Cited by 9Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchGenetics and Neurodevelopmental DisordersTactile and Sensory Interactions

Electrophysiological Measures of Tactile and Auditory Processing in Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder

Open access
Kadlaskar, Girija, Bergmann, Sophia, McNally Keehn, Rebecca, Seidl, Amanda, Keehn, Brandon·2021·Frontiers in Human Neuroscience

Abstract

Behavioral differences in responding to tactile and auditory stimuli are widely reported in individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). However, the neural mechanisms underlying distinct tactile and auditory reactivity patterns in ASD remain unclear with theories implicating differences in both perceptual and attentional processes. The current study sought to investigate (1) the neural indices of early perceptual and later attentional factors underlying tactile and auditory processing in children with and without ASD, and (2) the relationship between neural indices of tactile and auditory processing and ASD symptomatology. Participants included 14, 6–12-year-olds with ASD and 14 age- and non-verbal IQ matched typically developing (TD) children. Children participated in an event-related potential (ERP) oddball paradigm during which they watched a silent video while being presented with tactile and auditory stimuli (i.e., 80% standard speech sound/a/; 10% oddball speech sound/i/; 10% novel vibrotactile stimuli on the fingertip with standard speech sound/a/). Children’s early and later ERP responses to tactile (P1 and N2) and auditory stimuli (P1, P3a, and P3b) were examined. Non-parametric analyses showed that children with ASD displayed differences in early perceptual processing of auditory (i.e., lower amplitudes at central region of interest), but not tactile, stimuli. Analysis of later attentional components did not show differences in response to tactile and auditory stimuli in the ASD and TD groups. Together, these results suggest that differences in auditory responsivity patterns could be related to perceptual factors in children with ASD. However, despite differences in caregiver-reported sensory measures, children with ASD did not differ in their neural reactivity to infrequent touch-speech stimuli compared to TD children. Nevertheless, correlational analyses confirmed that inter-individual differences in neural responsivity to tactile and auditory stimuli were related to social skills in all children. Finally, we discuss how the paradigm and stimulus type used in the current study may have impacted our results. These findings have implications for everyday life, where individual differences in responding to tactile and auditory stimuli may impact social functioning.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fnhum.2021.729270

