Cited by 9Down syndrome and intellectual disability researchGenetics and Neurodevelopmental DisordersWilliams Syndrome Research

Neuronal Cell-Intrinsic Defects in Mouse Models of Down Syndrome

Open access
Chiotto, Alessandra Maria Adelaide, Migliorero, Martina, Pallavicini, Gianmarco, Bianchi, Federico Tommaso, Gai, Marta, Di Cunto, Ferdinando, Berto, Gaia Elena·2019·Frontiers in Neuroscience

Abstract

Down Syndrome (DS) is the most common genetic disorder associated with intellectual disability (ID). Excitatory neurons of DS patients and mouse models show decreased size of dendritic field and reduction of spine density. Whether these defects are caused by cell autonomous alterations or by abnormal multicellular circuitry is still unknown. In this work, we explored this issue by culturing cortical neurons obtained from two mouse models of DS: the widely used Ts65Dn and the less characterized Ts2Cje. We observed that, in the in vitro conditions, axon specification and elongation, as well as dendritogenesis, take place without evident abnormalities, indicating that the initial phases of neuronal differentiation do not suffer from the presence of an imbalanced genetic dosage. Conversely, our analysis highlighted differences between trisomic and euploid neurons in terms of reduction of spine density, in accordance with in vivo data obtained by other groups, proposing the presence of a cell-intrinsic malfunction. This work suggests that the characteristic morphological defects of DS neurons are likely to be caused by the possible combination of cell-intrinsic defects together with cell-extrinsic cues. Additionally, our data support the possibility of using the more sustainable line Ts2Cje as a standard model for the study of DS.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fnins.2019.01081

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent studies using complementary mouse models of DS (Ts65Dn, Ts2Cje, Tc1, Dp16) reported an activated microglia phenotype during brain development, with functional morphological alterations and elevated pro-inflammatory cytokines, accompanied by a reduction of neuronal dendritic spines.

    “Recent studies using complementary mouse models of DS, including Ts65Dn, Ts2Cje, Tc1, and Dp16 mice, reported an activated phenotype in microglia cells during brain development, as evidenced by functional morphological alterations and elevated pro-inflammatory cytokines, accompanied by a reduction of neuronal dendritic spines.26,27,28,29”

    From Interferon signaling modulates Down syndrome-associated Alzheimer’s disease pathology in a mouse model (2025) · cites this paper as [27]

