Cited by 2Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesDecision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsEmbodied and Extended Cognition

Revealing human sensitivity to a latent temporal structure of changes

Open access
Marković, Dimitrije, Reiter, Andrea M. F., Kiebel, Stefan J.·2022·Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Precisely timed behavior and accurate time perception plays a critical role in our everyday lives, as our wellbeing and even survival can depend on well-timed decisions. Although the temporal structure of the world around us is essential for human decision making, we know surprisingly little about how representation of temporal structure of our everyday environment impacts decision making. How does the representation of temporal structure affect our ability to generate well-timed decisions? Here we address this question by using a well-established dynamic probabilistic learning task. Using computational modeling, we found that human subjects' beliefs about temporal structure are reflected in their choices to either exploit their current knowledge or to explore novel options. The model-based analysis illustrates a large within-group and within-subject heterogeneity. To explain these results, we propose a normative model for how temporal structure is used in decision making, based on the semi-Markov formalism in the active inference framework. We discuss potential key applications of the presented approach to the fields of cognitive phenotyping and computational psychiatry.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fnbeh.2022.962494

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Marković, D., Reiter, A. M. F., & Kiebel, S. J.
Affiliations
  • Technische Universität Dresden (DE)
  • University of Würzburg (DE)
  • Centre for Tactile Internet with Human-in-the-Loop (DE)
Corresponding author
Marković, Dimitrije
Venue
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
Published
2022-10-17
Volume
16
Pages
962494-962494
ISSN
1662-5153 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4306381964
Cited by
2
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1
FWCI
0.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Qucosa (Saxon State and University Library Dresden) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  • Brain and Behavior Research Foundation
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
Keywords
temporal structure, time perception, decision-making, exploration-exploitation balance, active inference, semi-Markov model, normative model, cognitive phenotyping, computational psychiatry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review