Cited by 135Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchChild Nutrition and Feeding IssuesGenetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders

Brief report: further evidence of sensory subtypes in autism

Lane, Alison E., Dennis, Simon J., Geraghty, Maureen E.·2011·Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders

Abstract

Distinct sensory processing (SP) subtypes in autism have been reported previously. This study sought to replicate the previous findings in an independent sample of thirty children diagnosed with an Autism Spectrum Disorder. Model-based cluster analysis of parent-reported sensory functioning (measured using the Short Sensory Profile) confirmed the triad of sensory subtypes reported earlier. Subtypes were differentiated from each other based on degree of SP dysfunction, taste/smell sensitivity and vestibular/proprioceptive processing. Further elucidation of two of the subtypes was also achieved in this study. Children with a primary pattern of sensory-based inattention could be further described as sensory seekers or non-seekers. Children with a primary pattern of vestibular/proprioceptive dysfunction were also differentiated on movement and tactile sensitivity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10803-010-1103-y

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent evidence supports both hypo- and hyper-reactivity to tactile stimuli in ASD, with these responses varying according to stimuli and context.

    “Recent evidence supports both hypo-and-hyper-reactivity to tactile stimuli in ASD, with these responses varying according to stimuli and context (Lane et al., 2011, Crane et al., 2009, Ben-Sasson et al., 2007, Tomchek and Dunn, 2007, Allely, 2013, Brown and Dunn, 2010, Cascio et al., 2008).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 12 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lane, A. E., Dennis, S. J., & Geraghty, M. E.
Affiliations
  • The Ohio State University (US)
  • Abbott (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Lane, Alison E.
Venue
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
Published
2010-09-14
Volume
41
Issue
6
Pages
826-831
ISSN
  • 0162-3257 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3432
OpenAlex
W2026772236
Cited by
135
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 7
FWCI
3.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, sensory processing disorders, Short Sensory Profile, tactile sensitivity, movement sensitivity, children
MeSH terms
Auditory Perception, Child, Child Development Disorders, Pervasive, Humans, Movement, Proprioception, Sensation, Smell, Taste, Touch, Vision, Ocular

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review