The DOI matches its Crossref record; 101 of the 101 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Neural masses and fields in dynamic causal modeling
Open accessAbstract
Dynamic causal modeling (DCM) provides a framework for the analysis of effective connectivity among neuronal subpopulations that subtend invasive (electrocorticograms and local field potentials) and non-invasive (electroencephalography and magnetoencephalography) electrophysiological responses. This paper reviews the suite of neuronal population models including neural masses, fields and conductance-based models that are used in DCM. These models are expressed in terms of sets of differential equations that allow one to model the synaptic underpinnings of connectivity. We describe early developments using neural mass models, where convolution-based dynamics are used to generate responses in laminar-specific populations of excitatory and inhibitory cells. We show that these models, though resting on only two simple transforms, can recapitulate the characteristics of both evoked and spectral responses observed empirically. Using an identical neuronal architecture, we show that a set of conductance based models-that consider the dynamics of specific ion-channels-present a richer space of responses; owing to non-linear interactions between conductances and membrane potentials. We propose that conductance-based models may be more appropriate when spectra present with multiple resonances. Finally, we outline a third class of models, where each neuronal subpopulation is treated as a field; in other words, as a manifold on the cortical surface. By explicitly accounting for the spatial propagation of cortical activity through partial differential equations (PDEs), we show that the topology of connectivity-through local lateral interactions among cortical layers-may be inferred, even in the absence of spatially resolved data. We also show that these models allow for a detailed analysis of structure-function relationships in the cortex. Our review highlights the relationship among these models and how the hypothesis asked of empirical data suggests an appropriate model class.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“By adjusting a few key parameters (like the gain of neuronal populations that carry error signals), these models can simulate how precision (confidence) is encoded and modulated in the brain (21, 22).”
From Predictive coding and neurocomputational psychiatry: a mechanistic framework for understanding mental disorders (2026) · cites this paper as [21]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex
Felleman, D. J., & Van Essen, D. C. (1991) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/1.1.1 · Cited by 7,783
Friston, K. J., Harrison, L., & Penny, W. (2003) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/s1053-8119(03)00202-7 · Cited by 4,583
Self-citationA theory of cortical responses.
Friston, K. (2005) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2005.1622 · Cited by 4,578
Self-citationExcitatory and Inhibitory Interactions in Localized Populations of Model Neurons
Wilson, H. R., & Cowan, J. D. (1972) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1016/s0006-3495(72)86068-5 · Cited by 3,579
Preface: Cerebral Cortex Has Come of Age
Goldman, P. S., & RAKIC, P. T. (1991) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/1.1.1-a · Cited by 3,537
Canonical Microcircuits for Predictive Coding
Bastos, A. M., Usrey, W. M., Adams, R. A., Mangun, G. R., Fries, P., & Friston, K. J. (2012) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2012.10.038 · Cited by 2,421 · cited 8×
“The canonical microcircuit or “CMC” models a refinement of the Jansen and Rit convolution models that explicitly accommodates the neuronal sources of forward and backward connections in cortical hierarchies (Bastos et al., 2012). These are distinct superficial and deep pyramidal cell populations, respectively that, cr…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationVoltage oscillations in the barnacle giant muscle fiber
Morris, C., & Lecar, H. (1981) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1016/s0006-3495(81)84782-0 · Cited by 2,302
Electric Fields of the Brain: The Neurophysics of EEG
Nunez, P. L., & Harth, E. M. (1982) · Physics Today · doi:10.1063/1.2915137 · Cited by 2,257
Box, G. E. P. (1976) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1976.10480949 · Cited by 2,114
Baillet, S., Mosher, J., & Leahy, R. (2001) · IEEE Signal Processing Magazine · doi:10.1109/79.962275 · Cited by 1,846
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Great Expectations: Is there Evidence for Predictive Coding in Auditory Cortex?
