Cited by 38Visual perception and processing mechanismsFace Recognition and PerceptionAdvanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques

Learning and disrupting invariance in visual recognition with a temporal association rule

Open access
Isik, Leyla, Leibo, Joel Z., Poggio, Tomaso·2012·Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience

Abstract

Learning by temporal association rules such as Foldiak's trace rule is an attractive hypothesis that explains the development of invariance in visual recognition. Consistent with these rules, several recent experiments have shown that invariance can be broken at both the psychophysical and single cell levels. We show (1) that temporal association learning provides appropriate invariance in models of object recognition inspired by the visual cortex, (2) that we can replicate the "invariance disruption" experiments using these models with a temporal association learning rule to develop and maintain invariance, and (3) that despite dramatic single cell effects, a population of cells is very robust to these disruptions. We argue that these models account for the stability of perceptual invariance despite the underlying plasticity of the system, the variability of the visual world and expected noise in the biological mechanisms.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fncom.2012.00037

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Imposing continuity within certain models gives rise to aspects of the visual system including complex cells, specific properties of visual invariance, and even other representational properties such as the existence of place cells.

    “Imposing continuity within certain models gives rise to aspects of the visual system including complex cells (Körding et al., 2004), specific properties of visual invariance (Isik et al., 2012), and even other representational properties such as the existence of place cells (Wyss et al., 2006; Franzius et al., 2007).”

    From Toward an integration of deep learning and neuroscience (2016) · cites this paper as Isik et al., 2012

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Isik, L., Leibo, J. Z., & Poggio, T.
Affiliations
McGovern Institute for Brain Research (US)
Venue
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
Published
2012
Volume
6
Pages
37-37
ISSN
1662-5188 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2006151816
Cited by
38
References
22
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
FWCI
3.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Frontiers Research Foundation
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (0827427, 0645960, 0640097)
  • Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
Keywords
perceptual invariance, object recognition, visual cortex model, population coding, neuroplasticity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review