Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 938

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 198 of the 198 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The speed-accuracy tradeoff: history, physiology, methodology, and behavior

Open access
Heitz, Richard P.·2014·Frontiers in Neuroscience

Abstract

There are few behavioral effects as ubiquitous as the speed-accuracy tradeoff (SAT). From insects to rodents to primates, the tendency for decision speed to covary with decision accuracy seems an inescapable property of choice behavior. Recently, the SAT has received renewed interest, as neuroscience approaches begin to uncover its neural underpinnings and computational models are compelled to incorporate it as a necessary benchmark. The present work provides a comprehensive overview of SAT. First, I trace its history as a tractable behavioral phenomenon and the role it has played in shaping mathematical descriptions of the decision process. Second, I present a "users guide" of SAT methodology, including a critical review of common experimental manipulations and analysis techniques and a treatment of the typical behavioral patterns that emerge when SAT is manipulated directly. Finally, I review applications of this methodology in several domains.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fnins.2014.00150

Cites

198 of 198 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 198 references

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Audley, 1957, A stochastic description of the learning behaviour of an individual subject, Q. J. Exp. Psychol, 9, 12, 10.1080/17470215708416215 · doi:10.1080/17470215708416215
  2. Audley, 1958, The inclusion of response times within a stochastic description of the learning behavior of individual subjects, Psychometrika, 23, 25, 10.1007/BF02288976 · doi:10.1007/bf02288976
  3. Audley, 1973, “Some observations on theories of choice reaction time: tutorial review,”, 509
  4. Becker, 1958, Sequential decision making: wald's model and estimates of parameters, J. Exp. Psychol, 55, 628, 10.1037/h0046519 · doi:10.1037/h0046519
  5. Foster, 1870, The velocity of thought, Nature, 2, 2, 10.1038/002002a0 · doi:10.1038/002002a0
  6. Garrett, 1922, A study of the relation of accuracy to speed, Arch. Psychol, 56, 1
  7. Link, 1971, Speed and accuracy in comparative judgments of line length, Percept. Psychophys, 9, 284, 10.3758/BF03212649 · doi:10.3758/bf03212649
  8. Madden, 1991, Adult age differences in the rate of information extraction during visual search, J. Gerontol, 46, P124, 10.1093/geronj/46.3.P124 · doi:10.1093/geronj/46.3.p124
  9. Merkel, 1885, Die zeitlichen verhäItnisse der willenstätigkeit, Philos. Stud, 2, 73
  10. Pike, 1974, Speed-accuracy tradeoff models for auditory detection with deadlines, Acta Psychol, 38, 379, 10.1016/0001-6918(74)90042-0 · doi:10.1016/0001-6918(74)90042-0

Cited by

See all 938

Metadata

Authors
Heitz, R. P.
Venue
Frontiers in Neuroscience
Published
2014-06-11
Volume
8
Pages
150-150
ISSN
1662-453X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2108748822
Cited by
938
References
198
FWCI
12.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The speed-accuracy tradeoff: history, physiology, methodology, and behavior. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3389/fnins.2014.00150
The paper
Heitz, R. P. (2014). The speed-accuracy tradeoff: history, physiology, methodology, and behavior. Frontiers in Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2014.00150

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.