The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens, Bacillus velezensis, and Bacillus siamensis Form an “Operational Group B. amyloliquefaciens” within the B. subtilis Species Complex
Open accessAbstract
The plant growth promoting model bacterium FZB42T was proposed as the type strain of B. amyloliquefaciens subsp. plantarum (Borriss et al., Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2011, vol. 61, 1786-801), but has been recently recognized as being synonymous to Bacillus velezensis due to phylogenomic analysis (Dunlap et al. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2016, vol. 66, 1212-1217). However, until now, majority of publications consider plant-associated close relatives of FZB42 still as ´B. amyloliquefaciens´. Here, we reinvestigated the taxonomic status of FZB42 and related strains in its context to the free-living soil bacterium DSM7T, the type strain of B. amyloliquefaciens. We identified 66 bacterial genomes from the NCBI data bank with high similarity to DSM7T. Dendrograms based on complete rpoB nucleotide sequences and on core genome sequences, respectively, clustered into a clade consisting of three tightly linked branches: (1) B. amyloliquefaciens, (2) B. siamensis, and (3) a conspecific group containing the type strains of B. velezensis, B. methylotrophicus, and B. amyloliquefaciens subsp. plantarum. The three monophyletic clades shared a common mutation rate of 0.01 substitutions per nucleotide position, but were distantly related to B. subtilis (0.1 substitutions per nucleotide position). The tight relatedness of the three clusters was corroborated by TETRA, dDDH, ANI and AAI analysis of the core genomes, but dDDH and ANI values were found slightly below species level thresholds when B.amyloliquefaciens DSM7T genome sequence was used as query sequence. Due to these results, we propose that the B. amyloliquefaciens clade should be considered as a taxonomic unit above of species level, designated here as ´operational group B. amyloliquefaciens´ consisting of the soil borne B. amyloliquefaciens, and plant associated B. siamensis and B. velezensis, whose members are closely related and allow identifying changes on the genomic level due to developing the plant-associated life-style.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions
Meier-Kolthoff, J. P., Auch, A. F., Klenk, H.-P., & Göker, M. (2013) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-14-60 · Cited by 6,755
Self-citationShifting the genomic gold standard for the prokaryotic species definition
Richter, M., & Rosselló-Móra, R. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0906412106 · Cited by 6,359
Kim, M., Oh, H.-S., Park, S.-C., & Chun, J. (2014) · International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology · doi:10.1099/ijs.0.059774-0 · Cited by 3,202
JSpeciesWS: a web server for prokaryotic species circumscription based on pairwise genome comparison
Richter, M., Rosselló-Móra, R., Oliver Glöckner, F., & Peplies, J. (2016) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btv681 · Cited by 2,932
Approved Lists of Bacterial Names
SKERMAN, V. B. D., SNEATH, P. H. A., & McGOWAN, V. (1980) · International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology · doi:10.1099/00207713-30-1-225 · Cited by 2,604
Auch, A. F., von Jan, M., Klenk, H.-P., & Göker, M. (2010) · Standards in Genomic Sciences · doi:10.4056/sigs.531120 · Cited by 1,757
Self-citationTowards a Genome-Based Taxonomy for Prokaryotes
Konstantinidis, K. T., & Tiedje, J. M. (2005) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.187.18.6258-6264.2005 · Cited by 1,155
Chen, X. H., Koumoutsi, A., Scholz, R., Eisenreich, A., Schneider, K., Heinemeyer, I., Morgenstern, B., Voss, B., Hess, W. R., Reva, O., et al. (2007) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt1325 · Cited by 873
Self-citationMinimum Information about a Biosynthetic Gene cluster
Medema, M. H., Kottmann, R., Yilmaz, P., Cummings, M., Biggins, J. B., Blin, K., de Bruijn, I., Chooi, Y. H., Claesen, J., Coates, R. C., et al. (2015) · Nature Chemical Biology · doi:10.1038/nchembio.1890 · Cited by 873
Self-citationMeier-Kolthoff, J. P., Hahnke, R. L., Petersen, J., Scheuner, C., Michael, V., Fiebig, A., Rohde, C., Rohde, M., Fartmann, B., Goodwin, L. A., et al. (2014) · Standards in Genomic Sciences · doi:10.1186/1944-3277-9-2 · Cited by 620
Self-citation
Cited by
Bacillus As Potential Probiotics: Status, Concerns, and Future Perspectives
Elshaghabee, F. M. F., Rokana, N., Gulhane, R. D., Sharma, C., & Panwar, H. (2017) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2017.01490 · Cited by 940
Biological control of plant pathogens by Bacillus species
Fira, D., Dimkić, I., Berić, T., Lozo, J., & Stanković, S. (2018) · Journal of Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.jbiotec.2018.07.044 · Cited by 917
Bacillus velezensis: A Valuable Member of Bioactive Molecules within Plant Microbiomes
Rabbee, M. F., Ali, M. S., Choi, J., Hwang, B. S., Jeong, S. C., & Baek, K.-H. (2019) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules24061046 · Cited by 550
Metadata
- Authors
- Fan, B., Blom, J., Klenk, H.-P., & Borriss, R.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Microbiology
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2017-01-20
- Volume
- 8
- Pages
- 22-22
- ISSN
- 1664-302X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2574936607
- Cited by
- 438
- References
- 44
- FWCI
- 30.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bacillus amyloliquefaciens, Bacillus velezensis, and Bacillus siamensis Form an “Operational Group B. amyloliquefaciens” within the B. subtilis Species Complex. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3389/fmicb.2017.00022
- The paper
- Fan, B., Blom, J., Klenk, H.-P., & Borriss, R. (2017). Bacillus amyloliquefaciens, Bacillus velezensis, and Bacillus siamensis Form an “Operational Group B. amyloliquefaciens” within the B. subtilis Species Complex. Frontiers in Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.00022
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.