The DOI matches its Crossref record; 120 of the 120 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Critical Review of Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation: Challenges for Translation to Clinical Practice
Open accessAbstract
Several studies have illustrated that transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (tVNS) can elicit therapeutic effects that are similar to those produced by its invasive counterpart, vagus nerve stimulation (VNS). VNS is an FDA-approved therapy for the treatment of both depression and epilepsy, but it is limited to the management of more severe, intervention-resistant cases as a second or third-line treatment option due to perioperative risks involved with device implantation. In contrast, tVNS is a non-invasive technique that involves the application of electrical currents through surface electrodes at select locations, most commonly targeting the auricular branch of the vagus nerve (ABVN) and the cervical branch of the vagus nerve in the neck. Although it has been shown that tVNS elicits hypo- and hyperactivation in various regions of the brain associated with anxiety and mood regulation, the mechanism of action and influence of stimulation parameters on clinical outcomes remains predominantly hypothetical. Suppositions are largely based on correlations between the neurobiology of the vagus nerve and its effects on neural activity. However, tVNS has also been investigated for several other disorders, including tinnitus, migraine and pain, by targeting the vagus nerve at sites in both the ear and the neck. As most of the described methods differ in the parameters and protocols applied, there is currently no firm evidence on the optimal location for tVNS or the stimulation parameters that provide the greatest therapeutic effects for a specific condition. This review presents the current status of tVNS with a focus on stimulation parameters, stimulation sites, and available devices. For tVNS to reach its full potential as a non-invasive and clinically relevant therapy, it is imperative that systematic studies be undertaken to reveal the mechanism of action and optimal stimulation modalities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
1 retracted
Steenbergen, L., Sellaro, R., Stock, A., Verkuil, B., Beste, C., & Colzato, L. S. (2015) · European Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.euroneuro.2015.03.015 · Cited by 115
RetractedEarly Identification of Refractory Epilepsy
Kwan, P., & Brodie, M. J. (2000) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm200002033420503 · Cited by 5,204
Limbic-cortical dysregulation: a proposed model of depression
(1997) · The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences · doi:10.1176/jnp.9.3.471 · Cited by 1,585
Mayberg, H. S., Brannan, S. K., Tekell, J. L., Silva, J. A., Mahurin, R. K., McGinnis, S., & Jerabek, P. A. (2000) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s0006-3223(00)01036-2 · Cited by 1,115
Vagus nerve stimulation therapy for partial-onset seizures: A randomized active-control trial
Handforth, A., DeGiorgio, C. M., Schachter, S. C., Uthman, B. M., Naritoku, D. K., Tecoma, E. S., Henry, T. R., Collins, S. D., Vaughn, B. V., Gilmartin, R. C., et al. (1998) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.51.1.48 · Cited by 1,107
Beghi, E., Giussani, G., Nichols, E., Abd-Allah, F., Abdela, J., Abdelalim, A., Abraha, H. N., Adib, M. G., Agrawal, S., Alahdab, F., et al. (2019) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(18)30454-x · Cited by 1,036
Magnetoencephalography for Brain Electrophysiology and Imaging
Baillet, S. (2017) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.4504 · Cited by 992
The nerve supply of the human auricle
Peuker, E. T., & Filler, T. J. (2002) · Clinical Anatomy · doi:10.1002/ca.1089 · Cited by 779
Frangos, E., Ellrich, J., & Komisaruk, B. R. (2015) · Brain Stimulation · doi:10.1016/j.brs.2014.11.018 · Cited by 751
Groves, D. A., & Brown, V. J. (2005) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2005.01.004 · Cited by 675
Cited by
Dawson, J., Liu, C. Y., Francisco, G. E., Cramer, S. C., Wolf, S. L., Dixit, A., Alexander, J., Ali, R., Brown, B. L., Feng, W., et al. (2021) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(21)00475-x · Cited by 518
Keever, K. R., Yakubenko, V. P., & Hoover, D. B. (2023) · Pharmacological Research · doi:10.1016/j.phrs.2023.106758 · Cited by 82
Dolphin, H., Dukelow, T., Finucane, C., Commins, S., McElwaine, P., & Kennelly, S. P. (2022) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2022.897303 · Cited by 38
Sackeim, H. A., Dibué, M., Bunker, M. T., & Rush, A. J. (2020) · Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment · doi:10.2147/ndt.s286977 · Cited by 15
Rajabalee, N., Kozlowska, K., Lee, S. Y., Savage, B., Hawkes, C., Siciliano, D., Porges, S. W., Pick, S., & Torbey, S. (2022) · Harvard Review of Psychiatry · doi:10.1097/hrp.0000000000000341 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Yap, J. Y. Y., Keatch, C., Lambert, E., Woods, W., Stoddart, P. R., & Kameneva, T.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2020-04-28
- Volume
- 14
- Pages
- 284-284
- ISSN
- 1662-453X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3022810174
- Cited by
- 432
- References
- 120
- FWCI
- 14.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Critical Review of Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation: Challenges for Translation to Clinical Practice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3389/fnins.2020.00284
- The paper
- Yap, J. Y. Y., Keatch, C., Lambert, E., Woods, W., Stoddart, P. R., & Kameneva, T. (2020). Critical Review of Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation: Challenges for Translation to Clinical Practice. Frontiers in Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2020.00284
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.