P300 Speller Performance Predictor Based on RSVP Multi-feature
Open accessAbstract
Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) have been developed so that people can control computers or machines through their brain activity without limb movements. The P300 speller is one of the BCI applications most commonly used as it is very simple and reliable and may achieve relatively higher accuracy compared to other types of BCIs. However, like other BCIs, the P300 speller still has performance variation issues in practical use, for example, selecting the best tradeoff between spelling accuracy and information transfer rate (speed). Therefore, seeking correlates of the P300 speller’s performance and predicting their performance is necessary to improve the P300 speller. In this work, we investigated the correlations between rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) task features and the P300 speller performance. Fifty-five subjects participated in the RSVP and conventional matrix P300 speller tasks, and RSVP behavioral features and electroencephalography features were compared to the P300 speller performance. We found that several ERP features and behavioral features of the RSVP were correlated with the P300 speller’s offline binary classification accuracy. Using these RSVP features, we proposed a simple multi-feature performance predictor (r = 0.53, p < 0.0001) that outperformed any single feature performance predictor, including the conventional RSVP T1% predictor (r = 0.32, p < 0.05). This result demonstrates that selective multi-features can predict BCI performance better than only a single feature.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
This ability relies on attentional filtering capacity, which involves the ability to distinguish the object of interest from distractors and maintain this differentiation over time.
“This ability relies on attentional filtering capacity, which involves the ability to distinguish the object of interest from distractors and maintain this differentiation over time [21].”
From A Cascade xDAWN EEGNet Structure for Unified Visual-Evoked Related Potential Detection (2024) · cites this paper as [21]
The Discussion defines attentional filtering capacity as filtering an object of interest from distractors and maintaining that filtering over time. It says this capacity *could explain* the P300 speller process, rather than establishing that the ability relies on it. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThere is a significant positive correlation between P300 amplitude in RSVP and P300 speller performance.
“Moreover, Won et al. reported a significant positive correlation between P300 amplitude in RSVP and P300 speller performance.”
From A Cascade xDAWN EEGNet Structure for Unified Visual-Evoked Related Potential Detection (2024) · cites this paper as [21]
There is a strong negative correlation between the variation in P300 latency across trials in RSVP and P300 speller performance.
“They observed a strong negative correlation between the variation in P300 latency across trials in RSVP and P300 speller performance [21].”
From A Cascade xDAWN EEGNet Structure for Unified Visual-Evoked Related Potential Detection (2024) · cites this paper as [21]
A multi-feature predictor that includes multiple RSVP features has demonstrated that it can accurately predict P300 speller performance, outperforming single-feature predictors.
“Moreover, a multi-feature predictor that includes multiple RSVP features has demonstrated that it can accurately predict P300 speller performance, outperforming single-feature predictors [21].”
From A Cascade xDAWN EEGNet Structure for Unified Visual-Evoked Related Potential Detection (2024) · cites this paper as [21]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing
Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x · Cited by 109,482 · see citing works
Delorme, A., & Makeig, S. (2004) · Journal of Neuroscience Methods · doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2003.10.009 · Cited by 24,371 · see citing works
Updating P300: An integrative theory of P3a and P3b
Polich, J. (2007) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2007.04.019 · Cited by 7,919 · see citing works
Farwell, L. A., & Donchin, E. (1988) · Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/0013-4694(88)90149-6 · Cited by 3,228 · see citing works
BCI2000: A General-Purpose Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) System
Schalk, G., McFarland, D. J., Hinterberger, T., Birbaumer, N., & Wolpaw, J. R. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.2004.827072 · Cited by 3,022 · see citing works
On the utility of P3 amplitude as a measure of processing capacity
Kok, A. (2001) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1017/s0048577201990559 · Cited by 1,766 · see citing works
Cognitive and biological determinants of P300: an integrative review
Polich, J. M., & Kok, A. (1995) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/0301-0511(95)05130-9 · Cited by 1,611 · see citing works
Single-trial analysis and classification of ERP components — A tutorial
Blankertz, B., Lemm, S., Treder, M., Haufe, S., & Müller, K.-R. (2011) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.06.048 · Cited by 1,138 · see citing works
Debener, S., Ullsperger, M., Siegel, M., Fiehler, K., von Cramon, D. Y., & Engel, A. K. (2005) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3286-05.2005 · Cited by 1,055 · see citing works
Characterization of N200 and P300: selected studies of the Event-Related Potential
Patel, S. H., & Azzam, P. N. (2005) · International Journal of Medical Sciences · doi:10.7150/ijms.2.147 · Cited by 794 · see citing works
A comparison of classification techniques for the P300 Speller
Krusienski, D. J., Sellers, E. W., Cabestaing, F., Bayoudh, S., McFarland, D. J., Vaughan, T. M., & Wolpaw, J. R. (2006) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2560/3/4/007 · Cited by 762 · see citing works
Neurophysiological predictor of SMR-based BCI performance
Blankertz, B., Sannelli, C., Halder, S., Hammer, E. M., Kübler, A., Müller, K.-R., Curio, G., & Dickhaus, T. (2010) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.03.022 · Cited by 674 · see citing works
How many people are able to control a P300-based brain-computer interface (BCI)?
