The DOI matches its Crossref record; 108 of the 108 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
EEG Source Imaging: A Practical Review of the Analysis Steps
Open accessAbstract
The electroencephalogram (EEG) is one of the oldest technologies to measure neuronal activity of the human brain. It has its undisputed value in clinical diagnosis, particularly (but not exclusively) in the identification of epilepsy and sleep disorders and in the evaluation of dysfunctions in sensory transmission pathways. With the advancement of digital technologies, the analysis of EEG has moved from pure visual inspection of amplitude and frequency modulations over time to a comprehensive exploration of the temporal and spatial characteristics of the recorded signals. Today, EEG is accepted as a powerful tool to capture brain function with the unique advantage of measuring neuronal processes in the time frame in which these processes occur, namely in the sub-second range. However, it is generally stated that EEG suffers from a poor spatial resolution that makes it difficult to infer to the location of the brain areas generating the neuronal activity measured on the scalp. This statement has challenged a whole community of biomedical engineers to offer solutions to localize more precisely and more reliably the generators of the EEG activity. High-density EEG systems combined with precise information of the head anatomy and sophisticated source localization algorithms now exist that convert the EEG to a true neuroimaging modality. With these tools in hand and with the fact that EEG still remains versatile, inexpensive and portable, electrical neuroimaging has become a widely used technology to study the functions of the pathological and healthy human brain. However, several steps are needed to pass from the recording of the EEG to 3-dimensional images of neuronal activity. This review explains these different steps and illustrates them in a comprehensive analysis pipeline integrated in a stand-alone freely available academic software: Cartool. The information about how the different steps are performed in Cartool is only meant as a suggestion. Other EEG source imaging software may apply similar or different approaches to the different steps.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Delorme, A., & Makeig, S. (2004) · Journal of Neuroscience Methods · doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2003.10.009 · Cited by 24,371
Oostenveld, R., Fries, P., Maris, E., & Schoffelen, J.-M. (2011) · Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience · doi:10.1155/2011/156869 · Cited by 10,323
Brainstorm: A User-Friendly Application for MEG/EEG Analysis
Tadel, F., Baillet, S., Mosher, J. C., Pantazis, D., & Leahy, R. M. (2011) · Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience · doi:10.1155/2011/879716 · Cited by 3,677
Pascual-Marqui, R. D., Michel, C. M., & Lehmann, D. (1994) · International Journal of Psychophysiology · doi:10.1016/0167-8760(84)90014-x · Cited by 2,869
Self-citationThe scientist and engineer's guide to digital signal processing
Smith, S. W. (1997) · Cited by 2,799
Spherical splines for scalp potential and current density mapping
Perrin, F., Pernier, J., Bertrand, O., & Echallier, J. F. (1989) · Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/0013-4694(89)90180-6 · Cited by 2,706
Nunez, P. L., & Srinivasan, R. (2006) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195050387.001.0001 · Cited by 2,531
Interpreting magnetic fields of the brain: minimum norm estimates
Hämäläinen, M. S., & Ilmoniemi, R. J. (1994) · Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing · doi:10.1007/bf02512476 · Cited by 1,995
BioelectromagnetismPrinciples and Applications of Bioelectric and Biomagnetic Fields
Malmivuo, J., & Plonsey, R. (1995) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195058239.001.0001 · Cited by 1,834
Delorme, A., Sejnowski, T., & Makeig, S. (2007) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.11.004 · Cited by 1,759
Cited by
Hyperscanning: A Valid Method to Study Neural Inter-Brain Underpinnings of Social Interaction
Czeszumski, A., Eustergerling, S., Lang, A., Menrath, D., Gerstenberger, M., Schuberth, S., Schreiber, F., Rendon, Z. Z., & König, P. (2020) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2020.00039 · Cited by 511
TMS combined with EEG: Recommendations and open issues for data collection and analysis
Hernandez-Pavon, J. C., Veniero, D., Bergmann, T. O., Belardinelli, P., Bortoletto, M., Casarotto, S., Casula, E. P., Farzan, F., Fecchio, M., Julkunen, P., et al. (2023) · Brain Stimulation · doi:10.1016/j.brs.2023.02.009 · Cited by 238
A Review on P300 in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder
Raggi, A., Lanza, G., & Ferri, R. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2021.751215 · Cited by 22
du Bois, N., Korik, A., Hodge, S., Hudson, L., Elahi, A. S., Bigirimana, A., Dayan, N., Sanchez-Bornot, J. M., McCann, A., Yelden, K., et al. (2026) · Communications Medicine · doi:10.1038/s43856-026-01574-x · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Michel, C. M., & Brunet, D.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Neurology
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2019-04-04
- Volume
- 10
- Pages
- 325-325
- ISSN
- 1664-2295 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2927702442
- Cited by
- 705
- References
- 108
- FWCI
- 35.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: EEG Source Imaging: A Practical Review of the Analysis Steps. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3389/fneur.2019.00325
- The paper
- Michel, C. M., & Brunet, D. (2019). EEG Source Imaging: A Practical Review of the Analysis Steps. Frontiers in Neurology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2019.00325
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.