Heilbron, M., & Chait, M. (2018) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2017.07.061 · Cited by 428
A guide to group effective connectivity analysis, part 1: First level analysis with DCM for fMRI
Zeidman, P., Jafarian, A., Corbin, N., Seghier, M. L., Razi, A., Price, C. J., & Friston, K. J. (2019) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.06.031 · Cited by 369
Self-citationA systematic framework for functional connectivity measures
Wang, H., Bénar, C., Quilichini, P., Friston, K. J., Jirsa, V., & Bernard, C. (2014) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2014.00405 · Cited by 342
Self-citationBeyond the Connectome: The Dynome
Kopell, N., Gritton, H. J., Whittington, M. A., & Kramer, M. (2014) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2014.08.016 · Cited by 331
Dynamic causal modelling revisited
Friston, K. J., Preller, K. H., Mathys, C., Cagnan, H., Heinzle, J., Razi, A., & Zeidman, P. (2019) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.02.045 · Cited by 271
Self-citationActive inference on discrete state-spaces: A synthesis
Da Costa, L., Parr, T., Sajid, N., Veselic, S., Neacsu, V., & Friston, K. (2020) · Journal of Mathematical Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jmp.2020.102447 · Cited by 226
Self-citationClosed-form continuous-time neural networks
Hasani, R., Lechner, M., Amini, A., Liebenwein, L., Ray, A., Tschaikowski, M., Teschl, G., & Rus, D. L. (2022) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-022-00556-7 · Cited by 284
Active inference on discrete state-spaces: A synthesis
Costa, L. D., Parr, T., Sajid, N., Veselic, S., Neacsu, V., & Friston, K. J. (2020) · UCL Discovery (University College London) · Cited by 204
Self-citationTAPAS: An Open-Source Software Package for Translational Neuromodeling and Computational Psychiatry
Frässle, S., Aponte, E. A., Bollmann, S., Brodersen, K. H., Do, C. T., Harrison, O. K., Harrison, S. J., Heinzle, J., Iglesias, S., Kasper, L., et al. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2021.680811 · Cited by 169
Schwalger, T., Deger, M., & Wulfram Gerstner, B. (2017) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005507 · Cited by 161
Large-scale brain dynamics in disorders of consciousness
Schiff, N. D., Nauvel, T., & Victor, J. D. (2014) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2013.10.007 · Cited by 148
A hemodynamic model for layered BOLD signals
Heinzle, J., Koopmans, P. J., den Ouden, H. E. M., Raman, S., & Stephan, K. E. (2016) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.10.025 · Cited by 144
A Rapid Subcortical Amygdala Route for Faces Irrespective of Spatial Frequency and Emotion
McFadyen, J., Mermillod, M., Mattingley, J. B., Halász, V., & Garrido, M. I. (2017) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3525-16.2017 · Cited by 144
Neuronal message passing using mean-field, bethe, and marginal approximations
Parr, T., Markovic, D., Kiebel, S. J., & Friston, K. J. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-38246-3 · Cited by 128
Self-citationRanasinghe, K. G., Verma, P., Cai, C., Xie, X., Kudo, K., Gao, X., Lerner, H., Mizuiri, D., Strom, A., Iaccarino, L., et al. (2022) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.77850 · Cited by 119
vmPFC Drives Hippocampal Processing during Autobiographical Memory Recall Regardless of Remoteness
McCormick, C., Barry, D. N., Jafarian, A., Barnes, G. R., & Maguire, E. A. (2020) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhaa172 · Cited by 125
The Neural Dynamics of Novel Scene Imagery
Barry, D. N., Barnes, G. R., Clark, I. A., & Maguire, E. A. (2019) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2497-18.2019 · Cited by 102
Parcels and particles: Markov blankets in the brain