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 58

  1. Ausderau K. K. Furlong M. Sideris J. Bulluck J. Little L. M. Watson L. R. (2014). Sensory subtypes in children with autism spectrum disorder: latent profile transition analysis using a national survey of sensory features. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 55 935– 944. 10.1111/jcpp.12219 25039572 PMC4159682 · DOI
  2. Ben-Sasson A. Cermak S. Orsmond G. Tager-Flusberg H. Kadlec M. Carter A. (2008). Sensory clusters of toddlers with autism spectrum disorders: differences in affective symptoms. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 49 817– 825. 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2008.01899.x 18498344 · DOI
  3. Blakemore S.-J. Tavassoli T. Calò S. Thomas R. M. Catmur C. Frith U. (2006). Tactile sensitivity in Asperger syndrome. Brain Cogn. 61 5– 13. 10.1016/j.bandc.2005.12.013 16500009 · DOI
  4. Bremner A. Lewkowicz D. J. Spence C. (2012). Multisensory Development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  5. Bruderer A. G. Danielson D. K. Kandhadai P. Werker J. F. (2015). Sensorimotor influences on speech perception in infancy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 112 13531– 13536. 10.1073/pnas.1508631112 26460030 PMC4640749 · DOI
  6. Bruneau N. Bonnet-Brilhault F. Gomot M. Adrien J.-L. Barthélémy C. (2003). Cortical auditory processing and communication in children with autism: electrophysiological/behavioral relations. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 51 17– 25. 10.1016/s0167-8760(03)00149-1 14629919 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Cascio C. J. Gu C. Schauder K. B. Key A. P. Yoder P. (2015). Somatosensory event-related potentials and association with tactile behavioral responsiveness patterns in children with ASD. Brain Topogr. 28 895– 903. 10.1007/s10548-015-0439-1 26016951 PMC4601930 · DOI
  8. Chaumon M. Bishop D. V. Busch N. A. (2015). A practical guide to the selection of independent components of the electroencephalogram for artifact correction. J. Neurosci. Methods 250 47– 63. 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2015.02.025 25791012 · DOI
  9. Constantino J. N. (2012). The Social Responsiveness SCALE, Second Edition (SRS-2) Manual. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Service.
  10. Crane L. Goddard L. Pring L. (2009). Sensory processing in adults with autism spectrum disorders. Autism 13 215– 228. 10.1177/1362361309103794 19369385 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Delorme A. Mullen T. Kothe C. Acar Z. A. Bigdely-Shamlo N. Vankov A. (2011). EEGLAB, SIFT, NFT, BCILAB, and ERICA: new tools for advanced EEG processing. Comput. Intell. Neurosci. 2011: 10. 10.1155/2011/130714 21687590 PMC3114412 · DOI
  12. Donkers F. C. Schipul S. E. Baranek G. T. Cleary K. M. Willoughby M. T. Evans A. M. (2015). Attenuated auditory event-related potentials and associations with atypical sensory response patterns in children with autism. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 45 506– 523. 10.1007/s10803-013-1948-y 24072639 PMC4556131 · DOI
  13. Dudova I. Vodicka J. Havlovicova M. Sedlacek Z. Urbanek T. Hrdlicka M. (2011). Odor detection threshold, but not odor identification, is impaired in children with autism. Eur. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 20 333– 340. 10.1007/s00787-011-0177-1 21528391 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Dunbar R. I. (2010). The social role of touch in humans and primates: behavioural function and neurobiological mechanisms. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 34 260– 268. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.07.001 18662717 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Dunn W. (1997). The impact of sensory processing abilities on the daily lives of young children and their families: a conceptual model. Infants Young Child. 9 23– 35. 10.1097/00001163-199704000-00005 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Dunn W. (2014). Sensory Profile-2. San Antonio, TX: Pearson Publishing.
  17. Eimer M. Forster B. (2003). Modulations of early somatosensory ERP components by transient and sustained spatial attention. Exp. Brain Res. 151 24– 31. 10.1007/s00221-003-1437-1 12756516 · DOI
  18. Ferri R. Elia M. Agarwal N. Lanuzza B. Musumeci S. A. Pennisi G. (2003). The mismatch negativity and the P3a components of the auditory event-related potentials in autistic low-functioning subjects. Clin. Neurophysiol. 114 1671– 1680. 10.1016/s1388-2457(03)00153-6 12948796 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Fujikawa-Brooks S. Isenberg A. L. Osann K. Spence M. A. Gage N. M. (2010). The effect of rate stress on the auditory brainstem response in autism: a preliminary report. Int. J. Audiol. 49 129– 140. 10.3109/14992020903289790 20151887 · DOI
