The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Compensatory changes in cortical resource allocation in adults with hearing loss
Open accessAbstract
Hearing loss has been linked to many types of cognitive decline in adults, including an association between hearing loss severity and dementia. However, it remains unclear whether cortical re-organization associated with hearing loss occurs in early stages of hearing decline and in early stages of auditory processing. In this study, we examined compensatory plasticity in adults with mild-moderate hearing loss using obligatory, passively-elicited, cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEP). High-density EEG elicited by speech stimuli was recorded in adults with hearing loss and age-matched normal hearing controls. Latency, amplitude and source localization of the P1, N1, P2 components of the CAEP were analyzed. Adults with mild-moderate hearing loss showed increases in latency and amplitude of the P2 CAEP relative to control subjects. Current density reconstructions revealed decreased activation in temporal cortex and increased activation in frontal cortical areas for hearing-impaired listeners relative to normal hearing listeners. Participants' behavioral performance on a clinical test of speech perception in noise was significantly correlated with the increases in P2 latency. Our results indicate that changes in cortical resource allocation are apparent in early stages of adult hearing loss, and that these passively-elicited cortical changes are related to behavioral speech perception outcome.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Delorme, A., & Makeig, S. (2004) · Journal of Neuroscience Methods · doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2003.10.009 · Cited by 24,371
Hearing loss and cognitive decline in older adults
Lin, F. R., Yaffe, K., Xia, J., Xue, Q.-L., Harris, T. B., Purchase-Helzner, E., Satterfield, S., Ayonayon, H. N., Ferrucci, L., Simonsick, E. M., et al. (2013) · JAMA Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.1868 · Cited by 4,017
Näätänen, R., & Picton, T. (1987) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.1987.tb00311.x · Cited by 3,321
How young and old adults listen to and remember speech in noise.
Pichora-Fuller, M. K., Schneider, B. A., & Daneman, M. (1995) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.412282 · Cited by 1,089
Independent EEG Sources Are Dipolar
Delorme, A., Palmer, J., Onton, J., Oostenveld, R., & Makeig, S. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0030135 · Cited by 810
Syka, J. (2002) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00002.2002 · Cited by 369
Working memory capacity may influence perceived effort during aided speech recognition in noise.
Rudner, M., Lunner, T., Behrens, T., Thorén, E. S., & Rönnberg, J. (2012) · Journal of the American Academy of Audiology · doi:10.3766/jaaa.23.7.7 · Cited by 164 · cited 1×
“Recent studies have shown similar temporal cortical activation by visual stimuli in deaf adults fitted with cochlear implants (Doucet et al., 2006; Buckley and Tobey, 2011; Sandmann et al., 2012).”
Background
Cited by
Loughrey, D. G., Kelly, M. E., Kelley, G. A., Brennan, S., & Lawlor, B. A. (2018) · JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery · doi:10.1001/jamaoto.2017.2513 · Cited by 961
Hearing loss as a risk factor for dementia: A systematic review
Thomson, R. S., Auduong, P., Miller, A. T., & Gurgel, R. K. (2017) · Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology · doi:10.1002/lio2.65 · Cited by 332
Metadata
- Authors
- Campbell, J., & Sharma, A.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2013
- Volume
- 7
- Pages
- 71-71
- ISSN
- 1662-5137 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2085344019
- Cited by
- 198
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 4.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Compensatory changes in cortical resource allocation in adults with hearing loss. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3389/fnsys.2013.00071
- The paper
- Campbell, J., & Sharma, A. (2013). Compensatory changes in cortical resource allocation in adults with hearing loss. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2013.00071
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
