cited by 3,987
Plant Growth-Promoting Bacteria: Mechanisms and Applications
Glick, B. R. (2012) · Scientifica · doi:10.6064/2012/963401 · Cited by 3,346
Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria as biofertilizers
Vessey, J. K. (2003) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1023/a:1026037216893 · Cited by 3,224
Compant, S., Duffy, B., Nowak, J., Clément, C., & Barka, E. A. (2005) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.71.9.4951-4959.2005 · Cited by 2,640
Teather, R. M., & Wood, P. J. (1982) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.43.4.777-780.1982 · Cited by 1,844
Bacterial volatiles promote growth in Arabidopsis
Ryu, C.-M., Farag, M. A., Hu, C.-H., Reddy, M. S., Wei, H.-X., Paré, P. W., & Kloepper, J. W. (2003) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0730845100 · Cited by 1,656
IMG: the integrated microbial genomes database and comparative analysis system
Markowitz, V. M., Chen, I.-M. A., Palaniappan, K., Chu, K., Szeto, E., Grechkin, Y., Ratner, A., Jacob, B., Huang, J., Williams, P., et al. (2012) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkr1044 · Cited by 1,311
Portraying mechanics of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): A review
Goswami, D., Thakker, J. N., & Dhandhukia, P. C. (2016) · Cogent Food & Agriculture · doi:10.1080/23311932.2015.1127500 · Cited by 749
Bacterial chitin degradation—mechanisms and ecophysiological strategies
Beier, S., & Bertilsson, S. (2013) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2013.00149 · Cited by 518
Volatile affairs in microbial interactions
Schmidt, R., Cordovez, V., de Boer, W., Raaijmakers, J., & Garbeva, P. (2015) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/ismej.2015.42 · Cited by 481
Cited by
Li, Z., Zheng, M., Zheng, J., & Gänzle, M. G. (2023) · Current Opinion in Food Science · doi:10.1016/j.cofs.2023.101007 · Cited by 128
Metadata
- Authors
- Khan, N., Martínez-Hidalgo, P., Ice, T. A., Maymon, M., Humm, E. A., Nejat, N., Sanders, E. R., Kaplan, D., & Hirsch, A. M.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Microbiology
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2018-10-02
- Volume
- 9
- Pages
- 2363-2363
- ISSN
- 1664-302X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2892064295
- Cited by
- 282
- References
- 44
- FWCI
- 16.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Antifungal Activity of Bacillus Species Against Fusarium and Analysis of the Potential Mechanisms Used in Biocontrol. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3389/fmicb.2018.02363
- The paper
- Khan, N., Martínez-Hidalgo, P., Ice, T. A., Maymon, M., Humm, E. A., Nejat, N., Sanders, E. R., Kaplan, D., & Hirsch, A. M. (2018). Antifungal Activity of Bacillus Species Against Fusarium and Analysis of the Potential Mechanisms Used in Biocontrol. Frontiers in Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.02363
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.