Guger, C., Daban, S., Sellers, E., Holzner, C., Krausz, G., Carabalona, R., Gramatica, F., & Edlinger, G. (2009) · Neuroscience Letters · doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2009.06.045 · Cited by 652 · see citing works
Groß, J., Schmitz, F., Schnitzler, I., Kessler, K., Shapiro, K. L., Hommel, B., & Schnitzler, A. (2004) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0404944101 · Cited by 582 · see citing works
Sellers, E. W., Krusienski, D. J., McFarland, D. J., Vaughan, T. M., & Wolpaw, J. R. (2006) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2006.04.007 · Cited by 504 · see citing works
Neuronal Synchronization along the Dorsal Visual Pathway Reflects the Focus of Spatial Attention
Siegel, M., Donner, T. H., Oostenveld, R., Fries, P., & Engel, A. K. (2008) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2008.09.010 · Cited by 487 · see citing works
The P300 component of the event-related brain potential as an index of information processing
Duncan‐Johnson, C. C., & Donchin, E. (1982) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/0301-0511(82)90016-3 · Cited by 475 · see citing works
The attentional blink: Resource depletion or temporary loss of control?
Di Lollo, V., Kawahara, J.-I., Shahab Ghorashi, S. M., & Enns, J. T. (2005) · Psychological Research · doi:10.1007/s00426-004-0173-x · Cited by 448 · see citing works
P300 brain computer interface: current challenges and emerging trends
Fazel-Rezai, R., Allison, B. Z., Guger, C., Sellers, E. W., Kleih, S. C., & Kübler, A. (2012) · Frontiers in Neuroengineering · doi:10.3389/fneng.2012.00014 · Cited by 362 · see citing works
Nijboer (2010) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2010.00055 · Cited by 323 · see citing works
Flashing characters with famous faces improves ERP-based brain–computer interface performance
Kaufmann, T., Schulz, S. M., Grünzinger, C., & Kübler, A. (2011) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2560/8/5/056016 · Cited by 302 · see citing works
The Correction of Eye Blink Artefacts in the EEG: A Comparison of Two Prominent Methods
Hoffmann, S. F., & Falkenstein, M. (2008) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0003004 · Cited by 261 · see citing works
Motivation modulates the P300 amplitude during brain–computer interface use
Kleih, S. C., Nijboer, F., Halder, S., & Kübler, A. (2010) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2010.01.034 · Cited by 259 · see citing works
High Theta and Low Alpha Powers May Be Indicative of BCI-Illiteracy in Motor Imagery
Ahn, M., Cho, H., Ahn, S., & Jun, S. C. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0080886 · Cited by 209 · see citing works
Self-citationGaze-independent brain–computer interfaces based on covert attention and feature attention
Treder, M. S., Schmidt, N. M., & Blankertz, B. (2011) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2560/8/6/066003 · Cited by 182 · see citing works
Muenssinger, J., Halder, S., Kleih, S. C., Furdea, A., Raco, V., Hösle, A., & Kübler, A. (2010) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2010.00182 · Cited by 175 · see citing works
Independent home use of a brain-computer interface by people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
Wolpaw, J. R., Bedlack, R. S., Reda, D. J., Ringer, R. J., Banks, P. G., Vaughan, T. M., Heckman, S. M., McCane, L. M., Carmack, C. S., Winden, S., et al. (2018) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000005812 · Cited by 170 · see citing works
Attention and P300-based BCI performance in people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
Riccio, A., Simione, L., Schettini, F., Pizzimenti, A., Inghilleri, M., Belardinelli, M. O., Mattia, D., & Cincotti, F. (2013) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00732 · Cited by 162 · see citing works
Temporal dynamics of access to consciousness in the attentional blink
Kranczioch, C., Debener, S., Maye, A., & Engel, A. K. (2007) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.05.044 · Cited by 143 · see citing works
One-year test–retest reliability of auditory ERPs in young and old adults
Walhovd, K. B., & Fjell, A. M. (2002) · International Journal of Psychophysiology · doi:10.1016/s0167-8760(02)00039-9 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Relationships between the resting-state network and the P3: Evidence from a scalp EEG study
Li, F., Liu, T., Wang, F., Li, H., Gong, D., Zhang, R., Jiang, Y., Tian, Y., Guo, D., Yao, D., et al. (2015) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep15129 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
Mak, J. N., McFarland, D. J., Vaughan, T. M., McCane, L. M., Tsui, P. Z., Zeitlin, D., Sellers, E. W., & Wolpaw, J. R. (2012) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2560/9/2/026014 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
Effects of training and motivation on auditory P300 brain-computer interface performance
Baykara, E., Ruf, C. A., Fioravanti, C., Käthner, I., Simon, N., Kleih, S. C., Kübler, A., & Halder, S. (2016) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2015.04.054 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Empathy, motivation, and P300 BCI performance
Kleih, S. C., & Kübler, A. (2013) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00642 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Prediction of Auditory and Visual P300 Brain-Computer Interface Aptitude