Friston, K. J., Fagerholm, E. D., Zarghami, T. S., Parr, T., Hipólito, I., Magrou, L., & Razi, A. (2020) · Network Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/netn_a_00175 · Cited by 90
Self-citationA brain atlas of axonal and synaptic delays based on modelling of cortico-cortical evoked potentials
Lemaréchal, J.-D., Jedynak, M., Trébaul, L., Boyer, A., Tadel, F., Bhattacharjee, M., Deman, P., Tuyisenge, V., Ayoubian, L., Hugues, E., et al. (2021) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awab362 · Cited by 114
Dynamic effective connectivity
Zarghami, T. S., & Friston, K. J. (2019) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116453 · Cited by 90
Self-citationCircadian dynamics in measures of cortical excitation and inhibition balance
Chellappa, S. L., Gaggioni, G., Ly, J. Q. M., Papachilleos, S., Borsu, C., Brzozowski, A., Rosanova, M., Sarasso, S., Luxen, A., Middleton, B., et al. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep33661 · Cited by 84
Self-citationNext Generation Neural Mass Models
Coombes, S., & Byrne, Á. (2018) · PoliTO Springer series · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-71048-8_1 · Cited by 84
Understanding DCM: Ten simple rules for the clinician
Kahan, J., & Foltynie, T. (2013) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.07.008 · Cited by 78
Rosch, R. E., Hunter, P. R., Baldeweg, T., Friston, K. J., & Meyer, M. P. (2018) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006375 · Cited by 78
Self-citationHipólito, I., Ramstead, M. J. D., Convertino, L., Bhat, A., Friston, K., & Parr, T. (2021) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.02.003 · Cited by 79
Self-citationIon channels in EEG: isolating channel dysfunction in NMDA receptor antibody encephalitis
Symmonds, M., Moran, C., Leite, M. I., Buckley, C. J., Irani, S. R., Stephan, K. E., Friston, K. J., & Moran, R. (2018) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awy107 · Cited by 74
Self-citationByrne, A., Bonfiglio, E., Rigby, C., & Edelstyn, N. (2022) · Brain Informatics · doi:10.1186/s40708-022-00175-3 · Cited by 83
Bayesian population receptive field modelling
Zeidman, P., Silson, E. H., Schwarzkopf, D. S., Baker, C. I., & Penny, W. D. (2017) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.09.008 · Cited by 73
Brovelli, A., Chicharro, D., Badier, J., Wang, H., & Jirsa, V. (2015) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.4892-14.2015 · Cited by 61
Nunez, P. L., & Srinivasan, R. (2013) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2013.10.036 · Cited by 62
Estimation of effective connectivity via data-driven neural modeling
Freestone, D. R., Karoly, P. J., Nešić, D., Aram, P., Cook, M. J., & Grayden, D. B. (2014) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2014.00383 · Cited by 59
Multiscale modeling of brain dynamics: from single neurons and networks to mathematical tools
Siettos, C. I., & Starke, J. (2016) · WIREs Systems Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1002/wsbm.1348 · Cited by 58
Quiroga‐Martinez, D. R., Hansen, N. C., Højlund, A., Pearce, M. T., Brattico, E., & Vuust, P. (2020) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116816 · Cited by 59
Neural mass model-based tracking of anesthetic brain states
Kuhlmann, L., Freestone, D. R., Manton, J. H., Heyse, B., Vereecke, H. E. M., Lipping, T., Struys, M. M. R. F., & Liley, D. T. J. (2016) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.03.039 · Cited by 52
Bayesian fusion and multimodal DCM for EEG and fMRI
Wei, H., Jafarian, A., Zeidman, P., Vladimir Litvak, A., Razi, A., Hu, D., & Friston, K. J. (2020) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116595 · Cited by 54
Self-citationWorking Memory Load Modulates Neuronal Coupling
Pinotsis, D. A., Buschman, T. J., & Miller, E. K. (2018) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhy065 · Cited by 56
Self-citationLiu, Z., Han, F., & Wang, Q. (2022) · Nonlinear Dynamics · doi:10.1007/s11071-022-07298-6 · Cited by 52
