Cited by 29Plant-Microbe Interactions and ImmunityFungal Plant Pathogen ControlPlant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Pseudozyma aphidis activates reactive oxygen species production, programmed cell death and morphological alterations in the necrotrophic fungus Botrytis cinerea

Open access
Calderón, Claudia E., Rotem, Neta, Harris, Raviv, Vela‐Corcía, David, Levy, Maggie·2019·Molecular Plant Pathology

Abstract

Summary: Many types of yeast have been studied in the last few years as potential biocontrol agents against different phytopathogenic fungi. Their ability to control plant diseases is mainly through combined modes of action. Among them, antibiosis, competition for nutrients and niches, induction of systemic resistance in plants and mycoparasitism have been the most studied. In previous work, we have established that the epiphytic yeast Pseudozyma aphidis inhibits Botrytis cinerea through induced resistance and antibiosis. Here, we demonstrate that P. aphidis adheres to B. cinerea hyphae and competes with them for nutrients. We further show that the secreted antifungal compounds activate the production of reactive oxygen species and programmed cell death in B. cinerea mycelium. Finally, P. aphidis and its secreted compounds negatively affect B. cinerea hyphae, leading to morphological alterations, including hyphal curliness, vacuolization and branching, which presumably affects the colonization ability and infectivity of B. cinerea . This study demonstrates additional modes of action for P. aphidis and its antifungal compounds against the plant pathogen B. cinerea .

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/mpp.12775

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Pseudozyma aphidis parasitises the powdery mildew pathogen Podosphaera xanthii and B. cinerea.

    “the yeast-like Ustilaginomycete Pseudozyma aphidis parasitises the powdery mildew pathogen Podosphaera xanthii and B. cinerea (Calderon et al. 2019; Gafni et al. 2015).”

    From Biocontrol yeasts: mechanisms and applications (2019) · cites this paper as Calderon et al. 2019

    The Discussion describes P. aphidis parasitization of Podosphaera xanthii. For B. cinerea, however, it explicitly says the authors could not detect parasitism or penetration; they observed attachment and antagonistic effects instead. Thus the citation supports only the P. xanthii part of the claim. (LLM, conf=0.92)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 52

  1. 10.1139/w04-073 · DOI
  2. 10.1128/AEM.67.2.956-960.2001 · DOI
  3. 10.1111/j.1567-1364.2002.tb00062.x · DOI
  4. 10.1094/PDIS-04-14-0377-RE · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1016/j.fgb.2006.06.007 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2007.05.005 · DOI
  7. 10.1007/BF00394536 · DOI
  8. 10.1094/MPMI.2003.16.11.983 · DOI
  9. 10.1104/pp.112.212969 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.4161/psb.26273 · DOI
  11. 10.1111/1574-6941.12319 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/S0925-5214(00)00186-1 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1021/pr060483r · DOI
  14. 10.1128/AEM.69.5.2595-2602.2003 · DOI
  15. 10.1094/PHYTO.1997.87.3.310 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2008.11.009 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1007/BF01877146 · DOI
  18. 10.1007/978-1-4020-2626-3 · DOI
  19. 10.1094/PHYTO.2003.93.3.349 · DOI
  20. 10.1094/PHYTO.2003.93.3.344 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1006/bcon.1996.0086 · DOI
  22. 10.3389/fpls.2015.00132 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1128/AEM.01255-10 · DOI
  24. Hankin L., 1977, Solid media containing carboxymethylcellulose to detect Cx cellulase activity of micro‐organisms, Microbiology, 98, 109
  25. 10.1007/BF00447111 · DOI
  26. 10.1007/s00792-017-0943-1 · DOI
  27. 10.1016/j.micres.2015.03.008 · DOI
  28. 10.1094/PHYTO.2000.90.11.1196 · DOI
  29. 10.1111/nph.14851 · DOI
  30. 10.1128/AAC.49.6.2445-2453.2005 · DOI
  31. Li B., 2016, Attachment capability of antagonistic yeast Rhodotorula glutinis to Botrytis cinerea contributes to biocontrol efficacy, Front. Microbiol., 7, 601.
  32. 10.1016/S0925-5214(96)01302-6 · DOI
  33. 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2012.01324.x · DOI
  34. 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2013.07.011 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2010.07.008 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Monteiro V.N., 2014, Trichoderma reesei mycoparasitism against Pythium ultimum is coordinated by G‐alpha protein GNA1 signaling, J. Microb. Biochem. Technol, 7, 001
  37. 10.1186/1471-2229-7-41 · DOI
  38. 10.1016/j.fct.2017.05.010 · DOI
  39. 10.1016/j.fm.2014.11.013 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.1080/10408398.2017.1295017 · DOI
  41. Rupp S., 2016, Spread of Botrytis cinerea strains with multiple fungicides resistance in German horticulture, Front Microbiol., 7, 2075.
  42. 10.1016/j.micres.2004.07.001 · DOI
  43. 10.1007/978-1-60761-611-5_20 · DOI
  44. 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2009.00180.x · DOI
  45. 10.1099/mic.0.052670-0 · DOI
  46. 10.1042/BST0391493 · DOI
  47. 10.1016/j.tifs.2015.11.003 · DOI · Paper page
  48. Vardanyan R., 2016, Synthesis of best‐seller drugs, Chapter 30, Antibiotics, 573, 10.1016/B978-0-12-411492-0.00030-4 · DOI
  49. 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2007.00417.x · DOI
  50. Wilson C., 1994, Biological Control of Postharvest Diseases: Theory and Practice
  51. Zhang Y., 2015, Different reactive oxygen species scavenging properties of flavonoids determine their abilities to extend the shelf life of tomato, Plant Physiol, 169, 1568
  52. Zhimo V., 2014, Exploitation of yeasts as an alternative strategy to control post harvest diseases of fruits—a review, World Appl. Sci. J., 31, 785

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Calderón, C. E., Rotem, N., Harris, R., Vela‐Corcía, D., & Levy, M.
Affiliations
Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
Corresponding author
Levy, Maggie
Venue
Molecular Plant Pathology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-02-18
Volume
20
Issue
4
Pages
562-574
ISSN
  • 1364-3703 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-6722
OpenAlex
W2904083402
Cited by
29
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1
FWCI
1.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Molecular Plant Pathology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Israel Science Foundation (1375/14)
  • Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development (256-0484-99)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Fungal Plant Pathogen Control
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases
Keywords
Pseudozyma aphidis, Botrytis cinerea, epiphytic yeasts, biological control agents, antifungal agents, reactive oxygen species, programmed cell death, nutrient competition, mycoparasitism, induced resistance, antibiosis, plant pathogenic fungi
MeSH terms
Ustilaginales, Apoptosis, Reactive Oxygen Species, Botrytis, Mycelium

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review