Cited by 150Diabetes Management and EducationDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsPhysical Activity and Health

Retention among participants in the National Diabetes Prevention Program Lifestyle Change Program, 2012–2017

Open access
Cannon, Michael J., Masalovich, Svetlana, Ng, Boon Peng, Soler, Robin E., Jabrah, Rajai, Ely, Elizabeth K., Smith, Bryce D.·2020·Diabetes Care

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess retention in the National Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) lifestyle change program, which seeks to prevent type 2 diabetes in adults at high risk. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We analyzed retention among 41,203 individuals who enrolled in Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)-recognized in-person lifestyle change programs at organizations that submitted data to CDC’s Diabetes Prevention Recognition Program during January 2012–February 2017. RESULTS: Weekly attrition rates were typically <1–2% but were between 3.5% and 5% at week 2 and at weeks 17 and 18, where session frequency typically transitions from weekly to monthly. The percentage of participants retained through 18 weeks varied by age (45.9% for 18–29 year olds, 53.4% for 30–44 year olds, 60.2% for 45–54 year olds, 66.7% for 55–64 year olds, and 67.6% for ≥65 year olds), race/ethnicity (70.5% for non-Hispanic whites, 60.5% for non-Hispanic blacks, 52.6% for Hispanics, and 50.6% for other), mean weekly percentage of body weight lost (41.0% for ≤0% lost, 66.2% for >0% to <0.25% lost, 72.9% for 0.25% to <0.5% lost, and 73.9% for ≥0.5% lost), and mean weekly physical activity minutes (12.8% for 0 min, 56.1% for >0 to <60 min, 74.8% for 60 to <150 min, and 82.8% for ≥150 min) but not by sex (63.0% for men and 63.1% for women). CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate the need to identify strategies to improve retention, especially among individuals who are younger or are members of racial/ethnic minority populations and among those who report less physical activity or less early weight loss. Strategies that address retention after the first session and during the transition from weekly to monthly sessions offer the greatest opportunity for impact.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/dc19-2366

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cannon, M. J., Masalovich, S., Ng, B. P., Soler, R. E., Jabrah, R., Ely, E. K., & Smith, B. D.
Affiliations
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
  • CyberData Technologies, Inc., Herndon, VA
  • University of Central Florida (US)
  • Boston Consulting Group (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Cannon, Michael J.
Venue
Diabetes Care
Published
2020-07-02
Volume
43
Issue
9
Pages
2042-2049
ISSN
  • 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-5548
OpenAlex
W3038332575
Cited by
150
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 7
FWCI
12.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetes Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (CC999999)
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
Keywords
participant retention, National Diabetes Prevention Program, lifestyle modification program, type 2 diabetes prevention, attrition rates, racial and ethnic minorities, young adults, weight loss, physical activity
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S., Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Ethnicity, Female, Humans, Life Style, Male, Middle Aged, Minority Groups, Patient Participation, Primary Prevention, United States, Weight Loss, Exercise, Risk Reduction Behavior, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review