The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fuzzy System Based Medical Image Processing for Brain Disease Prediction
Open accessAbstract
The present work aims to explore the performance of fuzzy system-based medical image processing for predicting the brain disease. The imaging mechanism of NMR (Nuclear Magnetic Resonance) and the complexity of human brain tissues cause the brain MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging) images to present varying degrees of noise, weak boundaries, and artifacts. Hence, improvements are made over the fuzzy clustering algorithm. A brain image processing and brain disease diagnosis prediction model is designed based on improved fuzzy clustering and HPU-Net (Hybrid Pyramid U-Net Model for Brain Tumor Segmentation) to ensure the model safety performance. Brain MRI images collected from a Hospital, are employed in simulation experiments to validate the performance of the proposed algorithm. Moreover, CNN (Convolutional Neural Network), RNN (Recurrent Neural Network), FCM (Fuzzy C-Means), LDCFCM (Local Density Clustering Fuzzy C-Means), and AFCM (Adaptive Fuzzy C-Means) are included in simulation experiments for performance comparison. Results demonstrate that the proposed algorithm has more nodes, lower energy consumption, and more stable changes than other models under the same conditions. Regarding the overall network performance, the proposed algorithm can complete the data transmission tasks the fastest, basically maintaining at about 4.5 s on average, which performs remarkably better than other models. A further prediction performance analysis reveals that the proposed algorithm provides the highest prediction accuracy for the Whole Tumor under DSC (Dice Similarity Coefficient), reaching 0.936. Besides, its Jaccard coefficient is 0.845, proving its superior segmentation accuracy over other models. In a word, the proposed algorithm can provide higher accuracy, a more apparent denoising effect, and the best segmentation and recognition effect than other models while ensuring energy consumption. The results can provide an experimental basis for the feature recognition and predictive diagnosis of brain images.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A survey on digital twin: definitions, characteristics, applications, and design implications
Barricelli, B. R., Casiraghi, E., & Fogli, D. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2953499 · Cited by 1,480
Fuzzy Broad Learning System: A Novel Neuro-Fuzzy Model for Regression and Classification
Feng, S., & Chen, C. L. P. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/tcyb.2018.2857815 · Cited by 490
Jeyaraj, P. R., & Samuel Nadar, E. R. (2019) · Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1007/s00432-018-02834-7 · Cited by 360
Deep Learning-Based Decision-Tree Classifier for COVID-19 Diagnosis From Chest X-ray Imaging
Yoo, S. H., Geng, H., Chiu, T. L., Yu, S. K., Cho, D. C., Heo, J., Choi, M. S., Choi, I. H., Cung Van, C., Nhung, N. V., et al. (2020) · Frontiers in Medicine · doi:10.3389/fmed.2020.00427 · Cited by 287
Variability and reproducibility in deep learning for medical image segmentation
Renard, F., Guedria, S., Palma, N. D., & Vuillerme, N. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-69920-0 · Cited by 229
Deep-learning cardiac motion analysis for human survival prediction
Bello, G. A., Dawes, T. J. W., Duan, J., Biffi, C., de Marvao, A., Howard, L. S. G. E., Gibbs, J. S. R., Wilkins, M. R., Cook, S. A., Rueckert, D., et al. (2019) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-019-0019-2 · Cited by 228
Integrating fuzzy entropy clustering with an improved PSO for MRI brain image segmentation
Pham, T. X., Siarry, P., & Oulhadj, H. (2018) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2018.01.003 · Cited by 148
Fringe projection profilometry by conducting deep learning from its digital twin
Zheng, Y., Wang, S., Li, Q., & Li, B. (2020) · Optics Express · doi:10.1364/oe.410428 · Cited by 147
Wang, Z., Yao, L., Cai, Y., et al. (2020) · Renewable Energy · doi:10.1016/j.renene.2020.04.041 · Cited by 142
Xiao, L., Cao, J., Liu, Z. G., & Luo, X. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12030936 · Cited by 123
Cited by
Yin, P., & Wang, H. (2022) · Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine · doi:10.1155/2022/1786994 · Cited by 33
Jiang, N., Xie, H., Lin, J., Wang, Y., & Yin, Y. (2022) · Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience · doi:10.1155/2022/3123310 · Cited by 19
Du, Q., Liang, D., Zhang, L., Chen, G., & Li, X. (2022) · Contrast Media & Molecular Imaging · doi:10.1155/2022/9882532 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Hu, M., Zhong, Y., Xie, S., Lv, H., & Lv, Z.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2021-07-30
- Volume
- 15
- Pages
- 714318-714318
- ISSN
- 1662-453X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3192851400
- Cited by
- 292
- References
- 21
- FWCI
- 20.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fuzzy System Based Medical Image Processing for Brain Disease Prediction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3389/fnins.2021.714318
- The paper
- Hu, M., Zhong, Y., Xie, S., Lv, H., & Lv, Z. (2021). Fuzzy System Based Medical Image Processing for Brain Disease Prediction. Frontiers in Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2021.714318
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.