  20. Gomot M. Belmonte M. K. Bullmore E. T. Bernard F. A. Baron-Cohen S. (2008). Brain hyper-reactivity to auditory novel targets in children with high-functioning autism. Brain 131 2479– 2488. 10.1093/brain/awn172 18669482 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Gotham K. Pickles A. Lord C. (2009). Standardizing ADOS scores for a measure of severity in autism spectrum disorders. J. Autism Dev. Disorde. 39 693– 705. 10.1007/s10803-008-0674-3 19082876 PMC2922918 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Goy H. Fernandes D. N. Pichora-Fuller M. K. van Lieshout P. (2013). Normative voice data for younger and older adults. J. Voice 27 545– 555. 10.1016/j.jvoice.2013.03.002 23769007 · DOI
  23. Güçlü B. Tanidir C. Mukaddes N. M. Ünal F. (2007). Tactile sensitivity of normal and autistic children. Somatosens. Motor Res. 24 21– 33. 10.1080/08990220601179418 17558920 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Hertenstein M. J. Verkamp J. M. Kerestes A. M. Holmes R. M. (2006). The communicative functions of touch in humans, nonhuman primates, and rats: a review and synthesis of the empirical research. Genet. Soc. Gen. Psychol. Monogr. 132 5– 94. 10.3200/mono.132.1.5-94 17345871 · DOI
  25. Hilton C. L. Harper J. D. Kueker R. H. Lang A. R. Abbacchi A. M. Todorov A. (2010). Sensory responsiveness as a predictor of social severity in children with high functioning autism spectrum disorders. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 40 937– 945. 10.1007/s10803-010-0944-8 20108030 · DOI
  26. Jansson-Verkasalo E. Ceponienè R. Kielinen M. Suominen K. Jäntti V. Linna S.-L. (2003). Deficient auditory processing in children with Asperger Syndrome, as indexed by event-related potentials. Neurosci. Lett. 338 197– 200. 10.1016/s0304-3940(02)01405-2 12581830 · DOI
  27. Jansson-Verkasalo E. Kujala T. Jussila K. Mattila M.-L. Moilanen I. Näätänen R. (2005). Similarities in the phenotype of the auditory neural substrate in children with Asperger syndrome and their parents. Eur. J. Neurosci. 22 986– 990. 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2005.04216.x 16115221 · DOI
  28. Jung T.-P. Makeig S. Humphries C. Lee T.-W. Mckeown M. J. Iragui V. (2000). Removing electroencephalographic artifacts by blind source separation. Psychophysiology 37 163– 178. 10.1111/1469-8986.3720163 10731767 · DOI
  29. Kadlaskar G. Seidl A. Tager-Flusberg H. Nelson C. A. Keehn B. (2019). Atypical response to caregiver touch in infants at high risk for autism spectrum disorder. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 49 2946– 2955. 10.1007/s10803-019-04021-0 31016672 PMC6827711 · DOI
  30. Kadlaskar G. Seidl A. Tager-Flusberg H. Nelson C. A. Keehn B. (2020). Caregiver touch-speech communication and infant responses in 12-month-olds at high risk for autism spectrum disorder. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 50 1064– 1072. 10.1007/s10803-019-04310-8 31754946 PMC12042276 · DOI
  31. Kargas N. López B. Reddy V. Morris P. (2015). The relationship between auditory processing and restricted, repetitive behaviors in adults with autism spectrum disorders. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 45 658– 668. 10.1007/s10803-014-2219-2 25178987 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Katayama J. I. Polich J. (1998). Stimulus context determines P3a and P3b. Psychophysiology 35 23– 33. 10.1111/1469-8986.3510023 9499703 · DOI
  33. Kim J. Bang H. (2016). Three common misuses of P values. Dent. Hypotheses 7: 73. 10.4103/2155-8213.190481 27695640 PMC5042133 · DOI
  34. Lepistö T. Kujala T. Vanhala R. Alku P. Huotilainen M. Näätänen R. (2005). The discrimination of and orienting to speech and non-speech sounds in children with autism. Brain Res. 1066 147– 157. 10.1016/j.brainres.2005.10.052 16325159 · DOI
  35. Lew-Williams C. Ferguson B. Abu-Zhaya R. Seidl A. (2019). Social touch interacts with infants’ learning of auditory patterns. Dev. Cogn. Neurosci. 35 66– 74. 10.1016/j.dcn.2017.09.006 29051028 PMC5876072 · DOI
  36. Linke A. C. Keehn R. J. J. Pueschel E. B. Fishman I. Müller R.-A. (2018). Children with ASD show links between aberrant sound processing, social symptoms, and atypical auditory interhemispheric and thalamocortical functional connectivity. Dev. Cogn. Neurosci. 29 117– 126. 10.1016/j.dcn.2017.01.007 28223033 PMC5664206 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Lopez-Calderon J. Luck S. J. (2014). ERPLAB: an open-source toolbox for the analysis of event-related potentials. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 8: 213. 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00213 24782741 PMC3995046 · DOI
  38. Marco E. J. Hinkley L. B. Hill S. S. Nagarajan S. S. (2011). Sensory processing in autism: a review of neurophysiologic findings. Pediatr. Res. 69(5 Pt 2) 48R– 54R. PMC3086654 21289533
  39. Marco E. J. Khatibi K. Hill S. S. Siegel B. Arroyo M. S. Dowling A. F. (2012). Children with autism show reduced somatosensory response: an MEG study. Autism Res. 5 340– 351. 10.1002/aur.1247 22933354 PMC3474892 · DOI
  40. O’Riordan M. Passetti F. (2006). Discrimination in autism within different sensory modalities. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 36 665– 675. 10.1007/s10803-006-0106-1 16639532 · DOI
