Cited by 145Visual perception and processing mechanismsNeural dynamics and brain functionMemory and Neural Mechanisms

A model of the ventral visual system based on temporal stability and local memory

Open access
Wyss, Reto, König, Peter, Verschure, Paul F. M. J·2006·PLoS Biology

Abstract

The cerebral cortex is a remarkably homogeneous structure suggesting a rather generic computational machinery. Indeed, under a variety of conditions, functions attributed to specialized areas can be supported by other regions. However, a host of studies have laid out an ever more detailed map of functional cortical areas. This leaves us with the puzzle of whether different cortical areas are intrinsically specialized, or whether they differ mostly by their position in the processing hierarchy and their inputs but apply the same computational principles. Here we show that the computational principle of optimal stability of sensory representations combined with local memory gives rise to a hierarchy of processing stages resembling the ventral visual pathway when it is exposed to continuous natural stimuli. Early processing stages show receptive fields similar to those observed in the primary visual cortex. Subsequent stages are selective for increasingly complex configurations of local features, as observed in higher visual areas. The last stage of the model displays place fields as observed in entorhinal cortex and hippocampus. The results suggest that functionally heterogeneous cortical areas can be generated by only a few computational principles and highlight the importance of the variability of the input signals in forming functional specialization.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040120

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Imposing continuity within certain models gives rise to aspects of the visual system including complex cells, specific properties of visual invariance, and even other representational properties such as the existence of place cells.

    “Imposing continuity within certain models gives rise to aspects of the visual system including complex cells (Körding et al., 2004), specific properties of visual invariance (Isik et al., 2012), and even other representational properties such as the existence of place cells (Wyss et al., 2006; Franzius et al., 2007).”

    From Toward an integration of deep learning and neuroscience (2016) · cites this paper as Wyss et al., 2006

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Barlow HB Rosenblith W Possible principles underlying the transformation of sensory messages Sensory Communication 1961 Cambridge (Massachusetts) MIT Press 336 360
  2. Douglas RJ Martin KAC Shepherd GM Neocortex The Synaptic Organization of the Brain 1990 Oxford Oxford University Press 389 438
  3. Orbach J The neuropsychological theories of Lashley and Hebb 1998 Lanham (Maryland) University Press of America 395

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wyss, R., König, P., & Verschure, P. F. M. J.
Affiliations
  • California Institute of Technology (US)
  • Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ES)
Venue
PLoS Biology
Published
2006-04-18
Volume
4
Issue
5
Pages
e120
ISSN
  • 1544-9173 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-7885
OpenAlex
W2040572703
Cited by
145
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 13
FWCI
4.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • ETH Zürich Research Collection (cc-by)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (28127)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
ventral stream, temporal stability, local memory, computational model of visual cortex, receptive fields, place fields, entorhinal cortex, hippocampus, natural stimuli
MeSH terms
Cerebral Cortex, Computer Simulation, Memory, Models, Neurological, Robotics, Visual Perception

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review