Parametric estimation of cross-frequency coupling
van Wijk, B. C. M., Jha, A., Penny, W. D., & Vladimir Litvak, A. (2015) · Journal of Neuroscience Methods · doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2015.01.032 · Cited by 51
NMDA-receptor antibodies alter cortical microcircuit dynamics
Rosch, R. E., Wright, S. K., Cooray, G., Papadopoulou, M., Goyal, S., Lim, M. J., Vincent, A. C., Upton, A. L., Baldeweg, T., & Friston, K. J. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1804846115 · Cited by 48
Self-citationTesler, F., Linne, M., & Alain Destexhe, A. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-32618-0 · Cited by 47
Generic dynamic causal modelling: An illustrative application to Parkinson's disease
van Wijk, B. C. M., Cagnan, H., Vladimir Litvak, A., Kühn, A. A., & Friston, K. J. (2018) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.08.039 · Cited by 47
Self-citationHimmelstoß, N. A., Schuster, S., Hutzler, F., Moran, R., & Hawelka, S. (2019) · Language Cognition and Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/23273798.2019.1616102 · Cited by 64
Self-citationDynamic causal modelling of electrographic seizure activity using Bayesian belief updating
Cooray, G., Sengupta, B., Douglas, P. K., & Friston, K. J. (2015) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.07.063 · Cited by 47
Self-citationRandom graph theory and neuropercolation for modeling brain oscillations at criticality
Kozma, R., & Puljic, M. (2014) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2014.11.005 · Cited by 48
Dynamic causal modelling of fluctuating connectivity in resting-state EEG
de Steen, F. V., Almgren, H., Razi, A., Friston, K. J., & Marinazzo, D. (2019) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.01.055 · Cited by 47
Self-citationMonk, A. M., Dalton, M. A., Barnes, G. R., & Maguire, E. A. (2020) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_01634 · Cited by 50
Peak visual gamma frequency is modified across the healthy menstrual cycle
Sumner, R. L., McMillan, R. L., Shaw, A. D., Singh, K. D., Sundram, F., & Muthukumaraswamy, S. D. (2018) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.24069 · Cited by 44
Wright, S. K., Rosch, R. E., Wilson, M. A., Upadhya, M. A., Dhangar, D., Clarke-Bland, C., Wahid, T. T., Barman, S., Goebels, N., Kreye, J., et al. (2021) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-021-02635-8 · Cited by 44
Characterising seizures in anti-NMDA-receptor encephalitis with dynamic causal modelling
Cooray, G., Sengupta, B., Douglas, P. K., Englund, M., Wickström, R., & Friston, K. J. (2015) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.05.064 · Cited by 43
Self-citationTracking slow modulations in synaptic gain using dynamic causal modelling: Validation in epilepsy
Papadopoulou, M., Leite, M., van Mierlo, P., Vonck, K. E. J., Lemieux, L., Friston, K. J., & Marinazzo, D. (2014) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.12.007 · Cited by 41
Self-citationEmpirical Bayes for Group (DCM) Studies: A Reproducibility Study
Vladimir Litvak, A., Garrido, M. I., Zeidman, P., & Friston, K. J. (2015) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2015.00670 · Cited by 43
Self-citationComparing dynamic causal models of neurovascular coupling with fMRI and EEG/MEG
Jafarian, A., Vladimir Litvak, A., Cagnan, H., Friston, K. J., & Zeidman, P. (2020) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116734 · Cited by 44
Self-citationNeural masses and fields: modeling the dynamics of brain activity
Pinotsis, D. A., Robinson, P. A., Graben, P. B., & Friston, K. J. (2014) · Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fncom.2014.00149 · Cited by 42
Self-citationGenerative Models of Brain Dynamics