  41. Oldfield R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 9 97– 113. 10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4 5146491 · DOI · Paper page
  42. Picton T. W. Hillyard S. A. Krausz H. I. Galambos R. (1974). Human auditory evoked potentials. I: evaluation of components. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 36 179– 190. 10.1016/0013-4694(74)90155-2 4129630 · DOI
  43. Polich J. (2003). “ Theoretical overview of P3a and P3b,” in Detection of Change, ed. Polich J. (Boston, MA: Springer), 83– 98. 10.1016/j.neulet.2006.11.066 · DOI
  44. Ponton C. W. Eggermont J. J. Kwong B. Don M. (2000). Maturation of human central auditory system activity: evidence from multi-channel evoked potentials. Clin. Neurophysiol. 111 220– 236. 10680557
  45. Puts N. A. Wodka E. L. Harris A. D. Crocetti D. Tommerdahl M. Mostofsky S. H. (2017). Reduced GABA and altered somatosensory function in children with autism spectrum disorder. Autism Res. 10 608– 619. 10.1002/aur.1691 27611990 PMC5344784 · DOI
  46. Puts N. A. Wodka E. L. Tommerdahl M. Mostofsky S. H. Edden R. A. (2014). Impaired tactile processing in children with autism spectrum disorder. J. Neurophysiol. 111 1803– 1811. 10.1152/jn.00890.2013 24523518 PMC4044368 · DOI
  47. Reynolds G. D. Bahrick L. E. Lickliter R. Guy M. W. (2014). Neural correlates of intersensory processing in 5-month-old infants. Dev. Psychobiol. 56 355– 372. 10.1002/dev.21104 23423948 PMC3954462 · DOI
  48. Roberts T. P. Khan S. Y. Rey M. Monroe J. F. Cannon K. Blaskey L. (2010). MEG detection of delayed auditory evoked responses in autism spectrum disorders: towards an imaging biomarker for autism. Autism Res. 3 8– 18. 10.1002/aur.111 20063319 PMC3099241 · DOI
  49. Rosenhall U. Nordin V. Brantberg K. Gillberg C. (2003). Autism and auditory brain stem responses. Ear Hear. 24 206– 214. 12799542
  50. Russo N. Foxe J. J. Brandwein A. B. Altschuler T. Gomes H. Molholm S. (2010). Multisensory processing in children with autism: high-density electrical mapping of auditory–somatosensory integration. Autism Res. 3 253– 267. 10.1002/aur.152 20730775 · DOI · Paper page
  51. Russo N. Zecker S. Trommer B. Chen J. Kraus N. (2009). Effects of background noise on cortical encoding of speech in autism spectrum disorders. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 39 1185– 1196. 10.1007/s10803-009-0737-0 19353261 PMC2810203 · DOI
  52. Schomaker J. Meeter M. (2014). Novelty detection is enhanced when attention is otherwise engaged: an event-related potential study. Exp. Brain Res. 232 995– 1011. 10.1007/s00221-013-3811-y 24402203 · DOI
  53. Schubert R. Blankenburg F. Lemm S. Villringer A. Curio G. (2006). Now you feel it—now you don’t: ERP correlates of somatosensory awareness. Psychophysiology 43 31– 40. 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2006.00379.x 16629683 · DOI
  54. Seidl A. Tincoff R. Baker C. Cristia A. (2015). Why the body comes first: effects of experimenter touch on infants’ word finding. Dev. Sci. 18 155– 164. 10.1111/desc.12182 24734895 · DOI
  55. Stack D. M. Muir D. W. (1990). Tactile stimulation as a component of social interchange: new interpretations for the still-face effect. Br. J. Dev. Psychol. 8 131– 145. 10.1111/j.2044-835x.1990.tb00828.x · DOI
  56. Tavassoli T. Bellesheim K. Tommerdahl M. Holden J. M. Kolevzon A. Buxbaum J. D. (2016). Altered tactile processing in children with autism spectrum disorder. Autism Res. 9 616– 620. 10.1002/aur.1563 26568449 · DOI · Paper page
  57. Wagner J. B. Hirsch S. B. Vogel-Farley V. K. Redcay E. Nelson C. A. (2013). Eye-tracking, autonomic, and electrophysiological correlates of emotional face processing in adolescents with autism spectrum disorder. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 43 188– 199. 10.1007/s10803-012-1565-1 22684525 PMC3913826 · DOI
  58. Watson L. R. Patten E. Baranek G. T. Poe M. Boyd B. A. Freuler A. (2011). Differential associations between sensory response patterns and language, social, and communication measures in children with autism or other developmental disabilities. J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res. 54 1562– 1576. 10.1044/1092-4388(2011/10-0029) 21862675 PMC3325756 · DOI

Authors
Kadlaskar, G., Bergmann, S., McNally Keehn, R., Seidl, A., & Keehn, B.
Affiliations
Purdue University West Lafayette (US)
Corresponding author
Kadlaskar, Girija
Venue
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Published
2021-12-23
Volume
15
Pages
729270-729270
ISSN
1662-5161 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4200447421
Cited by
9
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1
FWCI
0.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Human Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • IUScholarWorks (Indiana University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (T32MH073124)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, tactile processing, auditory processing, event-related potentials, vibrotactile stimuli, speech sounds, P3a, P3b, P1, N2, attention, perceptual processing, social skills, sensory reactivity, children

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review