Cited by 61Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsDiabetes Management and EducationMobile Learning in Education

A smartphone app-based lifestyle change program for prediabetes (D’LITE Study) in a multiethnic asian population: a randomized controlled trial.

Open access
Lim, Su Lin, Ong, Kai Wen, Johal, Jolyn, Han, Chad Yixian, Yap, Qai Ven, Chan, Yiong Huak, Zhang, Zhi Peng, Chandra, Cheryl Christine +2 more·2022·Frontiers in Nutrition

Abstract

Introduction: Landmark studies have established that lifestyle interventions focused on weight loss, diet modification and physical activity can prevent diabetes progression. However, the effectiveness of mobile health application among Asians with prediabetes remains largely unexamined. We aimed to assess whether a smartphone app-based lifestyle intervention program would lead to weight loss, normoglycemia and improved metabolic indices in a multiethnic Asian population with prediabetes. Research Design and Methods: This multicentre prediabetes RCT is part of the Diabetes Lifestyle Intervention using Technology Empowerment (D'LITE) trial. Adults ( n = 148) with prediabetes and BMI ≥ 23 kg/m 2 were randomly allocated either to the intervention group ( n = 72) empowered by self-monitoring features of the Nutritionist Buddy Diabetes app with in-app dietitian coaching for 6 months, or the control group ( n = 76) receiving standard diet counseling at baseline. Primary outcome was defined as change in body weight at 6 months, while secondary outcomes included glycemic control and other metabolic indices analyzed using Generalized Linear Mixed Model analysis with intention-to-treat approach. Results: Intervention group achieved a significantly greater weight loss of 4.2 vs. 1.3 kg [mean difference of −3.1 kg (95% CI −4.5 to −1.7), p < 0.001], and a 4.3-fold increased likelihood of achieving ≥ 5% weight loss, as compared to the control group at 6 months. The likelihood of achieving normoglycemia (defined as HbA 1c < 5.7%) was 2.1 times higher in intervention group than in the control group ( p < 0.018). Changes to blood pressure, total and LDL cholesterol were not statistically significant. Conclusion: An app-based lifestyle program led to clinically significant weight loss and improved glycemia, and can potentially augment current standard care in the prevention of diabetes among an Asian multiethnic population. Clinical Trial Registration: anzctr.org.au , identifier: ACTRN12617001112358.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fnut.2021.780567

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Despite CDC recognition of digital DPPs since 2015, limited RCT evidence has evaluated their effectiveness, with no trials comparing them directly to the criterion-standard DPP.

    “Despite CDC recognition of digital DPPs since 2015, limited RCT evidence has evaluated their effectiveness, with no trials comparing them directly to the criterion-standard DPP.14-19,37”

    From An AI-Powered Lifestyle Intervention vs Human Coaching in the Diabetes Prevention Program: A Randomized Clinical Trial (2025) · cites this paper as [17]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) calls D’LITE one of the few RCTs assessing a mobile app with virtual dietitian coaching, supporting the limited-RCT-evidence portion for that specific intervention. The Methods describe a comparison with standard dietary advice, not the criterion-standard DPP, but the paper does not establish that no trials made that comparison. Our copy also does not state that the CDC has recognized digital DPPs since 2015. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Prior randomized trials of digital DPP adaptations did not include fully automated AI-based experimental groups or a human-led DPP control group.

    “Although previous randomized trials have assessed digital adaptations of the DPP, none had experimental groups that were fully automated and AI-based and none used a human-led DPP control group.14-19”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lim, S. L., Ong, K. W., Johal, J., Han, C. Y., Yap, Q. V., Chan, Y. H., Zhang, Z. P., Chandra, C. C., Thiagarajah, A. G., & Khoo, C. M.
Affiliations
  • National University Hospital (SG)
  • National University of Singapore (SG)
  • National University Polyclinics (SG)
Corresponding author
Lim, Su Lin
Venue
Frontiers in Nutrition
Published
2022-01-24
Volume
8
Pages
780567-780567
ISSN
2296-861X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4207077721
Cited by
61
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 6
FWCI
15.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Nutrition (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Medical Research Council
  • National Medical Research Council (NMRC/HSRG/0063/2016)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Mobile Learning in Education
Keywords
prediabetes, mobile health, mobile application, lifestyle intervention, weight loss, glycemic control, HbA1c, self-monitoring, diabetes prevention, multi-ethnic Asian population

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review