Ramezanian-Panahi, M., Abrevaya, G., Gagnon-Audet, J.-C., Voleti, V., Rish, I., & Dumas, G. (2022) · Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.3389/frai.2022.807406 · Cited by 52
Estimating Directed Connectivity from Cortical Recordings and Reconstructed Sources
Papadopoulou, M., Friston, K., & Marinazzo, D. (2019) · Brain Topography · doi:10.1007/s10548-015-0450-6 · Cited by 40
Self-citationComputational modelling of movement-related beta-oscillatory dynamics in human motor cortex
Bhatt, M. B., Bowen, S., Rossiter, H. E., Dupont-Hadwen, J., Moran, R., Friston, K. J., & Ward, N. (2016) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.02.078 · Cited by 40
Self-citationPinotsis, D. A., Geerts, J. P., Pinto, L., FitzGerald, T. H. B., Vladimir Litvak, A., Auksztulewicz, R., & Friston, K. J. (2016) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.11.041 · Cited by 38
Self-citationParr, T., Sajid, N., & Friston, K. J. (2020) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e22050552 · Cited by 39
Self-citationGerster, M., Taher, H., Škoch, A., Hlinka, J., Guye, M., Bartoloméi, F., Jirsa, V., Zakharova, A., & Olmi, S. (2021) · Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnsys.2021.675272 · Cited by 39
Neural dynamics under active inference: plausibility and efficiency of information processing
Da Costa, L., Parr, T., Sengupta, B., & Friston, K. (2021) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e23040454 · Cited by 38
Self-citationGenerative models for clinical applications in computational psychiatry
Frässle, S., Yao, Y., Schöbi, D., Aponte, E. A., Heinzle, J., & Stephan, K. E. (2018) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Cognitive Science · doi:10.1002/wcs.1460 · Cited by 36
Resting-state neural activity and connectivity associated with subjective happiness
Sato, W., Kochiyama, T., Uono, S., Sawada, R., Kubota, Y., Yoshimura, S., & Toichi, M. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-48510-9 · Cited by 40
MULTIPLE OSCILLATORY STATES IN MODELS OF COLLECTIVE NEURONAL DYNAMICS
Kalitzin, S., Koppert, M. M. J., Petkov, G. H., & Lopes, F. H. D. S. (2014) · International Journal of Neural Systems · doi:10.1142/s0129065714500208 · Cited by 37
Empirical validation of directed functional connectivity
Mill, R. D., Bagic, A. I., Bostan, A. C., Schneider, W., & Cole, M. W. (2016) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.11.037 · Cited by 38
Quiroga‐Martinez, D. R., Hansen, N. C., Højlund, A., Pearce, M. T., Brattico, E., & Vuust, P. (2019) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/ejn.14667 · Cited by 34
Dynamic causal modelling of COVID-19
Friston, K. J., Parr, T., Zeidman, P., Razi, A., Flandin, G., Jean Daunizeau, A., Hulme, O. J., Billig, A. J., Vladimir Litvak, A., Moran, R., et al. (2020) · Wellcome Open Research · doi:10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15881.1 · Cited by 88
Self-citationNeural Dynamics under Active Inference: Plausibility and Efficiency of Information Processing
Costa, L. D., Parr, T., Sengupta, B., & Friston, K. J. (2021) · UCL Discovery (University College London) · Cited by 37
Self-citationThe functional role of oscillatory dynamics in neocortical circuits: A computational perspective
Effenberger, F., Carvalho, P., Dubinin, I., & Singer, W. (2025) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2412830122 · Cited by 41
Sonkusare, S., Ding, Q., Zhao, Y., Liu, W., Yang, R., Mandali, A., Manssuer, L. R., Zhang, C., Cao, C., Sun, B., et al. (2022) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41380-022-01883-2 · Cited by 36
GABA-ergic Dynamics in Human Frontotemporal Networks Confirmed by Pharmaco-Magnetoencephalography
Adams, N., Hughes, L. E., Phillips, H. N., Shaw, A. D., Murley, A. G., Nesbitt, D. J., Cope, T., Bevan-Jones, W. R., Passamonti, L., & Rowe, J. B. (2020) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1689-19.2019 · Cited by 32