    The Results section, “Dendritic Spines of Trisomic Neurons in Primary Culture Show Immature Morphology and Reduced Density” (page unavailable), reports reduced spine density in Ts65Dn and Ts2Cje cortical neurons. The paper does not report activated microglia, elevated pro-inflammatory cytokines, or findings from Tc1 and Dp16 mice; searches for microglia and those models found no supporting passage. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. Baj G. Patrizio A. Montalbano A. Sciancalepore M. Tongiorgi E. (2014). Developmental and maintenance defects in Rett syndrome neurons identified by a new mouse staging system in vivo. Front. Cell. Neurosci. 8: 18. 10.3389/fncel.2014.00018 24550777 PMC3914021 · DOI
  2. Banker G. Goslin K. (1988). Developments in neuronal cell culture. Nature 336 185– 186. 10.1038/336185a0 3185736 · DOI
  3. Beaudoin G. M. J. Lee S.-H. Singh D. Yuan Y. Ng Y.-G. Reichardt L. F. (2012). Culturing pyramidal neurons from the early postnatal mouse hippocampus and cortex. Nat. Protoc. 7 1741– 1754. 10.1038/nprot.2012.099 22936216 · DOI
  4. Becker L. Mito T. Takashima S. Onodera K. (1991). Growth and development of the brain in Down syndrome. Prog. Clin. Biol. Res. 373 133– 152. 1838182
  5. Belichenko P. V. Masliah E. Kleschevnikov A. M. Villar A. J. Epstein C. J. Salehi A. (2004). Synaptic structural abnormalities in the Ts65Dn mouse model of Down Syndrome. J. Comp. Neurol. 480 281– 298. 10.1002/cne.20337 15515178 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Chapman R. S. Hesketh L. J. (2000). Behavioral phenotype of individuals with Down syndrome. Ment. Retard. Dev. Disabil. Res. Rev 6 84– 95. 10899801
  7. Davisson M. T. Schmidt C. Reeves R. H. Irving N. G. Akeson E. C. Harris B. S. (1993). Segmental trisomy as a mouse model for Down syndrome. Prog. Clin. Biol. Res. 384 117– 133. 8115398
  8. de Graaf G. Buckley F. Skotko B. G. (2017). Estimation of the number of people with Down syndrome in the United States. Genet. Med. 19 439– 447. 10.1038/gim.2016.127 27608174 · DOI
  9. Dierssen M. Benavides-Piccione R. Martínez-Cué C. Estivill X. Flórez J. Elston G. N. (2003). Alterations of neocortical pyramidal cell phenotype in the Ts65Dn mouse model of Down syndrome: effects of environmental enrichment. Cereb. Cortex. 13 758– 764. 10.1093/cercor/13.7.758 12816891 · DOI
  10. Dierssen M. Herault Y. Estivill X. (2009). Aneuploidy: from a physiological mechanism of variance to Down syndrome. Physiol. Rev. 89 887– 920. 10.1152/physrev.00032.2007 19584316 · DOI
  11. Faundez V. De Toma I. Bardoni B. Bartesaghi R. Nizetic D. de la Torre R. (2018). Translating molecular advances in Down syndrome and Fragile X syndrome into therapies. Eur. Neuropsychopharmacol. 28 675– 690. 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2018.03.006 29887288 · DOI
  12. Golden J. A. Hyman B. T. (1994). Development of the superior temporal neocortex is anomalous in trisomy 21. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 53 513– 520. 10.1097/00005072-199409000-00011 8083693 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Haas M. A. Bell D. Slender A. Lana-Elola E. Watson-Scales S. Fisher E. M. (2013). Alterations to dendritic spine morphology, but not dendrite patterning, of cortical projection neurons in Tc1 and Ts1Rhr mouse models of Down syndrome. PLoS One 8: e78561. 10.1371/journal.pone.0078561 24205261 PMC3813676 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Harris K. M. Jensen F. E. Tsao B. (1992). Three-dimensional structure of dendritic spines and synapses in rat hippocampus (CA1) at postnatal day 15 and adult ages: implications for the maturation of synaptic physiology and long-term potentiation. J. Neurosci. 12 2685– 2705. 10.1523/jneurosci.12-07-02685.1992 1613552 PMC6575840 · DOI
  15. Haydar T. F. Reeves R. H. (2012). Trisomy 21 and early brain development. Trends Neurosci. 35 81– 91. 10.1016/j.tins.2011.11.001 22169531 PMC3273608 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Ishihara K. Amano K. Takaki E. Shimohata A. Sago H. Epstein C. J. (2010). Enlarged brain ventricles and impaired neurogenesis in the Ts1Cje and Ts2Cje mouse models of Down syndrome. Cereb. Cortex 20 1131– 1143. 10.1093/cercor/bhp176 19710359 · DOI
  17. Martinez de Lagran M. Benavides-Piccione R. Ballesteros-Yañez I. Calvo M. Morales M. Fillat C. (2012). Dyrk1A influences neuronal morphogenesis through regulation of cytoskeletal dynamics in mammalian cortical neurons. Cereb. Cortex 22 2867– 2877. 10.1093/cercor/bhr362 22215728 · DOI
  18. Raveau M. Nakahari T. Asada S. Ishihara K. Amano K. Shimohata A. (2017). Brain ventriculomegaly in Down syndrome mice is caused by Pcp4 dose-dependent cilia dysfunction. Hum. Mol. Genet. 26 923– 931. 10.1093/hmg/ddx007 28069794 · DOI
  19. Raz N. Torres I. J. Briggs S. D. Spencer W. D. Thornton A. E. Loken W. J. (1995). Selective neuroanatomic abnormalities in Down’s syndrome and their cognitive correlates: evidence from MRI morphometry. Neurology 45 356– 366. 10.1212/wnl.45.2.356 7854539 · DOI
  20. Rueda N. Flórez J. Martínez-Cué C. (2012). Mouse models of Down syndrome as a tool to unravel the causes of mental disabilities. Neural Plast. 2012: 584071. 10.1155/2012/584071 22685678 PMC3364589 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Schindelin J. Arganda-Carreras I. Frise E. Kaynig V. Longair M. Pietzsch T. (2012). Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat. Methods 9 676– 682. 10.1038/nmeth.2019 22743772 PMC3855844 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Sholl D. A. (1953). Dendritic organization in the neurons of the visual and motor cortices of the cat. J. Anat. 87 387– 406. 13117757 PMC1244622
  23. Sosa L. J. Postma N. L. Estrada-Bernal A. Hanna M. Guo R. Busciglio J. (2014). Dosage of amyloid precursor protein affects axonal contact guidance in Down syndrome. FASEB J. 28 195– 205. 10.1096/fj.13-232686 24036883 PMC3868833 · DOI
  24. Takano T. Xu C. Funahashi Y. Namba T. Kaibuchi K. (2015). Neuronal polarization. Dev. Camb. Engl. 142 2088– 2093. 10.1242/dev.114454 26081570 · DOI
  25. Villar A. J. Belichenko P. V. Gillespie A. M. Kozy H. M. Mobley W. C. Epstein C. J. (2005). Identification and characterization of a new Down syndrome model. Mamm. Genome. 16 79– 90. 10.1007/s00335-004-2428-7 15859352 · DOI
  26. Wisniewski K. E. Laure-Kamionowska M. Wisniewski H. M. (1984). Evidence of arrest of neurogenesis and synaptogenesis in brains of patients with Down’s syndrome. N. Engl. J. Med. 311 1187– 1188. 10.1056/NEJM198411013111818 6237262 · DOI
  27. Zou C. Crux S. Marinesco S. Montagna E. Sgobio C. Shi Y. (2016). Amyloid precursor protein maintains constitutive and adaptive plasticity of dendritic spines in adult brain by regulating D-serine homeostasis. EMBO J. 35 2213- 2222. 10.15252/embj.201694085 27572463 PMC5069548 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chiotto, A. M. A., Migliorero, M., Pallavicini, G., Bianchi, F. T., Gai, M., Di Cunto, F., & Berto, G. E.
Affiliations
  • Neuroscience Institute Cavalieri Ottolenghi (IT)
  • University of Turin (IT)
Corresponding author
Berto, Gaia Elena
Venue
Frontiers in Neuroscience
Published
2019-10-10
Volume
13
Pages
1081-1081
ISSN
1662-453X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2980151119
Cited by
9
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3
FWCI
1.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System University of Turin (University of Turin) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Fondation Jérôme Lejeune
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Williams Syndrome Research
Keywords
Down syndrome, Ts65Dn mouse model, trisomy, intellectual disability, cortical neurons, dendritic field size, dendritic spine density, axon specification, dendritogenesis, neuronal differentiation, neuronal morphology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review