The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Antibiotic alternatives: the substitution of antibiotics in animal husbandry?
Open accessAbstract
It is a common practice for decades to use of sub-therapeutic dose of antibiotics in food-animal feeds to prevent animals from diseases and to improve production performance in modern animal husbandry. In the meantime, concerns over the increasing emergence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria due to the unreasonable use of antibiotics and an appearance of less novelty antibiotics have prompted efforts to develop so-called alternatives to antibiotics. Whether or not the alternatives could really replace antibiotics remains a controversial issue. This review summarizes recent development and perspectives of alternatives to antibiotics. The mechanism of actions, applications, and prospectives of the alternatives such as immunity modulating agents, bacteriophages and their lysins, antimicrobial peptides, pro-, pre-, and synbiotics, plant extracts, inhibitors targeting pathogenicity (bacterial quorum sensing, biofilm, and virulence), and feeding enzymes are thoroughly discussed. Lastly, the feasibility of alternatives to antibiotics is deeply analyzed. It is hard to conclude that the alternatives might substitute antibiotics in veterinary medicine in the foreseeable future. At the present time, prudent use of antibiotics and the establishment of scientific monitoring systems are the best and fastest way to limit the adverse effects of the abuse of antibiotics and to ensure the safety of animal-derived food and environment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bacteriocins: Developing innate immunity for food
Cotter, P. D., Hill, C., & Ross, R. P. (2005) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro1273 · Cited by 2,380
Antimicrobial properties of tannins
Scalbert, A. (1991) · Phytochemistry · doi:10.1016/0031-9422(91)83426-l · Cited by 2,321
Fungal Resistance to Plant Antibiotics as a Mechanism of Pathogenesis
Morrissey, J. P., & Osbourn, A. E. (1999) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.63.3.708-724.1999 · Cited by 635 · cited 2×
“Only after the extensive use of penicillin was Frontiers in Microbiology | Antimicrobials, Resistance and Chemotherapy May 2014 | Volume 5 | Article 217 | 10 the emergence penicillin-resistance discovered.”
BackgroundIzano, E. A., Amarante, M. A., Kher, W. B., & Kaplan, J. B. (2008) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.02073-07 · Cited by 553
Enzymatic Detachment of Staphylococcus epidermidis Biofilms
Kaplan, J. B., Ragunath, C., Velliyagounder, K., Fine, D. H., & Ramasubbu, N. (2004) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.48.7.2633-2636.2004 · Cited by 332
Cited by
Hoseinifar, S. H., Sun, Y.-Z., Wang, A., & Zhou, Z. (2018) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2018.02429 · Cited by 601
Antibiotic use in food animals worldwide, with a focus on Africa: Pluses and minuses
Van, T. T. H., Yidana, Z., Smooker, P. M., & Coloe, P. J. (2020) · Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance · doi:10.1016/j.jgar.2019.07.031 · Cited by 451
Bacillus probiotics: an alternative to antibiotics for livestock production
Mingmongkolchai, S., & Panbangred, W. (2018) · Journal of Applied Microbiology · doi:10.1111/jam.13690 · Cited by 341
Poudel, P., Froehlich, K., Casper, D. P., & St-Pierre, B. (2019) · Microorganisms · doi:10.3390/microorganisms7050120 · Cited by 58
Metadata
- Authors
- Cheng, G., Hao, H., Xie, S., Wang, X., Dai, M., Huang, L., & Yuan, Z.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Microbiology
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2014-05-13
- Volume
- 5
- Pages
- 217-217
- ISSN
- 1664-302X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2149023620
- Cited by
- 622
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 34.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Antibiotic alternatives: the substitution of antibiotics in animal husbandry? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3389/fmicb.2014.00217
- The paper
- Cheng, G., Hao, H., Xie, S., Wang, X., Dai, M., Huang, L., & Yuan, Z. (2014). Antibiotic alternatives: the substitution of antibiotics in animal husbandry? Frontiers in Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2014.00217
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.