The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Spread of Botrytis cinerea Strains with Multiple Fungicide Resistance in German Horticulture
Open accessAbstract
Botrytis cinerea is a major plant pathogen, causing gray mold rot in a variety of cultures. Repeated fungicide applications are common but have resulted in the development of fungal populations with resistance to one or more fungicides. In this study, we have monitored fungicide resistance frequencies and the occurrence of multiple resistance in Botrytis isolates from raspberries, strawberries, grapes, stone fruits and ornamental flowers in Germany in 2010 to 2015. High frequencies of resistance to all classes of botryticides was common in all cultures, and isolates with multiple fungicide resistance represented a major part of the populations. A monitoring in a raspberry field over six seasons revealed a continuous increase in resistance frequencies and the emergence of multiresistant Botrytis strains. In a cherry orchard and a vineyard, evidence for immigration of multiresistant strains from neighboring fields was obtained. Inoculation experiments with fungicide-treated leaves in the laboratory and with strawberry plants cultivated in the greenhouse or outdoors revealed a nearly complete loss of fungicide efficacy caused by multiple resistance. B. cinerea field strains carrying multiple resistance mutations against all classes of site-specific fungicides were found to show similar fitness as sensitive field strains under laboratory conditions, based on their vegetative growth, reproduction, stress resistance, virulence and competitiveness in mixed infection experiments. Our data confirm an alarming increase in the occurrence of multiresistance in gray mold populations from different cultures, which presents a major threat to the chemical control of gray mold.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Petrasch, S., Knapp, S. J., van Kan, J. A. L., & Blanco‐Ulate, B. (2019) · Molecular Plant Pathology · doi:10.1111/mpp.12794 · Cited by 473
Fungicide resistance management: Maximizing the effective life of plant protection products
Corkley, I., Fraaije, B., & Hawkins, N. (2022) · Plant Pathology · doi:10.1111/ppa.13467 · Cited by 280
Yeasts from Different Habitats and Their Potential as Biocontrol Agents
Pretscher, J., Fischkal, T., Branscheidt, S., Jäger, L., Kahl, S., Schlander, M., Thines, E., & Claus, H. (2018) · Fermentation · doi:10.3390/fermentation4020031 · Cited by 104
Tóth, L., Váradi, G., Boros, É., Borics, A., Ficze, H., Nagy, I., Tóth, G. K., Rákhely, G., Marx, F., & Galgóczy, L. (2020) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2020.00820 · Cited by 29
Calderón, C. E., Rotem, N., Harris, R., Vela‐Corcía, D., & Levy, M. (2019) · Molecular Plant Pathology · doi:10.1111/mpp.12775 · Cited by 29
Metadata
- Authors
- Rupp, S., Weber, R. W. S., Rieger, D., Detzel, P., & Hahn, M.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Microbiology
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2017-01-03
- Volume
- 7
- Pages
- 2075-2075
- ISSN
- 1664-302X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2561444988
- Cited by
- 182
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Spread of Botrytis cinerea Strains with Multiple Fungicide Resistance in German Horticulture. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3389/fmicb.2016.02075
- The paper
- Rupp, S., Weber, R. W. S., Rieger, D., Detzel, P., & Hahn, M. (2017). Spread of Botrytis cinerea Strains with Multiple Fungicide Resistance in German Horticulture. Frontiers in Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.02075
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.