Cited by 75Lung Cancer Treatments and MutationsLung Cancer Diagnosis and TreatmentChemotherapy-related skin toxicity

Management of Common Toxicities in Metastatic NSCLC Related to Anti-Lung Cancer Therapies with EGFR–TKIs

Open access
Melosky, Barbara, Hirsh, Vera·2014·Frontiers in Oncology

Abstract

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) against the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) are the standard of care treatment in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). TKIs are used first line in EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC; erlotinib is the only TKI approved for subsequent lines of treatment in EGFR wild-type NSCLC. As promising as TKIs are in helping patients avoid some of the side effects of traditional cytotoxic chemotherapy, they do come with a variety of side effects. This article will describe the most common adverse events associated with the epidermal EGFR family of TKIs including diarrhea, rash, mucositis, and paronychia. The objective of this paper is to provide simple guidelines to assist oncologists in managing these common toxicities. As patient survival is often directly correlated with successful therapeutic drug delivery, the management of TKI-induced adverse events ensures proper treatment and may avoid discontinuation or reduction of the therapeutic.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fonc.2014.00238

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Afatinib-related AEs are manageable by means of tolerability-guided dose adjustments, along with use of AE-specific treatment administered either prophylactically or as needed.

    “afatinib-related AEs are manageable by means of tolerability-guided dose adjustments, along with the use of AE-specific treatment administered either prophylactically or as needed.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Melosky, B., & Hirsh, V.
Affiliations
  • BC Cancer Agency (CA)
  • Royal Victoria Regional Health Centre (CA)
Corresponding author
Melosky, Barbara
Venue
Frontiers in Oncology
Published
2014-09-16
Volume
4
Pages
238-238
ISSN
2234-943X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1984047229
Cited by
73
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 1
FWCI
5.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Frontiers in Oncology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Chemotherapy-related skin toxicity
Keywords
EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors, non-small cell lung cancer, metastatic non-small cell lung cancer, drug toxicity management, diarrhea, rash, mucositis, paronychia, erlotinib

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review