Dynamic causal modelling of seizure activity in a rat model
Papadopoulou, M., Cooray, G., Rosch, R. E., Moran, R., Marinazzo, D., & Friston, K. J. (2016) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.08.062 · Cited by 29
Self-citationIhalainen, R., Gosseries, O., de Steen, F. V., Raimondo, F., Panda, R., Bonhomme, V. L., Marinazzo, D., Bowman, H., Laureys, S., & Chennu, S. (2021) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.117841 · Cited by 36
Gilbert, J. R., Symmonds, M., Hanna, M. G., Dolan, R. J., Friston, K. J., & Moran, R. (2015) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.08.057 · Cited by 29
Self-citationAshourvan, A., Shah, P., Pines, A. R., Gu, S., Lynn, C. W., Bassett, D. S., Davis, K. A., & Litt, B. (2021) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-021-01700-6 · Cited by 30
An integrated measure of GABA to characterize post-stroke plasticity
Paparella, I., Vandewalle, G., Stagg, C. J., & Maquet, P. (2023) · NeuroImage Clinical · doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2023.103463 · Cited by 30
Applying EEG phase synchronization measures to non-linearly coupled neural mass models
Vindiola, M., Vettel, J. M., Gordon, S. M., Franaszczuk, P. J., & McDowell, K. (2014) · Journal of Neuroscience Methods · doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2014.01.025 · Cited by 28
A tutorial on variational Bayes for latent linear stochastic time-series models
Ostwald, D., Kirilina, E. P., Starke, L., & Blankenburg, F. (2014) · Journal of Mathematical Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jmp.2014.04.003 · Cited by 29
Cope, T. E., Hughes, L. E., Phillips, H. N., Adams, N. E., Jafarian, A., Nesbitt, D., Assem, M., Woolgar, A., Duncan, J., & Rowe, J. B. (2022) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1622-21.2022 · Cited by 32
A neural mass model of cross frequency coupling
Chehelcheraghi, M., van Leeuwen, C., Steur, E., & Nakatani, C. (2017) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0173776 · Cited by 27
Thalamocortical dynamics underlying spontaneous transitions in beta power in Parkinsonism
Reis, C., Sharott, A., Magill, P. J., van Wijk, B. C. M., Parr, T., Zeidman, P., Friston, K. J., & Cagnan, H. (2019) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.03.009 · Cited by 27
Self-citationHamburg, S., Rosch, R. E., Startin, C. M., Friston, K. J., & Strydom, A. (2019) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhz043 · Cited by 27
Self-citationGlobal dynamics of neural mass models
Cooray, G., Rosch, R. E., & Friston, K. J. (2023) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010915 · Cited by 29
Self-citationDíez, Á., Ranlund, S. M., Pinotsis, D. A., Calafato, S., Shaikh, M., Hall, M., Walshe, M., Nevado, Á., Friston, K. J., Adams, R. A., et al. (2017) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.23588 · Cited by 26
Self-citationThe lure of misleading causal statements in functional connectivity researchPreprint
Mehler, D. M., & Kording, K. P. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1812.03363 · Cited by 51
SEED-G: Simulated EEG Data Generator for Testing Connectivity Algorithms
Anzolin, A., Toppi, J., Petti, M., Febo Cincotti, A., & Laura Astolfi, A. (2021) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s21113632 · Cited by 24
Classifying dynamic transitions in high dimensional neural mass models: A random forest approach
Ferrat, L. A., Goodfellow, M., & Terry, J. R. (2018) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006009 · Cited by 25
Pereira, I., Frässle, S., Heinzle, J., Schöbi, D., Tri, C., Gruber, M., & Stephan, K. E. (2021) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118662 · Cited by 22
Dynamic Causal Modeling for fMRI With Wilson-Cowan-Based Neuronal Equations
Sadeghi, S., Mier, D. U., Gerchen, M. F., Schmidt, S. N. L., & Haß, J. (2020) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2020.593867 · Cited by 21