Halder, S., Hammer, E. M., Kleih, S. C., Bogdan, M., Rosenstiel, W., Birbaumer, N., & Kübler, A. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0053513 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Topographical and temporal stability of the P300
Karniski, W. M., & Blair, R. C. (1989) · Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/0013-4694(89)90043-6 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Performance predictors of brain–computer interfaces in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
Geronimo, A. M., Simmons, Z., & Schiff, S. J. (2016) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2560/13/2/026002 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Effects of resting heart rate variability on performance in the P300 brain-computer interface
Kaufmann, T., Vögele, C., Sütterlin, S., Lukito, S., & Kübler, A. (2011) · International Journal of Psychophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.11.018 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Alpha neurofeedback training improves SSVEP-based BCI performance
Wan, F., da Cruz, J. N., Nan, W., Wong, C. M., Vai, M. I., & Rosa, A. C. (2016) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2560/13/3/036019 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Do resting brain dynamics predict oddball evoked-potential?
Lee, T., Yu, Y. W. ‐., Wu, H., & Chen, T. (2011) · BMC Neuroscience · doi:10.1186/1471-2202-12-121 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
The cost of space independence in P300-BCI spellers
Chennu, S., Alsufyani, A., Filetti, M., Owen, A. M., & Bowman, H. (2013) · Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1186/1743-0003-10-82 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Psychological Predictors of Visual and Auditory P300 Brain-Computer Interface Performance
Hammer, E. M., Halder, S., Kleih, S. C., & Kübler, A. (2018) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2018.00307 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
ESANN'1997 proceedings - European Symposium on Artificial Neural Networks
Herrmann, M., Bauer, H.-U., & Villmann, T. (1997) · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Mind the Traps! Design Guidelines for Rigorous BCI Experiments
Jeunet, C., Debener, S., Lotte, F., Mattout, J., Scherer, R., & Zich, C. (2018) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/9781351231954-32 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Elsawy, A. S., Eldawlatly, S., Taher, M., & Aly, G. M. (2014) · Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) · doi:10.1109/embc.2014.6944755 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Single-trial P300 Classification using PCA with LDA, QDA and Neural NetworksPreprint
Sharma, N. L. (2017) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1712.01977 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Mainsah, B. O., Reeves, G., Collins, L. M., & Throckmorton, C. S. (2017) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2552/aa7525 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Delorme A. Makeig S. Sejnowski T. (2001). “ Automatic artifact rejection for EEG data using high-order statistics and independent component analysis,” in Proceedings of the 3rd International Independent Component Analysis and Blind Source Decomposition Conference, San Diego, CA.
- Won K. Kwon M. Lee S. Jang S. Lee J. Ahn M. (2018). “ Seeking RSVP task features correlated with P300 speller performance,” in IEEE SMC2018 (Miyazaki: IEEE), 1138– 1143.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
EEG Dataset for RSVP and P300 Speller Brain-Computer Interfaces
Won, K., Kwon, M., Ahn, M., & Jun, S. C. (2022) · Scientific Data · doi:10.1038/s41597-022-01509-w · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Self-citationA Cascade xDAWN EEGNet Structure for Unified Visual-Evoked Related Potential Detection
Wang, H., Wang, Z., Sun, Y., Yuan, Z., Xu, T., & Li, J. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering · doi:10.1109/tnsre.2024.3415474 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
“Moreover, a multi-feature predictor that includes multiple RSVP features has demonstrated that it can accurately predict P300 speller performance, outperforming single-feature predictors [21].”
BackgroundInfluential
- Authors
- Won, K., Kwon, M., Jang, S., Ahn, M., & Jun, S. C.
- Affiliations
- Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology (KR)
- Handong Global University (KR)
- Corresponding author
- Jun, Sung Chan
- Venue
- Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2019-07-30
- Volume
- 13
- Pages
- 261-261
- ISSN
- 1662-5161 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC6682684
- OpenAlex
- W2957657110
- Cited by
- 34
- References
- 47
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 6
- FWCI
- 2.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Frontiers in Human Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Iran Telecommunication Research Center
- Institute for Information and Communications Technology Promotion (2017-0-00451)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
- Keywords
- P300 speller, brain-computer interface, performance prediction, rapid serial visual presentation, event-related potentials, behavioral characteristics, information transfer rate, spelling accuracy, EEG features
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
