The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
EEG entropy measures in anesthesia
Open accessAbstract
HIGHLIGHTS: ► Twelve entropy indices were systematically compared in monitoring depth of anesthesia and detecting burst suppression.► Renyi permutation entropy performed best in tracking EEG changes associated with different anesthesia states.► Approximate Entropy and Sample Entropy performed best in detecting burst suppression. OBJECTIVE: Entropy algorithms have been widely used in analyzing EEG signals during anesthesia. However, a systematic comparison of these entropy algorithms in assessing anesthesia drugs' effect is lacking. In this study, we compare the capability of 12 entropy indices for monitoring depth of anesthesia (DoA) and detecting the burst suppression pattern (BSP), in anesthesia induced by GABAergic agents. METHODS: Twelve indices were investigated, namely Response Entropy (RE) and State entropy (SE), three wavelet entropy (WE) measures [Shannon WE (SWE), Tsallis WE (TWE), and Renyi WE (RWE)], Hilbert-Huang spectral entropy (HHSE), approximate entropy (ApEn), sample entropy (SampEn), Fuzzy entropy, and three permutation entropy (PE) measures [Shannon PE (SPE), Tsallis PE (TPE) and Renyi PE (RPE)]. Two EEG data sets from sevoflurane-induced and isoflurane-induced anesthesia respectively were selected to assess the capability of each entropy index in DoA monitoring and BSP detection. To validate the effectiveness of these entropy algorithms, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) modeling and prediction probability (Pk) analysis were applied. The multifractal detrended fluctuation analysis (MDFA) as a non-entropy measure was compared. RESULTS: All the entropy and MDFA indices could track the changes in EEG pattern during different anesthesia states. Three PE measures outperformed the other entropy indices, with less baseline variability, higher coefficient of determination (R (2)) and prediction probability, and RPE performed best; ApEn and SampEn discriminated BSP best. Additionally, these entropy measures showed an advantage in computation efficiency compared with MDFA. CONCLUSION: Each entropy index has its advantages and disadvantages in estimating DoA. Overall, it is suggested that the RPE index was a superior measure. Investigating the advantages and disadvantages of these entropy indices could help improve current clinical indices for monitoring DoA.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Zadeh, L. A. (1965) · Information and Control · doi:10.1016/s0019-9958(65)90241-x · Cited by 67,855
A Mathematical Theory of Communication
Shannon, C. E. (1948) · Bell System Technical Journal · doi:10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb00917.x · Cited by 48,949
Huang, N. E., Shen, Z., Long, S. R., Wu, M. C., Shih, H. H., Zheng, Q., Yen, N.-C., Tung, C. C., & Liu, H. H. (1998) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspa.1998.0193 · Cited by 23,564
Physiological time-series analysis using approximate entropy and sample entropy
Richman, J. S., & Moorman, J. R. (2000) · American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology · doi:10.1152/ajpheart.2000.278.6.h2039 · Cited by 7,880
Approximate entropy as a measure of system complexity.
Pincus, S. M. (1991) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.88.6.2297 · Cited by 5,811
Permutation Entropy: A Natural Complexity Measure for Time Series
Bandt, C., & Pompe, B. (2002) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.88.174102 · Cited by 4,867
Multifractal detrended fluctuation analysis of nonstationary time series
Kantelhardt, J. W., Zschiegner, S. A., Koscielny-Bunde, E., Havlin, S., Bunde, A., & Stanley, H. E. (2002) · Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications · doi:10.1016/s0378-4371(02)01383-3 · Cited by 3,637
A Primer for EEG Signal Processing in Anesthesia
Rampil, I. J. (1998) · Anesthesiology · doi:10.1097/00000542-199810000-00023 · Cited by 1,503
The role of constraints within generalized nonextensive statistics
Tsallis, C., Mendes, R., & Plastino, A. R. (1998) · Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications · doi:10.1016/s0378-4371(98)00437-3 · Cited by 1,430
Characterization of Surface EMG Signal Based on Fuzzy Entropy
Chen, W., Wang, Z., Xie, H., & Yu, W. (2007) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering · doi:10.1109/tnsre.2007.897025 · Cited by 1,094
Cited by
EEG frequency bands in psychiatric disorders: a review of resting state studies
Newson, J. J., & Thiagarajan, T. C. (2019) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2018.00521 · Cited by 863
A Review of EEG Signal Features and Their Application in Driver Drowsiness Detection Systems
Stancin, I., Cifrek, M., & Jovic, A. (2021) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s21113786 · Cited by 269
Čukić, M., Stokić, M., Simić, S., & Pokrajac, D. (2020) · Cognitive Neurodynamics · doi:10.1007/s11571-020-09581-x · Cited by 130
Multimodal mild depression recognition based on EEG-EM synchronization acquisition network
Zhu, J., Wang, Y., La, R., Zhan, J., Niu, J., Zeng, S., & Hu, X. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2901950 · Cited by 56
Self-citationWong, W., Noreika, V., Móró, L., Revonsuo, A., Windt, J., Valli, K., & Tsuchiya, N. (2020) · Neuroscience of Consciousness · doi:10.1093/nc/niaa006 · Cited by 40
Metadata
- Authors
- Liang, Z., Wang, Y., Sun, X., Li, D., Voss, L. J., Sleigh, J. W., Hagihira, S., & Li, X.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2015-02-18
- Volume
- 9
- Pages
- 16-16
- ISSN
- 1662-5188 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1991033480
- Cited by
- 306
- References
- 47
- FWCI
- 28.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: EEG entropy measures in anesthesia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3389/fncom.2015.00016
- The paper
- Liang, Z., Wang, Y., Sun, X., Li, D., Voss, L. J., Sleigh, J. W., Hagihira, S., & Li, X. (2015). EEG entropy measures in anesthesia. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2015.00016
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.