Cortical signatures of precision grip force control in children, adolescents, and adults
Beck, M. M., Spedden, M. E., Dietz, M. J., Karabanov, A. N., Christensen, M. S., & Lundbye‐Jensen, J. (2021) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.61018 · Cited by 22
Cope, T., Hughes, L. E., Phillips, H. N., Adams, N., Jafarian, A., Nesbitt, D. J., Assem, M., Woolgar, A., Duncan, J., & Rowe, J. B. (2022) · Apollo (University of Cambridge) · doi:10.17863/cam.83553 · Cited by 23
Inputs to prefrontal cortex support visual recognition in the aging brain
Gilbert, J. R., & Moran, R. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep31943 · Cited by 30
Self-citationHahn, G., Skeide, M. A., Mantini, D., Ganzetti, M., Alain Destexhe, A., Friederici, A. D., & Deco, G. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-44909-6 · Cited by 25
Spedden, M. E., Beck, M. M., Christensen, M. S., Dietz, M. J., Karabanov, A. N., Geertsen, S. S., Nielsen, J. B., & Lundbye‐Jensen, J. (2020) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116982 · Cited by 22
Huang, J., Choo, S., Pugh, Z. H., & Nam, C. S. (2021) · Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/0018720820987443 · Cited by 21
Adiabatic dynamic causal modelling
Jafarian, A., Zeidman, P., Wykes, R. C., Walker, M. C., & Friston, K. J. (2021) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118243 · Cited by 21
Self-citationWhole-brain dynamical modelling for classification of Parkinson’s disease
Jung, K., Florin, E., Patil, K. R., Caspers, J., Rubbert, C., Eickhoff, S. B., & Popovych, O. V. (2022) · Brain Communications · doi:10.1093/braincomms/fcac331 · Cited by 21
A neural mass model based on single cell dynamics to model pathophysiology
Zandt, B., Visser, S., van Putten, M. J. A. M., & ten Haken, B. (2014) · Journal of Computational Neuroscience · doi:10.1007/s10827-014-0517-5 · Cited by 20
Human fronto-parietal response scattering subserves vigilance at night
Gaggioni, G., Ly, J. Q. M., Chellappa, S. L., Wallant, D. C. ’., Rosanova, M., Sarasso, S., Luxen, A., Salmon, É., Middleton, B., Massimini, M., et al. (2018) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.03.055 · Cited by 21
Low-dimensional firing-rate dynamics for populations of renewal-type spiking neurons
Pietras, B., Gallice, N., & Schwalger, T. (2020) · Physical review. E · doi:10.1103/physreve.102.022407 · Cited by 21
Modelling the brain: Elementary components to explain ensemble functions
D'Angelo, E. U., & Wheeler‐Kingshott, C. A. M. G. (2017) · UCL Discovery (University College London) · doi:10.1393/ncr/i2017-10137-5 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Moran, R., Pinotsis, D. A., & Friston, K.
- Affiliations
- Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Moran, Rosalyn
- Venue
- Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2013
- Volume
- 7
- Pages
- 57-57
- ISSN
- 1662-5188 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3664834
- OpenAlex
- W2142039948
- Cited by
- 255
- References
- 100
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 3
- FWCI
- 9.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Portal (King's College London) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- City Research Online (City University London) (acceptedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion)
- VTechWorks (Virginia Tech) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Wellcome Trust (091593, 088130)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- dynamic causal modeling, neural mass model, neural field models, conductance-based models, effective connectivity, ion channel dynamics, multiple resonances, structure-function relationship, EEG, magnetoencephalography, local field potentials, electrocorticography
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
